posted September 27, 2006 04:43 PM              

Government documents released by a Freedom of Information Act request reveal the Bush administration is running a "shadow government" with Mexico and Canada in which the U.S. is crafting a broad range of policy in conjunction with its neighbors to the north and south, asserts WND columnist and author Jerome R. Corsi.

The documents, a total of about 1,000 pages, are among the first to be released to Corsi through his FOIA request to the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, or SPP, which describes itself as an initiative "to increase security and to enhance prosperity among the three countries through greater cooperation."

"The documents clearly reveal that SPP, working within the U.S. Department of Commerce, is far advanced in putting together a new regional infrastructure, creating a 'shadow' trilateral bureaucracy with Mexico and Canada that is aggressively rewriting a wide range of U.S. administrative law, all without congressional oversight or public disclosure," Corsi said.

Among the initial discoveries, said Corsi, is the existence of an internal Intranet website that never has been revealed to Congress or the public.

"This private internal website," he claims, "undoubtedly contains a wealth of documentation that the FOIA request has so far intentionally excluded."

Corsi told WND the documents reveal hundreds of internal meetings, memoranda of understanding and other referenced agreements that have not been disclosed.

"We have here the beginnings of a whitewash," he said, "in which SPP evidently thinks the public will be hoodwinked by a 'Myths vs. Facts' document posted for public relations purposes on their public website."

Among the documents is an organizational chart accompanied by a listing of trilateral Mexican, Canadian and U.S. administrative officers who report on multiple cabinet level "working groups."

The government watchdog Judicial Watch announced today it has received some of the same documents, including the organizational chart, which can be seen in this pdf file, on page seven.

"There is no specific authorization for this massive administrative-branch integration with Mexico and Canada other than what amounts to a press conference jointly issued by President Bush, Mexico's President Vicente Fox, and Canada's then-Prime Minister Paul Martin on March 23, 2005, at the end of their summit in Waco, Texas," Corsi said.

Corsi added that even the "Myth vs. Facts" blurb on the SPP.gov website admits the SPP is neither a treaty nor a law.

"The Bush administration is trying to create the infrastructure of a new regional North American government in stealth fashion, under the radar and out of public view," Corsi claims. "Where is Congress, asleep at the wheel?"

The SPP organizational chart Corsi obtained shows 13 working groups covering a wide range of public policy issues, including Manufactured Goods; Energy, Food & Agriculture; Rules of Origin' Health; E-Commerce; Transportation; Environment; Financial Services; Business Facilitation; External Threats to North America; Streamlined & Secured Shared Borders; and Prevention/Response within North America.

U.S. administrative-branch officers participating in these working groups are drawn from the U.S. departments of State, Homeland Security, Commerce, Treasury, Agriculture, Transportation, Energy, Health and Human Services, and the office of the U.S. Trade Representative.

The released documents affirm that counterparts from official governmental agencies in Mexico and Canada are combined with the U.S. administrative branch to form new trilateral "working groups" that actively rewrite U.S. administrative law to "harmonize" or "integrate" with administrative law in Mexico and Canada.

"What we have here amounts to an administrative coup d'etat," Corsi told WND. "Where does the Bush administration get the congressional authorization to invite two foreign nations to the table to rewrite U.S. law?"

posted September 30, 2006 12:43 AM              

OKAY. HERE'S A WHOLE BUNCH MORE FOOD FOR THOUGHT.....AND IT'S PRETTY SCAREY....

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~

Can we call it a conspiracy yet?

Conspiracy is defined as:
1. An agreement to perform together an illegal, wrongful, or subversive act.

2. A group of conspirators.

3. Law An agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime or accomplish a legal purpose through illegal action.

4. A joining or acting together, as if by sinister design.

What would you call a secret meeting by the elite of three nations at the "Castle in the Wilderness" to plot the deep integration of their three countries in such a manner forbidden by their respective constitutions?

I would call it a treasonous conspiracy.

The Banff Springs Hotel is a castle in the Rockies and is world renowned for its spa.

