|
Author
|
Topic: is she inlove with me?
|
nikki01
Knowflake Posts: 234
From: neptune
Registered: Feb 2012
|
posted February 05, 2015 07:04 AM
  
deletedIP: Logged |
appleberry
Knowflake Posts: 1641
From: Venusian, w/Cancer MC
Registered: Jun 2011
|
posted February 05, 2015 08:56 PM
You asked this question in 1982?The birth data should be when the question was born... IP: Logged |
appleberry
Knowflake Posts: 1641
From: Venusian, w/Cancer MC
Registered: Jun 2011
|
posted February 05, 2015 08:58 PM
Ask the synastry question in Personal Readings, there you will find people who focus on that area of practice....IP: Logged |
nikki01
Knowflake Posts: 234
From: neptune
Registered: Feb 2012
|
posted February 06, 2015 12:24 AM
quote:
Originally posted by appleberry:
You asked this question in 1982?The birth data should be when the question was born...
Im so sorry new at horary will repost, i am planning on a confession after mercury retrogade. i am just so nervous looking for some universal assistance IP: Logged |
nikki01
Knowflake Posts: 234
From: neptune
Registered: Feb 2012
|
posted February 06, 2015 12:33 AM
deletedIP: Logged |
hannaramaa
Moderator Posts: 9423
From:
Registered: Nov 2011
|
posted February 06, 2015 01:04 AM
I'm so sorry to tell you this and make you do another chart over but what I would do is stick with the time in the first horary which I think was 6:40 pm. and just change the day / year. This chart you just posted has the ASC at too early degrees but I don't think it should count against you since all you did was get the year wrong on the first horary.IP: Logged |
nikki01
Knowflake Posts: 234
From: neptune
Registered: Feb 2012
|
posted February 06, 2015 01:07 AM
quote:
Originally posted by hannaramaa:
I'm so sorry to tell you this and make you do another chart over but what I would do is stick with the time in the first horary which I think was 6:40 pm. and just change the day / year. This chart you just posted has the ASC at too early degrees but I don't think it should count against you since all you did was get the year wrong on the first horary.
no problem at all, 6:40 was my birth time in the 1st chart, the time i used in the 2nd was the time i draw the chart yesterday.
IP: Logged |
nikki01
Knowflake Posts: 234
From: neptune
Registered: Feb 2012
|
posted February 06, 2015 01:41 AM
quote:
Originally posted by hannaramaa:
I'm so sorry to tell you this and make you do another chart over but what I would do is stick with the time in the first horary which I think was 6:40 pm. and just change the day / year. This chart you just posted has the ASC at too early degrees but I don't think it should count against you since all you did was get the year wrong on the first horary.
what i did was use my birth details in the first chart, actually drew the chart 5th feb at 7am, i am so sorry for the confusion. IP: Logged |
hannaramaa
Moderator Posts: 9423
From:
Registered: Nov 2011
|
posted February 06, 2015 01:54 AM
Oh okay then yeah the ASC is at 1 degree which means it's too early to answer. Have you asked this question a lot, because that can be problematic for an accurate horary. I find horary charts are the most accurate when they're genuinely drawn meaning its not being done with a set answer already in mind or out of anxiousness.IP: Logged |
nikki01
Knowflake Posts: 234
From: neptune
Registered: Feb 2012
|
posted February 06, 2015 02:11 AM
deleteIP: Logged |
nikki01
Knowflake Posts: 234
From: neptune
Registered: Feb 2012
|
posted February 06, 2015 02:17 AM
quote:
Originally posted by hannaramaa:
Oh okay then yeah the ASC is at 1 degree which means it's too early to answer. Have you asked this question a lot, because that can be problematic for an accurate horary. I find horary charts are the most accurate when they're genuinely drawn meaning its not being done with a set answer already in mind or out of anxiousness.
IP: Logged |
hannaramaa
Moderator Posts: 9423
From:
Registered: Nov 2011
|
posted February 06, 2015 07:02 AM
Yes because it's early at 1 degrees it means your question can't be answered. A chart has to meet a certain standard of requirements for it to be "answerable" for lack of a better term.IP: Logged |
nikki01
Knowflake Posts: 234
From: neptune
Registered: Feb 2012
|
posted February 06, 2015 09:42 AM
deleted IP: Logged |
Lindaland
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
