|
Author
|
Topic: The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge
|
Delilah
Knowflake Posts: 559
From:
Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted April 29, 2012 02:00 PM
  
quote:
Originally posted by Ami Anne:
I have been in a million fights. It is best to just bury the hatchet. We, all, have a lot of stress and anger in life. We let it out on an Anonymous Board easier than our real life but there comes a time to walk away. My smilie face at the top does not go with my post.I was trying to make a joke and look like a creep 
I just laughed so hard at this I snorted. Lol.  But, yes, you're right. There's no point in arguing and I really would like to get back to the topic. IP: Logged |
YoursTrulyAlways
Knowflake Posts: 2531
From:
Registered: Oct 2011
|
posted April 29, 2012 02:08 PM
I don't mean any disrespect or to upset anyone, especially anyone who is British or a British subject. But I'm sorry that I've had a strange crush on the Duchess since she came into the spotlight. My wife is not jealous of many women since she is so confident, but she is very jealous of my fawning over the Duchess. Of course, every guy is in awe of the princess, but this is somehwat different. I didn't check the synastry until a few minutes ago, and I don't know much anyway, but I see some good synastry aspects there. All I knew before today was that she is a Capricorn. Venus Conjunct Venus, Sun Conjunct Mars, etc. I'm sure there are bad ones too, but I guess that's why I have had this crush.  IP: Logged |
Ami Anne
Moderator Posts: 31530
From: Pluto/house next to NickiG
Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted April 29, 2012 03:03 PM
If you laughed like that Delilah, you made my day! xxx------------------
Passion, Lust, Desire. Check out my journal
http://www.mychristianpsychic.com/
IP: Logged |
Lonake
Moderator Posts: 7515
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 29, 2012 03:27 PM
Well it looks like the Sun says a lot here but honestly it doesn't bode well for her relationships. It's in Capricorn conj SN sq Saturn, so there are rigid expectations in line with the male, duties, rules, demands. It falls in line with the requirements needed, since not everyone would qualify, or would want, that kind of life. She has the Sun/Moon/Saturn t square so she's looking for security, Sun in Cap 4th, same as Moon Cancer 10th, are 2 placements that are very tied to tradition. Both in sq to Saturn like I said just seem to add to the rigid/steely manner, one where you can't fall off your game. I would say she's a tough cookie and can roll with it, she'd have to be. Capricorn is the SN and it's ruler is sq her nodal axis, detrimental. On the other hand, her NN ruler is in Cancer and conj the NN, in the 10th. So she's here it seems to showcase a quality of care/concern in the limelight as core to her reputation, it's a huge deal for her. So in this sense I see her resembling Diana. To face facts, the loss of a parent is a tragedy when young, esp of a mother to a boy with Sun/Moon in Cancer, and if it's in his 7th, it's obvious he wants to go searching for those qualities in another, to rekindle something out of nothing. The interesting thing is that Kate doesn't have any hard/strong Neptune aspects but William does, it's opp his Sun, and one could argue Neptune on ASC is difficult on its own. In my chart estimation, she is the one pulling rank and keeping him together, no matter what it looks like to us on the outside. I don't know much of anything about Kate, and not much of William either. But his chart is very strange to me. He looks like a coddled person who was born into the spotlight, Sadge ASC, ruler Jup conj MC trine Sun/Moon. Otoh, there is a feeling of the world not seeing him for who he is, Neptune on ASC opp Sun, and with that, he doesn't even hardly know who he is. As if he grew up in a fantasy world and is trying to grasp what real life is like through engaging with others one on one, primarily through the partner (Sun/Moon H7). He's projecting out that Cancer energy in order to connect, to have a close emotional bond to get a sense of being rooted, of security. The guy has Mars/Saturn squaring the nodes, so there's a past pattern of rigidity that he is trying to break out of to get to that place where he can be open and vulnerable to the partner, to the public. If that is the aim then they're well suited, esp considering his NN is in the 7th in Cancer as well, to balance out the commanding elitist type role that he could play easily if he wanted (SN Cap H1 sq Mars/Saturn). IP: Logged |
Lotis White
Knowflake Posts: 313
From: USA
Registered: Dec 2010
|
posted April 29, 2012 03:29 PM
Does Kate's chart have an accurate birth time, or is it a guess? I've heard before that William's birth time is known while no one is really sure about Kate's birth time.... If her bith time is not sure that could make a big difference to their synastry in terms of her Moon, and Asc positions. IP: Logged |
Lonake
Moderator Posts: 7515
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 29, 2012 03:44 PM
She gets t.Pluto conj her n.IC next Jan. That's one thing to watch for.
Then in March Uranus will be conj her DSC.IP: Logged |
Diana
Knowflake Posts: 2564
From:
Registered: May 2009
|
posted April 29, 2012 05:18 PM
Well, they were each born on cancer eclipses. Him on the solar, and her on the lunar, so it's all very karmic.IP: Logged |
Diana
Knowflake Posts: 2564
From:
Registered: May 2009
|
posted April 29, 2012 05:20 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Lonake:
She gets t.Pluto conj her n.IC next Jan. That's one thing to watch for.
Then in March Uranus will be conj her DSC.
This could just mean she becomes pregnant or begins to try to become pregnant.
