Author
|
Topic: I No longer believe in Zodiac Sign Astrology
|
Funkstar Knowflake Posts: 11 From: Australia Registered: Jul 2009
|
posted January 14, 2010 07:49 AM
Hello PeaceAngel, I also approached astrology through self-interest and that is still a big part of it for me. I do like helping others if I can, and becoming a better person through it for the benefit of those around me, but really I'm an ego-maniac (Sun conjunct Uranus and Pluto).This also probably makes me more of the technical type, I am always struggling to make my interpretations more flowing and personal. I expect the eclipse tomorrow exatly squaring my Mercury will force the issue. I am supposed to be doing an interp for a client right now but just can't get into it. I do want to know the actual workings of astrology. Before I started into astrology I was a scientist (Biology), so naturally want to know how things work. This is the reason I have abandoned the signs and all the rules that follow then (rulership, dignities etc). I see now reason why they should work. I believe that astrology works via energy, like everything else. I don't see the source of energy in the signs. I do see the source of energy in the stars. ------------------ Funk Astrology IP: Logged |
DD Knowflake Posts: 2774 From: Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 14, 2010 09:09 AM
"He thought that the zodiac itself was merely a human geometry exercise and primarily served to aid the memory of astrologers as they computed aspects in their heads."This thought had crossed my mind, too.
IP: Logged |
Glaucus Knowflake Posts: 2161 From: Sacramento,California Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 14, 2010 01:22 PM
"Good for you dude. But then again, no-one said that you should "believe" in it. "I know that nobody said that I should believe in it. You're telling me the obvious. I didn't need to be told that like I am stupid. I didn't even think bringing that up was necessary. I did believe in and use Zodiac Astrology over 11 years. I started believing in Astrology on June 29, 1998 after learning about moonsigns. Before that, I was a skeptic of Astrology. As I delved into it,studying it intensely,experimenting,giving people readings, my belief increased more and more. I believe that Zodiac Astrology might seem to work because of Forer Effect.
As for my own chart, I don't believe that I relate to my chart because of it. I realize that I can probably relate to my tropical zodiac signs because of other things Sun in Scorpio (the sign ruled by Mars and the transneptunian dwarf planet,Pluto) can be explained by Sun in cazimi (in the heart of the Sun) with transneptunian dwarf planet candidate/plutino Ixion in regards to great depth Sun conjunct transneptunian dwarf planet candidate Quaoar in regards to great depth Sun oppose transneptunian dwarf planet candidate Sedna in Right Ascension in regards to great depth, Inuit Goddess of the Underworld (Adlivun) located at the bottom of the Arctic Ocean Sun quincunx transneptunian dwarf planet candidate Varuna in Right Ascension in regards to great depth,Indian God had dominion over the drowned,judged souls Sun contraparallel transneptunian dwarf planet candidate/plutino Orcus in regards to great depth, Etruscan God Ruler of the Underworld Sun oppose/conjunct the nodes of transneptunian dwarf planet Eris in regards to great depth Sun-Pluto in Golden Section Aspect in regards to great depth Mercury in Scorpio (the sign ruled by Mars and the transneptunian dwarf planet,Pluto) can be explained by Mercury parallel Neptune in regards to sensitivity Mercury square transneptunian dwarf planet,Makemake in regards to great depth Mercury biquintile transneptunian dwarf planet, Eris in regards to great depth Mercury oppose/conjunct Heliocentric Mars Nodes in regards to passion Mercury sextile South Geocentric Pluto Node in regards to great depth Mercury-Pluto in Golden Section Aspect in regards to great depth Venus in Scorpio (the sign ruled by Mars and the transneptunian dwarf planet,Pluto) can be explained by Venus square Mars in regards to passion Venus parallel Neptune in regards to sensitivity Venus trine transneptunian dwarf planet candidate/plutino Orcus in regards to great depth