posted February 23, 2012 05:57 PM            

quote:

---

the Mars person can be a conduit for the Moon to act out their sexual fantasies, since Mars will naturally be more intrepid in that area.

---

posted February 23, 2012 06:15 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by SaggiMC:
so generically moon can be in one of 12 signs and so can mars, so THAT's 144 combinations. Are you that well versed to give 144 combinations of how this could play out?? and that's not including any aspects..... and yes,I will keep repeating myself until members actually get a grip and understand that you are NOT the sum total of your sun sign and asking generic questions is very niave.....

---

There's no need to be a know-it-all. Different people who study astrology have different levels of knowledge. I've been at it for almost four years and there are still things I know little about (such as transits, for instance). And I don't try and wield my knowledge over other people's heads who are less informed in a superior sort of way.

If you like to really analyze it from that super-personalized manner of signs, then houses, then aspects, that's great. But, I don't see the need to harp on it in EVERY subject. Many of the discussions on here are about general placements instead of doing some very personal birth chart analysis. If it's about ONE individual, then fine. And many people do ask questions about a friend or a romantic partner. Then, it's very appropriate to ask a question like that.

But, if it's just a basic discussion about Virgo Moons, why toss that in there? Like I said it's condescending. Anyone with half a brain who's been studying astrology for a while already knows what you're repeatedly telling them. And just because they don't approach the subject in the manner that you do doesn't mean they're naive or uninformed.

In that same respect, I don't believe it's necessary to overanalyze the Moon-Mars conjunction question to the point where we have to calculate every combination possible. Essentially, each combo will operate in the same manner. The signs they're in will add different flavors and layers, but the essence of the aspect will be the same. Besides, the majority of us aren't professional astrologers, looking to make a living from interpreting birth charts. We're just trying to have some fun discussions about astrology. No need to take it so seriously.

But, if that's the way you feel, fine. I see no need to argue with you anymore about it.

posted February 23, 2012 06:20 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Betty Boop:
In my experience they were not open to my sexual fantasies, because they were/are both very self-centred, at least in their relationships w. me.
I have nothing against these guys... But they're definitely not what I'm looking for.

---

Yeah, I can see that happening too, in negative cases. The Moon might also find the Mars individual selfish or insensitive to their needs. To the Moon person, things will be more emotional and intimate. But Mars might be more about immediate self-gratification.

posted February 23, 2012 07:39 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by SaggiMC:
so generically moon can be in one of 12 signs and so can mars, so THAT's 144 combinations. Are you that well versed to give 144 combinations of how this could play out?? and that's not including any aspects..... and yes,I will keep repeating myself until members actually get a grip and understand that you are NOT the sum total of your sun sign and asking generic questions is very niave.....

---

With all due respect, I have never seen you post a reply to a question about aspects that takes into account the signs of the planets involved, even when the charts are given.

Are you well-versed enough to take into account the signs involved?

Can you tell me the difference between Gemini Mars trine Libra moon and Capricorn Mars trine Taurus moon?

Is that difference substantial enough to warrant criticism of naivety, if we fail to take it into account? How dramatically do the two scenarios differ?

posted February 24, 2012 07:37 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by the89freespirit:
There's no need to be a know-it-all. [yours words not mine. I'm here to help members learn astrology, what's your excuse?}

Different people who study astrology have different levels of knowledge. I've been at it for almost four years and there are still things I know little about (such as transits, for instance). And I don't try and wield my knowledge over other people's heads who are less informed in a superior sort of way.

If you like to really analyze it from that super-personalized manner of signs, then houses, then aspects, that's great. But, I don't see the need to harp on it in EVERY subject. Many of the discussions on here are about general placements instead of doing some very personal birth chart analysis. If it's about ONE individual, then fine. And many people do ask questions about a friend or a romantic partner. Then, it's very appropriate to ask a question like that.

But, if it's just a basic discussion about Virgo Moons, why toss that in there? Like I said it's condescending. Anyone with half a brain who's been studying astrology for a while already knows what you're repeatedly telling them. And just because they don't approach the subject in the manner that you do doesn't mean they're naive or uninformed.

