Lindaland
  Global Unity
  The Twin Towers, etc were destroyed by explosions (Page 1)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
This topic is 3 pages long:   1  2  3 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   The Twin Towers, etc were destroyed by explosions
ListensToTrees
unregistered
posted August 18, 2007 04:37 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IqSsTmWv7k

More on Youtube if you put in "9/11, big explosions".

Also, if you have time, please watch this incredible speech, William Rodriguez, 'last man out'. I don't know about you, but after watching this, I felt in my heart that he is sincere, because he is so traumatized by what he saw that day, it changed his whole perspective on life. He also turned down millions of dollars to work for the government.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4380137365762802294

------------------
Ego is no more than this: identification with form, which primarily means thought forms. If evil has any reality - and it has a relative, not absolute, reality - this is also it's definition: complete identification with form - physical forms, thought forms, emotional forms. This results in a total unawareness of my connectedness with the whole, my intrinsic oneness with every "other" as well as with the Source. This forgetfulness is original sin, suffering, delusion. When this delusion of utter separateness underlies and governs whatever I think, say and do, what kind of world do I create? To find the answer to this, observe how humans relate to each other, read a history book, or watch the news on television tonight.

If the structures of the human mind remain unchanged, we will always end up re-creating fundamentally the same world, the same evils, the same dysfunction."

Ekhart Tolle
A New Earth

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 18, 2007 02:59 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
How many threads on this same subject is enough.

There are threads going back to the 9/11 event on this same forum, not to mention one already currently running...by YOU.

There's nothing new here and nothing of substance

IP: Logged

AcousticGod
Knowflake

Posts: 4415
From: Pleasanton, CA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 18, 2007 04:36 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for AcousticGod     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
There's nothing new here and nothing of substance

In that way they are similar to Jwhop's posts.

IP: Logged

ListensToTrees
unregistered
posted August 18, 2007 07:27 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

------------------
Ego is no more than this: identification with form, which primarily means thought forms. If evil has any reality - and it has a relative, not absolute, reality - this is also it's definition: complete identification with form - physical forms, thought forms, emotional forms. This results in a total unawareness of my connectedness with the whole, my intrinsic oneness with every "other" as well as with the Source. This forgetfulness is original sin, suffering, delusion. When this delusion of utter separateness underlies and governs whatever I think, say and do, what kind of world do I create? To find the answer to this, observe how humans relate to each other, read a history book, or watch the news on television tonight.

If the structures of the human mind remain unchanged, we will always end up re-creating fundamentally the same world, the same evils, the same dysfunction."

Ekhart Tolle
A New Earth

IP: Logged

pidaua
Knowflake

Posts: 67
From: Back in AZ with Bear the Leo
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 18, 2007 07:58 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for pidaua     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
jwhop,

I often wonder about the intention of bringing up the same argument about something that happened 40 different times with no new evidence. It is as though if it is said enough (regardless of how old the facts are and how many times they have been disproven) will somehow make the conspiracy theory true.

Oh well.. to each their own. LOL....

IP: Logged

ListensToTrees
unregistered
posted August 19, 2007 04:23 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Sorry if I didn't have the time to pour over the threads posted here on the subject. The only version of 9/11 I had up to recently was the one given by the mainstream news so SORRY if my heart told me that this was something WORTH thinking about it.

Those of you who don't wish to discuss it anymore needn't read this thread- go back to bed Just kidding. I do wonder how some of you expect people to be aware of every single thread which has been posted- I am sorry but it takes far too long to read every one of them!

I am going to post something, a bulletin, I just read because it is very relevant here.

IP: Logged

ListensToTrees
unregistered
posted August 19, 2007 04:26 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
This is my response to the bulletin below......

These people make their minds up before examining all the facts, or they close their minds to anything that goes against what THEY want to believe.......it's a defense mechanism because this stuff sure does get depressing, so don't hate them for it- just let people carry on in the way they chose......

My own personal philosophy is to always keep an open mind. If someone has a greater knowledge of all the facts than I do, I am always willing to listen.....right now the all facts I've seen are OVERWHELMINGLY pointing to the conspiracy "theory".........

I'm always willing to have an open mind; my 'soul' purpose is to find the TRUTH.....personally I'd rather NOT think that the world had these conspiracies, but I am not going to bury my head in the sand if it really is going on......

And if I am proven wrong, it wouldn't bother me....just show me the TRUTH!!!!!!

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: (edit)
Date: 19 Aug 2007, 04:32


I won't leave her link here, because that would be terribly mean. But I had to share this with all of you, because incidentally , I happen to be in her top friends. (I Swear) Talk about being the real moron here.

Monday, July 16, 2007


To those who spew 911 conspiracy theories. I have had it.