It this posh setting, these elites conspired against their fellow citizens who believe in national sovereignty.

A closed-door meeting of high-level government and business leaders that discussed the merger of North America was designed to subvert the democratic process, charged an attendee of the confab in Banff, Canada.

Mel Hurtig, a noted Canadian author and publisher who was the elected leader of the National Party of Canada, provided the agenda and attendee list of the North American Forum at the Fairmont Banff Springs Hotel in Banff, Alberta, Sept. 12-14.

Hurtig said the "secret meeting was designed to undermine the democratic process."

"What is sinister about this meeting is that it involved high level government officials and some of the top and most powerful business leaders of the three countries and the North American Forum in organizing the meeting intentionally did NOT inform the press in any of the three countries," he said.

"It was clear that the intention was to keep this important meeting about integrating the three countries - out of the public eye."

About one-third of the listed members of CFR task force attended the Banff conference.

One prominent participant in both was Carla A. Hills, who served as U.S. trade representative from 1989 to 1993 and was the primary U.S. negotiator for NAFTA.

When like-minded people work openly to achieve a common goal, it is an agenda.

When those same people meet secretly because they know their goals might get them lyched by an angry citizenry, it then becomes a conspiracy.

Jerome Corsi wrote of the Security and Prosperity Partnership, "Geri Word, who heads the SPP office within the NAFTA office of the U.S. Department of Commerce affirmed to WND last Friday in a telephone interview that the membership of the working groups, as well as their work products, have not been published anywhere, including on the Internet.

"Why the secrecy?

'We did not want to get the contact people of the working groups distracted by calls from the public,' said Word."

They know full well what they are attempting will be viewed negatively by the peoples of Canada......Mexico.......the USA........and the majority of their elected representatives.....

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~

What follows is a compilation of information from various sources readers need to be familiar with.

--Henrietta

http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article.php/20060919132553106/print

Deep Integration Planned at Secret Conference Ignored by the Media

NORTH AMERICAN FORUM
CONFIRMED PARTICIPANTS

Forum Co-Chairs:
Dr. Pedro Aspe
Hon. Peter Lougheed
Hon. George Shultz

American Participants

Ms. Deborah Bolton Political Advisor to Commander, US Northcom
Mr. Ron T. Covais, President, The Americas, Lockheed Martin Corporation
Sec. Kenneth W. Dam Max Pam Professor Emeritus of American & Foreign Law and Senior Lecturer, University of Chicago Law School
Mr. Dan Fisk Senior Director, Western Hemisphere, National Security Council
Sec. Ryan Henry Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Policy
Ms. Carla A. Hills Chairman & CEO, Hills & Co.
Ms. Caryn Hollis DASD (Acting) Western Hemisphere Affairs
Mr. Bill Irwin Manager - International Government Affairs; Policy, Government and Public Affairs, Chevron Corporation
Mr. Robert G. James President, Enterprise Asset Management Inc.
Admiral Tim Keating Commander, US Northern Command
Mr. Floyd Kvamme Chair, President’s Council of Advisors on Science & Technology; Director, Centre for Global Security Res.
Dr. Ronald F. Lehman II Director, Center for Global Security Research, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Mr. William W. McIlhenny Policy Planning Council for Western Hemisphere Affairs
Dr. Peter McPherson President, National Association of State Universities & Land-Grant Colleges
Ms. Doris Meissner Senior Fellow, Migration Policy Institute
Dr. George Miller Director, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Mr. George Nethercutt Chairman, US Section of the Permanent Joint Board on
Defense, US – Canada (Security)
Mary Anastasia O’Grady Journalist for Wall Street Journal (Area Specialist)
Dr. Robert A. Pastor Director, Center for North American Studies, American
University, Washington, DC

