Lindaland
  Divine Diversities
  Twin souls and the Bible (Page 1)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
This topic is 2 pages long:   1  2 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Twin souls and the Bible
Quinnie
Knowflake

Posts: 1204
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted December 17, 2002 04:31 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Quinnie     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
In Edgar Cayce's 'Story of Jesus' it says that both Mary the mother of Jesus and Jesus were immaculate conceptions as Anne conceived Mary (through the power of mind over matter)and both Mary and Jesus were without a father. It is in compliance with natural law the book describes; the projection of mind into matter makes matter of it'self incased in itself. And that Mary bore Jesus as her twin soul, that as far as the earth is concerned they were one soul.
How would that apply to twin souls in general then?
Must you give birth to your twin soul from your soul before it can be made flesh? What does that mean exactly? Does it mean actual birth or the birth of soul realisation?
As in the trinity of three that Linda talked about also, that Mary and Jesus were one soul but Mary Magdalene and Jeus were twins as well or were they just soulmates? Or was Mary the mother of God and Mary Magdalene the same woman?


Another thing the book talks about is the soul-entity of Jeshua born in Jesus who is the main character of the whole Bible.
Jeshua was also Joshua and the mouth of Moses.
Is it so then that the Bible talks more about the channellings of a soul or spirit rather than actual events taking place or factual happenings... the whole Bible being a parable ... Did Jesus exist as a human?
And are twin souls truly so very rare and complex?

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 15094
From: Saturn next to Charmainec
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 16, 2003 01:08 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
How did I miss this string?

------------------
"Never mentally imagine for another that which you would not want to experience for yourself, since the mental image you send out inevitably comes back to you." Rebecca Clark

IP: Logged

Mazz
unregistered
posted March 16, 2003 08:18 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

I need to ask something
When we meditate as one example of connecting with our higher self we connect with that self in heaven.I believe this earth is a reflection of heaven,our higher selves live in peace there with one's spiritual ideal on earth to connect once again with heaven.Therefore,if everything is as it should be in heaven it must mean that the higher selves of twin souls are together already in heaven,does it mean then that wanting and desiring to meet your twin soul would automatically influence the polarity of both combined.
If one of the pair was working towards being immortal,balancing karma and so on,would that be effecting the other twin wherever he/she may be and saving them spiritually and causing changes in their life.Should we be expecting our twin soul to be a fallen angel who needs to be saved?
Surely ,if we are constantly being assured that our spiritual self is as it should be and knows everything and it's simply a matter of remembering that knowledge then our twin higher selves must be astrally standing side by side somewhere already right?

IP: Logged

Quinnie
Knowflake

Posts: 1204
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 16, 2003 06:39 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Quinnie     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yes I think thats right... Have you read any of the twin souls/twin rays websites, mazz?
I think as you say on a higher level we are always with our twin soul/divine ray.
According to some, it's our twin souls (higher selves?) that are actually guiding us in spirit and always with us so actually coming together on earth is a big deal.
I think it's because if we have a twin soul guiding us then he/she would be of higher frequency and maybe a master from another realm and so coming together means the blending of dimensions but I'm not entirely sure how it works.
There are different defintions of soulmate, twinsouls, twin rays, divine rays etc.
and they all serve a purpose to us.
The links aren't working on my computer but if you go to the Soul Union thread there is a thread there called 'Enter the Divine Twin ray Unions'
Check that one out if you haven't already ,cause it explains this concept better.

IP: Logged

bases loaded
unregistered
posted March 17, 2003 08:51 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Hello. Greetings for everyone. Quinnie, I would like to ask about those inmaculate conceptions. We must notice that only the catholic church says that about Mary. Protestant churches donīt. Indeed, there are several evidences to prove that Mary was not inmaculate. And the Bible is really clear about that, and has the best evidences. We cannot believe everything the church teaches, because we can miss the point the Book wants we understand, donīt you think?

Love, Bases Loaded.

IP: Logged

StarLover33
unregistered
posted March 17, 2003 04:02 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Well what are the evidences?

Personally, I've come to realize that perhaps Mary was raped by a roman soldier. I was thinking that maybe they were afraid that the mob would consider Jesus to be rather unholy and that maybe they created the immaculate to certify him as a God-Man that no one can be like.
I'm not saying that immaculate conception is not possible, but it's more of an advanced Avatar thing, and if Jesus was really trying to tell people you could be like him, then I do not believe he was immaculate to try and prove his point. Maybe I'm wrong.

