Lindaland
  Lindaland Central
  Mother who gave pot to toddler sentenced

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Mother who gave pot to toddler sentenced
LibraSparkle
Knowflake

Posts: 6034
From: Vancouver USA
Registered: May 2004

posted August 05, 2005 11:04 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for LibraSparkle     Edit/Delete Message
Are you kidding me?!


Mother who gave pot to toddler sentenced

By CLAIR JOHNSON - Billings Gazette Staff - 8/05/05

Calling the crime ‘‘repugnant,'' a federal judge Wednesday sentenced a former Gardiner woman to five years in prison for encouraging her toddler daughter to smoke marijuana.

‘‘Sixty months is an appropriate sentence in this case,'' Senior U.S. District Judge Jack Shanstrom told Jessica Lynne Durham, 24, currently of Washington.

U.S. District Judge Richard Cebull found Durham guilty in January of distributing marijuana to a person under the age of 18. Cebull's verdict came after a one-day trial on Oct. 27.

A key prosecution witness was Brandi Nichols, an admitted drug user who turned Durham in after taking photographs of her holding a water pipe while her 18-month-old daughter put her mouth over the top. The water pipe, called a bong, allows smoke to be drawn through water into a glass tube and inhaled.

Nichols gave law enforcement the photographs, which were admitted as evidence.

The incident occurred in February 2004 as Nichols was helping Durham move from Gardiner to Washington with her mother. Nichols testified that she entered Durham's residence, hugged the toddler and sat on the couch. On the floor next to the couch was a 2-foot bong.

Nichols said the toddler ran for the bong. When she tried to waive the toddler away, the child threw a fit.

Durham told Nichols that her daughter wanted the bong and proceeded to light the residue in the pipe. Durham sucked marijuana smoke into the pipe and gave the bong to her daughter, Nichols testified. ‘‘She (the toddler) put her mouth on it and took a big hit,'' she said.

Nichols then took a turn inhaling from the pipe, Durham smoked again and gave her baby the pipe again. Nichols testified she got a buzz from the smoke, went outside and got sick. ‘‘I was freaking out,'' she said.

Nichols went home and talked to her boyfriend about what had happened. He told her to return with a camera and take pictures because ‘‘nobody would believe us,'' she said. Nichols went back to Durham's with a camera and took pictures.

Durham did not testify at trial and the defense called no witnesses. She said nothing at her sentencing.

Federal defender Zachary Cain urged Shanstrom to sentence Durham to a year of probation with her conviction to be vacated if she successfully completed the term. He said the statute that applied dealt with personal-use quantities and that the maximum sentence by law was two years.

Cain further argued that no quantity of marijuana had been established and no tests were conducted on the residue. Tests on the child within days of the incident were negative for marijuana, he said.

Durham has been in drug treatment and has taken classes on domestic violence and parenting, Cain said.

Durham's daughter is in foster care, but Durham is working on getting her parental rights restored, Cain said.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Marcia Hurd said Durham deserved the maximum punishment, which in her interpretation of the law was 10 years in prison.

Durham admitted the offense to law enforcement officers and told them that smoking pot helped her daughter's appetite, Hurd said. Durham called her daughter ‘‘a little stoner,'' she said.

Shanstrom calculated a sentencing guideline range of 78 months to 97 months, which reflected enhancements because the child was very young and vulnerable, then sentenced Durham to five years in prison.

‘‘Jessica, this is a statute that is confusing, but I think punishment is necessary. The crime is one that is just repugnant,'' Shanstrom said. ‘‘You got a break to a certain extent.''

The judge allowed Durham to surrender to prison. She is appealing her case.
http://www.helenair.com/articles/2005/08/05/montana/c02080505_02.txt

IP: Logged

lovely*
Knowflake

Posts: 2141
From: CA
Registered: Jul 2003

posted August 05, 2005 11:17 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for lovely*     Edit/Delete Message
oh boy..

i'm wondering why they didn't find any traces in the toddlers blood though. i thought pot was supposed to stick around in the system for 30 days or longer. if this woman had a good lawyer they would have no other choice but to drop the charges.

still.. its distgusting

IP: Logged

trillian
Knowflake

Posts: 4050
From: The Boundless
Registered: Mar 2003

posted August 06, 2005 02:38 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for trillian     Edit/Delete Message
Exactly, lovely. Tests that turned out negative are pretty strong evidence that there was, indeed, no pot in her system.

I'm not crazy about the idea of a mother giving pot to her daughter at all, and I'm not condoning it in the least, but frankly, there's more poison at McDonald's than in a hit off a bong.