Dr. William Perry Co-Director, Preventive Defense Project
Lt. Gen. Gene Renuart USAF Senior Military Assist. to Sec. Rumsfeld
Mr. Eric Ruff Department of Defense Press Secretary
Sec. Donald R. Rumsfeld Secretary of Defense, US Department of Defense
Dr. James Schlesinger Former Sec. Of Energy & Defense
Mr. William Schneider President, International Planning Services
Sec. Clay Sell Deputy Secretary of Energy, US Dept. of Energy
Dr. Thomas A. Shannon Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere A
Dr. David G. Victor Director, Program on Energy & Sustainable Development, Center for Environmental Science & Policy
Maj. Gen. Mark A Volcheff Director, Plans, Policy & Strategy, NORAD-NORTHCOM
Ms. Jane Wales President & CEO, World Affairs Council of Northern California (and served as Director of the Rockefeller Brothers Fund's Project on World Security)
Mr. R. James Woolsey Vice President, Booz Allen Hamilton

Among the Canadian participants were Mr. Thomas d’Aquino, Canadian Council of Chief Executives and Dr. Wendy Dobson The Institute for International Business.

Both were members of the "Building a North American Community" Council on Foreign Relations original Task Force.

One of the Task Force recommendations was to create a North American Advisory Council.

With the creation of an independent group of advisors, the authors of the report particularly insist on the fact that "their mandate would be to engage in creative exploration of new ideas from a North American perspective and to provide a public voice for North America.

A complementary approach would be to establish private bodies that would meet regularly or annually to buttress North American relationships, along the lines of the Bilderberg or Wehrkunde conferences, organized to support transatlantic relations."

Building a North American Community - Council on Foreign Relations
Chairs: John P. Manley, Pedro Aspe, William F. Weld
Vice Chairs: Thomas P. D'Aquino, Andres Rozental, Robert A. Pastor

In recent years, the vice-chairman of the board of directors of the Council on Foreign Relations, Carla Hill, has sat on the board of directors of Chevron. Hill was a former Trade Negotiator in the Bush #41 Administration and a primary architect of NAFTA.

From an old WorldNetDaily article::

'U.S. backs U.N. plan
to control land'

"That headline appeared in the Utah Independent and hundreds of other newspapers across the country on July 22, 1976.

"The article proclaims that: 'Use of all land, public and private, will be controlled by the federal government in the future,' Assistant Secretary of Agriculture Rexford Tugwell predicted this week.

" Land which cannot be operated effectively under private ownership, will be held by the government as public forests, parks, game preserves, grazing ranges, recreation centers and the like, Tugwell asserted.

Privately owned land will be controlled 'to whatever extent is found necessary. ...'

"This new federal land policy reflected the new U.N. land policy developed and adopted at a U.N. conference in Vancouver, British Columbia, that concluded on June 11, 1976.

The U.S. delegation, headed by Carla Hill, then-secretary of housing and urban development, endorsed virtually every resolution in the new policy, as did every Communist nation."

The United Nations Conference on Human Settlements (HABITAT I) met in Vancouver, British Columbia in 1976.

Agenda Item 10 of the conference report was entitled simply "Land."

Here is an excerpt from the Preamble to that item:

"Land...cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market.

Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice; if unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes.

Public control of land use is therefore indispensable...."

This policy document was agreed to by the United States.

I repeat, the .S. delegation was headed by Carla Hill.

The "Constitution For The Newstates Of The United States," which was located at Liberty Lobby, 100 Independence Ave., S.E., Washington, D.C. 20003; was the subject matter of the book entitled: "The Emerging Constitution" by Rexford G. Tugwell, which was accomplished under the auspices of the Rockefeller tax-exempt foundation called the "Center For The Study Of Democratic Institutions."

In 1950, a "Preliminary Draft of a World Constitution" authored by CFR globalists Robert M. Hutchins, Rexford G. Tugwell, and others was introduced in Congress by Senator Glen Taylor (D-ID).

The submitted World Constitution declared that "iniquity and war inseparably spring from the competitive anarchy of the national states; that therefore the age of nations must end."