IP: Logged

Quinnie
Knowflake

Posts: 1204
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 17, 2003 05:27 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Quinnie     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Bases Loaded I don't know if Edgar Cayce is talking about actual physical conception.
His words are making me ponder beyond the conventional concept-ions of the Bible and I'm thinking maybe Mary was a woman who channelled the entity Jesus, but this is just an airy fairy idea because I do not know anything more than what I'm reading and concluding from the Bible and other sources such as Edgar Cayce readings.
Another idea is that It was an immaculate conception as such, that an immaculate entity (untainted by the world) was speaking through Mary and was possibly a guide or twin soul of Mary?
The female being one half of the soul who can give birth to her soul-half in some realms and this could be further channelled into physicality?
Like Anne in the third dimension being the shadow and channel of Mary, her light form in a higher dimension. Jesus being the other half of the entity of Mary but on an even higher level yet again.
But I could be taking this a little too far, then again maybe not.
I am not entirely sure who was actually born into the physical but I do believe that mind over matter can work that as such by concentrating enough on thought energy it will materialise into matter.
I'd love to open my mind to as many possibilities as is possible about what this could mean so I'm not just of the belief that Jesus actually physically existed and so whether Mary was channelled through Anne also could be another thought to think.
The thinking of the physical immaculate mary is not my whole belief but one of a possibility of many beliefs, so I'm open to all opinions. I totally agree that we cannot believe everything the church teaches us as by doing that, we are going against the Christian ideal that we can think for ourselves and therefore have trust in God, in love.
Starlover I think that is my point too that there is no evidence, we don't just believe in things just because we can see them there infront of us. belief's are thoughts and thoughts are of constant change,eg. I don't see myfamily everyday but I believe they are here, they exist and when I need them, I think of them and sometimes they manifest infront of me or phone me up.

I think Mary could have possibly been raped by a soldier also, it's another possibility and if the timeline of the time of Jesus is anything to go by, what was happening then with the Roman's and the Jews gives this theory even more weight to it.
But even this theory could be further expanded... perhaps Mary was raped by a someone of royal blood...I gotta do more research though.
Then what about the Essenes, who were they in this?
In a book I read Joseph would have been called the Holy Spirit and the high priests or cousellers would have been called angels.
There are just alot of potentials to be explored but I'm too fague with anything here that really I'm just putting stuff out here to see what other people think. I can't really explain it the way I want to either because I could be making things way too complex.

IP: Logged

theFajita3
unregistered
posted March 18, 2003 12:47 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

------------------
food is the only art that nourishes!

IP: Logged

Quinnie
Knowflake

Posts: 1204
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 18, 2003 09:00 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Quinnie     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Another thought, does anyone know anything about the Roman Piso family?

IP: Logged

DeighLight
unregistered
posted March 18, 2003 10:42 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
IN THE BIBLE IT SAY THAT GOD TOUCH MARY AND THATS HOW SHE CONCIVED JESUS,
THERE ARE LOTS OF THINGS IN THE BIBLE THAT PROVES,IN REINCARNATION. I BELIVE THAT JESUS IS THE SAME DEITY AS ADAM, IT MAKES SENCE THE LAWS OF KARMA, HE BROGHT SIN IN TO THIS WORLD, AND AS CHRIST HE GETS IT OUT. ON A MANER OF SPEAKING.
ALSO IN GENISIS IT TALKS ABOUT HOW THE FALLEN ANGELS WERE HAVEING SEX WITH THE PEOPLE AND THEN RIGHT AFTER IT TALKS ABOUT THAT GOD SENDS THE FLOOD. COULD IT BE POSIBLE THAT A FORM OF GOD, WHICH WE ARE ALL A PART OF CONCIVED JESUS.ALSO IF YOU THINK IF OWR SOULS KNOW EVERY THING, BUT CAN NOT BE ANY THING UNLESS, WE EXPERENCE IT, TO BECOME IT.

IP: Logged

bases loaded
unregistered
posted March 19, 2003 09:43 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Hello, friends. These are some evidences to understand the true nature of Mary. As the first point, let's see the Bible; we'll consider the history later, as the second point. We must remember that you'll have to see these statements as a Christian would see them, although you are not, because the so-called Christians are the source of that teaching about Mary.

