posted November 11, 2015 03:49 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by LeeLoo2014:
Unfortunately, great charts don't generate meetings between two people, we are bound to stick to those coming our way as part of our destiny.

---

posted November 11, 2015 10:55 AM            

All I have are clues. She's musically gifted, and streams copious lovesongs straight to my heart. She attended university abroad, and presents as an organized business manager. Her family is landed with agricultural holdings. They own an airplane. Brazil or Australia? Many family members have also appeared in my dreams. Her sister is also attractive, and married.

I honestly don't know where to look. Online casts the widest web. She once told me that we don't have to wait to meet. The search is my attempt to match astrology that correlates with what I feel in our Vortex. I believe that synastry must accurately describe our relationship together. And relocation astrology will match where we meet, and live.

Any suggestions?

quote:

---

Originally posted by Aubyanne:
Didn't you once say that you already have seen her many times in dreams? Did she tell you to actively search for her? Would you not even have a physical description to go off of?

---

posted November 11, 2015 11:07 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by LeeLoo2014:
Still looking, C? all your charts are always significant. Unfortunately, great charts don't generate meetings between two people, we are bound to stick to those coming our way as part of our destiny.

---

posted November 11, 2015 11:34 AM            

Intuition suggests Earth planets (to ground my Fire/Air?). Love Taurus Moon(my TAU NN).

quote:

---

Originally posted by LaceyLeigh:
Maybe. However, Mars, Pluto and Saturn opposite her sun and Mercury, and her moon/Mars opposite your moon/Uranus. Seems too volatile for a long-term relationship.

---

posted November 11, 2015 01:31 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by comdoc:

Any suggestions?

---

Yes. Stop looking.

Now, I'm going to be real with you, and do something I rarely EVER do as a scientist -- I'm going to take you at your word here. This means I'm presuming all that you tell me to be true, and I'm going to offer you practical advice, as such -- forsaking argument.

You know the old adage; a watched pot never boils. In my experience -- it's a bit like that. Or it can be. Looking can absolutely prevent you from finding.

Now, how long have you had these dreams? I'm guessing you've journalled each one carefully. Is it for several years? Over a decade? You'd want to note the general age in which she appears to you, on top of, of course, details. When this is a transdimensional experience occurring through, many times, the only time the brain is sufficiently able to process weirdness -- theta- and delta-wave state -- it's occurring in realtime, in some regard, and the individual won't always be the same age. There will be changes -- minor shifts. Hair style changes. Slight signs of ageing (or, dramatic, if it's been a long time). Different clothing -- that sort of thing.

If there are no changes, you're probably picking up from another timeline / lifeline / eigenstate entirely, and attempting to process some event or experience from that 'time'. In some cases, a 'dream lover' exists purely to 'check in' at times, while they're in another space. Think The Lake House. That sort of thing.

Now, if there ARE changes -- this is good. It could be realtime. (I'd need to know a LOT more to assess that -- but it's a good sign.) This allows you to more successfully track age, so that you can -- yes -- assume a birthdate.

Is that the reason why they're all in this mid-twenties range? In which case, I can't imagine you've been 'seeing' her for long. Otherwise, she would've been first 'appearing' to you as a teenager.

ALL of that being said -- my initial advice still stands.

STOP LOOKING.

In the cases of which I'm aware (including my own personal experience), none actually assumed that the individual exists, and thus, never went actively looking. But you know how it is. IF you should happen upon someone who matches those features, you WILL pay attention -- close attention.

Otherwise, have some faith in the Universe. Unless she's SAID to you, 'come find me' or 'launch an Internet-wide search to find me' -- you may very well be ruining your chances OF finding her.

posted November 11, 2015 04:26 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Aubyanne:
Yes. [b]Stop looking.

Now, I'm going to be real with you, and do something I rarely EVER do as a scientist -- I'm going to take you at your word here. This means I'm presuming all that you tell me to be true, and I'm going to offer you practical advice, as such -- forsaking argument.

Thanks, all I've written is accurate to my conscious knowledge.

You know the old adage; a watched pot never boils. In my experience -- it's a bit like that. Or it can be. Looking can absolutely prevent you from finding.

This reminds me of Abraham's advice to cease focus on whatever is desired--and just enjoy living happily.

Now, how long have you had these dreams? I'm guessing you've journalled each one carefully. Is it for several years?

Going on 3 years, since Aug. 1, 2012.

Over a decade? You'd want to note the general age in which she appears to you, on top of, of course, details. When this is a transdimensional experience occurring through, many times, the only time the brain is sufficiently able to process weirdness -- theta- and delta-wave state -- it's occurring in realtime, in some regard, and the individual won't always be the same age. There will be changes -- minor shifts. Hair style changes. Slight signs of ageing (or, dramatic, if it's been a long time). Different clothing -- that sort of thing.

