Lindaland
  Uni-versal Codes
  Adding up and reducing in numerology HELP

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Adding up and reducing in numerology HELP
tracysalome
Knowflake

Posts: 288
From: minneapolis minnesota USA
Registered: Jan 2005

posted May 05, 2005 03:41 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for tracysalome     Edit/Delete Message
I have a BIG question that was never explained in star signs.... When you are reducing individual words, IF one name or word were to add up to a 19 would you reduce it to a 10 or a one before adding the final reductions for the final single and compound number? Also my son was born on 1-5-01 so he just doesn't have a compound birth number or what?? This is very very important for me to know..

IP: Logged

sesame
Moderator

Posts: 816
From: Oz
Registered: Nov 2003

posted May 05, 2005 07:55 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for sesame     Edit/Delete Message
Well, I'm glad you asked

The trick is that your entire name *should* have both a single and compound number, but the "sad" fact is that some don't. This will take me a little while to explain. However, be rest assured that not having a compound number is actually more positive than negative because their is no negative (or positive) karma to overcome. Also remember that positive karma may have hooks - in that if you take it for granted, your next life could suffer etc.

Anyhow, as for the adding. Now, I'll run through some examples.

Say you had three numbers:

6, 7, and 5. This added = 17 and 8.
Now, if you had 3, 3, and 3, then the final number is 9 - no compound.

But this is where it gets tricky. if your initial numbers were 12, 3, and 3 before reducing them, then you recalculate your final number to be 12 + 3 + 3 = 19.

So, you see, you need to look through all names again, but it is possible that after looking through them that their is still no compound number.

One final note. If any numbers are reduced or initially a master number - ie (22 or 11 only - 33 is not according to the chaldeans) then they should not be reduced.

For example 29, 2, 3 = 11, 2, 3 = 16.

Is that all cool? I'd like you to test this on my program if at all possible. I know it works, but I like continuous testing to find any bugs. But if you can't run the prpgram, then no biggy.

Dean.

------------------
Always think compassion... The Dalai Lama
My numerology program based on "Star Signs" by Linda Goodman
Logically Magical Logic is Magically Logical Magic! (and vice versa!)

IP: Logged

tracysalome
Knowflake

Posts: 288
From: minneapolis minnesota USA
Registered: Jan 2005

posted May 06, 2005 11:32 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for tracysalome     Edit/Delete Message
Thats fantastic that you've made this site sesame! But I think i need to clarify my question. for the name number issue I meant If one of the names were to add up to 19 or 29 or 28 or something like that would you reduce one or twice (except 11) to get the total number of that part of the name or word, so i mean if the first name out of the first middle and last is adding up to a 19 would I reduce it to a 10 or a one? Or does this all have to do with what number pertains better to the person? I am glad to hear about the single birth number also.. but since this is probably pretty common for children born from 2000 up to..what 2007?? Then do you think that there is something special about the millenium children? indigo children perhaps? Although from what i've heard i need alot more convincing before i buy the indigo children theory. Thanks for the reply

IP: Logged

Ayumi
Knowflake

Posts: 73
From: Under your bed, next to that magazine
Registered: Jan 2005

posted May 07, 2005 03:11 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ayumi     Edit/Delete Message
Dean-
Hey I have a question for you! I thought my compound name number was 22, but after I added my numbers up like you said, I got 31. But the program says 22.
7 + 13 + 11. Which one is it???

IP: Logged

sesame
Moderator

Posts: 816
From: Oz
Registered: Nov 2003

posted May 09, 2005 01:35 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for sesame     Edit/Delete Message
tracysalome, OK, yeah, they're reduced twice (except for 29 which is reduced once). 19 = 10 = 1 - the 10 is ignored completely. if all names = 19 ie 19, 19, 19 = 1 + 1 + 1 = 3, then they would be added separately to 19 X 3 = 57, which then is greater than 52, so it equals 12 (5 + 7).

Ayumi, the 13 is reduced, so it's 7 + 4 + 11 = 22.

Anymore queries? Come on, I can handle 'em
Dean.

IP: Logged

beebuddy
Knowflake

Posts: 178
From: illinois
Registered: Apr 2005

posted May 09, 2005 06:40 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for beebuddy     Edit/Delete Message
hi dean, im curious why 12, 3, 3 = 19. was this an oversight, or is there a reason that the number was not 18?

(not tryin to nitpick )

IP: Logged

sesame
Moderator

Posts: 816
From: Oz
Registered: Nov 2003

posted May 10, 2005 09:54 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for sesame     Edit/Delete Message
Woops, yeah, my bad

Dean.

IP: Logged

beebuddy
Knowflake

Posts: 178
From: illinois
Registered: Apr 2005

posted May 11, 2005 06:42 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for beebuddy     Edit/Delete Message
ahhhhhh, i wasnt sure if it was a method that i was un-aware of, i had never heard of the method of not assigning the number 9 to any letter for instance. in general i have noticed some uniqueness and originality to Linda's technique (or at least methods that are new to me!)

i checked out your program online, pretty cool!

IP: Logged

Eleanore
Moderator

Posts: 1141
From: North Carolina
Registered: Aug 2003

posted May 11, 2005 07:48 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Eleanore     Edit/Delete Message
Here's an example:

Sarah Jessica Parker
31215 1533131 812252
12 + 17 + 20
3 + 8 + 2 = 13
Compound name number is 13
Single name number is 4

The only time you would not reduce a number in the middle of the calculation was if it was 11 or 29.

For example:

Ann Smith
155 34145
11 + 17
11 + 8 = 19
Compound name number is 19
Single name number is 1

Notice that in the final calculation of 19, it is not reduced to 10 for a compound number. In the final calculation, the compound number you get as a result is the one you interpret for. If it reduces to another compound number before reducing to a single number (such as 19 which reduces to 10 before reducing to 1) you simply ignore the second compound number (in other words, you ignore the 10 in this case).

Linda did go through this in Star Signs though I don't remember quite where. I'll see if I get a chance to look it up later.

As for birth dates that don't have a compound number, Linda states that that is actually rather fortunate for the same reasons that sesame pointed out in regards to karma.

------------------
"This above all:
to thine own self be true,
And it must follow,
as the night the day,
Thou canst not then be false
to any man." - Shakespeare

IP: Logged

sesame
Moderator

Posts: 816
From: Oz
Registered: Nov 2003

posted May 11, 2005 07:50 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for sesame     Edit/Delete Message
Hey, Eleanore, I reckon one you might enjoy doing is "Albert Einstein".

What do you think?

Dean.

IP: Logged

tracysalome
Knowflake

Posts: 288
From: minneapolis minnesota USA
Registered: Jan 2005

posted May 25, 2005 04:24 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for tracysalome     Edit/Delete Message
Thanks

IP: Logged

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2005

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a