Luke 2:22-24 says "Joseph and Mary took (Jesus) to Jerusalem to present him to the Lord (...) and to offer a sacrifice in keeping with what is said in the Law of the Lord: 'a pair of doves or two young pigeons'". the reason of that sacrifice? Read Leviticus 12:1-8. Verse 8 is this: "If she cannot afford a lamb, she is to bring two doves or two young pigeons, one for a burnt offering and the other for a sin offering. In this way the priest will make atonement for her, and she will be clean". So, Luke 2:22-24 means that Mary was not inmaculate, she didn't have the perfect purity, as the Catholic Church teaches. She had sins and needed the atonement.

That inmaculate condition is never mentioned in the Bible. Mary doesn't have the importance the Church says she have. That's why Peter doesn't mention her in his epistles, and Paul doesn't mention her name, only "a woman" (Galatians 4:4).

Now notice that Eve was the first disobedient human; Adam the second one. However the Bible says that "sin entered the world through one man", not through one woman (Romans 5:12). Therefore, to avoid the heredity of the sin reaches Jesus, God only removed the human father (the man); the human mother (the woman) stays, and her sins do not contaminate her son.

The New Catholic Encyclopedia (1967, vol VII, pages 378-381) says: "The Inmaculate Conception is not explicitly taught in the Scriptures(...) The first parents of the Church believed Mary was a saint, but not absolutly free of sin". About the belief on Mary as the Inmaculate Conception, that encyclopedia assures that it became commonly accepted by 8th or 9th centuries, not much before.

The first Christians did not believe and teach that. In the catacombs (underground refuges used by them due to the persecution) there are many texts and drawings, some of them from 1st, 2nd and 3rd centuries, where Mary is absent. Those are before the famous councils that gave the main shape to the religion. Besides, the church also teaches that Mary has always been virgin, even during the childbirth and after it. That's related to the inmaculate conception, to attract us with her superhuman purity and chastity. However we see she had several sons and daughters. In Matthew 13:55,56 we read about Jesus' brothers (adelphoi) and sisters (adelphai).Those Greek words have to be understood as 'full brothers and sisters', because 'relative' has its own word: 'syggenon' (e.g. Luke 21:16). So, Mary was virgin during the pregnancy, until the time for the childbirth.

As we can see, the church has defended a lot of absurd traditions without the solid support they need. Notice these: the cross for Jesus; perpetual virginity of Mary; Trinity; mass; hell with fire; limbo; heaven for all obedient people; baptism for babies; holy water; Peter as the first Pope; his death in Rome, etc.

If all those teachings (among others) are short of support, why should we believe Mary was an Inmaculate Conception? Remember this: Roman Catholic Church is the source of those believes (influenced by other ancient religions)... and cannot prove it is a reliable teaching.
Bases loaded

IP: Logged

Quinnie
Knowflake

Posts: 1204
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 19, 2003 06:28 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Quinnie     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Bases Loaded what do u think about Mary maybe being a vestal virgin and being betrothed to Joseph?

IP: Logged

kAHANyAH
unregistered
posted March 20, 2003 10:20 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I personally don't think Mary conceived thru the immaculate conception. Atleast not in the way the word is deffined. I applied psonix technology to the word immaculate and this is what I came up with...

Immaculate -> I-mmac-u-uaculate -> I*make*you*ejaculate, seems sex was involved to me.

What the church did was to conceal the true worship type they adhered to and concealed encryptively in the bible. That worship is called TEMPLE HARLOTRY. Notice the psonix Harlotry -> Harlo-->TREE<-- or HOLLOW TREE as in the HOLY FAMILY TREE of the PRIESTESS bloodline and also a hollowed tree which was revered by the babylonians. It was claimed that Ishtar's (Priestess temple wh*re ) son semaramis who died, his spirit was to dwell in the hollow of a tree. This tree later came to be known as christmass.

In ancient times, temple wh*re priestess'hood was a cult practiced in aegypt and other cultures. And many of these women brought forth bast*rd seeds, sons who knew not who the father was. And herein lies the *myth* of a divine son without father, it is from the bast*rd bloodline. I guess the church wanted to kina cover up the desecration.

There is more to this. I will continue at a later date.

