Lindaland
  Global Unity
  THE CASE FOR IMPEACHMENT - Harper's (Page 7)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
This topic is 7 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   THE CASE FOR IMPEACHMENT - Harper's
Rainbow~
unregistered
posted March 09, 2006 07:48 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I have Mercury Retro in my chart, AG....in Capricorn...

IP: Logged

AcousticGod
Knowflake

Posts: 4415
From: Pleasanton, CA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 09, 2006 09:54 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for AcousticGod     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thanks for replying.

Anyone else?

IP: Logged

lotusheartone
unregistered
posted March 09, 2006 10:04 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I have Mercury direct in Aries. ...

IP: Logged

Cardinalgal
unregistered
posted March 10, 2006 05:10 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Mercury direct in Scorpio

IP: Logged

TINK
unregistered
posted March 10, 2006 10:08 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
What exactly qualifies as "excess deaths" in war? Right now the Iraqis seem to doing quite well at causing their own excess deaths without our meddling assistance.

It's in scorpio, but I don't know if it's retro or not.

IP: Logged

pidaua
Knowflake

Posts: 67
From: Back in AZ with Bear the Leo
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 10, 2006 10:59 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for pidaua     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
DD,

I was not angry - but I did take offense to you insinuating that I would use a parable to either declare myself God or this country as a God. How you derived that from me using a parable is beyond me.

If I use a quote, like the ones attached to my signature, does that mean I am Winston Churchill (a wonderful saggie, but not so pleasing to the eyes) or Geronimo?

Anyway... I will admit that calling you thick-headed was not cool - you are pretty sharp .

AG... I have Mercury in Capricorn - Direct - Some Merc retros physically tear me up but for the most part I do okay (I have Virgo rising, so Mercury is also my chart ruler).

------------------
Better to be hated for what you are than to be loved for what you are not.
Andre Gide

"Lahn dádzaayú nahikai leh ni' nyelíí k'ehge," Goyathlay (Geronimo)

"Once we moved like the Wind"

"Arm yourselves, and be ye men of valour, and be in readiness for the conflict; for it is better for us to perish in battle than to look upon the outrage of our nation and our altar." This call and spur to the faithful servants of Truth and Justice was quoted by Churchill in his first broadcast as Prime Minister to the British people on the BBC - May 19, 1940, London.

IP: Logged

DayDreamer
unregistered
posted March 10, 2006 06:57 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Pidaua, I wasn't insinuating that you used that parable to declare you or the US was God. But that is how most of the world sees it. That the US believes it's a superpower that can use its military might and will on other nations.

quote:
Anyway... I will admit that calling you thick-headed was not cool - you are pretty sharp .

No worries Pid, I remember you have the same birthday as my father Just don't do it again or I'll have to poke you

AG, my Mercury is direct as well, in Aquarius. Why do you ask?

IP: Logged

pidaua
Knowflake

Posts: 67
From: Back in AZ with Bear the Leo
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 10, 2006 06:59 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for pidaua     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Poke me with what? hee hee

IP: Logged

DayDreamer
unregistered
posted March 10, 2006 07:39 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Tink, sorry I missed your post the first time. What qualifies as "excess deaths" in war? That study probably included casualties from "coalition forces", and "insurgents" which probably doesnt compare to casualities caused by the use of military weapons. I got this stat off of wikipedia.

Lancet surveyed 1000 households and extrapolated the figures. They found that the risk of death increased 2.5 fold after the invasion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_conflict_in_Iraq_since_2003

I also read it off of http://www.newscientist.com/article.ns?id=dn6596

The US doesn't do Iraqi civilian body counts. There are groups who do body counts though. However this method isn't reliable either since they can't keep count of all the deaths.

And another study by the New England Journal of Medicine said the counts could be worse.

quote:
One way to estimate the actual number of Iraqi enemy combatants killed is to consider the results of anonymous surveys of U.S. soldiers returning from Iraq done in 2003 as part of a study on posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) published in the New England Journal of Medicine [20]. In this study, 48% of the Army soldiers who had served in Operation Iraqi Freedom and 65% of the Marines said that they were responsible for the death of at least one enemy combatant.

Since at least 180,000 Army soldiers and 58,000 Marines served in Iraq in 2003, this means that a minimum of about 124,000 U.S. troops who returned from Iraq by the end of 2003 each believed they had caused the death of one or more enemy combatants. This would not include any deaths caused by Navy or Air Force personnel, such as those that resulted from the bombing missions during the invasion, nor would it include those killed since the beginning of 2004. However, this could reflect either more or less than 124,000 enemy combatants killed, as there are likely cases where one soldier felt responsible for the deaths of multiple Iraqis, where several soldiers each felt responsible for the death of the same person, and where soldiers were incorrect in their belief that anyone had died.




PID, well you said I was sharp...is it my words?

------------------------------------------
Edited. Here are stats and extra information from the studies I mentioned above:
http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/351/1/13/T2
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lancet_survey_of_mortality_before_and_after_the _2003_invasion_of_Iraq

IP: Logged

AcousticGod
Knowflake

Posts: 4415
From: Pleasanton, CA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 10, 2006 07:40 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for AcousticGod     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I was just wondering if there were any Merc retrogrades who were benefitting from the retro Merc. Jwhop's had the occasional point lately, and that's unusual. Maybe he's got the Merc retro?

IP: Logged

DayDreamer
unregistered
posted March 10, 2006 07:52 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
AG do you feel the effects of Mercury Rx on your points and arguments?

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 2787
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 10, 2006 09:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
acoustic, I don't have a retro Mercury. Mine's direct..in clear, logical, analytical Virgo.

What ever's working to lift the fog from your thought processes, do try to hang on to it.

IP: Logged

AcousticGod
Knowflake

Posts: 4415
From: Pleasanton, CA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 10, 2006 09:59 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for AcousticGod     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
DayDreamer,

Well, I haven't really felt like fighting a whole lot since Jwhop's been back this time, which is unusual. Normally he comes back spouting the same old nonsense, and I shut him down and he goes away. I haven't felt that urge so strongly this time. It could be that I know it's more entertaining around these parts when he's here. Not really sure.

Jwhop,

6 in 1000 are as smart or smarter than me, so your clear, logical Mercury in Virgo isn't altogether humbling toward my Merc in detriment in Sag. You wouldn't expect a Mercury in Sag to just bow before you now would you? http://www.freewebs.com/acousticgod/personalityiqreports.htm

IP: Logged

TINK
unregistered
posted March 11, 2006 09:17 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Jwhop is an aquired taste.

Daydreamer, I think I understand what you're saying in your post. I just think the concept of "excess deaths", given the circumstances, is silly. War means death, lots of it. I'm being a stoic again, so please forgive.

Ahhhh the Churchill quote : still gives me goosebumps. Sing it loud, pid!

IP: Logged


This topic is 7 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7 

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2011

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a