posted October 09, 2005 12:33 AM         

Anyway since you brought her name out in such a condescending way. Let me speak for her.

I will give you a clue of Mary:

* Jesus appears to Mary before he actually places himself in the womb
* Mary is given by Jesus a light that will protect her from this evil world. Its the same light which he has given the mother of our universe, as a crown of light. Hehehe go and ask your mother god again.

Did you read about lady of Guadalupe? Do check her out. Also Lady of Fatima, Lourdes, Medgugorje(of this I am not sure yet) You might get beautiful clues about this mysterious woman with a crown of light on her head. Remember the lady with 12 stars crown in Revelations?????

May you find the truth for it alone sets one free. I will be bold enough to tell you to give up tarots, astrology and other such magical things? When Jesus appeared he lessened the powers of these entities. Some he even weakened for ever. You may play with it, but do not be dead serious, there is no truth in them.
Just trust the true light? All your fears will go away.

posted October 09, 2005 12:42 AM         

beebuddy,
not sure, just thought it might have some signifigience in history, or something, I can't find anything on the internet, I saw something before, but it's not there anymore, sneaky serpent at work
hehe

posted October 09, 2005 12:47 AM         

Lotusheartone,
You did not answer why you want to assasinate her character in this thread.

I am actually scared of you, and will keep away from your posts. I think I am feeding your energies, and others who are having fun, by responding to such silly posts.

posted October 09, 2005 01:06 AM         

that is what this is all about
FEAR

the TRUTH is here
it's everywhere
you'll see, many things
will begin to be exposed

be patient, and pray to
Mother and Father
and take that leap of
Faith

posted October 09, 2005 03:17 AM         

Where is your guys sense of humor at?

posted October 09, 2005 04:46 AM         

...but seriously, what's humor got to do with it?

There's no reason to be offensive. I couldn't care less what anyone thinks about Mary's story, but I think IAT's point is valid. IAT offered his reasoning for his belief. I think that if Lotus wished to change someone's mind she ought to say why she believes what she believes. Saying Mother and Father told her so, doesn't really say anything. It's kind of a convenient excuse to get out of having to justify any beliefs or thoughts.

A lot of people when they can't explain why they feel the way they feel they say so [that they can't explain it]. A lot of people also say things in order to have a discussion about them. It's not usually the case where someone says something, another person has a different take on it, and then the first person says that, "No, I'm right, because some unknown force I'll call Mother and Father told me so." That's just not the way adult interaction works. If you're going to insist on claiming that your thoughts are truth, you back them up with some evidence of some sort. If that doesn't work, you agree to disagree. You don't just leave it at, "Oh, I'm sorry you feel that way, but the voices in my head insist that I'm correct, and say that I should try to shame you by talking about fear."

IN NO SENSE? Nonsense!

posted October 09, 2005 10:10 AM         

I do not expect you to take what I say for Truth, but for you to take it and explore, and find your own Truth.
and I will say again, what I have said, is what I know as my Truth.

Please if you have any questions and I can answer them, I will
and I'm sorry for making you uncomfortable.
Do you feel it though, can you feel something going on in the Universe, are you curious?

posted October 09, 2005 12:30 PM         

Who is crazier, the person who makes a claim that they couldn't ever possibly hope to prove or the person that argues with them?

posted October 09, 2005 12:37 PM         

Love and Light to ALL

posted October 09, 2005 05:12 PM         

If you tell me a banana is red, and I reply telling you it's yellow, you still appear to be the crazy one. Arguing and/or attempting to correct a person doesn't make one seem crazy.

posted October 09, 2005 06:20 PM         

Just to clarify, YOUR posts weren't the ones being referred to. Your posts were clear and accurate for the most part.

It's obvious who is crazy here, but IMO there is nothing wrong with craziness and it can even be refreshing if it's taken with some humor and a grain of salt.

This goes back to the "trolls" thread... it seems that getting all huffy about a bunch of absolute nonsense (in this case, rediculous speculations about the virgin Mary) is a waste of time. And FYI, the forum rules don't state that discussions have to be "adult" in nature, and expecting that from other posters is unrealistic. Lord knows there have been some flagrant violations of logic from posters other than "LotusHeartOne", just see "MysticGemini's" post in this thread.

posted October 09, 2005 07:04 PM         

I thought we had gotten past that
you know
judging people
we are not GOD
only their children

I'm just trying to show that the bible is missing alot of information, and that some is inaccurate

aren't we all just searching for Truth
each in our own way
let's repect that in each and every one of us
it'll go a long way
quickly

posted October 09, 2005 08:24 PM         

quote:

---

I hope you realize that the sane portion of the population realizes that there isn't a single person on the planet that is considered credible to comment on this subject.

---

what an intriguing statement. quite encompassing.

this assumes that:

a) beebuddy has been granted (or granted himself ) membership in that elite task force known as "the sane population".

b) beebuddy is privy to any and all decisions made by "the sane population" (quick aside. is there a governing body? what form does it take? do you vote on these matters? or are they decided on by some sort of tribunal? democracy? republic? dictatorship?)

c) "the sane population" is aware of the capabilities of every other living human on the planet

d) "the sane population" is entirely in agreement that those capabilties do not include an ability to access previously mentioned Biblical information

beebuddy, I am majorly impressed.

posted October 10, 2005 12:14 AM         

Points a., b. & c. are non-sequtur and point d. is accurate. In this case "sane" = logical. There are rules for debate.

LotusHeartOne,

posted October 10, 2005 02:18 PM         

------------------
Gemini sun, Cancer rising, mercury in Gemini, moon in Taurus *29, venus in Taurus, mars in Libra