Shalowm,

kAH

IP: Logged

bases loaded
unregistered
posted March 20, 2003 03:58 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Please, Quinnie, tell me the meaning of those words you mention, īvestalī, ībetrothedī. Iīm not a good English speaker. Iīm sorry. Can you explain them to me, please? Thanks a lot.

Bases Loaded

IP: Logged

Quinnie
Knowflake

Posts: 1204
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 20, 2003 06:24 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Quinnie     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Bases Loaded the word 'vestal' Virgins is a particular group of virgins ( similar to nuns) who I believe were part of the 'essenes'. Their mission in life to remain celibate ( attain purity) except for the time/s when the virgin would have sex only for the purpose of conceiving a child... This was organised, so that only certain bloodlines were allowed to reproduce to keep the sanctity of a certain bloodline remaining intact.
It was believed that those of the bloodline of David were the true 'Royals'.
All others remained celibate except for the chosen ... ( line of David?) who conceived for this purpose.
Mary was 'betrothed' to Joseph meaning that it was 'arranged' that Mary and Joseph should be together, to conceive a child so it seems that their bloodline was that of the line of david and because of this they had a purpose to conceive.

kAH what is the Psonix (sphinx?)technology u're applying? Where does it come from?
I think there are similarities to what we're both posting.

IP: Logged

kAHANyAH
unregistered
posted March 21, 2003 02:19 AM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
psonix is a word technology I use to decode harmonics in words. Its based in sound and rythm. I kina discovered it but can't take full credit. I have seen some sort of similarity to my method by others. But I can say I didn't learn this from any. So in that respect, I discovered it.

Opppsss.. Had to come edit this. I didnt see your sphinx association with psonix :-). Nice one! U seem to be able to do maSONICS also :-).


Peace,

kAH

IP: Logged

bases loaded
unregistered
posted March 24, 2003 03:09 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thanks,Quinnie. Now what you mean is clear for me. In my dictonary (1996) those words are absent.

Let me tell you what I think about that you asked. I donīt support any idea out of the biblical explanation. Everything the Bible mentions is completly explained in the same Book. Itīs not neccesary any external explanation to understand the meaning of a biblical teaching, althought other sources are important to confirm them. Besides, sometimes the explanation is found in a different part of the Bible. [e.g. the meaning of "there was no longer any sea", Revelation 21:1; Isaiah 57:20 says: "But the wicked are like the tossing sea,
which cannot rest". The literal sea was made by God; He wouldnīt destroy it].

The purpose of Jesusī coming has never been the same purpose of the Essenes. Jesus was the Messiah. He came for the fulfilment of a lot of prophecies writen in the Old Testament, including the sacrifice of his human life. He also came to teach us Godīs purpose for humankind and the planet Earth. You know that Jesus never mentioned that group in his speeches. And they donīt have those two teachings among theirs, at least among their main teachings.

Remember that Jesus said that his words had to be tought everywhere; they werenīt for only a selected group of persons, but for "disciples of all nations" (Matthew 28: 19,20). The persecution against his followers, described in the Bible, shows that Christians had no an `essene way of lifeī, but an active relation with the rest of people.

All these examples give us a clear idea about the insignificant relationship between Jesus and the essenes as seen through his teachings. That group of persons, kept away from the rest of people, was not the best source of Jesusī teachings.

The prophecy said that the Messiah had to come through a virgin (Isaiah 7:14). Therefore, the natural conception (male-female union) wasnīt neccesary between Mary and Joseph, because that son was not going to be a new being, but a person who already existed. God only transfered his characteristics from a spiritual nature to Mary uterus. God designed both natures, spiritual and physical, so "nothing is impossible with God" (Luke 1:37).The reason is explained in my last post: the child had to come free of sin: "We have one who has been tempted in every way, just as we are–yet was without sin" (Hebrews 4:15).

I hope you understand my viewpoint about Jesusī birth, Quinnie.

Bases Loaded


IP: Logged

Quinnie
Knowflake

Posts: 1204
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 24, 2003 08:01 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Quinnie     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yes I truly understand your view point about Jesus's birth, but I think also I would like to ask how you define God, what God means to you, and if you think there is just one 'God' or if the entity 'Christ' is God and is this an entity that can incarnate into a 'worthy' body... pehaps at birth or perhaps at the saturn-seven-cycle?
Is Jesus just one of those who received the Christ soul (christ being the soul of love...soul of pure awareness?)
I would very much like to hear how you would ponder deeper into who or what 'God' and Christ Jesus is as an entity.

