Author
|
Topic: Davison chart
|
Graham unregistered
|
posted September 14, 2020 02:38 AM
I can see the chart images again now ... So, in chart 2 (uncorrected davison) :-IC = opposite MC = 15Cancer56'55'' = 15deg56'55" TN = 20Aries51'48" = 20deg51'48" 20deg51'48" MINUS 15deg56'55" = 4deg54'53" IP: Logged |
CardinalT-Square Knowflake Posts: 408 From: Registered: Aug 2017
|
posted September 14, 2020 04:19 AM
quote: Originally posted by Graham: Originally posted by Saggy7 :- Square = 90 deg ... Sextile = 60 deg ... trine = 120 deg So ... IC makes a square with any planets/points that are 90 deg away from it (clockwise and anti-clockwise) ... a sextile with those that are 60 deg away from it ... and a trine with those that are 120 deg away from it. Aspects never exceed 180 deg (opposition) - because they are calculated in both directions (clockwise and anticlockwise). So, there is no 270 deg square; 240/300 deg sextile or 240 deg trine ... Instead, the aspect is referred to as "waxing" or "waning" - with waxing indicating that the faster moving planet is applying to the (180) opposition point and waning indicating that it is separating from the opposition point.
Would this apply to Sun and Uranus as well? I have Sun bi-quintile Uranus in the Davison Chart with someone that I'm trying to understand our potential relationship with.
IP: Logged |
Graham unregistered
|
posted September 14, 2020 04:33 AM
quote: Originally posted by CardinalT-Square :
quote: Originally posted by Graham:Square = 90 deg ... Sextile = 60 deg ... trine = 120 deg So ... IC makes a square with any planets/points that are 90 deg away from it (clockwise and anti-clockwise) ... a sextile with those that are 60 deg away from it ... and a trine with those that are 120 deg away from it. Aspects never exceed 180 deg (opposition) - because they are calculated in both directions (clockwise and anticlockwise). So, there is no 270 deg square; 240/300 deg sextile or 240 deg trine ... Instead, the aspect is referred to as "waxing" or "waning" - with waxing indicating that the faster moving planet is applying to the (180) opposition point and waning indicating that it is separating from the opposition point.
quote: Originally posted by CardinaiT-Square :
quote: Would this apply to Sun and Uranus as well? I have Sun bi-quintile Uranus in the Davison Chart with someone that I'm trying to understand our potential relationship with.
Yes ... Sun-144-Uranus is waxing if Sun is approaching its opposition to Uranus, and waning if it is past that 180 degree point in the Sun-Uranus cycle. And ... as you may already know ... waxing = learning the lesson whilst waning = walking-the-walk, after having learned the lesson. ... (Opposition point/180 +00::00:01 = lesson finally learned) IP: Logged |
Saggy7 Knowflake Posts: 832 From: Registered: Sep 2019
|
posted September 14, 2020 04:41 AM
Thank you Graham, for all the useful info and tools! If I think of anything else, I'll come back to this!  IP: Logged |
Graham unregistered
|
posted September 14, 2020 05:18 AM
quote: Originally posted by Saggy7: Thank you Graham, for all the useful info and tools! If I think of anything else, I'll come back to this! 
Having recently been informed that the astrology boards of this forum are not a place to discuss a particular core belief of mine, I may have become "an old member that faded away" before you return to this thread. If so ... be sure to look into the "interceptions and duplications" of this davison chart. 
