Lindaland
  The Spider Line
  Fraud of Science

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Fraud of Science
todd
Knowflake

Posts: 4886
From:
Registered: Jun 2009

posted August 10, 2019 11:56 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for todd     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
That science is merely suppositions and obfuscation is obvious if one considers reality.
The standard model is now considered finished with the “discovery” of the higg boson particle. http://www.mnn.com/green-tech/research-innovations/stories/higgs-boson-confirms-reigning-physics-model-yet-again

The nobel prize was given to higgs and englert for this discovery. But keep in mind that this same august body gave obama a peace prize for ranging an unending war. Here the august body game a prize for spending $ 12 billion to find sub atomic debris. They did not find a particle but the debris of a particle that they said must be the higg boson. yet other astrophysics dispute this identification and point out there are other particles that the debris could be from
So the standard model is enshrined.

But interestingly the standard model can not explain certain physical conditions that everyone alive experiences very moment.

As my allegation may be seen as ignorant and outlandish in light of the intimate contact we have with technology, I will make a point that all we have to agree shows the ignorance of science.

Most of us have dealt with a flat bike tire. And while fixing it, surely we have all noticed that if one spins the wheel in your hands, the tire exerts a right angle force that allows one to support the tire on one finger.
As long as the wheel spins it will remain horizontal and spin around the remaining finger.
The rotation of the tire creates a force that holds the axles level. But if you want to stop the wheel from revolving around you finger, one must gasp both ends of the wheel axle and hold it steady.

Any rotating body that has mass creates these forces, by Newton’s laws of motion. the more massive the object, the greater the rotations force created.
Every day we see the sun go across the sky and the seasons come and go with the steady, fixed orientation of the rotations axis of the earth. The problem is that for these constant movement of the earth to exist, there must be forces that hold the axis of the earth steady. If one places a rotating object in a vacuum, it will tumble thru space.
The spontaneous response is Gravity is doing it keeping the axis fixed in place.. But that is not even close, but the rotation of the planets have nothing to do with gravity.
No one knows why the planets are revolving. gravity didn’t do it.

So we all feel the steady motion of the earth, but for this to be. there must be a exterior force holding the earth’s axis steady.

Yet ,unbelievably, Science has no answer, in fact Science does not even ask the question. Because the answer must be hidden to conceal the secret of the black magician powers .

The only explanation ever given was an nebulous statement by Ernst mach. He said the every star in the universe is “holding” the axis’s ,of all the planets and stars in the universe, steady.
This is pure conjecture; it has no connection to any known forces. But Einstein coined the term the “mach affect”. But you will be hard pressed to find this in any scientific book .

So the question remains unanswered, what holds the rotational axis of the earth fixed.
Such a big omission in the standard model is hard to comprehend.
This is an example of the Mirrors of Science. One can not believe that science does not have a answer but they do not..
I didn’t figure this out , I read a paper by tesla http://teslasociety.com/biography.htm


in this article he calculated the immense rotational forces created by the earth’s rotation. And then pointed out that scientist ignore this conundrum.
I had to read the article 2-3 times before I realized the simplicity of the scientific omission, he had pointed out.
So science is in fact concealing the most primal dynamics in our world.

if there was not an external force holding the earth's axis steady, the earth would tumble through it's orbit and life as we know it would not exist as there would be no seasons or any regularity of light and dark.

Emmnuael velikovsky pointed out the missing celestial dynamic:the electrical fields of the planets and stars. http://velikovsky.org/en/velikovsky.html http://varchive.org/

Emmanuel velikovsky pointed out the missing celestial dynamic: the electrical fields of the planets and stars. His theories have been validated with by space probes thru the years, yet the “itelligentsia” , dismisses his work.understanably as he overturns, newton ,Darwin, Einstein and shows the intellectual blind spots of archeology and history. Velikovsky single handedly disclosed the falscity and manipulation of the archeological/historical records.
the magnetic fields of the planets and sun are the forces that orders the universe, just as electrical fields order the world of atoms and sub atomic particle. The affect produced on light by a “gravitation” field and on light produced by an electromagnetic field cannot be distinguished. Both are defined by inverse square mathematical equations I have emphasized repeatedly the glaring omission of scientist to look at the causes for the stability of the earth axis. clearly the editors of history do not want this dynamic included in modern scientific theories as this would reveal the true source of the energies underlying our reality.

It may seem like a simple matter, but recent discoveries are beginning to show the true strength of the rotation of the earth.
The alternating current of our electrical system was called, by it’s inventor.nikolai tesla, a rotating magnetic field system. it is the rotation of the earth that gives the electrical force.
Scientist had some decades ago noted that relativistic particles are generated in the van Allen belts. At first scientist thought these near light speed particles had to have come from beyond the solar system. Then recently they noted that these particles were being accelerated in the van allen belt. The problem was where was the van allen belt getting the immense energy to raise these particles to near light speed.
Now they have found out that the magnetic field of the earth’ rotation is the force accelerating these relativistic particles. No scientist thought that the earth’s relatively slow rotation speed could cause these charged particles to form. Yet that is exactly what is happening. they have come up with new theories but still where the energy is coming from eludes them.
The affects Einstein gives to gravity are illusionary, a singularity is illusionary ,black holes are illusionary just as steph hawkens, the dean of black holes has determined http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/stephen-hawking-there-are-no-black-holes-9085016.html
. Gravity is a mathematical mirror to hide the power of the electromagnetic fields of the earth , sun and the universe.

I have emphasized repeatedly the glaring omission of scientist to look at the causes for the stability of the earth axis. clearly the editors of history do not want this dynamic included in modern scientific theories as this would reveal the true source of the energies underlying our reality.
It may seem like a simple matter, but recent discoveries are beginning to show the true strength of the rotation of the earth.

todd

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 139870
From: Your Friendly Neighborhood Juris Doctorate.
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 16, 2019 12:43 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Interesting.

IP: Logged

nomad-monad
Knowflake

Posts: 320
From: universe university
Registered: Mar 2019

posted August 21, 2019 03:55 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for nomad-monad     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Todd, have you read Aaity Olsen's Alchemical Manual for This Millenium?
If not, I think you will find it very interesting.

Others to look into on this topic are DEWEY B LARSON and WALTER RUSSEL.

I have personally only read through Olsen's two volumes once, and briefly skimmed Larson/Russel, so I am not in a position to comment much on it. But Larson is mentioned in Ra Material and I think Russel presented his work to Tesla who replied something in the lines of "work in silence with this, because it will not be accepted in a 1000 years".

https://www.scribd.com/document/87878403/Alchemical-Manual-for-This-Millennium-Vol-1

You might need a membership at scribd to download it. If not, you may be able to find it somewhere else. If not, you can have it from me on request.

EXCERPT FROM FIRST PAGES IN OLSEN'S FIRST VOLUME:


Here is an easy alternative science textbook describing a NEW concept of COSMOLOGY and an all-new Symmetric Field Physics;

It introduces a revolutionary concept of reality that is both new to the modern world, and more ancient than recorded history. The text is simply presented (no math) for all those people interested in the truth of the world around them. It is designed for students (young and old), fascinated with the physical world, who have found problems with the current theories taught in the academies of today. The new information presented by the Star People through scribe, A. Olson, is destined to overturn both classical physics and particle physics . Described as both revolutionary and profoundly ancient, the ideas within the text will illuminate a path for humanity to move forward in knowledge and promise to integrate all aspects of scientific studies.
Here is an astounding, life changing book explaining the LAWS OF COSMIC FORCES in SPACE, in detail, in both their physical and philosophical aspects.

Vol. 1, printed in its entirety, is a gift to the world from the invisible Star People who wish to
communicate with earth at this time.