IP: Logged

Quinnie
Knowflake

Posts: 1204
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 26, 2003 08:02 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Quinnie     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Bases Loaded do you study any of the Egyptian mysteries?
I think the first post has could be applied to Osiris and Isis and Horus.
The entity of Osiris died so that he may be born unto Earth and through Isis he was born.So he rose again in the body of his son Horus born through Isis.
If Osiris and Isis were twin souls and Osiris died then she gave birth to him again in her son... Hence the soul giving birth to her twin. The female I oversoul births the O into the physical, or something. Not exactly sure.
How do you feel this applies to the Bible, if at all?

IP: Logged

Quinnie
Knowflake

Posts: 1204
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted March 26, 2003 08:06 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Quinnie     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Just read the last post.
I think the Egyptian Osiris, Isis and Horus could represent Mary and Jesus.
Mary the female I of the soul gives birth to the male O of the soul in Jesus.
I'm confusing myself a little can anyone clarify any of this?

IP: Logged

bases loaded
unregistered
posted March 27, 2003 12:30 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Quinnie, as I told you before, every idea I defend is supported by the Bible. The Book has shown a lot of evidences to me to make me believe it is a reliable book. The attacks that book receives from many people could be other evidence to prove its integrity: "Many will follow their shameful ways and will bring the way of truth into disrepute" (2 Peter 2:2). Jesus always defended many accounts written in the Bible, although the "specialists" say those portions are fictious.

About your question, the Bible is the best book to understand the true nature of God. God is described in many aspects: He loves (John 3:16); He directs actions to protect and save the humans (Ezekiel 33:11); He always warns about His judgements and decisions before doing anything (Amos 3:7); He has feelings [Psalm 78:41 (see this text in New American Standard Bible, Darby Translation or Contemporary English Version)].

Therefore, God cannot be something, but somebody. Remember He said we (humans) are created in His image, in his likeness (Genesis 1:26,27). So, if we are persons who love, feel, have wisdom, etc., God has to be a person too, but a spiritual one, with a different nature of vibrations, impossible to be seen by us (humans).

About Jesus, he is other person, not God Himself, but His son. In the Bible we read about many persons (humans and angels) described as Godīs sons, but Jesus has a particular condition: he was the first person created by God, and the only one God created directly. Thatīs why the Bible also says Jesus is Godīs "firstborn" and "firstborn over all creation" (Hebrews 1:6; Colossians 1:5).

Every other creation (spiritual, physical) was made through Jesus. This means that the Creator was God, but the labour belonged to Jesus (John 1:3; New International Version). Can we say there are two Creators? No way! Jesus is not a creator, but only who made the things and creatures. God is the true Creator, The only one, because He is the designer of everything in the universe, the Author. When God said: "Let us make man in our image, in our likeness", He was talking to His son, who would be Jesus later.

I wanna seize this opportunity to explain why thereīs no contradiction in Genesis 1:26,27. I quote from New International Version. Verse 26 says "let us make man in our image", in the plural, but verse 27 says that "God created man in his own image", in the singular. The reason is clear: In the verse 26, moses quotes when God is talking to His son, for they work together, but in the verse 27 Moses describes the work of God when finished, as God is the true Author, although Jesus has cooperated in everything. Notice that verse 26 use "make", but verse 27 use other verb, "create(d)". "Let us make" means ī"letīs work together", but the `creationī of man has a different meaning, because the Creator is God.

Many times we read that Hitler occupied Paris, but we know he wasnīt present there; he was only the author of the idea, and his army did enter and occupied Paris. Perhaps he said: "Let us occupy Paris", although he didnīt go to occupy it. Therefore, the Bible confirms time after time that thereīs only ONE Creator, although He shared the work with his son.

If you analyze this explanation youīll see the text is not contradictory. And notice that Iīve not used any source of information to explain it; the Bible is able to explain anything by itself. When we read John 1:3, we can understand Genesis 1:26,27. John didnīt give that explanation to us; God did, because the whole Bible belongs to Him. John was not present when God and Jesus were making man.

The Bible is really a book very easy to understand.

