posted November 09, 2005 07:20 PM            

Simply... I wanted to know what these equations were about, and why you insisted on posting them in this particular thread (and what I mean by, "this particular thread," is Were your posts directed at anyone? Was someone supposed to understand what you were talking about?). Was there a correlation?

quote:

---

Now put them base to base
10
11 12 13

1 2 3

we start all over again???

---

posted November 09, 2005 09:14 PM              

?

still the implied seperation, peajie? even after the "final outcome"?

"ecstasy" is a word I approach with some degree of hesitation. I have experienced transcendence.

Time is no enemy of mine. "A thousand violins cloy rapidly without percussion"

If all you have in your pocket are riddles to amuse and entertain yourself while matters of consequence are ignored, then you are correct ... we have nothing to say to each other.

I'll ask you again. After all the who-are-you-trying-to-impress esoteric rambling, after the fortune cookie wisdom, after that long list of required reading you so generously shared ...

what remains, old man?

what else have you got in your pocket?

posted November 10, 2005 02:34 AM              

>>>"one's self".. an implied separation.<<<
A bit like "transcendence",????
Just a word when only words can be exchanged ?

I used "ecstasy" because it does NOT imply a separation, nor a a going anywhere, or a movement in time; whereas transcendence does.

>>> Time is no enemy of mine. <<<
That is good, it would be stupid to make an enemy of something which does not exist.
It would be like different faiths fighting over a non-existant God.
Now wouldn't that be silly?

>>> "A thousand violins cloy rapidly without percussion"
If all you have in your pocket are riddles to amuse and entertain yourself .. <<<

After reading those two in conjunction I assume you were talking about yourself, so no reponse is necessary.

But I will respond to
>>>,what else have you got in your pocket? <<<,
'cos "I have Balls!" in my pocket.

>>> while matters of consequence are ignored, then you are correct ... we have nothing to say to each other <<<.

I shall assume you are unable to find something to say, unless you can define your interpretation of "matters of Consequence"?

>>> I'll ask you again. After all the who-are-you-trying-to-impress esoteric rambling, after the fortune cookie wisdom, <<<

Oh sorry.., you hadn't finished.
And I thought you were not in favour of rambling?

>>> after that long list of required reading you so generously shared what remains, old man? ...<<<

Seems I also have an "old-mans" memory, pray tell what was that long list of "required reading" which I shared ?
I seem to have missed it !

posted November 10, 2005 10:02 AM              

I don't think you have anything to offer, peajie. Maybe some smoke and mirrors, maybe even a nicely turned phrase now and again, but mostly just a lot of childish provocation in the interest of self delusion.

posted November 10, 2005 11:39 AM              

LL lovers live in the land of Tarot, stars and tea-leaves. My choice is a Crystal Ball !

It tells me that the only thing you "will pass", is the mirror you can not look into.
I think you would be too constipated for anything else .

If you did look in that mirror, you might lighten up and perhaps learn to make constructive comment, or stimulate others, instead of using the power of the word simply to attack and criticise.

posted November 10, 2005 11:56 AM              

To me, he is one of the most entertaining and "real" people on this board....I think Peajie deserves respect, really I do.

Just my heartfelt opnion.......

posted November 10, 2005 12:33 PM              

But I do believe those glimpses offer sufficient information for a someone to decide if a further look is warrented. I just don't think peajie is on a Path that interests me. It's very impersonal.

No offense to you, dear peajie. But you seem a bit too judgemental and critical for my taste. Aquarius-type "entertainment" doesn't hold my interest for long. But, of course, to each his own. Thinking back, the first post of yours I read was one where you told lovely* (and zala I think) she made too many assumptions. Which, as they pointed out to you, was an assumption itself. I see you are still singing that song. That Mirror is a tricky thing though, isn't it? Nowhere in your posts do I see "constructive criticism". Giving medicine is considerably easier than taking it, eh?

On the plus side, peajie, you did assist me in affirming a few things I was not entirely certain of. Knowing what you don't want maybe is another way of knowing what you do want. The grass, sadly, is not always greener on the other side. Big thanks for that, old man.

posted November 10, 2005 12:45 PM              

Hey Tink I am interested to know why you took quite a lot of abuse from a certain gemini girl, I think she called you such names as retard and bi**ch and maybe worse in the rcent past? You didnt seem to retaliate at all, but with Peajie, you seemed quite severe in a way. Is it because he is a man? Or was it because or something else?

Just wondered girl thats all?

posted November 10, 2005 12:58 PM              

Anywhoo ... why retaliate with peajie and not with a certain gemini girl?

Because I had no hope of finding anything in the Gemini's pot, so why stir it? Some pots offer up their true goodies if you ask nice. Some pots need to be stirred.

posted November 10, 2005 01:00 PM              

A question of intelligence....of course.....silly me.....just testing....

And oh yeah...whatever ye think, Peajie IS definatley worth stirring.....really he is.....there is NO comparison between the two....