What an amazing world we live in.

IP: Logged

Saturn's Child
Knowflake

Posts: 867
From: Just left of center
Registered: May 2004

posted August 06, 2005 05:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Saturn's Child     Edit/Delete Message
Wow...I'm not sure how they convicted her with no evidence of the pot in the child's blood.....must have had a really bad lawyer!!
What was she thinking??? Or was she??

IP: Logged

Petron
Knowflake

Posts: 3031
From: Paradise
Registered: Mar 2004

posted August 06, 2005 05:48 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Petron     Edit/Delete Message
it says there is.....

1)a photo of the mother holding the pipe to the childs mouth

2)a witness

3)a statement to an officer

thats more than enough evidence......it sounds to me like this was something she did repeatedly.....

IP: Logged

lovely*
Knowflake

Posts: 2141
From: CA
Registered: Jul 2003

posted August 06, 2005 06:13 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for lovely*     Edit/Delete Message
quote:
it says there is.....
1)a photo of the mother holding the pipe to the childs mouth

2)a witness

3)a statement to an officer


1. a photo could prove poor judgement, but necessarily prove the child ingested anything.

2. witnesses can be discredited very easily especially an admitted drug user making the accusation.

3. false statements are filed everyday and this goes with number 2..

just a side note.. what about mothers who ingest cocain and then breastfeed thier children. i'm wondering what child-endangerment laws are in place since most drugs are passed through mothers milk. i've never heard of a crack addicted mother convicted of harming her unborn fetus either.

like trillian, i'm not condoning the behaviour, just pointing to worse offenses where there are virtually no legal ramifications.

IP: Logged

Petron
Knowflake

Posts: 3031
From: Paradise
Registered: Mar 2004

posted August 06, 2005 07:40 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Petron     Edit/Delete Message
the witness was the 1 who took the picture and reported this to law enforcement, who could discredit that?

the statement to the officer was made by the mother

quote:
Durham admitted the offense to law enforcement officers and told them that smoking pot helped her daughter's appetite

if this was something she did regularly then she should have gotten the full 10 years...


********
Thirteen states have laws specifying that a baby born exposed to drugs is presumed to be abused or neglected and that such a condition provides grounds for removing the infant from the mother's custody, according to a report released earlier this month by the Guttmacher Institute, a Washington, D.C., non-profit for sexual and reproductive health research.

Another state, South Carolina, holds that a woman's prenatal substance abuse constitutes criminal child abuse.
http://www.azcentral.com/specials/special46/articles/0823crackfolo.html
********
http://www.mapinc.org/napwnews/v01/n894/a10.html

IP: Logged

Petron
Knowflake

Posts: 3031
From: Paradise
Registered: Mar 2004

posted August 06, 2005 07:54 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Petron     Edit/Delete Message
furthermore its not uncommon to get a false negative result from a marijuana screening, simply drinking alot of water can fool the test depending on how much was in the system and how sensative the test administered.....

IP: Logged

WaterNymph
Knowflake

Posts: 2276
From: London, UK
Registered: May 2005

posted August 07, 2005 09:55 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for WaterNymph     Edit/Delete Message
“Tests on the child within days of the incident were negative for marijuana, he said.”

“Durham admitted the offense to law enforcement officers and told them that smoking pot helped her daughter's appetite, Hurd said. Durham called her daughter ‘‘a little stoner,'' she said.”

How can that be? but WAOH!!! @ “helped appetite” & “little stoner”

------------------
aka Neptune’s Mermaid, NM, WN, Nurse Neptune, Waternixie, Nepsnympe and deputy #6

“If you see me with a man understand that you can’t question me
The feelings that you caught ain’t my fault can’t help your jealousy”
- Xtina ;)

IP: Logged

trillian
Knowflake

Posts: 4050
From: The Boundless
Registered: Mar 2003

posted August 08, 2005 09:44 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for trillian     Edit/Delete Message
Photographs don't prove there was ever pot in the bong, pipe or papers. You can see the apparatus in a photograph, but you can't test the contents. There is more than reasonable doubt as to what was actually in there.

IP: Logged

lovely*
Knowflake

Posts: 2141
From: CA
Registered: Jul 2003

posted August 08, 2005 02:22 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for lovely*     Edit/Delete Message
yeah.. the mothers admission of guilt was the most critical piece of evidence, not the photo. not sure the punishment fits the crime tho.

petron, its rare for a mother to serve any time or face criminal charges when taking drugs while pregnant. they may take the child away..temporarily.

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2007

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a