Understood. Yes, her hair style does change from time to time--maybe sometimes her hair appears blond because she's colored it. From her appearance I guess in her 20's. Believe me, I've wondered about this whole experience. When I asked her in dreamstate if she is actually currently incarnate in earth D, she told me: "Oh, I'm real, and am a real cutie." *LMAO*

If there are no changes, you're probably picking up from another timeline / lifeline / eigenstate entirely, and attempting to process some event or experience from that 'time'. In some cases, a 'dream lover' exists purely to 'check in' at times, while they're in another space. Think The Lake House. That sort of thing.

Well, I'm aware of multiple past lives together. One in Denmark, as brother and sister. Another in Egypt around the court of Queen Isis. We were clandestine lovers.

Now, if there ARE changes -- this is good. It could be realtime. (I'd need to know a LOT more to assess that -- but it's a good sign.) This allows you to more successfully track age, so that you can -- yes -- assume a birthdate.

Is that the reason why they're all in this mid-twenties range? In which case, I can't imagine you've been 'seeing' her for long. Otherwise, she would've been first 'appearing' to you as a teenager.

ALL of that being said -- my initial advice still stands.

STOP LOOKING.

In the cases of which I'm aware (including my own personal experience), none actually assumed that the individual exists, and thus, never went actively looking. But you know how it is. IF you should happen upon someone who matches those features, you WILL pay attention -- close attention.

She has my rapt attention! What a wild adventure this has been. She takes delight in showering me with love and affection.

Otherwise, have some faith in the Universe. Unless she's SAID to you, 'come find me' or 'launch an Internet-wide search to find me' -- you may very well be ruining your chances OF finding her.

Schrodinger, man. It's the observation itself that changes the experience. Don't force the wave. [/B]

---

Yah, the pesky cat! OK, I've given up on finding her, multiple times. But then she bombards me with more lovesongs, and I begin searching anew.

I sent you a private message with link to where this whole story has been posted.

posted November 13, 2015 11:02 PM            

I have a question.What if you find this girl,you recognize her but then you have a very bad synastry/composite/davison whatever.What would you do?
YOU would live the moment like theres no tomorrow or step back?

posted November 13, 2015 11:09 PM            

Empty Spaces, I think when your situation is truly inexplicable, you just go with what you've got, right? Is it ideal that he's an early Cancer SUN? Not exactly. Heh. Though, I am quite fond of his Aries MOON; that feels quite right to me.

But I would've thought that that intense Scorpio highly condensed composite would've been ours. Alas, it's not. Our composite isn't all that thrilling. But, I appreciate it, because it's the composite I have with him.

So, I'm pretty sure, when and if comdoc does find her, the chart really won't matter, either.

posted November 14, 2015 12:38 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Empty Spaces:
Actually thanks for chamming in Aubyanne.AND I agree 100%!!!
I just asked because for many people you have to have the best composite/synastry ever to be a soulmate couple and since Im not an astrologer i thought i was just being stupid thinking in a different way.

---

Noooooo, not a bit.

And, to be honest with you, it's changed MY perspective as well. But when I began realising how truly profound, inexplicable, and 'destined' my relationship with him is, I began to focus less upon what it seemed we don't have, and just read it as I would any other chart. It just happens to be between myself and a man I honestly didn't think existed.

So, for me, the weirder thing would be to disregard what is absolutely gobsmacking and beyond all logical comprehension (which, if you know the story, I think you'd agree) simply because our astrology isn't exceptional.

posted November 14, 2015 10:23 AM            

Although astrology science is incomplete and our understanding limited--there's a grain of truth in all astrological techniques. My intuition informs me whenever a certain astro finding doesn't quite fit the reality that I experience. Then we must modify or replace that technique so that it will explain the reality more accurately.

Art of Synastry, Composite, Davison, etc. interpretations are intimately dependent on the consciousness of the astrologer. The process of astro synthesis leads to a more accurate whole description than the sum of its parts.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Empty Spaces:
Im a fan of love and omg thats so sweet!!

I have a question.What if you find this girl,you recognize her but then you have a very bad synastry/composite/davison whatever.What would you do?
YOU would live the moment like theres no tomorrow or step back?

Ps: I really hope you find her.This is a very beautiful story!!

---

posted November 14, 2015 10:37 AM            

Auby wrote: "Empty Spaces, I think when your situation is truly inexplicable, you just go with what you've got, right?....So, I'm pretty sure, when and if comdoc does find her, the chart really won't matter, either....It's not like you can really choose!"

posted November 14, 2015 12:24 PM            

Have you made any contact outside of hypnagogic experiences and alleged clairaudience?