It held as well that nations must "surrender their arms" to the proposed "Federal Republic of the World."

http://www.vivelecanada.ca/staticpages/index.php/20060830133702539

Timeline of the Progress Toward A NORTH AMERICAN UNION
http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article.php/20060919132553106/print

Deep Integration Planned at Secret Conference Ignored by the Media

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHO20060919&articleI d=3274

Secret Banff Meeting of CEOs and the Defense Establishment : Militarization and the Deconstruction of North America
by Michel Chossudovsky

http://www.newswithviews.com/Richards/byron9.htm

SECRET RUMSFELD MEETING TO IMPLEMENT NORTH AMERICAN UNION

By Byron J. Richards, CCN
September 22, 2006
NewsWithViews.com

http://www.spectrezine.org/NorthAmerica/hillard.htm

Globalization: Building a North American Community

January 17, 2006 10:37 AM |

by Pierre Hillard

The true nature of today's "European Union" has become evident in the simultaneous construction of a North American community whose aim is to merge with the former.

Pierre Hillard analyzes this project as it is described in documents by Mexican, Canadian and American influential authors.

SNIP!

http://home.absolute.net/xode/nwofraud/Bankruptcy_fraud/Newstate.htm

THE "CONSTITUTION FOR THE NEWSTATES OF AMERICA" UNMASKED

The following document is an exact copy of the original as produced by Liberty Lobby.

Virtually all of the document paints a grim and hellish picture indeed.

However, there are a couple of sections that are so abysmal and so disrespectful of people's God given rights that they are in a class of their own, even within the context of this horrible document.

Those sections are in bold, are italicized, and are in red type.
http://beyond-the-illusion.com/files/Government/Constitution/new-states-constitution -1.txt

A Review of the Proposed Constitutional Model for the Newstates of America

By Col. Curtis B. Dall (FDR's son-in-law)

Opening Comments

This document was "hatched" in the Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions in Santa Barbara, California, under the direction of Rexford Tugwell, working with scores of collaborators for about ten years.

It is largely the distillation of a book written by him, entitled, "The Emerging Constitution," published in 1974 by Harper and Row, for a small, select group of readers.

It contains twelve Articles ]b]and is offered as a substitute for our time-honored, magnificent Constitution![/b]

Tugwell's document would foist upon unalerted Americans a new, deceitfully worded "Constitution" tooled up for a Police State under a Dictator!

Rex Tugwell, I can readily recall, was a well-known, Far-Out Liberal of the New Deal Era, a friend of Nelson Rockefeller who, reportedly, is also much interested in the promotion of this subversive new "Constitutional Model" with its varied overtones for a Dictatorship.

Just why should any group of Americans take it upon themselves to gratuitously present to the American people a NEW Constitution to replace the one which as served the country so outstandingly over the years?

Why attempt to tear down and overthrow our form of government by setting up, in its place, a Soviet-type, Godless Dictatorship, depriving the Individual American of Free Enterprise and personal Liberty?

Evidently, it is because a few super-rich men, devoid of loyalty to country, expect, along with some of their Satellite Corporations, to [profit greatly by assisting in the development of a One-World, Socialist State which they expect to control.

Their subversive planning will ultimately fail, once loyal Americans understand their monstrous plan.

I have read Dr. Peter Beter's very penetrating, brilliant analysis of this proposed new Constitution, which he wrote as an aroused lawyer.

This review of mine will represent the point of view of an aroused layman, emphasizing certain "key points" for those who are unsuspecting, and, therefore, unalerted--those who find it hard to believe that a few wealthy, politically-perverted-minded individuals, and their well-kept stooges, would stoop so low as to stick a knife in the back of their fellow-Americans and attempt to destroy the fruits of 200 years of struggle and great achievement here.

A struggle for the advancementawell-being of Free Men, in our enlightened, Constitutional Republic.

This abortive "New Constitution" pretends to follow the language of our own Constitution.

Lying just beneath some sweet-sounding, misleading words, however, are potential Subversion, Malfeasance, and perhaps, Treason.

Tugwell, the individual, and all sponsors of this Plan should be tried by the Courts and punished for their adjudged crimes against their country and their fellow-citizens, and the charters of all sponsoring and contributing Foundations voided.

For those who, with intent, have arrogantly attempted to turn back the clock and aim to plunge us all into miserable servitude, just what punishment is adequate?

SNIP!