IP: Logged |
Saggy7 Knowflake Posts: 832 From: Registered: Sep 2019
|
posted September 14, 2020 06:02 AM
Graham, please don't tell me that! We need you here and I think your approach is unique and interesting. I personally feed off of positivity and I value your, what I find to be, optimistic outlook on things. Would this mean you would not be allowed to post anymore? Can we help somehow to vote against it? I think all opinions/perspectives matter. Especially on forums. You are not being mean/malicious/rude to anyone.. IP: Logged |
Saggy7 Knowflake Posts: 832 From: Registered: Sep 2019
|
posted September 14, 2020 06:38 AM
I found a few articles explaining what certain duplicated/intercepted sign/house combinations mean, just will have trouble figuring out which signs/houses those are hereEdit: came across a really good article explaining it step by step so I think I'll be able to figure things out  IP: Logged |
Saggy7 Knowflake Posts: 832 From: Registered: Sep 2019
|
posted September 14, 2020 07:04 AM
Scorpio/7th house is intercepted! since the opposite house is automatically intercepted as well, it is 1st/Taurus..so we have a Taurus-Scorpio interception! Yay this felt good lol I feel mini accomplished )Will continue digging  So the problem areas are presenting yourself (1st) and partnerships(7th) Found this: Taurus – Scorpio Intercepted Finishing things can be a struggle. There is a tendency to accumulate things in the areas of life defined by the House Taurus is contained within. Letting go of things in the areas of life defined by the House Scorpio is contained within is also a struggle. IP: Logged |
Graham unregistered
|
posted September 14, 2020 07:21 AM
quote: Originally posted by Saggy7: Graham, please don't tell me that! We need you here and I think your approach is unique and interesting. I personally feed off of positivity and I value your, what I find to be, optimistic outlook on things. Would this mean you would not be allowed to post anymore? Can we help somehow to vote against it? I think all opinions/perspectives matter. Especially on forums. You are not being mean/malicious/rude to anyone.. Edit: I tried googling, but can't find much. Can you give me a few more hints please? On interceptions/duplicates ... is it signs or houses?
I shall still be here (and probably posting), but spending less time doing so - as a Psychological Astrology website/forum is probably a more appropriate place to discuss my core beliefs. If you search for Graham Interceptions in the LL search engine, it will probably turn up some of my past comments on interceptions/duplicates. ... However, you only need the following mantra :- "A problem in the house within the duplicated cusps is adversely affecting the affairs of the next house - in a way that (until resolved) will prevent the positive qualities of the intercepted signs (and any planets within them) from being used effectively." In your uncorrected davison chart, that would be :-
"A problem in the 2nd+8th house is adversely affecting the activities of the 3rd+9th house - in a way that is preventing effective use being made of the positive qualities of Taurus, Scorpio, Sun, Moon, Mercury, Venus and Pluto."
IP: Logged |
Saggy7 Knowflake Posts: 832 From: Registered: Sep 2019
|
posted September 14, 2020 08:00 AM
Understood.https://cafeastrology.com/articles/how-to-understand-read-chart-wheel.html I used this link, I thought the sign on the wheel has to be right in the middle between the lines to be considered intercepted and only the 1st/7th looked that way to me:/ Apparently got it wrong... I'll look more into it But Graham, Sun Moon Mercury Venus and Pluto are all in the 7th house? And also 1st house is in Taurus? Are you sure you didn't mean 1st/7th affecting 2nd and 8th?
IP: Logged |
Graham unregistered
|
posted September 14, 2020 12:25 PM
quote: Originally posted by Saggy7: Understood.https://cafeastrology.com/articles/how-to-understand-read-chart-wheel.html I used this link, I thought the sign on the wheel has to be right in the middle between the lines to be considered intercepted and only the 1st/7th looked that way to me:/ Apparently got it wrong... I'll look more into it But Graham, Sun Moon Mercury Venus and Pluto are all in the 7th house? And also 1st house is in Taurus? Are you sure you didn't mean 1st/7th affecting 2nd and 8th?
Sun Moon Mercury Venus and Pluto are all in the intercepted sign of Scorpio, so are also intercepted. No ... I meant 2/8 problem is affecting 3/9 house. And ... a sign is intercepted if it does not contain a house cusp. ... So the house cusps on either side of the sign do not need to be of equal distance from the sign cusps. IP: Logged |
vansio Knowflake Posts: 2514 From: the outskirts of Delphi Registered: Dec 2017
|
posted April 15, 2023 05:54 AM
quote: Originally posted by CardinalT-Square: Use "Davison Ref. Place Method" under experimental, and set the person with the location closest to where you both first met first in the comparison. It's by far the most accurate, especially if you've had both natals rectified.
IP: Logged |