Venus sextile transneptunian dwarf planet Haumea in Right Ascension in regards to great depth Venus quincunx transneptunian dwarf planet Eris in Right Ascension in regards to great depth Venus quincunx centaur Nessus - links the orbits of Saturn and Pluto..can be lusty,jealous,possessive Venus trine Geocentric North Pluto Node Moon in Pisces (the sign ruled by Jupiter and Neptune) can be explained by Moon square Jupiter in Right Ascension in regards to idealism,faith,optimism Moon square Neptune in regards idealism,imagination,inspiration,high sensitivity Moon square transneptunian dwarf planet candidate Varuna named after Indian God of the Oceans in regards to great depth sextile transneptunian dwarf planet candidate Sedna named after the Inuit Goddess of the Oceans in regards to great depth Moon conjunct centaur Pholus in Right Ascension - Pholus links Saturn and Neptune.....I also have Moon oppose Saturn/Neptune midpoint Moon trine transneptunian dwarf planet candidate Quaoar in regards to great depth Moon trine transneptunian dwarf planet/plutino in regards to great depth Moon semisquare transneptunian dwarf planet Eris in regards to great depth Ascendant in Virgo (the sign ruled by Mercury which also rules Gemini) can be explained by Ascendant sextile Mercury in Right Ascension in regards to nervous energy,analytical Ascendant parallel centaur Chiron - some astrologers suggest Chiron as ruler of Virgo, Chiron was a healer Ascendant contraparallel asteroid,Hygeia named after the Greek Goddess of Health Midheaven in Gemini (the sign ruled by Mercury which also rules Virgo) Midheaven conjunct Pallas - asteroid named after Pallas Athena, goddess of wisdom and warfare, it seems to act like an additional Mercury) Mars in Aquarius can be explained by Mars sesquiquadrate Uranus in regards to unconventional,independence North Geocentric Mars Node trine Uranus in regards to unconventional,independence Mars square Neptune - can be strange with it being hard outerplanet aspect Mars oppose transneptunian dwarf planet Makemake - can be nonconformist, as a transneptunian, it doesn't fit in with the planets, so doesn't fit in with the mainstream Raymond
------------------ "Nothing matters absolutely; the truth is it only matters relatively" - Eckhart Tolle IP: Logged |
Glaucus Knowflake Posts: 2161 From: Sacramento,California Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 14, 2010 02:20 PM
Here are a couple of links. This first one is from a book by Deborah Houlding about how the zodiac originated: http://www.skyscript.co.uk/zodiachistory.html "In its beginnings the zodiac was a convenient celestial measuring device, unrelated to astrological activity."This next one is about the sidereal zodiac: http://www.onereed.com/articles/sidereal-tropical.html "The great astrologer Johannes Kepler had a solution to this problem - he basically abandoned the zodiac and built his astrological system around the aspects between the planets. He thought that the zodiac itself was merely a human geometry exercise and primarily served to aid the memory of astrologers as they computed aspects in their heads." Yep....Kepler didn't believe in signs nor houses. He denounced them as Arabic Sorcery. He questioned why are there 12 houses. He questioned why can't they be less than 12 or more than 12. He opened the can of worms in regards to minor aspects. He devised the quintile(1/5),biquintile 2/5),sesquiquadrate (5/8) based on fiveness for musical harmonic theory. He opened the door to Harmonic Astrology. The Ptolemaic Aspects correlated with Aries,Gemini,Cancer,Leo,Libra,Sagittarius,Capricorn,Aquarius the Inconjuncts (semisextile,quincunx) correlated with Taurus,Pisces,Virgo,and Scorpio) I had thought about working with the actual Constellation Zodiac. I felt that using tropical zodiac was limiting me to what I am. The tropical zodiac being connected to the Earth's seasons and not with the constellations. I thought that using the constellation zodiac would be going beyond those limitations and embracing my cosmic self, acknowledging my connection to the cosmos,the stars, mythology of the constellations and stars. One of my problems with using the tropical zodiac is that it is a northern hemisphere season based zodiac. It ignores people that are born in southern hemisphere. I don't believe in using a northern hemisphere season based zodiac for people born in southern hemisphere. I had thought about using the Constellation Zodiac for them. I never did like to be pinned down by my tropical Scorpio sunsign. my tropical zodiac planet/point in constellations with any stars in those constellations