Thanks

posted November 10, 2005 01:06 PM              

And yes indeed I think Peajie has a lot to teach us all TBH, not just me.......

posted November 10, 2005 01:25 PM            

Weeds, aquarius,flowers & t.-leaves; thought I heard someone calling my name

posted November 10, 2005 01:53 PM              

This thread is really funny.....guys go back and read it, especially the first page.....the stuff between AG and Lotus and then between Peaj and Tink goin on at the same time....I just burst out laughin when I read it........... funny or what?

God bless ye all......legends all of ye....haha !!!

posted November 10, 2005 02:07 PM              

Quote:
Anyone else experiencing multi-Dimensions out there ?
>>yes! I am fairly sure we are speaking of the same thing here.
Quote:
Unless you could also explain why you consider my "thought" to be nonsense.
Maybe you have not been into ecstacy or ever been released from "time" ?
>>>Again..I DO KNOW where of thou doth speak!
It is only by having these types of ecstasies that one can speak of them!
Otherwise there is no point of reference from which to describe them and again..how does one explain such a wonder to another who has never been there or worse..is terrified of stepping out of his/her, so called reality to experience it!
Quote:
If it is because you consider Mans' created God to be something separate from your own Self then I suppose we need to wait awhile.
>>>>God is within..God is us..we are God. I have posted about this briefly on a threads at Universal Codes.
Will find the links.
Quote:
In the final outcome there is only one's self.
>>>>That is the simplified way of putting it...but I agree.
Quote:
Seems I also have an "old-mans" memory, pray tell what was that long list of "required reading" which I shared ?
I seem to have missed it !
>>>I too have no idea where his "reading" list is! please do tell!
Quote:
Peajie to my mind, has a lot more than balls Tink, really he does. He is a very very intelligent, articulate and funny man. Call me base if yer like girl, but I love his humour. His uranian energy shines thro brightly.......
....AAAAHHHhh!!!!!! YES! it most certainly does! I can see him! Perhaps I am just simply on his wavelength.
Cheers to you my friend!
Quote:
To me, he is one of the most entertaining and "real" people on this board....I think Peajie deserves respect, really I do.
>>>>hear hear! In total agreement with that!
Quote:
old man
>>>>>what the blooming freaking blazes has that to do with anything?!!!!!!!
Quote:
Aquarians do seem to sometimes have a very bizarre method of communication.
>>>>that may be true...yet the wonderfully bizzare or tilted from the common man's way of thinking to me is extremely attractive and intriguing!
Quote:
I must be weid guys, cos I love the Aqua humour....was married to one once and one of the finest things for me about him was the outrageous wit!!
>>>>Then I too must be weird for I agree with you!
Quote:
Peajie IS definatley worth stirring
>>>OH YES HE IS!!!!! And to those who are offended or afraid of him or think of him as only an old man...well you will miss out on much if you ignore this dear man or deem his words as nonsense.
Quote:
And yes indeed I think Peajie has a lot to teach us all TBH, not just me
>>>Again..I certainly agree!

Ok..I think I have mouthed off here enough for the moment.
The Aquarian is much more intense and fasinating and deep and has a soul that is able to love very deeply and see outside the boxes of common human thought!(these may not be apparent on the surface but look closer please..if you are not afraid)!
I percieve much to value in Peajie and his ways of thinking.
And he is not so vain as to not realize that he can learn from others also.
He has shown on other threads that he is able to, with a true heart,..to apologize and or to expresss his heartfelt gratitude!
Peajie...I may not be doing you much of a favor by defending you and proclaiming loudly that I value our growing friendship. I am not well liked by some here. But I see those, that I do get along with, are also able to see the value of your words and you.
You do supply much food for thought. Perhaps the dish thou doth serve is a wee bit too rare or exotic for most palates!.

posted November 10, 2005 02:29 PM              

Faye you rock, you really do and Peaj you rule......so honoured to be amongst such open minded and cool people......keep it coming folks........wonderful stuff.......

Love to all

posted November 10, 2005 03:50 PM              

I guess it depends on how you want to look at it.

Hello Juni. Nice to see you. Juni is an uncommonly wise Aquarian who has the ability to see things as they really are w/o her personal business getting in the way. For instance, if I were to call her an old crone, she would take it as a compliment.

posted November 10, 2005 06:23 PM            

From my perspective:
TINK likes depth. She isn't happy with merely scratching the surface of things. She wants to know everything. Where most stop, she digs deeper. She challenges people to define their own thoughts. She's quite focused.

Peajie may dig deep privately, but what he writes here tends to only scratch the surface. Any words said against his point of view are treated as a personal attack (I can be the same way). Instead of getting into the details of what the subject is, however, he instead tries to distance himself from the person by acting as if his point of view is beyond the comprehension of mere mortals.

Obviously there's a disconnect. TINK won't accept being treated as one who can't comprehend (and I don't think she should). Peajie won't accept anyone challenging his ideas, but he also won't engage in discussing the details with someone who would play devil's advocate.

quote:

---

No silly psuedo-intellectual banter, no obscure refrences, no tap dancing. That sort of thing is a tedious, tiresome waste of energy, don't you agree?

---

I agree with this. It's not that hard just to talk to people.

It's never nice when fixed signs go at it.