posted June 10, 2010 03:28 AM            

SOUL: O(h) U L(ove) US, SO U O(we) US L(ove).

LOVE: V O LEO (We owe Mammals ?)

SPIRIT: STRIP I TRIPS [removal of Ego?]

GOOD: O GOD

GOD: GO DO [just experience?]

BRAIN: BINAR(y), RAB(b)I [hebrew] + AR(a)B + IRAN [persia] + IN(dia) + RA [egyptian]

MIND: I M N(ot) DIM

CALL: C ALL

CLAP: C A PAL

SOUND: US NOD

LIGHT: G(od) LIT H(eaven)

------------------
http://tamsoft.co.in/articles.html

posted June 10, 2010 04:16 PM            

quote:

---

GOOD: O GOD
SOUND: US NOD

---

These are simple Lexigrams.

quote:

---

GOD: GO DO
SPIRIT: STRIP I TRIPS

---

Using "C" in lieu of "see"
and using "U" in lieu of "you"
is not acronymic but phonentic subtitution.
A lazy inaccurate thing to do.
Also an unethical thing to do when divining meaning hidden in words,
Neither substitution has anything to do with the actual words.
Then again Linda did the same bit of the ridiculous and inaccurate too with the word GURU, which she in error called a Lexigram of the false acronym "gee you are you".....
which is not an acronym nor Lexigram of GURU in the least.
An acronym of "GEE YOU ARE YOU"
would be "GYAY" not "GURU".
Very cutesy but not valid.
a Lexigram of GURU would yield little.
UR RUG is about all. Ur as in ancient Ur, not a bad substitution for your, you're, yore.

An acronym of GURU could be for example:
G=GREAT
U=UNIVERSAL
R=REALITY
U=UNITER

or

G=GREAT
U=UNIVERSAL
R=REVELATIONS
U=UNVEILER

or

G=GOES
U=UNTO
R=REALMS
U=UNSEEN

Interesting are your musings......
but still a form of adding things not actually to be found within the words.
They are neither Lexigrams nor Acronyms nor valid divination.

Have fun, but I see no valid reason to take most of them seriously or as having any deep meaning and other than playing, trying to force meaning (which is not actually all there to be found) into and out of words except your two actual little Lexigrams and your two Anagrams.
Trying to blend Acronyms/phonetic substitution/Lexigram words.....just does not work.
The resulting creations are all faulty and forced, and not Lexigrams, not Acronyms, but just a mess of frivolous word play.

You purport to be a genius.....
So........
Why not simply stick to creating great perfect Acronyms (which I assume you are able to do) instead of trying to mix "oil and water and sand"?

Seriously, I would enjoy seeing what PERFECT
acronyms your mind could find!

For example; you said:

quote:

---

MIND: I M N(ot) DIM

---

So if you do not want to or are unable to create Lexigrams without misspelling or cheating by adding letters,
then seriously;
Why not simply go with the acronym angle instead?

Like:
M=mind
I=is
N=not
D=dim (or dull)

or
M=man
I=is
N=not
D=dumb

M=MENSA
I=intelligence
N=no
D=dolts

posted June 10, 2010 04:44 PM            

L OVING
O DE'S,
V ISIONS
E TERNAL

LOVING
OTHERS
VANQUISHES
EVIL

LOVE'S
OVERTURES
VIRTUAL
ECSTASIES

LOVE
OPTIMISM
VISION
ENLIGHTENMENT

LOVE
OVERCOMES
VILE
EVILS

Linda Goodman

L ady
i nvented
n ew
d ivinatory
a strology

G ooberz
o de
o rating
d reams
m emories
a mour
n everending

A.L.I.C.E.

A STONISHED
L ASS
I N
C ARROLL'S
E PIC

G.O.D.
G=GREAT
O=OMNIPOTENT
D=DEITY (or DIVINE)

posted June 23, 2010 07:16 AM            

My favourite spiritual acronym is from "Bruce Almighty": ARK = Acts of Random Kindness. In words, deeds and spirit

posted June 23, 2010 01:31 PM            

quote:

---

My mind works a tad differently.