Sun in tropical Scorpio in constellation of Virgo (it's not in Libra like it is in Sidereal Libra) Moon in tropical Pisces in constellation of Aquarius, conjunct alpha Aquarius star Sadalmelik, conjunct theta Aquarius star,Ancha Mercury in tropical Scorpio in constellation of Libra conjunct beta Libra star Zuben Elschamali, conjunct Nu Libra star Zuben Hakrabi Venus in tropical Scorpio in constellation of Libra Mars in tropical Aquarius in constellation of Aquarius Jupiter in tropical Sagittarius in constellation of Scorpio Saturn in tropical Gemini in constellation of Taurus Uranus in tropical Libra in constellation of Virgo Neptune in tropical Sagittarius in constellation of Scorpio Ascendant in tropical Virgo in constellation of Leo conjunct theta Leo star Coxa Descendant in tropical Pisces in constellation of Aquarius Midheaven in tropical Gemini in constellation of Taurus Imum Coeli in tropical Sagittarius in constellation of Ophiuchus (it's not in Scorpio like it is in Sidereal Scorpio) my most pronounced constellation,star influences are Aquarius - with both Moon and Mars in it, my Moon conjunct 2 stars in Aquarius including the alpha star....Moon is also conjunct gamma Aquarius star Sadalbachia in Right Ascension are Libra - with both Mercury and Venus in it, my Mercury conjunct 2 stars in Libra including the beta star...Venus is also conjunct the beta star in Right Ascension so I am very Aquarian,Libran The zodiac is an arbitrary design based on a belief system. It depends on the cultures Western Astrologers mainly use the tropical zodiac. Some of them use sidereal zodiac. Vedic Astrologers use the sidereal zodiac with nakshatras. Celtic Astrologers use 13 zodiac signs.
Here is an article in how the sky was divided by various cultures. Very interesting stuff.
Sumerian 6 Sign Zodiac and Mayan Calendar 360-Day-Tun-Years http://www.timeemits.com/HoH_Articles/Sumerian_6_Sign_Zodiac_and_Mayan_Calendar_360.htm Raymond ------------------ "Nothing matters absolutely; the truth is it only matters relatively"
- Eckhart Tolle IP: Logged |
vertiver Knowflake Posts: 474 From: Registered: May 2009
|
posted January 14, 2010 02:40 PM
There is nothing wrong with astrology bringing you a better sense of identity, I don't consider that a egotistical in the least bit, Funkstar.I got into astrology at a really young age, seriously like at 7 or 8 years old, thanks to having a wiccan/pagan mother. Obviously my knowledge was only of the tropical zodiac and all I knew really was that I was a Leo Sun with Pisces Moon, but I didn't even figure out what my ASC. was until I was older. For the longest time I thought I had Capricorn ASC. according to some chart in some dated astrology book from the 1970's. Then I discovered this forum and astrodienst, when I was 16! From that point on I've accumulated a vast collection of astrology books and now I'm a skeptic as far as the tropical zodiac. Why? Like Glaucus, I believe zodiac signs are short-sighted and a bit shallow the way signs are generalized. I also tend to stereotype myself in regards to Sun signs, which I'm really trying to avoid and I'm also trying to stop asking people what their Sun sign is when I'm drunk... Linda Goodman would probably be a little annoyed by this, because she has written entire books just based solely on the Sun sign, and no offense to her, but they tend to be very fantastical and dramatic, anyone read love-signs by any chance? IP: Logged |
vertiver Knowflake Posts: 474 From: Registered: May 2009
|
posted January 14, 2010 08:28 PM
