|
Author
|
Topic: Madame Maria Skłodowska Curie
|
fayte.m
Knowflake Posts: 9809
From:
Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted December 25, 2007 01:28 AM
 
A fayte.m/Lexx update to a graphic.
 IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 26177
From: Columbus, GA USA
Registered: Nov 2000
|
posted December 26, 2007 01:46 AM
 ------------------
"There is no use trying," said Alice; "one can't believe impossible things." "I dare say you haven't had much practice," said the Queen. "When I was your age, I always did it for half an hour a day. Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast." Lewis Carroll IP: Logged |
LMB
Knowflake Posts: 801
From: Cooltown, USA
Registered: Dec 2000
|
posted December 26, 2007 03:20 PM
 IP: Logged |
fayte.m
Knowflake Posts: 9809
From:
Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted December 26, 2007 10:09 PM
Thank Randall & LMB!    IP: Logged |
Skyhawk
Knowflake Posts: 122
From: Kansas
Registered: Aug 2007
|
posted December 27, 2007 01:18 AM
Very cool, fayte.m!
IP: Logged |
silverstone
Moderator Posts: 3091
From:
Registered: Mar 2006
|
posted December 27, 2007 02:42 AM
 ------------------
Between the woods and frozen lake
The darkest evening of the year....
The only other sound's the sweep
Of easy wind and downy flake.
The woods are lovely, dark, and deep,
But I have promises to keep,
And miles to go before I sleep,
And miles to go before I sleep. ~Robert Frost IP: Logged |
fayte.m
Knowflake Posts: 9809
From:
Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted December 27, 2007 03:02 AM
Skyhawk & Silverstone!
Thank You!  For anyone who is not familiar with her,
see:
http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum2/HTML/001987-4.html
A link about her!
(a fellow Scorpio!) http://www.aip.org/history/curie/
Another at:
Wiki link about her at : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Curie IP: Logged |
Pumpkin Peace
Knowflake Posts: 43
From:
Registered: Sep 2007
|
posted January 13, 2008 11:51 PM
I don't mean to burst any bubbles after such an interesting discovery in lexigrams, but I just wanted to point out one of the lexigramming rules that states that the word, phrase, or entity being lexigrammed cannot contain more than four of the five vowels. That name happens to contain them all.
Of course, that doesn't stop the truth, and I'm sure those things are true about her. I just wanted to let you know.  IP: Logged |
fayte.m
Knowflake Posts: 9809
From:
Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted January 14, 2008 08:58 AM
quote:
I don't mean to burst any bubbles after such an interesting discovery in lexigrams, but I just wanted to point out one of the lexigramming rules that states that the word, phrase, or entity being lexigrammed cannot contain more than four of the five vowels. That name happens to contain them all.
Of course, that doesn't stop the truth, and I'm sure those things are true about her. I just wanted to let you know.
No bubbles burst here!
And I am sorry to burst your bubble dear  .....
but as much as I adore Linda , she was, based on my own personal experience of doing Lexigrams, before her, and for longer...Well sorry but she was wrong.
And I can prove it if you are interested.
I have written extensively here at Lexigram magic and backed up my claims.
If you wish to go on doing them in an unnecessaryly limited fashion, by all means do so.
But my over 40 years experience with doing them has shown me otherwise.
I was doing them before Linda, but I unfortunately did not write a book so most everyone took her word for how it should be done, because she wrote a book.
Even she admits to not being the end all to be all.
People were Lexigramming long before her and she made many claims that are simply untrue when it came to Lexigramming.
Like only able to be done in English.
That is untrue also.
But I see you are a newbie and have not read my arguments on the issue. 
I have bumped a few threads for you to ponder if you desire to do so.
Linda made many greivious errors in her Lexigrams too. May folks are unaware of that fact.
Why the errors were left in her book remains a mystery to me.
Continued next post....
IP: Logged |
fayte.m
Knowflake Posts: 9809
From:
Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted January 14, 2008 09:01 AM
To continue with Linda's own words on the matter of "her personal rules and truths", which many have taken to heart as Linda's way is the only way!
That is NOT what Linda said!
xxxviii  INTRODUCTION
quote:
Neither should you blindly accept, on your quest for truth, the validity of the star sign codes of the Universe I offer in this book-until you have practiced and carefully tested each one, so that you can decide for yourself rather than take my word for it.
To continue, in Linda's own words:
xl INTRODUCTION
quote:
However, I do not ask-nor do I even expect-any of you to regard my concepts as your truth, unless they should happen to agree with your own personal enlightenment and private convictions.
Concerning truth:
INTRODUCTION xli
quote:
But real Truth can be found in one place only-in every man's and woman's communion with an eternal Source of hidden Knowledge within-which each individual must seek and find for himself or herself.
