Author
|
Topic: Pathogran OR Chaldean Numerology??
|
sweet_face Knowflake Posts: 210 From: Registered: Mar 2005
|
posted May 01, 2006 07:07 PM
Which method is the best and most accurate to use,I feel the energires in both systems,this is what I have.Pathogran(i think i spelled it wrong) Soul urge-1 Destiny-1 Personality-9 Birthday#-28(1) Life Path-5 Chaldean Soul Urge-11(2) Destiny-7 Personality-5 Birthday#-28(1) Life Path-5 Theyre totally different but i feel both,Sometimes I have the urge to be assertive and take action,But sonmetimes I feel shy,unsure and passive.
IP: Logged |
sesame Moderator Posts: 1306 From: Oz Registered: Nov 2003
|
posted May 03, 2006 02:23 AM
I've never really looked into Pythagorean Numerology, but check this thread out: http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum2/HTML/002007.html . It links to others as well that could be usefull.Dean. IP: Logged |
Thorshammer Moderator Posts: 525 From: salt lake city, utah, USA Registered: Nov 2004
|
posted May 07, 2006 09:03 PM
Its said that once you delve into Numerology should master only ONE of the two, so you should choose one. I say CHALDEAN all the way, I have read others that did Path, and then went to Chaldean and swore it worked better, and it really does-there is nothing like it.and it is said the the greek mathematician didnt finish the system, instead it was a student of him that did it...so take that into hand. I think its incomplete, but of course thats up to you. The west has grasped it, but the west takes everthing into account that is greek or so...this is our way. Chaldean is a little more deep, but so worth the prize when you understand it. IP: Logged |
Lil_Rachele Knowflake Posts: 2 From: Registered: May 2006
|
posted May 25, 2006 08:44 PM
I learned to use the Chaldean system growing up and so feel more connected to that, I've used the Pythagorean many times and feel that it also rings true...I think it depends on whether you believe that the number 9 really is too sacred to be used when calculating, or if withholding it's use determines the incorrect result. Also, you could say that the Chaldean way is from an older era compared to the Pythagorean and so does not apply to people in this day and age...IP: Logged |
numero_uno_0 Knowflake Posts: 9 From: New Delhi, India Registered: Mar 2006
|
posted May 31, 2006 03:21 AM
Dear Friends, I felt that the "Destiny Number" was efficiently defined by Pythagorus and not by the Chaldeans. But to be more flexible I would like to say that you can take all the compound numbers as your destiny numbers. This is my personal experience. But still the main destiny number would be the sum of your entire d.o.b. and not your d.o.b. Try it. i have found it right.Note: All compound numbers: 1) D.o.b. 2) Sum of your entire d.o.b. 3) Your name number.
IP: Logged |