posted September 10, 2020 08:58 PM            

Takes initiative, self-aware, analytical, steadfast, likes exploring ideas, sensitive, conscious of their own wounds around sexuality & open to receiving ...

You may be prone to falling for men who operate with more aggressive energy than you need because you think they’re the only ones who can match your intensity but I think you could benefit from being open to considering men who don’t necessarily immediately exude an overabundance of raw male energy ... remain open to a connection which is more of a slow burn, take your time, & let them take the initiative in a way that is more grounding for you, & not necessarily as immediately intense or exciting as you may be unconsciously expecting

posted September 11, 2020 12:15 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by livvywatermonkey:
Someone secure, grounding, steady, cautious, willing to communicate,

Takes initiative, self-aware, analytical, steadfast, likes exploring ideas, sensitive, conscious of their own wounds around sexuality & open to receiving ...

You may be prone to falling for men who operate with more aggressive energy than you need because you think they’re the only ones who can match your intensity but I think you could benefit from being open to considering men who don’t necessarily immediately exude an overabundance of raw male energy ... remain open to a connection which is more of a slow burn, take your time, & let them take the initiative in a way that is more grounding for you, & not necessarily as immediately intense or exciting as you may be unconsciously expecting

That’s my intuitions right off the bat, let me know what you think even if it doesn’t resonate. xx

---

Hi livvy!

That sounds like a lot of Earth, maybe some water and just a bit of fire?

You are right about me wanting intensity, I actually don't pursue anything with a man if that lacks. So I don't know what it is like to have a slow burn connection with someone. I have to feel a strong pull.. that's how it's been so far.

I think I may also be too used to ups and downs (emotionally), which is probably bad and maybe like you said someone to calm me and ground me in those situations would be good for me..

posted September 11, 2020 12:22 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by comdoc:
Super Taurus Sun, Venus, Moon, ASC with Aries Mercury. Check out May 3, 1973--an OX year which fits the Taurus energy theme. His Capricorn NN contacts your Neptune. Your ONE Birthpaths could resonate. Caveats: you both would need to be learning to cooperate with each other, and be open to age gap. Power couple, Dynamic Duo.

---

Hi comdoc!

Interesting, I have never dated a Taurus before! I have a few in my family and we seem like polar opposites, we don't see eye to eye on a lot of things. There are some things I appreciate about them of course, just not sure if I could imagine myself with one especially with all that Taurus (Sun, Venus, Moon and ASC!)

Are you saying OX is good for me?? Last guy I dated was an OX also! And one of my exes is a life path 1 like me, and there was too much clashing and power struggles..

And age gap... yes, I am normally not attracted to older men, I stay around my age group!

posted September 11, 2020 08:10 PM            

You asked for a partner; 7th House describes your natural partner. What do you want in a life partner?

Your best close-in-age animal resonance are with:

1988 Dragon. Best Birthpath is 6. 4/3/88? Aries Sun, Libra or Scorp Moon. Taurus Venus conj your 7H Cupid.

1984 Rat: 3/26/84? Aries Sun, Cap Moon conj your Venus.

posted September 11, 2020 08:26 PM            

Maybe a man with Capricorn Moon & Sun/Pluto conjunction could be a good fit - having a natural intensity yet also cautiousness & not giving way too easily too quickly so the connection doesn’t “flame out” when physical connection progresses into getting more emotionally connected with each other - ie where the emotional connection builds consciously & gradually, giving you space to decide too if he really does have the traits you want in a partner, instead of attracting you with the appearance or promise of an emotionally intense connection which he ends up not being able to sustain?

posted September 12, 2020 04:40 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by comdoc:
Hi Saggy!

You asked for a partner; 7th House describes your natural partner. What do you want in a life partner?

Your best close-in-age animal resonance are with:

1988 Dragon. Best Birthpath is 6. 4/3/88? Aries Sun, Libra or Scorp Moon. Taurus Venus conj your 7H Cupid.

1984 Rat: 3/26/84? Aries Sun, Cap Moon conj your Venus.

---

There are things I appreciate in a Taurus (earthy signs in general), stability, reliability and such if positively aspected...however, I could see myself getting pretty bored if they have no fire/excitement aspects in them.. so I like your suggestions with Aries Sun much better.. would definitely need something to spice things up a bit, especially in the long run...

Why a number 6 if you don't mind elaborating?

From my, not so extensive research, I found that 3 and 5 are apparently best for me as a number 1? And possibly 7 and 9, but less likely.

Funnily enough, I have only been involved with other uneven numbers (1,3,5 and 7!)

posted September 12, 2020 05:01 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by livvywatermonkey:
I’m not sure but maybe guys with hard Moon/Saturn aspects & fire Mars are less likely to be a good fit, unless they have matured significantly, since they may have issues with relating to you intensely on an emotional level even if they have a kind of sexual magnetism which draws you in & makes you feel like they could match your intense way of being in the world ...

Maybe a man with Capricorn Moon & Sun/Pluto conjunction could be a good fit - having a natural intensity yet also cautiousness & not giving way too easily too quickly so the connection doesn’t “flame out” when physical connection progresses into getting more emotionally connected with each other - ie where the emotional connection builds consciously & gradually, giving you space to decide too if he really does have the traits you want in a partner, instead of attracting you with the appearance or promise of an emotionally intense connection which he ends up not being able to sustain?

I’m really just guessing though

---

The last guy was the only Moon-Saturn guy I dated. He has an Earth Mars though.
I did date Fire Mars in the past.

Capricorn Moon I don't have experience with...I do have a couple girl friends with this placement, not sure how it could play out with a partner. They seem to be not emotional/intense enough for me, but other aspects in their chart might help with this..or should I say I see the emotion come out at times, but they definitely don't wear it on their sleeve like I do and they seem incapable to fully relate to me on this level (they are both Virgo Suns)

I will check my ex's natals and see if any one of them had Sun conjunct Pluto, I'm curious to see this.

The last part resonates, I was attracted with a "false" promise of intensity a couple times...it continued to be intense, but not in a desirable way, rather in a painful/unstable way

How about people with Venus/Pluto aspects? I noticed they tend to have similar intensity like myself at times. Even though I don't have this aspect natally.

posted September 12, 2020 08:06 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by CardinalT-Square:
Is your chart rectified? Their is more to it than just a time on a piece of paper.

---

According to my Mom and my birth certificate 100%. I even asked her what are the chances that they rounded it up, she said none lol