Here is a brief synopsis of the contents of ALCHEMICAL MANUAL for this MILLENNIUM, Volume 1.

Symmetric Field Physics is the study of natural law and cosmic forces.
The forces of space are not just up in the sky, they are all round you and through you. As a fish lives in the oceans, you live in a sea of powerful space. Nations and individuals are on the threshold to learning to use the energies of space.

Lessons presented about forces are chosen to review the classic experiments of the physics classroom with a new perception. They radically revise the old textbook analysis to show that altogether new ways of recognizing energy laws solve problems in a better way. These laws cover basic engineering, cosmic energy balance, theoretical physics, and the practical study of magnetism, electricity, gravity, weight, essentials of mechanics, weather, and the way natural growth takes place. The SPACE / TIME Field energy systems are discussed to enable a person to envision interfunctioning octaves of energy and the way octaves connect through vortical points of intersection within corpuscular fields that fill all space and time.

Emphasis is placed on the ever-present space fields, unseen by human eyes, but active as tori around every motion or action in the time fields. These space tori are both mechanical and electrical, covering a full spectrum equal and opposite to the linear activity of the corpuscular time field (electromagnetic field).

It is important to say that the text is designed to be read by a person of highschool level training with only basic science as a backround. It is wise to have a high school (or college) physics textbook handy as a reference. It was necessary to go back to the roots of physical studies in order to correct basic assumptions.

Nevertheless, the studies are astute and thought provoking, often more challenging to an adult than to a youngster. These ideas will be new to the student, therefore, it is wise to study the manual sequentially. New concepts and new words will have to be assimilated in order to be understood. Patience and review will reveal even more with each reading.

Here are some questions that the ALCHEMICAL MANUAL will answer.
(these are not the same answers that you were taught in school)
1. What is magnetism?
2. What is electricity?
3. What is gravity?
4. Why do objects of different weight fall at the same rate?
5. What is momentum and inertia?
6. Why is the work of Isaac Newton incomplete?
7. Is there any empty space?
8. What is the nature of time?
9. How does space relate to time?
10. What are universal forces, and why are they invisible?
11. How is the galaxy structured?
12. What drives the weather systems?

IP: Logged

todd
Knowflake

Posts: 4886
From:
Registered: Jun 2009

posted August 22, 2019 02:41 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for todd     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
interesting stuff

but there is no need to delve into esoteric reasoning as the fixity of the axis of the planets(which is what I am specifically pointing out here). Science is ignoring and or concealing that the universe is a electromagnetic charge field. the force that holds all revolving objects axis, is the universe electromagnetic nature.

I say concealed, as the standard model is a product of the cultural black magicians control of the culture by enshrining scientific untruths.
the standard model is essentially from Aristotle and as such is3000 years old. the basic premise is that matter is the indivisible element of the universe. but this supposition has been show to be false by quantum theory. matter is an illusion. matter is only a image created by the intersections or nodes of quantum frequencies. but even though this has been proven,standard model scientist ignore the primacy of quantum theory and pigeon hole quantum theory into a standard model paradigm.

gravity is non existent. elestrical magnetic fields of the universe create the forces had are attributed to gravity. keep in mind that science doesn't even know what gravity is
todd

IP: Logged

todd
Knowflake

Posts: 4886
From:
Registered: Jun 2009

posted August 26, 2019 04:16 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for todd     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
just a brief note..... astrophysists/astronomers can not distinguish between a shift or distortion of light caused by "gravity" or an electromagnetic field. astronomers have observed electro magnetic fields over 500 million lights years long, but still they attribute every shift of light to solely to gravity.

todd

IP: Logged

todd
Knowflake

Posts: 4886
From:
Registered: Jun 2009

posted September 05, 2019 12:12 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for todd     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
now it seems the higgs boson discovery didnt clarify anything, rather uncovered more issues. http://www.prisonplanet.com/god-part...-to-exist.html

"Confirmation of the Higgs boson’s existence in July 2012 did not actually add clarity to the general picture of our Universe after all. The information acquired raised new, even more complex, questions.
Physicists at King’s College in London claim they have recreated the conditions following the Big Bang, but this time using the new information acquired with the help of the LHC. British scientists maintain now that the new data related to the so-called ‘God particle’ suggests the universe should have expanded excessively fast after the Big Bang and collapsed billions of years ago."

“We have to extend our theories to explain why this didn’t happen,” Hogan said.


well ,at least we do know the going rate for a nobel prize is 11 billion dollars.

IP: Logged

todd
Knowflake

Posts: 4886
From:
Registered: Jun 2009

posted September 13, 2019 03:10 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for todd     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by todd:
interesting stuff

but there is no need to delve into esoteric reasoning as the fixity of the axis of the planets(which is what I am specifically pointing out here). Science is ignoring and or concealing that the universe is a electromagnetic charge field. the force that holds all revolving objects axis, is the universe electromagnetic nature.

I say concealed, as the standard model is a product of the cultural black magicians control of the culture by enshrining scientific untruths.
the standard model is essentially from Aristotle and as such is3000 years old. the basic premise is that matter is the indivisible element of the universe. but this supposition has been show to be false by quantum theory. matter is an illusion. matter is only a image created by the intersections or nodes of quantum frequencies. but even though this has been proven,standard model scientist ignore the primacy of quantum theory and pigeon hole quantum theory into a standard model paradigm.

gravity is non existent. elestrical magnetic fields of the universe create the forces had are attributed to gravity. keep in mind that science doesn't even know what gravity is
todd


( TESLA AND DR IMMANUEL VELIKOVSKY BOTH REALIZED THE UNIVERSE IS FILL WITH ELECTRO MAGNETIC ENERGY. THIS ARTICLE GIVES A COMPETERARY REALIZATION OF THIS FACT TODD)
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2019/09/13/electricity-is-free-and-gravity-doesnt-exist-vt-on-maxwell-with-keshe-and-jeff-smith/
Electricity is Free and Gravity Doesn’t Exist, VT on Maxwell with Keshe and Jeff Smith


There is a war going on, one quite possibly more important to the fate of mankind than that other one that is strewing bodies across a third of the globe. What if we can prove there is electricity in the air, not just here on earth but in the vacuum of space, electricity that we can tap and use?


Jeff as a UN nuclear inspector in Iran

What if that secret, yes Tesla’s and now Keshe’s, can run your hair dryer or charge your electric car? A dozen governments are looking at his tech to power their next century development plans while, and quite contrary to Keshe’s strong anti-war message, a dozen armies look at Keshe tech as a way of powering the super weapons of the next generation and beyond.

Well, the plans are free, they are online and thousands around the world are doing just that – building their own Magrav units and some people are very unhappy about it as you might just guess. This isn’t just lying about the history or how many angels dance on the head of a pin.

Physicist Jeff Smith postulates that, since 1880, the perhaps not so great minds whose work now needs to be, just perhaps, relegated to the trash bin of history, decided that burning oil and coal (or the “flavor of the day”) was going to be the only way to power civilization, even if, for no reason whatsoever as we know now, planet earth would eventually look like Mars.

For those of you who don’t know, Mehran T. Keshe is an Oxford trained physicist, one time researcher (nuclear weapons researcher our investigations indicate) for the British MOD (Ministry of Defense) who now heads the equivalent of a worldwide cult. Keshe claims his physics, using different laws than are taught today, make free energy and even space travel, real space travel, a possibility.

We sent scientists to meet him, one said he was insane. Problem is this, his devices actually work, even when tested by detractors and skeptics. They are being manufactured and distributed around the world, the plans are available and people are building their own and all of this is documented.