---

And what you have attempted here, has nothing to do with Lexigramming, and the latest acronym is not valid

quote:

---

Lives have and can be been saved by using C as See, 4 as for, 2 as to and U as You.
It works with synchronicity. A person may see a bus with number "4C", followed by a poster of a disaster film, and choose to skip that bus that meets with an accident.

---

Yes, it can work but;

IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH LEXIGRAMS nor acronyms!

And sometimes a rock is just a rock, and trying to read meaning into everything leads to paranoia.

quote:

---

My favourite spiritual acronym is from "Bruce Almighty": ARK = Acts of Random Kindness. In words, deeds and spirit

---

Acts of Random Kindness
does NOT = ARK.

IT WOULD BE;
AORK.
A=ACTS
O=OF
R=RANDOM
K=KINDNESS

ARK IS NOT AN ACRONYM OF;
Acts of Random Kindness

The false acronym ARK, omits the "O" in of.

Additionally your giving alternative meaning to letters or numbers in lieu of the actual words can and does lead to false readings and duality of meaning/definition.
Far too much ambiguity there to be worth any real value.
Like your letter substitution for words.
C=see in your mind.
Well what about the homophones?
C
SEA
SI
SEE (as in holy see)

U
YOU
EWE
YEW

4
FOR
FORE
FOUR

2
TO
TOO
TWO

2 2
TUTU

B
BEE
BE
BEA

G
GI
GEE

I
AYE
EYE

J
JAY

M
EM

O
OH

P
PEA
PEE

Q
QUE

R
ARE

T
TI
TEE
TEA

Y
WHY

8
EIGHT
ATE

So, which definition used when using any of the substitution letters and numbers for words?
It is simply ridiculous and not accurate.

IT IS ALSO LAZY NET SPEAK, BAD SHORTHAND AND EVEN A SIGN OF NOT KNOWING HOW TO SPELL.
Or worse, not caring about appearing illiterate.

posted December 29, 2010 10:23 AM            

------------------

posted January 01, 2011 01:05 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Randall:
What's negative?

---

Thank you Randall.
I am sad that I have offended when that was not my intention.
If blonderiverkat had carefully read this thread;
it would be clear what and why the points were made by myself and iQ.
Simply saying this:

quote:

---

Sure, great stuff Randall, if you enjoy negative energy, which I don't...

---

------------------
I remember, therefore I am immortal~LEXX
Learning is eternal; all true Gods know this simple truth~LEXX
~Blinding ignorance does mislead us. O! Wretched mortals, open your eyes!
~Leonardo da Vinci
Religions are the cradles of despotism ~Marquis de Sade
Truth is The Incorruptible Light~Lucy
The present time is theirs, but the future is mine.~Nikola Tesla"
}><}}(*>♥<*){{><{
♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥

posted January 01, 2011 01:25 AM            

iQ is not an idiot;
He is quite aware of the fact that his creations are often NOT actual Lexigrams.

Calling a thing gold when it is not, does not make it gold.
Oh it can be quite lovely!
But if not actually gold,
simply saying it is gold,
does not make it true.

Lexigramming is something I have been doing for over 1/2 a century,
51 years to date.
Longer than most folks here at LindaLand have been incarnate.
THAT is a fact.

If you think that makes me unqualified to comment on,
and state facts on Lexigramming;

then you are entitled to your point of view;
albeit not logical nor based on fact.
Again sad to see you are offended
when no offense was intended,
only clarification of facts.

posted January 01, 2011 01:52 AM            

quote:

---

Occupation: Seeking the truth

---

Seriously;
Would you like to discuss why you are offended?

posted January 02, 2011 12:50 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by blonderiverkat:
hmmm Lexx....did I mention anyones name?

---

LOL!
No you did not.
However;
I sincerely would like to know what you found negative about this thread.