***********************************************************

http://beyond-the-illusion.com/files/Government/Constitution/new-states-constitution -3.txt

THE PROPOSED CONSTITUTION FOR THE 'NEWSTATES OF AMERICA'

An analysis by E. Stanley Rittenhouse

This new constitution would replace the present U.S. Constitution and would dissolve the States as we know them into Newstates, "each comprising no less than 5 percent of the whole population."

This new constitution with its regional government would bring about an oligarchy at the expense of our Constitutional Republic.

This form of dictatorship that is planned for America would bring into even more prominence and power the crowd who wants a "New World Order."

This proposed constitution is, in itself, a vehicle for the transition from our proven, tried and true, divinely-ordained Constitution to the New World Order that man, in his own efforts, hopes to impose upon mankind.

The first eight words of the preamble clearly spell out all of the above. "So that we may join in common endeavors" assumes that everyone wants to support their endeavors to destroy America's sovereignty, states rights and the individual's God- given liberty and freedom.

Should this be accomplished, the states would be abolished in favor of regions known as "Newstates."

By their assumption, the initiative is taken and the momentum gained.

The "common endeavors" in this case is the destruction of our U.S. Constitution so as to replace it with a dictatorship.

The new would have the form and appearance of the old but there the similarity would end.

The Newstates of America Constitution is merely a form of the old in order to pacify those still remembering the liberty that is guaranteed.

The new constitution is a bridge, a part of the hopefully peaceful transition from a Constitutional Republic to an oligarchic world dictatorship.

The mere fact that this new constitution is to be in effect only 25 years and that many opportunities are provided to revise and rewrite it in those years, indicates the role of transition.

Article XI, Section 2 declares: "When this Constitution shall have been in effect for twenty-five years the Overseer shall ask, by referendum whether a new Constitution shall be prepared."

And should those in power be defeated in the case of amending their new constitution, they won't take no for an answer.

To quote Article XI, Section 1: "If rejected (that which they proposed), it may be restudied and a new proposal submitted."

So evidently, it is not possible for the people to totally reject that which the appointed Principal Justice and that which the appointed Senate proposes.

The word "emergency" appears frequently in the proposed Constitution but is never mentioned in our U.S. Constitution.

Consequently, an "emergency" is used to impose new dictates-- which could only be accomplished at the expense of the U.S. citizen's liberty.

Much of the language is vague leaving it wide open to various interpretations--and of course the ones in power would control the courts as our judicial system would be restructured to favor the continuance of power.

This would be accomplished by eliminating the present checks and balances so established within the present Constitution.

The legislative, judicial and executive branches would be replaced with six branches, all designed and structured to perpetuate those in power.

Article XII spells out clearly the awesome dictatorial power that will be put into the hands of a few.

Section 1 states: "The President is authorized to assume such powers, make such appointments, and use such funds as are necessary to make this Constitution effective as soon as possible after acceptance by a referendum he may initiate."

Section 4 says, "the president shall cause to be constituted an appropriate commission to designate existing laws inconsistent with this Constitution, and they shall be void."

The new order would bring about land use--the federal control or "use" of private property. (And we all know there can be no human rights without property rights!)

The Newstates Constitution declares: "No property shall be taken without compensation."

By leaving the word "just" out, the compensation becomes very arbitrary and the final decision would rest with the government.

Article VI, B, Section 16, states: "To acquire property and improvements for public use at costs to be fixed, if necessary, by the Court of Claims." The Court of Claims will be made up of appointees.

In order for the One-Worlders to maintain themselves in power, the key positions would be filled by appointees with the authority as well as the power being given to these unelected bureaucrats.

Such officials as the Overseer, the Watchkeeper, the National Regulator, the Intendant, the Principal Justice and his appointed members of all national courts, the Public Custodian, the chairman of the National Planning Board, Chancellors of External, Financial, Legal & Military Affairs and the appointed Senate, to name a few will be the unelected.

This approach would tend to continually bring to power only those of like mind.

This is completely contrary to the attitude and approach our Founding Fathers had back in 1789 when writing the U.S. Constitution.