In that same respect, I don't believe it's necessary to overanalyze the Moon-Mars conjunction question to the point where we have to calculate every combination possible. Essentially, each combo will operate in the same manner. The signs they're in will add different flavors and layers, but the essence of the aspect will be the same. Besides, the majority of us aren't professional astrologers, looking to make a living from interpreting birth charts. We're just trying to have some fun discussions about astrology. No need to take it so seriously.

But, if that's the way you feel, fine. I see no need to argue with you anymore about it.

---

wow, 4years as opposed to my 20years hmmmm not much difference. If you find my posts tedious please feel free to ignore, rather than make negative comments

I am a Professional Astrologer and am frustrated by trivia and superficial, I want deep and meaningful. I am not looking to 'make money' from any member here, just to help and explain. Why does that make you feel threatened I wonder...

posted February 24, 2012 07:37 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Faith:
With all due respect, I have never seen you post a reply to a question about aspects that takes into account the signs of the planets involved, even when the charts are given.

[b]Are you well-versed enough to take into account the signs involved?

Can you tell me the difference between Gemini Mars trine Libra moon and Capricorn Mars trine Taurus moon?

Is that difference substantial enough to warrant criticism of naivety, if we fail to take it into account? How dramatically do the two scenarios differ?

Pray tell.[/B]

---

Post the two charts please and I will delinate the differences for you. I have to see the whole picture, and *other aspects* connected to all these planets....

posted February 24, 2012 07:39 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by L0veLess:
man saggi are yu a robot? i seem to see the same thing from yu whenever yu post a reply! :P

---

Why, because I am ever hopeful that members actually want to learn astrology, rather than 'dabble' in superficial ways

I have just created a new thread about moons
Basic astrology forum, All About Moons http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum12/private-jjLYZw161/HTML/000681.html

If you don't like or agree with my posts, please respond astrologically rather than making it personal or argumentative. You always have the choice to ignore my threads..rather than making 'flaming comments' or attacking how I respond here...

posted February 24, 2012 07:59 AM            

quote:

---

so what's you pedigree??

---

"Me" don't have much of a pedigree with astrology. And I cannot post charts with the details I alluded to, because it was merely a hypothetical question. You answered in the affirmative that yes, you are capable of providing analysis that takes into account the signs of the planets involved in an aspect.

So I'll just be looking for that kind of analysis from you in the future, rather than what you customarily post: a list of links that do not address the specifics of the chart, that do not address the signs of the planets forming an aspect.

I don't know why you've been concealing your erudition this long, but it will be nice to see how a REAL astrologer interprets a chart.

posted February 24, 2012 09:56 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Faith:
"Me" don't have much of a pedigree with astrology. And I cannot post charts with the details I alluded to, because it was merely a hypothetical question. You answered in the affirmative that yes, you are capable of providing analysis that takes into account the signs of the planets involved in an aspect.

So I'll just be looking for that kind of analysis from you in the future, rather than what you customarily post: a list of links that do not address the specifics of the chart, that do not address the signs of the planets forming an aspect.

I don't know why you've been concealing your erudition this long, but it will be nice to see how a REAL astrologer interprets a chart. **SEE BELOW**

Looking forward to it.

---

the whole reason I asked for charts is to SEE the whole ! As I'm sure you see daily on here members don't usually give that kind of information readily, unless prompted to do so

what I actually said was,

quote:

---

"Post the two charts please and I will delinate the differences for you. I have to see the whole picture, and *other aspects* connected to all these planets.... "

---

Please stop making 'flaming comments' with little substance to back it up with!!

All members here are free to answer any thread as this see fit, depending on their knowledge of astrology. Again if you do not care for my responses, please feel free to ignore them. Put up or shut up...

http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum23/HTML/000337.html

posted February 24, 2012 10:38 AM            

Even when charts are posted, you do not offer professional readings or insight. You just post links.