If this is true, and it is, and we can prove it, and we can, then physics as taught in our schools is a lie. Toward that end, VT Science Editor and nuclear physicist Jeff Smith, archivist and researcher for the US Department of Energy, now has to talk his way out of a corner, using his skills, his humor and the world’s largest scientific library. This is a good read but first see what Ian Greenhalgh has to say:

If I understand things right, then my suspicions are correct – that the aether was mainstream in physics until the Clark-Maxwell equations, that electricity, gravity and magnetism are the same thing and powerful people don’t want this to be known.


Robert Herjavec and Neil Patel just taught me the most important lesson of my life.


World War 3 Strategy Game


Turkey Will Flood 10,000 Year Old City – Veterans Today | Military Foreign Affairs Policy Journal for Clandestine Services


At some point at the end of the 19th century, as the exploitation of petroleum for profit was getting underway, those who stood to profit acted to suppress the knowledge that electrical potential was everywhere around us and if we could only learn to harness it…

Tesla had figured it out, but he was blocked from developing a workable system because, as the legend goes, he admitted to some rich financiers that you couldn’t put a meter on this power which meant there were no huge profits to be made. So instead of entering an electrical age, we entered a petroleum age that did untold damage to our planet, our environment, our health and perhaps worst of all, our understanding of the physical universe we inhabit.

We live in an electric universe and the key to controlling gravity is also the key to extracting usable electrical power from the aether. This is knowledge that the elite don’t want to get out as it contains within it the potential to obliterate the petroleum-based economy that their wealth and power has been built on.

Furthermore, it unlocks the barrier to outer space – to leaving the confines of our one small planet without having to ride atop a giant firework that might go bang at any moment and spread your ashes across half the globe.

Anti-gravity propulsion and UFOs

Which brings us to the esoteric subject of anti-gravity propelled craft and UFOs. We know that the British RAF and US Air Force operating over Europe in 1944 and 45, bombing to bits Germany’s towns and cities, reported frequent encounters with ‘foo fighters’ or what we would today call UFOs and suspect were alien craft.

Well, regardless of whether aliens exist or if they have visited us here on Earth, I have always felt that the major, overriding motivating factor behind the immense UFO cover-up that has gone on since 1945 is to hide technologies developed here on Earth by humans; that almost all of the strange craft seen in the skies were not alien, but rather something built by humans using technologies suppressed from the public.

Which brings us to Operation Paperclip and the grabbing of as many German scientists, engineers and technologies as possible and transporting them to the US to work for Uncle Sam. I think it is a thousand times more likely that the USAF got it’s advanced anti-gravity propulsion technology not from reverse-engineering something alien that crashed on a ranch in New Mexico but from German scientists and engineers who had developed the technology after studying the work of Maxwell and Hertz.

This also leads us to the uneasy suspicion that NASA, with all it’s fancy fireworks is nothing more than an elaborate multi-billion dollar cover op to hide the real space programme that rather than using metal tubes trailing smoke and flame to crawl out of the gravity well into orbit has been based on anti-gravity craft, See Gary McKinnon and Solar Warden.

The Battle of Berlin

We all know that Stalin told Zhukov to take Berlin ASAP in May 1945, to spare no efforts to take the city before the Allies could. For this reason, Zhukov went straight on into a frontal attack on the Seelow Heights and bludgeoned his way through and fought his way into the city where he battered his way block by block to the Reichstag to plant the Red Flag.

It cost the Russians immense casualties, over a million men, whereas they could have circled north and south of Berlin to meet up west of the city and taken it with minimum loss of life. All those lives lost purely due to haste and the desire to take physical possession of Berlin.

We have long known that there was no political need for Stalin to seize Berlin – he had already been given Eastern Germany and Berlin by the Allies at Yalta; so why the undue haste to seize the city?

I have long felt that the real reason lay in the southwestern suburbs at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute, for here was stored a large stockpile of high grade uranium ore that had been mined in the Belgian Congo and taken by the Germans after they overran Belgium in 1940. It was this uranium stockpile along with the nuclear research and the scientists who worked on the atomic waffen project that I thought was the motivation behind Stalin’s undue haste to capture Berlin.

However, given Jeff’s information about the Hertz files stored at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute and the groundbreaking research of von Braun and Dornberger based on those files, I have to consider a whole new motivation for the capture of Berlin in May 1945. Perhaps getting their hands on the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute and the research done there explains the how and why of the Russian’s early lead in the space race?

Once again, I find myself being reminded that not only is history written by the victors; science and our understanding of the physical world is similarly controlled by those who are at the top of the world’s power structure.

__________

…by Jeff Smith

I have been busy doing some long deep research into Hertz lab notes on Gravity circa 1888. It’s a most interesting read. Apparently he got his data from Helmholtz who got it from Lord Rayleigh who got it from Maxwell’s original research into light and gravity.

It appears that Maxwell’s first two formulas describe what gravity is and his second two formulas describe what light or transverse radio waves are. This is according to Hertz’ own notes!!!

Thi is also confirmed by J.J. Thompson and T.T. Brown’s work on electrostatics.

You have to understand that magnetic and electrostatic fields were well understood and developed during the time of Maxwell but this was well before circuit theory and the discovery of the electron so it was very easily missed by mainstream science.

The part on gravity was dropped by Rayleigh who took over Maxwell’s seat at Cambridge around 1885. Then Maxwell’s notes were passed on to Helmholtz who then gave them to Hertz. It seems that nobody was interested in the gravity part and simply dumped it. Hertz worked on it for a while then moved on to transverse wave theory after being encouraged by Helmholtz and Faraday to stop playing with the gravity part and focus on the more important transverse wave part.

So the Gravity part of Maxwell’s theory and Hertz’ own work on gravity got shelved until WW2 when Von Braun, Dornberger and company dusted it off at the Kaiser Willhem Institute where Hertz’ files were kept and got it to work.

Dornberger then gave it to Larry Bell after the war in 1948 and that led to the NASA weight loss program on Apollo. It’s interesting how funny little quarks in history can have really big effects later on. The data matches what I have on Bell and Dornberger’s work in the 1950’s.

Here is the simple science / math part.:

1. Gravity is non-rotational. It has no spin or rotation; therefore it is not a wave of any type and never can be. Only transverse waves have rotation or curl as it is called. Light spins. Gravity is static
and does not possess spin. This is because it is a vector force field only. Vector fields do not posses spin, rotation or curl.

2. Gravity is a static vector field of force. I.E. a flow of current from the sky towards the center of the Earth. You can also say it is a difference in potential or a voltage drop. Therefore it is static and
flows in one direction only. It is not scalar and has no spin, rotation or curl. This is why gravity is always attractive and never repulsive on Earth.

3. It is not Scalar but it is a type of Scalar field. I.E. the field varies from zero in outer space to 100% at sea level but the field always has a constant vector amplitude and direction. I.E. it’s field
intensity or force is always in the same direction and level, everywhere, when measured in a closed space. Like Einstein’s elevator.

4. It’s Gradient is negative. Anti-gravity has a positive Gradient or what is called an “Over Gradient”.

5. According to J.J. Thomas and T.T. Brown, electrostatic levitation is a form of anti-gravity because it uses an electrical over-gradient to cancel the effect of gravity by pushing out the magnetic
lines of force, creating a form of magnetic buoyancy.

6. J.J. Thompson also states that the presence of air surrounding an object of mass interferes with the ability of an electrostatic charge to deflect it. The effect was heavily researched with
vacuum tubes, x-rays, cathode ray tubes, etc. back in the late 1900’s by everybody but they missed the gravity part that was right in front of them until the Germans re-discovered the effect in
WW2.

There is more to the theory; this is just the frosting on the cake for general info. After looking at some of Keshe’s math this is where he got it from – Maxwell and Hertz’ original notes on gravity.

Keshe is describing Aether and electrostatic fields of forces and not photons. His so called “Mag-grav” units are simply Maxwell’s first two formulas combined together to form a new scientific unit.