Their concern was with the individual, his life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness; certainly not with an obsession of bringing more power to themselves and perpetuating themselves in power.

The fact that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely still applies today as it did then and should make us eternally vigilant against such a trend ever developing toward absolute power.

Article I, Section 1, states:

"Freedom of expression of communication, of movement, of assembly or of petition shall not be abridged except in declared emergency."

In other words, all freedom is dependent upon whether the government would declare an emergency or not.

But freedom is a right not to be revoked; they make it a privilege and at the mercy of their whim.

This would be government by men, not by law.

As this constitution states throughout, so much is dependent on certain conditions which can be determined at a later date, "Except in declared emergency;"

"except in the interest of national security;"

"Existing states may continue and may have the status of Newstates if the Boundary Commission, hereinafter provided, shall so decide;"

"except they be approved;"

"unless authorized;" "shall conform to his regulation;" etc., all point out that the form of government proposed by this document would be very arbitrary and dictatorial with the individual being forced to yield to his government.

The result would be very little individual liberty.

Article I, B, Section 8 would establish federal gun control and at the same time the dissolution of our 2nd Amendment which guarantees the citizen the right to bear arms.

This proposed new government would control the elections.

Political parties would need the approval of the Overseer and elections would be controlled by controlling the spending; this, in turn, would control the legislature.

The club of Revenue Sharing would also be in effect.

"If governments of the Newstates fail to carry out fully their constitutional duties, their officials shall be warned and may be required by the Senate, on the recommendations of the Watchkeeper, to forfeit revenues for the Newstates of America." (Art II, Sec 15).

This new constitution establishes the President with a term of nine years. This would make the government still less accountable to the people.

There no longer would be a competitive, free-enterprise system but a "planned economy."

And the planners would be appointed by the President.

This constitution would seek to dictate that the interests of America not be put first.

Article IV, Section 13 & 14 declares: "In making plans, there shall be due regard to the interests of other nations and such cooperation with their intentions as may be approved by the Board.

"There may also be cooperation with international agencies and such contributions to their work as are not disapproved by the President."

In regard to taxes, the President would be the tax czar, a virtual dictator.

"To assist in the maintenance of economic stability, the President may be authorized to alter rates by executive order." Article VI, B, Section 9d.

The economic dictatorship is also promoted in Article VII, the Regulatory Branch, Section 1 declares that the "National Regulator...shall make and administer rules for the conduct of all economic enterprises."

But "they" always look out for their own. Section 3 states: "Under procedures approved by the Board, the Regulator shall charter all corporations or enterprises except those exempted because of size or other characteristics, or those supervised by the Chancellor of Financial affairs, or the intendant..."

One wonders what characteristics would be sufficient to escape the hand of the Regulator?

Section 10: "The Regulator shall make rules for and shall supervise marketplaces for goods and services."

The law of supply and demand would come under the heel of the bureaucrat. The free-enterprise system that has provided the prosperity and level of living that is the envy and standard of the world would be abandoned by these international-socialists promoting the scheme and conspiracy of a socialistic, dictatorial economic system that has proven throughout the history of mankind, to be disfunctional, non-workable and a total failure.

Why, you may ask?

This whole document and what it represents is a move toward a centralization of power so that the few may control the many.

"The President may make agreements with OTHER ORGANIZED PEOPLES for a relation OTHER THAN FULL MEMBERSHIP in the Newstates of America.

They may become citizens and may PARTICIPATE IN THE SELECTION OF OFFICIALS.

They may RECEIVE ASSISTANCE for their development or or from the National Sharing Fund if they conform to its requirements; and they may serve in civilian or military services, BUT ONLY AS VOLUNTEERS.

They shall be REPRESENTED IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES BY MEMBERS ELECTED AT LARGE, their number proportional to their constituencies; but each shall have at least one; and each shall in the same way choose one permanent member of the Senate."

The [capitalized] emphases are added and they speak for themselves.

This document would put America at the mercy of the United Nations by recognizing U.N. agreements on par with our treaties (Article VIII, Section 14c).

