Lindaland
  Interpersonal Astrology
  Energy Direction of Quindeciles (165˚) in Synastry

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Energy Direction of Quindeciles (165˚) in Synastry
NxNW
Newflake

Posts: 18
From: nyc
Registered: May 2020

posted May 29, 2020 09:08 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for NxNW     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
There are several threads on Quindeciles (165˚, the so-called "obsession" aspect) on this forum already but most of them focus on this aspect in natal charts.

I have lots of them in my natal and a few in synastry with a current crush.

I'm really curious about how the energy flow works with Qds...is the energy reciprocal, who feels what?

His Pluto (Sco)Qd my Sun (Tau)
His Sun (Tau) Qd my Jupiter & Uranus (Sag)
His Mars (Gem) Qd my Jupiter (Sag)

We already have other aspects in our synastry that give rise to super charged chemistry (Moon/Mars/Venus/Pluto/Eros/Nodal stuff) but I just learned about Quindeciles and am so curious!

For some reason, I get the sense that the "Qd obsession" is less sexual and more focused on directing energies toward achieving something together? I read an article about how Tom Cruise and Kate Holmes' Suns were Qd and they seemed super determined to build a very public image of their marriage (allegedly a "contract marriage" if you believe the gossip)...

Anyway, I want to hear your experiences please!

IP: Logged

outofideas
Knowflake

Posts: 638
From:
Registered: Jul 2014

posted May 29, 2020 02:00 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for outofideas     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I've been wondering about Qd in synastry too.

Someone's Mercury and Venus are Qd to my Ascendant and made me wonder if this would mean they think about me a lot and find me beautiful.

IP: Logged

Graham
Knowflake

Posts: 1087
From:
Registered: Apr 2019

posted May 29, 2020 05:12 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Graham     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Is the aspect waxing ... or is it waning?
And ... is it within an orb of 15 arc minutes?

[The faster planet in the pair will be learning from the slower, if the aspect is waxing ... but exemplifying the already learned lesson if the aspect is waning.

And ... John Addey's research on harmonics indicated that an orb of no more than 30 arc minutes is valid for the 24th harmonic aspect in natal charts - but, in synastry, this orb should be halved to offset the fact that twice as many planets are involved.]

Moreover ... My own experience with this aspect indicates that (as you state) it produces an intense focus rather than an obsession. But, in synastry, that each planet/person will be focused upon the undesirable characteristics of the other planet that he/she is projecting on to the other person.

IP: Logged

NxNW
Newflake

Posts: 18
From: nyc
Registered: May 2020

posted May 30, 2020 01:55 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for NxNW     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Graham:
John Addey's research on harmonics indicated that an orb of no more than 30 arc minutes is valid for the 24th harmonic aspect in natal charts - but, in synastry, this orb should be halved to offset the fact that twice as many planets are involved.

This is so interesting! B/c I had read that a 2˚orb was permitted...

And the manifesting the negative characteristics part is also interesting. I haven't come across any info on that!

I know Ricki Reeves has a book on Qd but I don't have access to that. Found a few free pages on gbooks but those segments have already been reposted on various discussion threads...

IP: Logged

Graham
Knowflake

Posts: 1087
From:
Registered: Apr 2019

posted May 31, 2020 11:22 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Graham     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by NxNW:
This is so interesting! B/c I had read that a 2˚orb was permitted...

And the manifesting the negative characteristics part is also interesting. I haven't come across any info on that!

I know Ricki Reeves has a book on Qd but I don't have access to that. Found a few free pages on gbooks but those segments have already been reposted on various discussion threads...



I have the RR book, and she uses an orb of 2 degrees either side of exact for natal aspects ... which I would halve for synastry aspects.

She also states therein that "all astrologers have their own opinions and rules regarding the amount of orb to allow for any given planetary relationship. I like to keep orbs very small. When synthesising the various components of a horoscope, I like to focus on things that are of major impact in the individual's life. Wide orbs tend to give more information, but with less specific focus on the dynamics of the individual's life."

In harmonics ... An exact 165 aspect = 24th harmonic, and an exact 164 aspect = 90th harmonic ... So, an orb of 30 arc minutes either side of exact of 165 means the aspect is no longer a quindecile before 164:30 or after 165:30.
_________________________________________________________________

quote:
And the manifesting the negative characteristics part is also interesting. I haven't come across any info on that!

This is based upon my personal observations/experiences, with a Moon-in-Cancer/10th 166 Mars-in-Sagittarius/3rd natal contact (so outside my suggested orb, but within that of RR).

However, I have tested this using the charts of other people that have a quindecile within my suggested orb - and my conclusion (about projection) does appear to be valid, both in synastry and natal charts. Moreover, those who have this aspect in the natal chart tend to project the negative qualities of BOTH planets in synastry. ... So, someone with a planet quindecile my Moon will be seen (by me) as "uncaring" - and someone with a planet quindecile my Mars will be seen (by me) as "under-achieving" ... (because, my natal Moon-Mars is strongly focused upon learning to find the correct balance between protecting and developing others).

But, until now, it has not occurred to me that my own "projection of the negative" might be because natal Moon-Mars are in a waxing relationship ... so waning 165 aspects might "project the positive" (because the faster-moving planet is now conscious of the lesson it is being taught by the slower-moving planet)

IP: Logged

NxNW
Newflake

Posts: 18
From: nyc
Registered: May 2020

posted May 31, 2020 02:33 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for NxNW     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thank you so much for all your additional insight!

quote:
But, until now, it has not occurred to me that my own "projection of the negative" might be because natal Moon-Mars are in a waxing relationship ... so waning 165 aspects might "project the positive" (because the faster-moving planet is now conscious of the lesson it is being taught by the slower-moving planet)

Terribly sorry but I'm still very much a novice and am not quite clear on what is considered a "waxing/waning" aspect? (I only know those terms when applied to moon phases...)

IP: Logged

Graham
Knowflake

Posts: 1087
From:
Registered: Apr 2019

posted May 31, 2020 05:38 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Graham     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by NxNW:
Thank you so much for all your additional insight!

Terribly sorry but I'm still very much a novice and am not quite clear on what is considered a "waxing/waning" aspect? (I only know those terms when applied to moon phases...)



Every planet except Pluto (the slowest moving of them) circles around the planets that move more slowly than itself. When the faster moving planet is between the conjunction and the opposition, it is waxing. When between the opposition and the conjunction it is waning.

Hence, when the faster moving moon is at 0 to 180 degrees of it's cycle around the sun, it is waxing ... And when at 181 to 360 degrees of that cycle, it is waning.

When at the 180 degrees point of opposition, the moon is fully visible ... So, the opposition degree of each planetary cycle symbolises the point at which the faster moving planet becomes fully enlightened by the slower moving planet - ie when it becomes fully aware of the lesson being taught by the slower-moving planet.

And, because the slower-mover is teaching the faster-mover, the convention is to refer to the former as "shaping" the later.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright 2020

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a