Hey Glaucus aka Raymond, I finally got the time to look up my natal aspects between the transneptunian dwarf planets and you've got to tell me more about thier influences, because my natal is aspected by them, and I noticed some similarities from your own natal:My aspects, within 3 degree orb or less: Sun (8' Leo) -Sun inconjunct Moon -Sun conjunct Mercury - Sun trine Mars -Sun inconjunct Neptune -Sun semi-sextile Vesta -Sun square Pluto -Sun opposite Pallas -Sun conjunct Orcus (help me interpret this) -Sun square Sedna (and this one) *There is a reason I can't relate to having Leo Sun, with these aspects! Moon (4 11' Pisces) -Moon inconjunct Mercury -Moon square Jupiter -Moon sextile Neptune -Moon trine Pluto -Moon trine Lilith Mercury (4 '26 Leo)
-Mercury novile Venus -Mercury trine Mars -Mercury sextile Jupiter -Mercury Bi quintile Uranus -Mercury square Pluto -Mercury semi-sextile Chiron -Mercury trine Ceres (help interpret this) Venus (24 '41 Gemini) -Venus opposition Saturn -Venus opposition Uranus -Venus sesquisquare Pluto -Venus semi-square Orcus (help me interpret) -Venus conjunct Varuna (help me interpret) Mars ( 6 '50 Aries) -Mars square Neptune -Mars square Lilith -Mars trine Orcus (help me) -Mars sesquisquare Quaour (help me interpret) Jupiter (1 '28 Gemini and Asc. Ruler) -Jupiter bi quintile Neptune -Jupiter sextile Ceres (please don't tell me I'll have 5 children, ceres is already in my 5th H in whole sign system as well) -Jupiter semi-square Eris (help me interpret this one) Pholus is conjunct my DSC. by 3 degrees (I'm curious about that as well...) IP: Logged |
Glaucus Knowflake Posts: 2161 From: Sacramento,California Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 14, 2010 08:31 PM
check out Philip Sedgwick's site he has preliminary keywords for the transneptunian objects and centaurs http://www.philipsedgwick.com/ ------------------ "Nothing matters absolutely; the truth is it only matters relatively" - Eckhart Tolle IP: Logged |
Lara Knowflake Posts: 2641 From: aspideronmars Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 16, 2010 12:43 AM
WOWI'm really digging this thread!  There's something so simple and therefore freeing about it. Thanks Raymond. IP: Logged |
Lara Knowflake Posts: 2641 From: aspideronmars Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 16, 2010 12:43 AM
WOWI'm really digging this thread!  There's something so simple and therefore freeing about it. Thanks Raymond. IP: Logged |
vertiver Knowflake Posts: 474 From: Registered: May 2009
|
posted January 16, 2010 01:23 AM
Thanks for pointing out Philip Sedgwick's site, I actually purchased a galactic interpretation from him, and all I can say is, wow! I think my whole idea of astrology has been revolutionized with the new understanding of the centaurs and black holes in relation to the natal chart... IP: Logged |
Glaucus Knowflake Posts: 2161 From: Sacramento,California Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted January 16, 2010 01:48 AM
vertiver,awesome! Yeah...he's my favorite astrologer! Raymond ------------------ "Nothing matters absolutely; the truth is it only matters relatively" - Eckhart Tolle IP: Logged |
aka Kat Knowflake Posts: 268 From: Cleveland, Ohio Registered: Jun 2009
|
posted January 16, 2010 10:24 PM
I have a challenge for you.Read 50 or so posts/studies which debunk astrology and then see if you still believe any astrology. IP: Logged |
Funkstar Knowflake Posts: 11 From: Australia Registered: Jul 2009
|
posted January 17, 2010 04:18 AM
2012: TIPPING POINT The Prophets Conference Cancun January 22-24, 2010 Conference Jan 22-28 Conference + Pilgrimage to Mayan Temple Sites"Individuals who had such illuminating cosmic visions suddenly understood that what is happening in the material world is formed and informed by archetypal principles, beings, and events existing in dimensions of reality that are inaccessible for our everyday consciousness. They also saw that the dynamics of the archetypal world is systematically correlated with the movements of the planets, their angular relationships, and their relative positions to the fixed stars. This led to a completely new understanding of astrology, its origins, and paramount importance. It became clear to them that the source of astrology were global encompassing visions of the workings of the Kosmos and not tedious accumulation of individual observations of correlations between events in the world and celestial bodies." Stanislav Grof, M.D. ------------------ Funk Astrology IP: Logged | |