This would open the door to the Genocide Treaty with evils too numerous to list here.

When a government is highly centralized, it is also highly vulnerable.

It is an efficient structure for takeover by a determined minority.

When there is decentralization and the power of the government truly rests with its citizens, to capture a part only provides a threat to the whole but does not necessarily mean a total loss.

This system of checks and balances which we enjoy under the U.S. Constitution provides the opportunity of correcting the wrong, throwing the rascals out and preserving the Union.

The name itself says it all, the United States of America, not a collection of federal regions controlled and run by the unelected elite.

In diversification of authority and power, there is security.

States' rights themselves provide that service and when united in a Union provide a formidable structure against attack from without and subversion from within.

To weaken that structure, the states and their rights must be dissolved.

The Newstates (regions) and this infamous constitution would weaken the Union and make us vulnerable to these vultures who want America for their own.

Certain powerful forces hope to replace the freedoms guaranteed in our Constitution by their own dictatorship--a cleverly disguised dictatorship.

It has been planned to resemble superficially the government we have now, so that we will not recognize it for what it is--until too late!!!

They are using every propaganda trick at their command to make us lower our guard.

For years they have been working through groups too numerous to list, orchestrating their efforts to force a "New Constitution" on us while the people of America slumber, unaware of what is happening.

In 1964 a tax-exempt foundation, the far left, internationalist "Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions," an offshoot of the multibillion dollar Ford Foundation, began writing a "New Constitution."

It took ten years and hundreds of thousands of tax-free dollars to write.

The final version was prepared under the leadership of Rexford G. Tugwell, well-known in the 1930's as one of FDR's "brain- trusters."

The "Newstates Constitution" is a blueprint for the slavery of the American people.

It is a document you should know and understand to comprehend the conspiracy that powerful forces in America have entered into in order to snap the manacles of an international dictatorship on the arms and legs of America.

This 32-page document contains, in addition to the complete text of the "Newstates Constitution," a review by Col. Curtis B. Dall, Chairman of Liberty Lobby, and a commentary by E. Stanley Rittenhouse, Liberty Lobby's Legislative Aide.

Colonel Dall is a former investment banker who has been connected with the federal banking-political complex at the highest levels. He is also a well-known author and lecturer.

posted September 30, 2006 01:03 AM              

Lotza food for thought...the stuff I cant wait to ingest while I fast tomorrow.

posted October 01, 2006 10:27 PM              

.......The details of the NAFTA Super Highway are hidden in plan view.

Still, Bush has not given speeches to bring the NAFTA Super Highway plans to the full attention of the American public.

Missing in the move toward creating a North American Union is the robust public debate that preceded the decision to form the European Union.

All this may be for calculated political reasons on the part of the Bush Administration.......

(borrowed this from an older post of yours, Petron......hope you don't mind....)

posted October 02, 2006 01:28 AM              

It was reported on Lou Dobbs last night that the traitors to the United States are finally coming out from their positions under the rocks.

The Council on Foreign Relations has published a report which articulates the plan to subvert the Constitution by dissolving our nation in favor of a
continental government.

The media has kept a pretty tight lid on this treason until now.

The 1986 amnesty, NAFTA, CAFTA have been stepping stones towards the dissolution of our national sovereignty.

Here is the transcript from last night's program -

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~

DOBBS: Border security is arguably the critical issue in this country's fight against radical Islamist terrorism.

But our borders remain porous.

So porous that three million illegal aliens entered this country last year, nearly all of them from Mexico.

Now, incredibly, a panel sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations wants the United States to focus not on the defense of our own borders, but rather create what effectively would be a common border that includes Mexico and Canada.

Christine Romans has the report.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

CHRISTINE ROMANS, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): On Capitol Hill, testimony calling for Americans to start thinking like citizens of North America and treat the U.S., Mexico and Canada like one big country.

ROBERT PASTOR, IND. TASK FORCE ON NORTH AMERICA: The best way to secure the United States today is not at our two borders with Mexico and Canada, but at
the borders of North America as a whole.