I must say one thing about all of you 911 conspiracy theorists. You're all a bunch of idiots. I'm as upset as anyone over 911. Many poor decisions have been made over the past 6 years following this great tragedy. To spew lies and conspiracy theories, however, is the ultimate disrespect to all those who died on 911. It's high time people stop spewing utter ******** about 911! Inside job by the Bush administration my ass. Get ******* real. Sorry, but I'm getting so sick of this **** ! If you're one of those ***** who wants to obsess over such rubbish, find someone else to add to your MySpace site. I will no longer have anything to do with such idiocy. The same delusional people who turn 911 into a conspiracy by the Bush administration are the same people who obsess over aliens. I had added some of you because I had associated you with enlightenment. Since then, you've proven to be nothing more than crazed, radical liberals that lack the capacity to make any rational judgement whatsoever. You harbor an us vs them mentality that smacks of the same irrational thinking possessed by the terrorist who attacked us. While some attempt to instill in Americans an irrational fear of terrorism, you infect others with your irrational fear of the Bush administration and imagined evils of our nation. You're ridiculous. Spread anti-Bush sentiments all you want. But your rationale must make sense. Buh, bye morons!

12:07 AM - 2 Comments - 2 Kudos - Add Comment
.: (edit)


Too bad this damn thing only goes up to 2 Kudos....

They are total ******* morons... They weren't even creative enough to alter the OKC Federal building conspiracy theories very much.

BTW- I went online after the first tower fell... and that is when I saw the first conspiracy theory rear its ugly head, several minutes before the 2nd tower fell. I guess they are really quick with their investigations in the structural dynamics of a highrise fire and the effects of slamming a 500,000 lb aircraft into a 110 story building at 300mph. They were able to determine the cause of the collapse before anybody.

IDIOTS!!!!

Posted by .: (edit)on Monday, July 16, 2007 at 6:02 PM
[Reply to this]
(edit)


Exactly! It's all a bunch of nonsense talk from radical idiot liberals that obviously have too much time on their hands. My suggestion is they get a life and get a job. One of my friends here on MySpace is constantly forwarding bulletins he gets from his fellow conspiracy nuts. Anything to slam the conservatives. There are plenty of valid reasons to disapprove of Bush or the conservative party. PLENTY of reasons. What's the deal with making up ridiculous accusations? They lock themselves in their rooms and worry about CIA coverups, how Bush Sr. was PERSONALLY responsible to Kennedy's assassination and how George W had a personal hand in the planning and execution of 911. You've GOT to be KIDDING me!

I want the off my friends list. I don't care if they share my spiritual or esoteric interests. They're idiots. And I don't associate with idiots. They are the reason I abandoned the Democratic party and became and Independent.

Posted by (edit) on Monday, July 16, 2007 at 6:15 PM

IP: Logged

Eleanore
Moderator

Posts: 112
From: Okinawa, Japan
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 19, 2007 06:48 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Eleanore     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The problem, imo, is what people will take to constitute "facts" or "truth". Suppose this is the Truth ... then there's how I see it and how you see it and how she sees it and how he sees it, etc.

It's the same with facts. Is it true because X person, whomever they may be or whatever field they may represent, said it's a fact? Or does it hold up on its own through a thorough analysis of its statements? And what about the relative knowledge regarding the subject at hand of the person making the inquiries?

Especially with theories such as these that involve various fields of knowledge, getting all the facts without bias is not a stroll in the park. X amount of experts will give you Y amount of statements regarding how, scientifically, this and that were impossible. Then Z amount of experts will give you A amount of statements regarding how, scientifically, this and that were possible. Just look at the Global Warming debate.


In the end, imo, many people simply believe what makes most sense to them irregardless of whatever Truth is out there. And that's how we develop (or should) tolerance. But people on both sides of this particular debate show little tolerance and less patience with anyone who disagrees with them. Even here, just make a foray into past discussions ... head for the earliest threads in GU and inch forward ... but arm yourself with some headache blockers and a serene frame of mind first.

IP: Logged

SattvicMoon
unregistered
posted August 19, 2007 09:22 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
There's nothing new here and nothing of substance

Look who is talking! The self-proclaimed junkyard discussion messiah!

------------------
If you are taking a walk through the garden of life
What do you think you'd expect you would see?

IP: Logged

ListensToTrees
unregistered
posted August 19, 2007 02:23 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Perhaps the conspiracy theorists are wrong. If someone can enlighten me, please do.....the truth is what I am seeking, not a fight, although I understand how difficult it is not to feel overwhelmed by it all......this world is in a state of such profound confusion right now.

IP: Logged

BlueRoamer
Knowflake

Posts: 95
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 19, 2007 09:27 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for BlueRoamer     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

I"m glad not everyone believes what is force fed by the mass media. This theory is not necessarily true, but what was presented to us by the media is not necessarily true either. I believe it's important to keep an open mind, question authority, and try to see events from different perspectives.

I like you a lot LTT.

IP: Logged

cancerrg
unregistered
posted August 20, 2007 04:23 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
::There's nothing new here and nothing of substance
----------------------------------------
In that way they are similar to Jwhop's posts.
:::

hahahahahahaa......
terrific. that was a good one ag !