Bases Loaded

IP: Logged

Quinnie
Knowflake

Posts: 1204
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 02, 2003 07:08 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Quinnie     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I think that the virgin birth refers to the sign Virgo, which is the divine virgin.
In esoteric astrology there are three divine currents and the trinity of father,Mother and Son/daughter.
The Virgin represents the unseeded mother, who focuses her energy towards her own manifestation as of active intelligience.
because the female is receptive and the male is the spirit and will who gives to the receiver, the Divine Mother is the female who receives herself, thus becoming active in herself and achieving purity, Purity because through her soul she achieves physical manifestation.
The immaculate conception is not about actual physical conception of one woman giving birth to another physical being with another soul, but rather it's every soul that gives birth to itself in the physical is the immaculate conception of itself.
it is the soul coming into matter and ehat an individual can achieve alone in itself that is the divine concept... The Genius!
It's the geniuses who develop their ideas alone form iside themselves that conceive of their own genius.
But the Divine Mohter herself, like us all is continually evolving as her own essence, without the male union. It's the female essensce that evolves in itself that makes it pure and immaculate.
How we apply this to twin souls then is when the soul becomes physical and the inner will (will being the masculine essence and the spirit) is the same as the outer (and universal) will, then just as a new conception of will happens, a new union takes place that unites soul,body and spirit together (in Christ?)
I can't do links but there is an article all about the three divine currents..unconscious evolution, conscious evolution and unconscious creation in 'Tools of Esoteric Astrology' and how they are applied to teh 12 signs of the zodiac.

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 15094
From: Saturn next to Charmainec
Registered: Apr 2009

posted April 03, 2003 08:26 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

------------------
"Never mentally imagine for another that which you would not want to experience for yourself, since the mental image you send out inevitably comes back to you." Rebecca Clark

IP: Logged

alkmi
unregistered
posted April 09, 2003 05:07 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote

ohmygod kAHANyAH
you are EXCELLENT.

"I personally don't think Mary conceived thru the immaculate conception. Atleast not in the way the word is defined. I applied psonix technology to the word immaculate and this is what I came up with...
Immaculate -> I-mmac-u-uaculate -> I*make*you*ejaculate, seems sex was involved to me.

you bet! the church perch has denied the sexual nature of god. bless you! you are some clever pointy knowflake!
kAHANyAH goes on brilliant like a star:
"What the church did was to conceal the true worship type they adhered to and concealed encryptively in the bible. That worship is called TEMPLE HARLOTRY. Notice the psonix Harlotry -> Harlo-->TREE<-- or HOLLOW TREE as in the HOLY FAMILY TREE of the PRIESTESS bloodline and also a hollowed tree which was revered by the babylonians. It was claimed that Ishtar's (Priestess temple wh*re ) son semaramis who died, his spirit was to dwell in the hollow of a tree. This tree later came to be known as christmass."

kAHANyAH is rocking me!


In ancient times, temple wh*re priestess'hood was a cult practiced in aegypt and other cultures. And many of these women brought forth bast*rd seeds, sons who knew not who the father was. And herein lies the *myth* of a divine son without father, it is from the bast*rd bloodline. I guess the church wanted to kina cover up the desecration.

There is more to this. I will continue at a later date.

Shalowm,

kAH

so rocking me! so gentle. so smart. so honest.

to be point-of-fact i KNOW what you are talking about but i "cheated": i use the Right Use Of Will information which is all about prehistory and what Deity was doing and thinking prior to earth's creation. and yes, it was sexual like THIS clever lexigram or what-ever--

Immaculate -> I-mmac-u-uaculate -> I*make*you*ejaculate

bravo! you done SEEN with the eyes God gave Herself!


i intuited what you know. if not -- well let's just say this:

poor Jane!

Jane Roberts took in an ancient deity of badness out for redemption it burned her Self out: but the Seth Material was published.

i'll say this: there is a whole bunch of money and success waiting mystically for kAHANyAH...hidden in downtown Egypt...under a giant letter "O".


IP: Logged

kAHANyAH
unregistered
posted April 10, 2003 01:24 PM           Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Hello Alkmi...

Care to elaborate for me the letter "O" if you don't mind. Thanx.

Peace,

kAH

IP: Logged


This topic is 2 pages long:   1  2 

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright Đ 2012

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a