Actually he is describing a non rotational vector gradient field of force. This is what gravity really is – a simple difference in voltage between two objects of mass that is always attractive. By simply displacing the magnetic lines of force between the two objects you get a positive form of buoyancy called an-over gradient. This follows with nuclear plasma magnetic buoyancy theory or why heat and flame always repel gravity.

So the quest to figure out what light was preceded gravity research and the government simply sat on it for military reasons due to the cold war. I do believe that this is what Keshe learned when he was working in the UK? His “spinning glass spears” simply are filled with sulfur that when spun up creates a very large positive charge on the outside of the glass sphere producing an over-gradient and reversing the Lorentz F=QVXB formula that is the basic cause of Gravity. If you make the charge on an object of mass positive it repels the local magnetic field and goes up not down.

The problem is simple; air is highly resistive and it therefore it requires a very very large voltage drop to overcome the effect of gravity. As in lightning. However in the vacuum of space or on the moon this is not a problem due to the high conductivity of a vacuum.

Even in the vacuum of free space there still remains over 10 billion electrically active particles of all types per cubic inch that will conduct electricity. This is why space is not empty and the aether really does exist. Maxwell’s equations will not work without it. Einstein was wrong, space is not empty. It is very conductive electrically.

The key is in maximizing the current density of the reverse or over gradient field. Dornberger’s vacuum tank demonstrations at NASA proved this to be true leading to the Apollo space program’s ability to solve how to get off of the moon with limited weight and thrust restrictions.

In the future this is how we will land and get back off of Mars. It is also how we will travel between the stars and it is the Transporter Beam on Star Trek or how the US government steals cows with black helicopters for covert fallout testing……..


IP: Logged

todd
Knowflake

Posts: 4886
From:
Registered: Jun 2009

posted September 17, 2019 05:55 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for todd     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Einstein was a friend of dr Immanuel velikovsky and had read his books..in fact Einstein was rereading "worlds in collision" when he took ill and died.
Einsteins main objection was that the planets are neutral bodies and could not act the way velikovsky predicted,which meant they were charged bodies acting in magnetic field .


the the basic fraud of science that this thread is based on(see below) , is that the axis of rotation of the earth and all revolving celestial objects must be "fixed" by some force compensating for the centripedal force created by these rotations...but science ignores this fact completely.even though electro magnetic fields 500 million light years long have been observed....science continues to ignore the most basic motion of out existence...the fixed angle of the rotation of the earth and all rotating objects.


belows an article from 1944, that shows that the universe does have magetic flow components...just what the velikovsky predicted over 70 years ago.
this experiment also verified tesla's rotary motion electric motor.

New York Times july 30 1944
Page E9
Column 5-6

Physicists attending the recent meeting of the American physical society at the university opf Rochester watched prof. felix Ehrenaft present the most dramatic evidence so far for his hypothesis that “not only electric currents but also magnetic currents flow through the universe”they saw a permanent Ainico magnet with apiece of iron wire attached to each pole,the gap between the two poles narrowed to about one millimeter. On one of the poles professor Ehrenhaft deposited ,by means of a eye-dropper , a droplet of a solution bearing naturel electric charges,ferric chloride in this case.he then placed a microscope in front of the magnet and invited the skeptical physicists to observe.
What they saw when observing the face of the south pole was a miniature planet in motion, revolving counter clockwise .round and round went the droplet,hour after hour,in seemingly uniform motion.according to all concepts of modern physics the droplet should have stuck to the magnet and stayed there. What force made it move like the earth on its axis?

To professor Ehrenhaft……………….there is a magnetic current flowing between the poles of the permanent magnet.this magnetic current makes the electrically charged particle revolve and keeps it in motion as long as there are electric charges left.
The motion of the particle…..demonstrates for the first time the principle of the magnetic motor.instead of there being only two general forces in nature,gravity and the magnetic action of electric currents, we have here demonstrated the electrical action of magnetic currents.

IP: Logged

todd
Knowflake

Posts: 4886
From:
Registered: Jun 2009

posted November 08, 2019 03:47 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for todd     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2019/11/04/einstein-from-patent-clerk-to-internatio nal-celebrity/

(one of the biggest frauds by the scientific establishment is albert Einstein. every few months the media trots out another article about Einstein. yet the truth about him is closely hidden. Einstein was a plagiarist. below is another smoke screen.todd)
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2019/11/04/einstein-from-patent-clerk-to-internatio nal-celebrity/


by Dan Falk/Smithsonian.com

When the year 1919 began, Albert Einstein was virtually unknown beyond the world of professional physicists. By year’s end, however, he was a household name around the globe. November 1919 was the month that made Einstein into “Einstein,” the beginning of the former patent clerk’s transformation into an international celebrity.


On November 6, scientists at a joint meeting of the Royal Society of London and the Royal Astronomical Society announced that measurements taken during a total solar eclipse earlier that year supported Einstein’s bold new theory of gravity, known as general relativity. Newspapers enthusiastically picked up the story. “Revolution in Science,” blared the Times of London; “Newtonian Ideas Overthrown.” A few days later, the New York Times weighed in with a six-tiered headline—rare indeed for a science story. “Lights All Askew in the Heavens,” trumpeted the main headline. A bit further down: “Einstein’s Theory Triumphs” and “Stars Not Where They Seemed, or Were Calculated to Be, But Nobody Need Worry.”


(Einstein's rise to fame was base on a lie. the article above does not tell the full story. Einstein predicted the light of the star would be bent according to relativity ...but his calculation was wrong. keep in mind that a electromagnetic field will also bend light. the experiment was repeated in 6 months when another eclipse would occur....this time Einstein's predict of the value were correct... of course he had seen the real value 6 months before...the newspapers never made this known. so even this is a lie todd)


The spotlight would remain on Einstein and his seemingly impenetrable theory for the rest of his life. As he remarked to a friend in 1920: “At present every coachman and every waiter argues about whether or not the relativity theory is correct.” In Berlin, members of the public crowded into the classroom where Einstein was teaching, to the dismay of tuition-paying students. And then he conquered the United States. In 1921, when the steamship Rotterdam arrived in Hoboken, New Jersey, with Einstein on board, it was met by some 5,000 cheering New Yorkers. Reporters in small boats pulled alongside the ship even before it had docked. An even more over-the-top episode played out a decade later, when Einstein arrived in San Diego, en route to the California Institute of Technology where he had been offered a temporary position. Einstein was met at the pier not only by the usual throng of reporters, but by rows of cheering students chanting the scientist’s name.

The intense public reaction to Einstein has long intrigued historians. Movie stars have always attracted adulation, of course, and 40 years later the world would find itself immersed in Beatlemania—but a physicist? Nothing like it had ever been seen before, and—with the exception of Stephen Hawking, who experienced a milder form of celebrity—it hasn’t been seen since, either.


Over the years, a standard, if incomplete,

(one should read the book A Different Universe by nodel prize reciepient laughton. in the book he reveals that which is omitted in science books which is that Einstein's theory is not complete. or rather the mathematic of general relativity does not work. he spent 18 years trying to make the math work and failed. yet today scientist say that if the theory could be worked out they " suppose" it would work out. why was Einstein given a pass. if he had been a physic student and submitted this work ,it would have be rejected because the math is faulty. todd)

explanation emerged for why the world went mad over a physicist and his work: In the wake of a horrific global war—a conflict that drove the downfall of empires and left millions dead—people were desperate for something uplifting, something that rose above nationalism and politics. Einstein, born in Germany, was a Swiss citizen living in Berlin, Jewish as well as a pacifist, and a theorist whose work had been confirmed by British astronomers. And it wasn’t just any theory, but one which moved, or seemed to move, the stars. After years of trench warfare and the chaos of revolution, Einstein’s theory arrived like a bolt of lightning, jolting the world back to life.

