posted December 14, 2014 03:19 PM
I'm into scientifically testing astrological hypotheses, and am hoping Lindaland members can help me by posting the asteroids and/or Arabic Parts and Uranian planetoids, etc. that you have found to be strongly predictive by studying transits for yourself or others. Please let me know your top 10 asteroids (or more) which you feel have proven themselves to be predictive--as in, things happened during the transits that you would've predicted would happen, given the "meaning" ascribed to the asteroid. Also, if you've found unusual occurrences happen when an asteroid or planet transits a natal point, please let us know.
For instance, I find Atropos to be highly predictive, but for me it always marks dramatic BEGINNINGS, not endings. And all the other "Fates" asteroids have proven pretty meaningless in my transits. But when Atropos is coming around one of my natal points, I take notice.
Also, I find Juno to be about partnerships in general, whether they are business partnerships or close friendships. I don't think it should be called the "marriage asteroid", but let me know if you disagree.
BTW- I'm fairly impressed by the Uranian "planets" even though they're imaginary points and the whole system sounds pretty nutty. Rather than accept or reject the system, however, I've been mapping my Uranian transits and they have proven quite predictive.
Also, I find Waldemath Lilith to be the most dramatic of the Liliths (though asteroid Lilith is prominent in my natal chart and I find it to be predictive of areas in life where I take a stand for the human right to express ones true self, whether the person I'm defending is myself or others. I'm also very impressed by another "imaginary point" White Moon Selena, which has proven highly predictive in my transits.I'm also impressed by several of the Arabic Parts, which are also mathematical points, vs. planetary bodies.
Since I'm into scientific proof, I'm a little embarrassed to admit that I've found the "imaginary points" to be at least as predictive as transits of the larger, slow-moving planets. Then again, the midheaven, IC, descendant etc are calculated points vs actual physical bodies in the sky, so maybe this shouldn't be so surprising.