IP: Logged

ListensToTrees
unregistered
posted August 21, 2007 07:10 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Some information I can across today you may find interesting.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USnxe7hxP4I

IP: Logged

ListensToTrees
unregistered
posted August 21, 2007 07:11 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

IP: Logged

ListensToTrees
unregistered
posted August 21, 2007 07:13 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

IP: Logged

ListensToTrees
unregistered
posted August 21, 2007 07:15 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

IP: Logged

ListensToTrees
unregistered
posted August 21, 2007 07:17 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

[img]http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/7139/017ip0.jpg[img]


IP: Logged

ListensToTrees
unregistered
posted August 21, 2007 07:18 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bx1E2B5oAEs

IP: Logged

Eleanore
Moderator

Posts: 112
From: Okinawa, Japan
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 21, 2007 08:09 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Eleanore     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
The web is full of sites covering various conspiracy theories. Many seem well-researched, and appear to have plenty of detailed documentation to prove their claims. But are they really true?

We don’t know, but one good way to start is by checking a few claims for yourself. We tried that with a number of 9/11 sites, with surprising results. Many of the “facts” we read were distorted, or simply wrong. Quotes were routinely taken out of context. Relevant information was often ignored. And much of this could be discovered with a minimum of online research.

Whatever you believe about 9/11, the spreading of false claims helps no-one, and we’d like to play a small part in revealing some of them. We’re not about debunking entire conspiracies, then, but will use this site to zoom in on what we think are the more dubious stories, revealing the misquotes, the distortions, the inaccuracies that are so common online.

But does this make us an authority? No. If we’ve an overall message here, it’s check things for yourself. Don’t trust a site just because it’s telling you what you want to believe. Don’t believe us without evaluating our arguments and checking the references we provide, either (we’re as likely to make mistakes as anyone else). Look into the claims yourself, discover both sides of the argument, and make your own mind up. The truth deserves nothing less.


911Myths ... Reading between the lies

Clearly, this forum has plenty of links and articles, questions, opinions and facts regarding how 911 was the most heinous of conspiracies. I certainly hope a few links to a different perspective won't cause offense. So, though perhaps inevitable and to be as clear as I can, this link isn't intended to offend. Looking at all possible sides must include all possible sides, not only the ones we'd like to believe are true ... and that goes for "both" sides.

IP: Logged

ListensToTrees
unregistered
posted August 21, 2007 09:03 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thanks for the link, Eleanore. Very interesting. But do you know who exactly wrote it?

'Facts'.....'facts'....What really are the 'facts'?

Is the media really a 'free' one?

IP: Logged

ListensToTrees
unregistered
posted August 21, 2007 09:10 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Well, I guess we'll just have to wait and see what happens! It feels like we're all stuck in a labyrinth of 'facts'!!!!


IP: Logged

Happy Dragon
unregistered
posted August 22, 2007 11:17 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
i started to think down the lines of aluminium in aircraft construction ..
i.e. re the puddles of molten steel etc

" Aluminum burns at over 4,100 K (6920°F), which is two-thirds the temperature at the surface of the Sun " ( ref. ~ http://www.aerospaceweb.org ~ )

then i took a look at this .. i.e against the demolition theory
( us government site )
~ http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm ~

and then this .. for the demolition theory ..
this looks at the construction of WTC and how it might have been brought down ..

~ http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11scenario.html ~

i was trying to find some data about those angle 'cut' columns ..

either way one looks at it .. it's mass murder ..

IP: Logged

ListensToTrees
unregistered
posted August 22, 2007 11:50 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
It still seems a labyrinth of facts, but overall, officials clearly seem to be acting very suspiciously.


When I watched William Rodriguez' speech, I just couldn't see any reason for him to lie; I just felt he was telling the truth. A traumatic experience like that would have changed his viewpoint forever. He doesn't seem to care about money- he is/was homeless....he turned down the money to work for the government.....Ok, people praise him but he deserves that, I'm sure it has nothing to do with the ego....and it is no compensation for the nightmares he has to live with every day.

IP: Logged

Happy Dragon
unregistered
posted August 22, 2007 12:26 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
~ http://algoxy.com/psych/supportfor9-11truth.html ~

"As an underwriter of architects and engineers professional liability I am privy to many of the means and methods of construction of large bulidings and such (I have to know what I am insuring) . It is a fairly common practice for demolitions to be incorporated within the design elements of any skyscraper such as the trade centers as building designers have to think about the future and an "orderly" method of bringing down these buildings after their useful lifespan has been reached."

( i've no idea how correct that is .. there must be some construction engineers to ask for another opinion on that one )

IP: Logged

Happy Dragon
unregistered
posted August 22, 2007 12:41 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
~ http://algoxy.com/psych/supportfor9-11truth.html ~

" .. His contention that the Port Authority put C4 in the building during the original construction in very unconfirmed though. THE EARLIEST WE ARE AWARE OF ANY PREPERATIONS FOR DEMOLITION OF THE WTC BEING MADE WERE AROUND 1990, BY WHICH TIME THE BUILDINGS HAD PROVEN VERY UNPROFITABLE FOR THE PORT AUTHORITY. We have direct testimony from someone involved in a group hired by the Port Authority, that studied possibilities including demolition at that time.
However, an actual decision to demolish the WTC does not seem to have been made until early 2001. .. "

IP: Logged


This topic is 3 pages long:   1  2  3 

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2011

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a