Mythological as this story sounds, it contains a grain of truth, says Diana Kormos-Buchwald, a historian of science at Caltech and director and general editor of the Einstein Papers Project. In the immediate aftermath of the war, the idea of a German scientist—a German anything—receiving acclaim from the British was astonishing.

“German scientists were in limbo,” Kormos-Buchwald says. “They weren’t invited to international conferences; they weren’t allowed to publish in international journals. And it’s remarkable how Einstein steps in to fix this problem. He uses his fame to repair contact between scientists from former enemy countries.”


Lights All Askew
Headline in the New York Times about Einstein's newly confirmed general theory of relativity, November 10, 1919. (The New York Times Archives / Dan Falk)

At that time, Kormos-Buchwald adds, the idea of a famous scientist was unusual. Marie Curie was one of the few widely known names. (She already had two Nobel Prizes by 1911; Einstein wouldn’t receive his until 1922, when he was retroactively awarded the 1921 prize.) However, Britain also had something of a celebrity-scientist in the form of Sir Arthur Eddington, the astronomer who organized the eclipse expeditions to test general relativity. Eddington was a Quaker and, like Einstein, had been opposed to the war. Even more crucially, he was one of the few people in England who understood Einstein’s theory, and he recognized the importance of putting it to the test.

“Eddington was the great popularizer of science in Great Britain. He was the Carl Sagan of his time,” says Marcia Bartusiak, science author and professor in MIT’s graduate Science Writing program. “He played a key role in getting the media’s attention focused on Einstein.”

A

It also helped Einstein’s fame that his new theory was presented as a kind of cage match between himself and Isaac Newton, whose portrait hung in the very room at the Royal Society where the triumph of Einstein’s theory was announced.

“Everyone knows the trope of the apple supposedly falling on Newton’s head,” Bartusiak says. “And here was a German scientist who was said to be overturning Newton, and making a prediction that was actually tested—that was an astounding moment.”

Much was made of the supposed incomprehensibility of the new theory. In the New York Times story of November 10, 1919—the “Lights All Askew” edition—the reporter paraphrases J.J. Thompson, president of the Royal Society, as stating that the details of Einstein’s theory “are purely mathematical

(again Einstein's math was faulty.he never proved his theory mathematically todd)

and can only be expressed in strictly scientific terms” and that it was “useless to endeavor to detail them for the man in the street.” The same article quotes an astronomer, W.J.S. Lockyer, as saying that the new theory’s equations, “while very important,” do not “affect anything on this earth. They do not personally concern ordinary human beings; only astronomers are affected.” (If Lockyer could have time travelled to the present day, he would discover a world in which millions of ordinary people routinely navigate with the help of GPS satellites, which depend directly on both special and general relativity.)

The idea that a handful of clever scientists might understand Einstein’s theory,

(there is a book titled" Einstein the Plagiarist". the truth is that nothing in Einstein's theory was his. he plagiarized everything.and he plagiarized because he presented his theory has his original work which it was not.
one example is the idea that time is variable. this is a central point of relativity. but hendrik Lorentz had first published thisi idea years before Einstein. Lorentz complained until his death that Einstein was ripping off his ideas...again nothing Einstein published was his. the famous equation E=MC2 was published 4 years before Einstein claimed it. the concept of a space time continuum was not Einstein idea...on and on. Einstein was not given a nobel prize for his theory of general relativity. because if he had been, every prominent scientist of the day would have stood up and protested.

Einstein was given a Nobel prize for his work on the Brownian affect. the Brownian affect is a vibration that scientist saw when they turned new powerful microscope on small bits of matter. this vibration could not be understood. some years before,the legendary Viennese physicist Ludwig Boltzmann had theorized that the vibrations were created by the molecules of the air striking the object in question. Einstein by mathematical calculations , verified boltzmans theory. but Einstein got the nobel prize because he did the math on some else's idea. this was significant because even in the early 20th century the idea of atoms had not been proven. but Einstein's calculation "proved" the exist of atoms.todd)

but that such comprehension was off limits to mere mortals, did not sit well with everyone—including the New York Times’ own staff. The day after the “Lights All Askew” article ran, an editorial asked what “common folk” ought to make of Einstein’s theory, a set of ideas that “cannot be put in language comprehensible to them.” They conclude with a mix of frustration and sarcasm: “If we gave it up, no harm would be done, for we are used to that, but to have the giving up done for us is—well, just a little irritating.”


IP: Logged

todd
Knowflake

Posts: 4886
From:
Registered: Jun 2009

posted November 14, 2019 02:20 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for todd     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
just a lies have taken over our culture on all levels, even science is lying or rather not interested in giving true analysis of the events based on scientific "facts"

the concept of black holes is a false flag. the concept is retained to keep supporting faulty Einstein's plagiarism .

the late Stephen hawkins,who climbed to fame with his work on black holes, disavowed the existence of balck holes before his death.

the entire concept is false. this was first made clear when relativistic jets were observed coming out of the poles of the supposed black hole at the center of the galaxiy.
no light is supposed to be able to escape a black hole yet here were energy streams traveling near the speed of light emanating from a black hole. scientist did not question how a black hole could be a black hole and do this.

now the scientist have resin to even higher lies that trump.now they said a star was ejected by a black hole.......again pure dogma is superseding true science. by theory it is impossible for a star to be ejected from a black hole. Einstein's theories are totally garbage but the kabbalahist censors of knowledge or the guardians of dogmas,as dr Immanuel velikovsky called them, are still trying to shore Einstein's false theories .
http://beforeitsnews.com/space/2019/11/supermassive-black-hole-ejects-star-from-the-heart-of-the-milky-way-at-6-million-kmh-2517832.html

Supermassive Black Hole Ejects Star from the Heart of the Milky Way at 6 Million Km/H

Astronomers have spotted an ultrafast star, traveling at a blistering 6 million km/h, that was ejected by the supermassive black hole at the heart at the Milky Way five million years ago.

The discovery of the star, known as S5-HVS1, was made by Carnegie Mellon University Assistant Professor of Physics Sergey Koposov as part of the Southern Stellar Stream Spectroscopic Survey (S5). Located in the constellation of Grus ¨C the Crane ¨C S5-HVS1 was found to be moving ten times faster than most stars in the Milky Way.

An artist¡¯s impression of S5-HVS1¡äs ejection by Sagittarius A*, the black hole at the center of the galaxy. The black hole and the captured binary partner to S5-HVS1 are seen far away in the left corner of the picture, while S5-HVS1 is in the foreground, speeding away from them.

Credit: James Josephides (Swinburne Astronomy Productions)

¡°The velocity of the discovered star is so high that it will inevitably leave the galaxy and never return,¡± said Douglas Boubert from the University of Oxford, a co-author on the study.

Astronomers have wondered about high velocity stars since their discovery only two decades ago. S5-HVS1 is unprecedented due to its high speed and close passage to the Earth, ¡°only¡± 29 thousand light years away. With this information, astronomers could track its journey back into the center of the Milky Way, where a four million solar mass black hole, known as Sagittarius A*, lurks.

¡°This is super exciting, as we have long suspected that black holes can eject stars with very high velocities. However, we never had an unambiguous association of such a fast star with the galactic center,¡± said Koposov, the lead author of this work and member of Carnegie Mellon¡¯s McWilliams Center for Cosmology. ¡°We think the black hole ejected the star with a speed of thousands of kilometers per second about five million years ago. This ejection happened at the time when humanity¡¯s ancestors were just learning to walk on two feet.¡±

The location of S5-HVS1 on the sky and the direction of its motion. The star is flying away from the galactic center, from which it was ejected 5 million years ago.


