posted July 02, 2007 03:34 PM         

AAAAAA,CCC,D,EEEEE,HHH,II,J,L,M,N,PPP,RRRR,SSS,T,

Could anyone more familiar w/ this possibly do a lexigram for me?PWEASE!!

posted July 08, 2007 11:43 PM         

Being that this Spiritual Art is fairly new to you, may I suggest you start with your very own. Discover yourself... If this is too difficult at first, focus on another such as a grandparent, parent, or friend. But combining as you've done is really quite difficult as you each have your very own stories.
I am not at all surprised to see that you each share eachothers name within your own. This actually is pretty common. In fact here's a funny fact: My father has an entire list of guys names within his own [Guys I've Dated!] He even has the ENTIRE name of my husband FIRST, MIDDLE, and LAST!
[NOTE: This was there 21 years before my birth!]

Remember always that the Last name is representative of the entire family not just that person. A woman who changes her name in marraige does actually change. A nickname used does change the vibrations as well.

I would definately skip the online generator, this does not allow you to follow your spiritual intuitiveness. [Spiraling is a very important process]

When and if, you become ready to innertwine names so to speak. Please do so carefully. Always do these individually first, then omit the things that are personal only to one or the other. Then omit all things you both share. Only combine the things that are created by the two names being combined.
For a relationship lexigram you should only use the words that cannot be found in one name alone, but in both together.

As an example, let's use this one by fayte.m

quote:

---

Romeo Montague
Juliet Capulet

Which at first glance has interesting words to consider as relevant.
ONLY in union, both names put together do they get this:

TRAGIC ROMANCE

Neither has it as individuals.
Neither has it in common.
And in union/together, his NO does not affect their union, because she does not have it in her name alone.
In a compatibility, using only the words they both share and have as individuals, "tragic romance" does not appear. But as a couple, tragedy by way of the Lexigram is revealed. Any positive compatibilty could not save them.

---

Does this make sense?

Here's some more good reading:
No more than 15 letters of the alphabet, and no more than 3 or 4 vowels.
[ Yours Qualifies ]

ELEANORE:

quote:

---

I don't think Linda meant that it was impossible to find words in a name of any length or with any amount of vowels, etc. That would be anagramming and not lexigramming. Star Signs is really a beginner's book for a lot of things and, if you read carefully, Linda never said she invented anything on her own rather she gathered information from various sources and presented them in one simple guide to spirituality. She was adamant about what she believed was the right way to do things but she never said that those right ways were "hers" or that she invented them. Her rules seem rather logical to me as far as lexigramming is concerned which again is completely different from doing an anagram. The point is not to find any and every word that could possibly be formed from the letters in a name. It's to find certain words in a name and then intuitively string them together to find a meaning hidden in the name. There are words that creep up in all sorts of names, like "this". Consequently, all those people also have the word sh*t in their name ... is that undeniably meaningful? I highly doubt it. I think it's important to remember that Linda presented these codes in order to help people safely and simply develop their own intuitive powers while still growing on a spiritual path. Star Signs is a book to be practiced not just to be read. And, as far as developing intuition is concerned, it's important to have certain guidelines to follow. That's all they are ... lines to guide you forward. Her guidelines are meant to be interpreted for a person who is just waking up to the magic of words. If you used a word with that many letters and vowels as a beginner it would surely be a daunting task. It would be easy to get carried away with the number of words you found instead of the intuitive stringing together of them which is the important part. Likewise, I don't believe in using a program to find the words for you. That's like using a calculator for basic functions. If the point is to develop your sense of intuition via lexigrams why would you take a shortcut that stops you from using your intuition about the words you should be picking out of the many words that are possible? For fear that you might miss one? Where is the joy of discovery in that? I've done the same lexigram on numerous different occasions and found words I had originally missed and ended up finding a different perspective later. They were the words my intuition led me to at the time and they provided me with the proper interpretation at the time as well. If I had used a program to find all the words for me then my intuition would only be getting half the exercise that lexigrams can provide. Back to the calculator analogy ... I know plenty of educated people who are not able to multiply 2034 by 45 in their heads. It's not a difficult calculation but it does take practice in order to be able to not depend on tools to do it for you. My nine year old nephew can do it in his head because he doesn't depend on calculators yet. You're not "stupid" if you can't do it in your head, you're just out of practice. And that's what lexigramming is supposed to do; give you the practice you need to stop looking outside of yourself for answers and trust the voice within yourself. Likewise, I agree with Linda as far as words not wanting to tell you things at certain times. It all goes back to the idea of the word druids ... that words are alive, really truly alive. When working on a lexigram you're working with them to find a meaning, not demanding them to display themselves for your convenience or amusement. Likewise, I think it quite possible that certain words may or may not want to be lexigrammed for whatever reason. It's about having respect for words in a way. Many people have no problem with nudity but would balk at the idea of having some stranger strip them down in order to see them more clearly.

---

Now after having said all this [and you having read all this] if you are genuinely working on this and still desire some help. I would be more than happy to help.
Email me the individual names: [ex. STEPHANIE RACHAEL CAMP / JARED CHRIS SPEAR]
yourfriendinspirit@gmail.com [or] myspace it

posted August 24, 2007 09:32 PM         

quote:

---

I've just started learning about this,and was using an online generator and to my surprise...when I lexi'd my name,my love's last name was one possible word.It was the same w/ my name being in his possible lexi's phrases.Here are our letters....(I used first,middle & last names,don't know if that is correct or not)

AAAAAA,CCC,D,EEEEE,HHH,II,J,L,M,N,PPP,RRRR,SSS,T,

---

quote:

---

When and if, you become ready to innertwine names so to speak. Please do so carefully. Always do these individually first, then omit the things that are personal only to one or the other. Then omit all things you both share. Only combine the things that are created by the two names being combined.
For a relationship lexigram you should only use the words that cannot be found in one name alone, but in both together.

As an example, let's use this one by fayte.m

quote:
Romeo Montague
Juliet Capulet

Which at first glance has interesting words to consider as relevant.
ONLY in union, both names put together do they get this:

TRAGIC ROMANCE

Neither has it as individuals.
Neither has it in common.
And in union/together, his NO does not affect their union, because she does not have it in her name alone.
In a compatibility, using only the words they both share and have as individuals, "tragic romance" does not appear. But as a couple, tragedy by way of the Lexigram is revealed. Any positive compatibility could not save them.

Does this make sense?

---

quote:

---

Could anyone more familiar w/ this possibly do a lexigram for me?PWEASE!!

---

quote:

---

I would definately skip the online generator, this does not allow you to follow your spiritual intuitiveness. [Spiraling is a very important process]

---

THE REAL MAGIC OF THE SPIRALING BEGINS ONCE YOU ACQUIRE ALL THE WORDS YOU ARE ABLE TO ACQUIRE, BY ANY MEANS YOU WISH!

------------------