And since you don't add much to the actual dialogue, I feel you are in no position to criticize and belittle anyone.

posted February 24, 2012 12:22 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Faith:
You missed my point.

Even when charts are posted, you do not offer professional readings or insight. You just post links.

And since you don't add much to the actual dialogue, I feel you are in no position to criticize and belittle anyone.

---

posted February 24, 2012 01:38 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by VenusDiSirius:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Faith:
[b]You missed my point.

Even when charts are posted, you do not offer professional readings or insight. You just post links.

And since you don't add much to the actual dialogue, I feel you are in no position to criticize and belittle anyone.

---

quote:

---

SaggiMc is Coffee,'former' member. just ignore him!

[/B]

---

posted February 24, 2012 01:40 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Faith:
You missed my point.

Even when charts are posted, you do not offer professional readings or insight. You just post links.

And since you don't add much to the actual dialogue, I feel you are in no position to criticize and belittle anyone.

---

Are you following, stalking me around PR forum? have you read any of my responses THEIR? no this is not PR forum. considering I've made over 1,500 posts and you have 316 I hardly think YOU are in ANY position to critisize ME. Grow up and stick to what you know ----- ok excuse this that should be very short -- from what I've seen

posted February 24, 2012 02:27 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by SaggiMC:
I am female and have no idea who coffee is but if you keep flaming and insulting I will have no hesitation but to report you to Moderators..

---

posted February 24, 2012 03:16 PM            

It is always a good idea to post links.
That just backs up your interps.
I try to do it whenever possible.

posted February 24, 2012 04:59 PM            

quote:

---

and yes,I will keep repeating myself until members actually get a grip

---

Wow.

You need to get a grip yourself and stop talking down to people. Think before you insult someone. We have members here who know a lot more about astrology than you. At least they know what an "angle" is in a chart, something you admitted you have no clue about. And you call yourself an astrologer.

posted February 24, 2012 05:28 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by anongrl10:
Wow.

You need to get a grip yourself and stop talk down to people. Think before you insult someone. We have members here who know a lot more about astrology than you. At least they know what an "angle" is in a chart, something you admitted you have no clue about. And you call yourself an astrologer.

Just wow.

---

OMG who are you referring to? You haven't contributed on THIS thread OR answered OP query, but come on to criticize and cause trouble. Shame on you

L0veLess, here started making inappropriate comments,and then a new member the89freespirit
started commenting on my style of posting. I am not aware of any forum rule about *Style of posting* or even posting links either. None of this was appropriate and attacking and making flaming comments. for which I should not have taken the bait but hey I am human after all...

the Faith decided to 'get on the bandwagon' and challenge my style of responding to members, again uncalled for inappropriate and flaming comments

ALL I am guilty of is 'defending my self' SO if YOU want to contribute to this OP please do, otherwise but out and stop critiquing something that has NOTHING to do with you....

posted February 24, 2012 06:53 PM            

I fully admit that sometimes I'm not interested in furthering my knowledge of astrology at that moment. Personally I really prefer to talk things out in conversation form, rather than always researching stuff by myself. Obviously I do this as well or I wouldn't have gotten into astrology at all.

My point: whether or not this should have occurred on this thread, i agree and express similar frustration with your recent posts on all threads. Starting a new thread just about it seems a tad silly, which is why I'm sure it was just kind of a "i've had it up to here, and i've got to say something!" kind of post.

posted February 24, 2012 08:19 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by SaggiMC:
OMG who are you referring to? You haven't commented on THIS thread but come on to criticize and cause trouble. Shame on you

L0veLess, here started making inappropriate comments,and then a new member the89freespirit
started commenting on my style of posting. I am not aware of any forum rule about *Style of posting* or even posting links either. None of this was appropriate and attacking and making flaming comments. for which I should not have taken the bait but hey I am human after all...

the Faith decided to 'get on the bandwagon' and challenge my style of responding to members, again uncalled for inappropriate and flaming comments

ALL I am guilty of is 'defending my self' SO if YOU want to contribute to this OP please do, otherwise but out and stop critiquing something that has NOTHING to do with you....

---