Superfast stars can be ejected by black holes via the Hills Mechanism, proposed by astronomer Jack Hills thirty years ago. Originally, S5-HSV1 lived with a companion in a binary system, but they strayed too close to Sagittarius A*. In the gravitational tussle, the companion star was captured by the black hole, while S5-HVS1 was thrown out at extremely high speed.

¡°This is the first clear demonstration of the Hills Mechanism in action,¡± said Ting Li from Carnegie Observatories and Princeton University, and leader of the S5 Collaboration. ¡°Seeing this star is really amazing as we know it must have formed in the galactic center, a place very different to our local environment. It is a visitor from a strange land.¡±

The discovery of S5-HVS1 was made with the 3.9-meter Anglo-Australian Telescope (AAT) near Coonabarabran, NSW, Australia, coupled with superb observations from the European Space Agency¡¯s Gaia satellite, that allowed the astronomers to reveal the full speed of the star and its journey from the center of the Milky Way.

An artist¡¯s impression of the ejection mechanism of a star by a supermassive black hole.

Credit: James Josephides (Swinburne Astronomy Productions) via SciTech Daily

¡°The observations would not be possible without the unique capabilities of the 2dF instrument on the AAT,¡± said Daniel Zucker, an astronomer at Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia, and a member of the S5 executive committee. ¡°It¡¯s been conducting cutting-edge research for over two decades and still is the best facility in the world for our project.¡±

These results were published on November 4 online in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, and the S5 collaboration unites astronomers from the United States, United Kingdom, Australia and Chile.

¡°I am so excited this fast-moving star was discovered by S5,¡± says Kyler Kuehn, at Lowell Observatory and a member of the S5 executive committee. ¡°While the main science goal of S5 is to probe the stellar streams ¡ª disrupting dwarf galaxies and globular clusters ¡ª we dedicated spare resources of the instrument to searching for interesting targets in the Milky Way, and voila, we found something amazing for ¡®free.¡¯ With our future observations, hopefully we will find even more!¡±

Contacts and sources:
Jocelyn Duffy
Carnegie Mellon University

Citation: Discovery of a nearby 1700 km/s star ejected from the Milky Way by Sgr A*
Sergey E Koposov, Boubert Douglas, S Li Ting, Denis Erkal, Gary S Da Costa, Daniel B Zucker, Alexander P Ji, Kyler Kuehn, Geraint F Lewis, Dougal Mackey ¡­ Show more

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, stz3081, https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz3081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz3081

IP: Logged

todd
Knowflake

Posts: 4886
From:
Registered: Jun 2009

posted December 29, 2019 04:24 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for todd     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
http://www.rawstory.com/2019/12/how-christian-fundamentalism-is-turning-people-away-from-religion-and-toward-science/

(interesting article but underneath it is just another attempt to replace the Spiritual Reality with the fallacies of Science. rather to make Science the new God of the tyranny of modern technological society. todd)

How Christian fundamentalism is turning people away from religion and toward science


Christianity is on the way out, according to surveys Americans who identify as Christian have dropped by 12 percent in the last decade, and those who identify as having no religion have increased 9 percent.

The Daily Beast cited multiple researchers who have examined the evolution of religion and the turn toward science. Christian fundamentalism is adding to the problem as some sects devolve back to the 1600s when science and religion were mutually exclusive.

Report Advertisement


“Those who have remained faithful are more fundamentalist than ever,” said the Beast. “Moderate Protestantism has declined, while conservative evangelical religion has increased as a percentage of America’s religious, with immediate political consequences: Donald Trump would not be president had conservative evangelicals and Catholics not rallied to his side, despite his many personal transgressions and evident lack of faith.”


Happy Holidays! As a special thanks for your support this year, you can get Raw ad-free for just $2 a week. Now until Dec. 31.


Science, by contrast, has provided answers for those who hear “voices of the Devil” or who say they literally hear “the voice of God.” As neurology advances, doctors can pinpoint the source of delusion and use medication to aid in mental and emotional healing. Still, the well-known Bible stories persist in culture, which Pascal Boyer explained in his 1994 book is due to their simplicity.


“Religious stories, in another irony, have survived human history’s version of natural selection. They are the ones that have stuck around, and they’ve done so not because of their truth or value, but because they are the kinds of stories that human brains understand, and want to repeat,” The Beast paraphrased.

Robert McCauley argued in his 2011 book that religion is “cognitively natural” and reflects how humans think after millions of years of evolution. The brain processes things “fast, (mostly) unconscious, automatic, effortless, intuitive thought.” It makes sense for the early years of human life when those who couldn’t think fast were often killed by larger animals.

“Science, McCauley shows, is actually very unnatural and counterintuitive. For example, we ‘naturally’ look for agents who take actions in the world; we look for quasi-people, not impersonal forces. But science has shown that impersonal forces—the laws of physics and natural selection, for example— actually are responsible for most of the world around us,” explained The Beast.

Essentially, the big questions humans have always asked like, “where did we come from?” and “are we alone?” are also questions our brains want to find easy explanations to.

For fundamentalists, whose brains are not accustomed to thinking critically, rational arguments don’t make a dent with entrenched belief systems. McCauley explains, “people are rarely argued out of beliefs that they were not argued into in the first place.”

When confronted with evidence that conflicts their worldviews, fundamentalists blame the sciences.
The Beast went on to cite Antony Alumkal’s 2017 book, Paranoid Science: The Christian Right’s War on Reality, which explains how conservative Christians not only don’t trust science, they then create conspiracy theories about scientists to justify their beliefs.

“Alumkal’s examples are familiar: climate denial, intelligent design, ‘gay conversion therapy,’ and opposition to stem cell research. In each case, drawing on Richard Hofstadter’s classic The Paranoid Style in American Politics, Alumkal shows how rather than simply state that their faith disagrees with the scientific evidence, Christian Right figures have created a fake scientific discourse to compete with the real one, which they allege to be a conspiracy,” the report explained.

The example they used was the evangelical group, the “Cornwall Alliance,” which takes a large portion of its funds from oil companies and oil executives. Naturally, the group doesn’t believe that climate change is real. It’s akin to a corrupt politician taking funds from an industry lobbyist and voting to support that industry. The main difference, however, is that religion uses God to justify their corruption and emotionally manipulate followers to believe the same.

Cornwall has resorted to creating conspiracy theories about the 97 percent of climate scientists who believe in the science.

The Beast compared it to atheists, whose militantism isn’t exactly comparable to fundamentalist Christianity. Atheists don’t burn people at the stake for being a witch, put scientists under house arrest for believing the Earth is round or perform exercises to remove demons. There are atheist activists like Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins and the late Christopher Hitchens, The Beast recalled. they want to rid the world of religion, but most non-believers just want to be left alone. None are taking up a flaming sword to crusade against religious leaders.

According to Jerome Baggett’s 2019 book, The Varieties of Nonreligious Experience: Atheism in American Culture, Atheists have positive values based on the goodness of humanity. The value integrity, “open-mindedness, and the importance of progress.”

IP: Logged

todd
Knowflake

Posts: 4886
From:
Registered: Jun 2009

posted January 03, 2020 11:33 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for todd     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2020/01/02/was-einstein-a-wife-beater-womanizer-plagiarizer-and-eugenicist/

( here is an article that gives a truer view of the failings of Einstein. but the author does not have an accurate picture of wihlem reich and has mouthed the same propaganda against Reich that was used to smear his name in a similar manner like tesla was ostracized by the establishment. the author also does not make note that Einstein's theory of general relativity is a failed theory. it was never proven. the math does not work out ,yet to this days physicist do not mentioned his theory is invalid. todd)

Was Einstein a Wife Beater, Womanizer, Plagiarizer, and Eugenicist?

