*HTML is OFF *UBB Code is ON Smilies Legend
Smilies Legend
If you have previously registered, but forgotten your password, click here.
T O P I C R E V I E WPegasusinFlightGreetings,While some astrologers only use the traditional planets, many others have extended the chart to use the modern planets (Uranus, Neptune, Pluto) and a number of others have also begun to integrate asteroids into the chart. Still others use theoretical planets (Uraniun astrology), others incorporate midpoints, fixed stars and Arabic parts. Is there anyone that uses all of these when examining a chart? Where, when and how do you decide what the cut of is? For example, use the traditional and modern planets, major asteroids but not fixed star or Arabic parts? Or perhaps using all of these? How can one synthesize the chart interpretation with so many celestial bodies? Gemini BluesSome people watch the Today show or GMA and feel they've got a handle on the news. Others are cable news junkies or scan Google News for the headlines.We all process information differently, and each has a limit to how much we can process.I like the planets, Chiron and Ceres, the Part of Fortune, Nodes, Vertex, and angles. Aspects and synastry, include the in conjunct, exclude things like semi-squares, not so much the composites or draconic...We each have a finite amout of capicity. Focus on what gives you the most insight into a chart.lalalindaHello PegasusinFlight! Welcome to LL ------------------"There ain't no revolution, only evolution, but every time I'm in Georgia I 'eat a peach' for peace." Duane AllmanReadingTheStars95Personally.. I use:MidpointsDeclinations (parallels, contraparallels)Traditional and Modern PlanetsFixed StarsDraconic, Natal and sometimes Vedic chartsAsteroids.. Many different asteroids (one of my favorite parts of astrology, along with the stars..)And, Sabian SymbolsSometimes, I do research on Magi astrology.. However, I'm not sure that should be seperated from the rest of these.Honestly, everyone does things a bit differently.. Research the things you find interest in.. I guess it also kind of depends on whether or not you plan to read other people's charts.
While some astrologers only use the traditional planets, many others have extended the chart to use the modern planets (Uranus, Neptune, Pluto) and a number of others have also begun to integrate asteroids into the chart. Still others use theoretical planets (Uraniun astrology), others incorporate midpoints, fixed stars and Arabic parts.
Is there anyone that uses all of these when examining a chart? Where, when and how do you decide what the cut of is? For example, use the traditional and modern planets, major asteroids but not fixed star or Arabic parts? Or perhaps using all of these? How can one synthesize the chart interpretation with so many celestial bodies?
We all process information differently, and each has a limit to how much we can process.
I like the planets, Chiron and Ceres, the Part of Fortune, Nodes, Vertex, and angles. Aspects and synastry, include the in conjunct, exclude things like semi-squares, not so much the composites or draconic...
We each have a finite amout of capicity. Focus on what gives you the most insight into a chart.
------------------"There ain't no revolution, only evolution, but every time I'm in Georgia I 'eat a peach' for peace." Duane Allman
Honestly, everyone does things a bit differently.. Research the things you find interest in..
I guess it also kind of depends on whether or not you plan to read other people's charts.
Copyright 2000-2024 Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000 Ultimate Bulletin Board Version 5.46a
Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000 Ultimate Bulletin Board Version 5.46a