ROMANS: That's the view in a report called "Building a North American
Community."

It envisions a common border around the U.S., Mexico and Canada
in just five years, a border pass for residents of the three countries, and
a freer flow of goods and people.

Task force member Robert Pastor.
PASTOR: What we hope to accomplish by 2010 is a common external tariff which
will mean that goods can move easily across the border.

We want a common
security perimeter around all of North America, so as to ease the travel of people within North America.

ROMANS: Buried in 49 pages of recommendations from the task force, the brief
mentions, "We must maintain respect for each other's sovereignty." But security experts say folding Mexico and Canada into the U.S. is a grave breach of that sovereignty.

FRANK GAFFNEY, CENTER FOR SECURITY POLICY: That's what would happen if
anybody serious were to embrace this strategy for homogenizing the United
States and its sovereignty with the very different systems existing today in
Canada and Mexico.

ROMANS:]/b] Especially considering Mexico's problems with drug trafficking,
human smuggling and poverty.

Critics say the country is just too far behind
the U.S. and Canada to be included in a so-called common community.

But the task force wants military and law enforcement cooperation between all three countries.

[b]UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Indeed, an exchange of personnel that bring Canadians and Mexicans into the Department of Homeland Security.

ROMANS: And it wants temporary migrant worker programs expanded with full
mobility of labor between the three countries in the next five years.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

ROMANS: The idea here is to make North America more like the European Union.

Yet, just this week, voters in two major countries in the European Union voted against upgrading -- updating the European constitution.

So clearly, this is not the best week to be trying to sell that idea.

DOBBS: Americans must think that our political and academic elites have gone utterly mad at a time when three-and-a-half years, approaching four years after September 11, we still don't have border security. And this group of elites is talking about not defending our borders, finally, but rather creating new ones.

It's astonishing.

ROMANS: The theory here is that we are stronger together, three countries in one, rather than alone.

DOBBS: Well, it's a -- it's a mind-boggling concept.

Christine Romans, thank you, as always.....

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

RECOGNIZING the contributions of the OAS and other regional and sub-regional
mechanisms to the promotion and consolidation of democracy in the Americas;

RECALLING that the Heads of State and Government of the Americas, gathered
at the Third Summit of the Americas, held from April 20 to 22, 2001 in
Quebec City, adopted a democracy clause which establishes that any
unconstitutional alteration or interruption of the democratic order in a
state of the Hemisphere constitutes an insurmountable obstacle to the
participation of that state's government in the Summits of the Americas
process;

"The terrorist catastrophes in New York and Washington swept away media
comment on other global events taking place on September 11, 2001.

Virtually obscured on that historic agreement reached in Lima, Peru by the
foreign ministers of the Organization of American States (OAS) on the
Inter-American Democratic Charter.

You'd never guess it from the ho-hum reportage of the Establishment press,
but the recently concluded Summit of the Americas in Monterrey, Mexico, was
a revolutionary event of major magnitude!

The two-day summit (January 12-13)
attended by President Bush marked another step forward in a long-term agenda to abolish national borders and merge the countries of the Western Hemisphere into a regional Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA).

The general spin by most of the media analysts is that the conference hosted by Mexican President Vicente Fox did not accomplish much, ending with a harmless declaration but little consensus among the hemispheric leaders.

The truth is far different.

The summit's final statement, the Declaration of Nuevo Leon, commits the 34 nations to courses of action that have little or nothing to do with increasing trade - the ostensible purpose for creating
the FTAA -

- but much to do with destroying our borders, soaking U.S. taxpayers for billions of dollars more in foreign aid, and promoting socialism throughout the hemisphere.

The Declaration, for instance, included
a call for tripling the funding of the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB)
for loans to Latin American businesses.

The IDB - like the World Bank, the
International Monetary Fund and other multi-lateral lending agencies - has a
horrible record of corruption and of funding statist projects that have
saddled Latin Americans with a crushing debt burden.

With a huge infusion of new IDB bribe money for business and political leaders, the FTAA architects will be able to overcome much of the current resistance south of the border to their merger plans.