When Einstein was getting negative reviews for his theory, he quickly jumped to the anti-Semitism trump card, which obviously shocked many of the scientists who were reviewing his work.

When Hitler came to power in 1933, he single-handedly shut down the sexual laboratory which Jewish revolutionaries such as Magnus Hirschfield and Ivan Bloch had established. Moreover, Hitler shut down the vast majority of the sex/entertainment industry which revolutionaries made possible in Germany.[1]

In the early 1920s, Berlin was “the vice-ridden scum”[2] which produced all kinds of sexual activities. “People from all over the industrialized world flocked to Berlin to be part of this experiment, if only for a short while.”[3] Philo-Semitic historian Paul Johnson himself declares,

“The Foxtrot and short skirts, the addiction of pleasure in ‘the imperial sewers of Berlin,’ the ‘dirt pictures’ of sexologist Magnus Hirschfeld or the typical man of the times took on in the minds of the average citizen a repugnance that is difficult to recall in hindsight without some historical effort. In a number of highly celebrated provocations, the stage of the ‘20s dealt with topics like patricide, incest and other crimes and the deepest inclination of the times tended to self-mockery.”[4]

A number of Jewish icons such as George Gershwin, Ben Hecht, Douglas Fairbanks, Sergei Eisenstein visited Hirschfeld’s Institute. Eisenstein “enjoyed the Institute’s collection of sailor-dolls—homemade paper toys that German homosexuals fashioned during the Great War.”[5]

The library of the school,

“which contained the largest sex and pornographic book collection in Europe, remained accessible to all readers…Politically, the Institute provided a forum for progressive lawyers and government officials who sought to eradicate the laws against homosexuality and defend Germany’s legal abortion rights from the growing onslaught of fascist and religious parties. Most of the legal work involved suits protecting gay men against threats of petty blackmail….The Institute itself was a font of sexological activity. Pediatric care, abortions, ‘sexual rejuvenation’ and sexual ‘correction’ operations were conducted on the lower level of the main building.”[6]

Even D. H. Lawrence, himself a proponent of sexual liberation, knew that the Weimar Republic had become a place for sexual debauchery, writing in a letter that “at night you feel strange things stirring in the darkness…There is a sense of danger…a queer, bristling feeling of uncanny danger.”[7]

Later, Christopher Isherwood, a homosexual and proponent of sexual liberation, went to Berlin to immerse himself into the gay bars, writing later, “There was terror in the Berlin air.”[8]

But the sexual moment of that period was indeed short-lived largely because Hitler overturned the plans of Hirshfield and other sexual ideologues like Freud and Wilhelm Reich by making life a living hell for them. In fact, both Freud and Reich left Germany when Hitler came to power and moved to the United States.

In January of 1941, Reich discussed his sex economy with Albert Einstein for nearly five hours. When Einstein thought that anti-Semitism was on the rise in Germany, Reich wrote him a letter saying that he had discovered “specific biologically effective energy which behaves in many respects differently to all that is known about electromagnetic energy.”

For Reich, this “biologically effective energy” could be used “in the fight against the Fascist pestilence.”[9] And this sexualized ideology would be a “rival, perhaps, to the incipient atomic bomb.”[10] For Reich, sexual ideologies are like atomic bombs. They have the power to destroy lives.

We never know how much influence Reich had on Einstein, or vice versa, but it was pretty clear that both individuals understood each other. At one point, “Reich told his wife ‘how exciting it was to talk to someone who knew the background of these physical phenomena, who had immediate grasp of the implications.”[11]

Einstein himself tried to do some experiment with Reich’s “orgonoscope.” Reich, in his desperate attempt to deconstruct morality, tried to use physics to justify his own sexual theories. This was called “orgone accumulator,” but it simply didn’t work scientifically.[12]

Einstein ended up abandoning Reich’s illusionary experiment altogether. For Reich, Einstein simply did not want to lose his scientific credibility by allying himself with Reich’s theory.
Reich later wrote, “It was understandable that Einstein did not want to contribute to the collapse of his life’s work, although this would have been demanded by strict scientific objectivity…”[13]

Reich’s ideology did not gain a scientific ground, but it surely was politicized. Moreover, Einstein did not really need “orgonoscope” to rationalize his sexual freedom. But the question for us is simply this: Was Einstein a plagiarist, a wife beater, and a eugenicist?

Einstein, the Man
By 1912, Einstein was already on the road of sexual excess, despite the fact that he was already married to Mileva Maric.
Einstein met Mileva at the Polytechnic in Zurich, where they both had a keen interest in physics. They eventually got married on January 6, 1903, but due to Einstein’s sexual adventure and abuse, the marriage turned into a complete disaster.
Einstein, like Charles Darwin before him, embarked on a sexual relationship with his cousin Elsa Einstein, who “had been divorced since 1908 and had two daughters, aged fifteen and thirteen.”[14]

This grieved his wife even more. Hans C. Ohanian, another biographer, writes that when Einstein arrived in Berlin, he

“did not spend much time at home. Sometimes he would disappear for a week, leaving Mileva ignorant of his whereabouts. Mileva suspected he was spending days and nights in the arms of the plump and eager Elsa….We do not know how Mileva found out about the adulterous liaison. But we do now that in July, after a violent quarrel, she suddenly moved out of their apartment and, with the boys, went to live in the home of the Haber family.”[15]

On October 10, Einstein wrote to Elsa saying that Mileva “is the most sour sourpuss that ever existed. I shudder at the thought of seeing her and you together. She will writhe like a worm if she sees you even from afar!”[16]

Mileva later complained that “we are a bit unimportant to him and that we take second place.”[17]

Mileva’s complaint was not without evidence. Einstein himself wrote to Elsa, “I treat my wife as an employee whom I cannot fire. I have my own bedroom and avoid being alone with her.”[18]
Writer Michele Zackheim declares,

“Mileva had planned to accompany Albert to Paris, where on March 26, 1913, he was giving a lecture on the law of photochemical equivalence. But on March 14, Lisbeth Hurtwitz, the daughter of family friends, wrote in her diary that she and her mother had visited Mileva and were shocked to see Mileva with her face badly bruised and swollen. Albert explained that it was caused by a dental problem. Mileva would not answer her friends’ inquiries. Albert traveled to Paris alone.”[19]

Zackheim says that even after all the humiliation, “Mileva persisted in trying to hold her marriage together.”[20] Then Albert unleashed a list of unreasonable demands to Mileva, which the Daily Mail called “a misogynistic manifesto”[21]:

“Albert decided that if Mileva wanted to stay married to him she would have to obey his rules: ‘A. you will see to it (1) that my clothes and linen are kept in order, (2) that I am served three regular meals a day in my room, (3) that my bedroom and study are kept in good order and that my desk is not touched by anyone other than me.

“‘B. You will renounce all personal relations with me, except when they are required to keep up social appearance. In particular you will not request (1) that I sit with you at home, (2) that I go out with you or travel with you.

“‘C. You will promise explicitly to observe the following points in any contact with me: (1) you will expect no affection from me and you will not reproach me for this, (2) you must answer me at once when I speak to you, (3) you must leave my bedroom or study at once without protesting when I ask you to go.

“‘D. You will promise not to denigrate me in the eyes of the children, either by word or by deed. Ever since you have been in Berlin, you have become quite nasty. You should know that people take an interest in the way the great man [himself, of course] behaves.”[22]

Shortly thereafter, Einstein wrote to a friend, “Life without my wife is a veritable rebirth for me personally.”[23] He continued to humiliate his lovely wife throughout his life, saying things like,
“Had I known you twelve years ago as I know you now, I would have viewed my responsibilities toward you at that time quite differently.”[24]

And then this: Mileva, Einstein declared,

“is and will forever remain for me an amputated limb. I will never again be close to her. I will finish my days far from her, feeling this is absolutely necessary.”[25]
Zackheim writes,

“Mileva still hoped that he might come back to her. Perhaps she thought that the longer he remained on his own, the better chance there was of finding a peaceful solution and keeping the family intact.