Also, I still think it's in error to try and 'guess' the individual's chart. In most cases, you could be wrong, and, in all honesty, it's more of a hindsight sort of thing. Looking back now, his chart makes TOTAL sense to me. But would I have EVER thought Cancer SUN? Aries MOON? Hah! No. I was thinking Scorpio -- all the way. Maybe some Taurus. Virgo. Gemini, even. But a Cancerian?

And, pretty much, since that day, I've decided that looking for them -- and, trying to guess their chart -- is useless.

However, a slightly more 'common' archetype does resonate to 11 August. Every time. Especially, 1970-1971.

posted November 14, 2015 06:51 PM            

My connections with her have moved beyond hypnagogic. Lucid dreaming has been an ongoing feature. But in the last year, clairsentient messages have happened with Beauty during full waking state!

I think it's fun trying to correlate what I know about her with astrology and numerology. Certainly my ideas could be wrong. My intuition is highly developed--and she seems to enjoy giving me clues, surprising and delighting me! She's actually provided musical confirmation when I've been focused on LEO placements.

I could stop looking socially. But where would that leave me? Isolated (I live in the country) and not available for physical contact.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Aubyanne:
To be honest with you, comdoc, I'm still rather confused as to what's going on. First off, I think you've said it's been a few years now, yeah? Or was it mostly in 2012? Is it continuing regularly?

Have you made any contact outside of hypnagogic experiences and alleged clairaudience?

Also, I still think it's in error to try and 'guess' the individual's chart. In most cases, you could be wrong, and, in all honesty, it's more of a hindsight sort of thing. Looking back now, his chart makes TOTAL sense to me. But would I have EVER thought Cancer SUN? Aries MOON? Hah! No. I was thinking Scorpio -- all the way. Maybe some Taurus. Virgo. Gemini, even. But a Cancerian?

And, pretty much, since that day, I've decided that looking for them -- and, trying to guess their chart -- is useless.

However, a slightly more 'common' archetype does resonate to 11 August. Every time. Especially, 1970-1971.

Incidentally, I was off by 1-2 years, depending on the 'date' I was using. Perhaps you'd be intrigued by the 'potential' charts I was guessing for him, before we actually met?

---

posted November 14, 2015 08:44 PM            

For me, it's all apophenia until it isn't. You know? I was never looking, though. I never once considered he actually exists. Or was living in my city (well, the city I'd moved to a few years prior).

Also, everything but physical appearance (including age -- well, a narrow, relative range) was wrong. Occupation, location, birthplace -- all wrong. The background history is a match, but not for place names, locations, or specific organisational, institutional, or even occupational details.

posted November 14, 2015 09:59 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Aubyanne:
Hey, if you're having fun, that's all that matters, right?

I'm enjoying my life and journey, irregardless of my present conditions.

For me, it's all apophenia until it isn't. You know?

It's only apophenia if one looks for meaning in random events. Synchronicities do not qualify. You know? My life is filled with synchronous events: I watch for them! If you listen, the Universe is always communicating.

I was never looking, though. I never once considered he actually exists. Or was living in my city (well, the city I'd moved to a few years prior).

Also, everything but physical appearance (including age -- well, a narrow, relative range) was wrong. Occupation, location, birthplace -- all wrong. The background history is a match, but not for place names, locations, or specific organisational, institutional, or even occupational details.

All of that proved incorrect, going merely by the information I had 'collected' over time. (9 years).

---

I do understand your point. Some things are ineffable. Astrology and human intellect only go so far. For me personally, my intuition trumps all analytical methods. Yet I still use them, as far as they do go. Systems analysis intrigues me personally. While Tantric sacred sexualove totally blows my mind!

Heart knows, while mind conjectures. No need to search for something that's already manifested. If my dream mate "Beauty" physically walked into my life now, I would stop searching.

posted November 14, 2015 11:32 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by comdoc:
If my dream mate "Beauty" physically walked into my life now, I would stop searching.

---

Just saying. I never looked. Never even thought to look. And we'll have known each other for 6 years in January, and been together for 2 since this past Hallowe'en. Granted, it's only been 3 years for you, but still.

posted November 15, 2015 12:20 AM            

Former fiance was one of over 100 who responded to my matrimonial ad. First meeting was love at first sight. Two wonderful months later, she proposed.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Aubyanne:
Just saying. I never looked. Never even thought to look. And we'll have known each other for 6 years in January, and been together for 2 since this past Hallowe'en. Granted, it's only been 3 years for you, but still.

Maybe you should get out more. Maybe you'll just know when you're going to meet her.

---

Perhaps I should get out more. Meeting eligible girls has been a challenge.