I do not believe that Linda had intended for any of us to set her up high upon a pedestal and worship her blindly nor even agree with her or follow her way, her path.  IP: Logged |
Pumpkin Peace
Knowflake Posts: 43
From:
Registered: Sep 2007
|
posted January 14, 2008 08:40 PM
I see.  I tend to forget that sometimes.. and get really legalistic. Sorry. I AM a newbie and obviously don't know much about Lexigrams, and since Linda had some "rules" about it, I thought I should obey them.
I did notice the errors in her Lexigrams, and she did apologize for them in her Star Notes, so I read Star Signs not taking the error parts seriously. Though I did find ways I could rewrite some of them.
I would like to know more about Lexigramming, the RIGHT way, since accuracy means so much to me.
Thanks for clearing that up.IP: Logged |
fayte.m
Knowflake Posts: 9809
From:
Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted January 14, 2008 10:56 PM
Pumpkin Peace quote:
I see. I tend to forget that sometimes.. and get really legalistic. Sorry. I AM a newbie and obviously don't know much about Lexigrams, and since Linda had some "rules" about it, I thought I should obey them.
No problem!
By "Linda's" rules you are indeed correct!
Many have become upset at me for not following her rules. But I feel Linda would have a more open mind than that as I have illustrated by quoting her above!
Wise woman!
I wish I'd known she was into Lexigramming because I would have loved to discuss them with her! However not having television and not online until I came to LL in March 2005;
I was totally unaware of her interest in Lexigramming or much more than Sun and Love Signs, which I still consult and treasure as her masterpieces!
quote:
I did notice the errors in her Lexigrams, and she did apologize for them in her Star Notes, so I read Star Signs not taking the error parts seriously. Though I did find ways I could rewrite some of them.
Here is one of her errors, there are more. I mean no disrespect but facts are facts.
quote:
I would like to know more about Lexigramming, the RIGHT way, since accuracy means so much to me.
Thanks for clearing that up.
Oh yes! Accuracy overrides any rules!
I shall be happy to talk about them or you can do them LG's way.
I take lexigramming very seriously!
If you read my posts you will see that.
Thanks for your kind reply!
IP: Logged |
fayte.m
Knowflake Posts: 9809
From:
Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted January 14, 2008 11:01 PM
Oh BTW...all the threads dated today I bumped up for your benefit if you are interested!IP: Logged |
Pumpkin Peace
Knowflake Posts: 43
From:
Registered: Sep 2007
|
posted January 15, 2008 07:02 AM
Thank you! I will check them out.
You know ... after discovering lexigrams, I really start feeling like lexigramming everything! So why are TIME, MITE, and ITEM the same word in Lexigrams? I wonder. . .
IP: Logged |
fayte.m
Knowflake Posts: 9809
From:
Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted January 15, 2008 09:21 AM
Like Linda indicated...it sure can become rather addicting!
Hee hee, I even Lexigram in my dreams at times!  IP: Logged |
wlorac
Knowflake Posts: 135
From: New Zealand
Registered: Aug 2002
|
posted March 14, 2008 03:02 AM
Marie Curie-Sklodowska
aaa c d e ii kk l m oo rr ss u wI make a cure - radium
I am a sc(h)olar
I like (to) cure (the) sick
I make Radioac(t)i(v)e swarm
I am sad I wear socks, I cook
I like cakes - our sakes
I am social, I swim IP: Logged |
LEXX
Moderator Posts: 1240
From: Still out looking for Schrödinger's cat.........& LEXIGRAMMING... is my Passion!
Registered: Jan 2008
|
posted March 14, 2008 09:35 AM
Thank you so much for setting your added letters off in ( ). BTW..your sequence has an extra A.
aaa c d e ii kk l m oo rr ss u w NO NO MATTER HOW MUCH YOU WANT THE ADDED WORDS...THEY SIMPLY ARE not actually from her name.
This is what is actually there from your version: I MAKE A CURE
RADIUM
I AM A
I LIKE
CURE SICK
I MAKE
I
SWARM
I AM SAD
I WEAR SOCKS
I COOK
I LIKE CAKES
OUR SAKES
I AM SOCIAL
I SWIM One can try to force a Lexigram to say untruths, but then it is not a true Lexigram.
------------------
LEXIGRAMMING! And "Still out looking for Schrödinger's cat........." IP: Logged |
LEXX
Moderator Posts: 1240
From: Still out looking for Schrödinger's cat.........& LEXIGRAMMING... is my Passion!
Registered: Jan 2008
|
posted April 08, 2008 09:49 PM
Version updated! IP: Logged |
Lindaland
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