“After all, he had told her that he liked being a bachelor and that his autonomy ‘revealed itself as an indescribable blessing to me.’ She could not believe that he was asking for a divorce—it could only mean that he wanted to remarry.”[26]

In 1919, when the marriage between the two partners was finally over, Einstein’s own statement seemed to have confirmed that he did indeed get involved in physical abuse. He specifically declared to the court that he had

“no accusations against the plaintiff [his wife]….During the marriage there have been numerous scenes because of differences of opinion where on the part of the plaintiff verbal and physical abuse occurred to which I in a state of irritation…responded…

“It is true that I committed adultery. I have been living for approximately four and one-half years with my cousin, the widow Elsa Lowenthal, and since then I have had intimate relations with her.

“My wife, the plaintiff, has been informed that I have had intimate relations with my cousin since the summer of 1914. She expressed her indignations to me.”[27]

Einstein’s sexual exploration did not stop when he me Elsa. After four years of marriage with Elsa, he moved his sexual relativity to Bette Neumann, his secretary. Prior to that, he also wanted to marry Elsa’s daughter, Ilse. Ilse told a friend,

“Yesterday, suddenly the question was raised about whether A. wished to marry Mama or me….Albert himself is refusing to take any decision, he is prepared to marry either Mama or me.
“I know that A. loves me very much, perhaps more than any other man ever will, he also told me so himself yesterday….[But] I have never wished nor felt the least desire to be close to him physically….

“A. also thought that if I did not wish to have a child of his it would be nicer for me not to be married to him. And I truly do not have this wish….I do not know whether it really would be fair—after all [my mother’s] years of struggle—[if] I were to compete with her over the place she had won for herself, now that she is finally at the goal.”[28]

When the divorce between Einstein and Mileva finally occurred, “Mileva never remarried. Albert, on the other hand, was only just beginning his romantic exploits. He continued his pursuit of women and his extramarital affairs long after his marriage to Elsa.”[29]

Zackheim writes, “Clearly, Albert had no patience with and very little respect for women. The only female scientist to whom he accorded a modicum of respect was Marie Curie, and even that he could not do without qualification…Even from Elsa, he kept his distance. Once when she referred to the two of them as ‘us,’ Albert retorted, ‘talk about you or me but never about us.”[30]

Perhaps the most shocking of all, the evidence from Zackheim suggests that Einstein had abandoned his only daughter, Liesel, because she was believed to be mentally handicapped. Einstein’s younger son, Eduard, or “Tete,” born in 1910,

“developed schizophrenia as a young man, apparently in consequence of a disturbing love affair with an older woman….After Mileva’s death in 1948, Tete was placed with foster families and then again confined until his own death in 1965. Einstein made a quick visit to Tete at the Burgholzli in 1933, before leaving for the United States. After that, he broke off all contact and sent no letters…”[31]

WAS EINSTEIN A PLAGIARIZER?

Mathematician Roger Schlafly has recently revived the long-forgotten argument that much of what is credited to Einstein has been the work of others. The noted mathematician Henri Poincare and physicist Hendrik Lorentz wrote about relativity long before Einstein ever thought about the topic. Einstein just made them popular without giving credit to whom it is due.[32]

This point was articulated by a British mathematician and historian of science Sir Edmund T. Whittaker (1873-1956), who wrote in his work A History of the Theories of Aether & Electricity that the equation E = mc2 was the creation of Lorentz and Poincare.

“Einstein’s friend and colleague Max Born had even tried to persuade Whittaker not to publish this opinion,” but Born himself later admitted that it was highly plausible that Einstein got his idea from Poincare.[33] Similar points were made by Russian physicist A. A. Logunov in his book Henri Poincare and Relativity Theory.[34]

It was after he was confronted with this fact by Whittaker that Einstein hoped that posterity would give Lorentz and Poincare some credit to the theory. As biographer Albrecht Folsing puts it,
“After nearly half a century this was the first time that Einstein ever mentioned Poincare in connection with the special relativity theory.”[35]

Biographer Dennis Brian, however, declared that the charge that Einstein got some of his work from somewhere else has little weight. The evidence? No one, not even Poincare, argues Brian, has ever charged Einstein of plagiarism.

But Brian failed to mention that Lorentz came close to saying that Einstein snatched relativity out of his hand: “Einstein simply postulates what we [Lorentz and Poincare] have deduced.”[36]
Schlafly argues:

“On every essential part of special relativity, Poincare published the same idea years earlier, and said it better. It was Lorentz’s and Poincare’s work, not Einstein’s, that led to time being considered the fourth dimension.”[37]

Shlafly continues to say that while historians “prefer to credit Einstein” for the theory, “no one can dispute the fact that Poincare discovered all the elements of special relativity with help from Lorentz and others, published them before Einstein, and developed a theory that was either identical or observationally equivalent to Einstein’s.”[38]

Einstein’s 1905 paper in particular “fails to cite any references to the scientific literature. The failure is extremely odd,” since “the best mathematical physicists in Europe had been writing papers on the subject for ten years, and Einstein did not cite any of them.”

Einstein “uses some of Poincare’s terminology without mentioning Poincare’s name. Einstein is not just sloppy; he is artfully vague about his sources.”[39] Here is how Einstein defended his position:

“It appears to me that it is the nature of business that what follows has already been partly solved by other authors. Despite that fact, since the issues of concern are here addressed from a new point of view, I am entitled to leave out a thoroughly pedantic survey of the literature…”[40]

When Einstein was getting negative reviews for his theory, he quickly jumped to the anti-Semitism trump card,[41] which obviously shocked many of the scientists who were reviewing his work.

IP: Logged

todd
Knowflake

Posts: 4886
From:
Registered: Jun 2009

posted March 25, 2021 08:34 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for todd     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Today the world faces genocide of humanity.even though it has begun with mass murder under the auspices of science,the this plan to eliminate the goyim-us-subhumans has been in the works before the rothschilds .what began as the Florentine awakening and flowering into the Renaissance was the first salvo in a culture war against god.science was planned to supplant god as the ultimate Cause.

This successful subterfuge is why we are on the brink of rascist insane men convincing the world to commit suicide because of a nonexistent threat.

The blind allegiance to the god of science is why humanity is on a precipice of self destruction.
Science has become our god.science which started out as the epitome of rationality and intelligence has become belief that controls men's souls.
This is clearly evide fed by the fact that the corona virus hoax is but on pure lies.
Fauci the voice of science is a liar and crook,yet shrouded by the belief that science can explain the unsolvable mysterys of life,utter blatant lies with every breath...and We don't suspect his science is corrupt and false.
This situation was brought forth so that when the satanic force gathered enough strenght enslave our souls there would be no cry out in the night because god is a superstition and satanic motivation is just another Halloween theme.
The plandemic is based on no scientific facts.true there is a bioweapons created from the corona virus but the natural coronavirus is harmless.the PCR can not diagnose anything.the 500000 deaths are a statistical game.TheCDC records show there is no 50000 extra deaths this year.the corona virus itsf has not been isolated or purified by the CDC or any other country.
The only truth is that the Rothschild mossad created a bioweapon and have used it.a y time they what they can create a slime of deaths because the medical authorizes will not allow the use of existent drugs that fauci himself knows that kill corona viruses.

So in the end,it is our moral void/materialism that will allow the satanic host to commit genocide

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright 2000-2021

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a