IP: Logged |
Lonake
Moderator Posts: 7515
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 29, 2012 05:32 PM
Simultaneously, he gets Saturn moving through his 10th, for change in responsibility.But the eerie one to me, is when Saturn crosses over his Neptune/ASC, at the same time that Pluto crosses her Sun/SN 
5 yrs off still. IP: Logged |
Diana
Knowflake Posts: 2564
From:
Registered: May 2009
|
posted April 29, 2012 06:24 PM
That could be birth of a child too. Saturn/ac is responsibility and pluto/sun can be birth or pregnancy.IP: Logged |
Delilah
Knowflake Posts: 559
From:
Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted April 29, 2012 07:14 PM
Someone wrote a small article about how the two would have T.Jupiter in their 5th houses at some point, her sooner than him (I'm pretty sure that there was a different birth time given for Kate). I'll try to find it to link.Lotus, I'm trusting the time given by astrotheme. They have just added her birth time not too long ago when others had different times as well. It's being logical without being logical. I think there is a good chance for them to make it as they didn't rush into the marriage like Prince Charles and Princess Diana did before they could get to know each other. Even cafeastrology says that there is not much between the charts of Charles and Camilla, but look at how long they have been together, both publicly and secretly. Lonake, thank you for getting it back on topic. IP: Logged |
Faith
Knowflake Posts: 1170
From:
Registered: Jul 2011
|
posted April 30, 2012 09:00 AM
I guess my opinion will look amateurish. Oh well, I am going to give it anyway! I have studied the book The Secret Language of Relationships for a long time, and applied it to my life and that of my friends. I rely on it heavily, because it's proven itself accurate over and over again. This books says that William is born on The Cusp of Magic (Gem-Cancer) and Kate is born in the Week of Determination (Jan 3-9). And the relationship is called "Mitigating Seriousness." Ever see how much they laugh together? And the couple is expected to radiate a kind of charm and enthusiasm that infects everyone around them. Isn't this the case, so far? As for having children, according to this book, the relationship is especially well-suited for it, since both signs are naive to begin with and relate very well to children.  My birthday's right before Catherine's, and the way I get along with Gem-Cancers is, for the most part, exactly how it is described in that book. The only thing that worries me is his SN conjunct her sun.
IP: Logged |
Rosalind
Knowflake Posts: 507
From: Someday in London...
Registered: Mar 2011
|
posted April 30, 2012 09:06 AM
quote:
Originally posted by Faith:
I guess my opinion will look amateurish. Oh well, I am going to give it anyway! I have studied the book The Secret Language of Relationships for a long time, and applied it to my life and that of my friends. I rely on it heavily, because it's proven itself accurate over and over again. This books says that William is born on The Cusp of Magic (Gem-Cancer) and Kate is born in the Week of Determination (Jan 3-9). And the relationship is called "Mitigating Seriousness." Ever see how much they laugh together? And the couple is expected to radiate a kind of charm and enthusiasm that infects everyone around them. Isn't this the case, so far? As for having children, according to this book, the relationship is especially well-suited for it, since both signs are naive to begin with and relate very well to children. My birthday's right before Catherine's, and the way I get along with Gem-Cancers is, for the most part, exactly how it is described in that book. The only thing that worries me is his SN conjunct her sun.
Its a karmic relationship. I already said that. If NN relationships don't last longer, SN last even less. Que sera sera.
IP: Logged |
lalalinda
Moderator Posts: 2201
From: nevada
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted April 30, 2012 11:49 AM
This relationship is a keeper.
It doesn't matter about the NN
His Saturn conjunct Ascendant is solidifying and her Sun at the top of his chart shows love and acceptance from the public.Other than that, I've always thought that there could be a chance of a miscarriage because of the Pluto transit. Hope not, I want them to have a beautiful daughter named Diana  Beautiful Couple IP: Logged |
Cat Face
Knowflake Posts: 116
From:
Registered: Jan 2010
|
posted April 30, 2012 12:40 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Lotis White:
Does Kate's chart have an accurate birth time, or is it a guess? I've heard before that William's birth time is known while no one is really sure about Kate's birth time.... If her bith time is not sure that could make a big difference to their synastry in terms of her Moon, and Asc positions.
Glad you pointed this out. Her birth time is still unknown. IP: Logged |
Rosalind
Knowflake Posts: 507
From: Someday in London...
Registered: Mar 2011
|
posted April 30, 2012 04:42 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Cat Face:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Lotis White:
[b]Does Kate's chart have an accurate birth time, or is it a guess? I've heard before that William's birth time is known while no one is really sure about Kate's birth time.... If her bith time is not sure that could make a big difference to their synastry in terms of her Moon, and Asc positions.
Glad you pointed this out. Her birth time is still unknown. [/B][/QUOTE]
So Astrotheme and the other websites are lying? I'm dissapointed. She might not be a Libra Rising. However, the karma is still there.
IP: Logged |
Diana
Knowflake Posts: 2564
From:
Registered: May 2009
|
posted April 30, 2012 06:28 PM
quote:
Originally posted by lalalinda:
This relationship is a keeper.
It doesn't matter about the NN
His Saturn conjunct Ascendant is solidifying and her Sun at the top of his chart shows love and acceptance from the public.Other than that, I've always thought that there could be a chance of a miscarriage because of the Pluto transit. Hope not, I want them to have a beautiful daughter named Diana Beautiful Couple
Aww, that would be so sweet. Baby Diana. I though it was her valid tob too, oh well. IP: Logged |
Cat Face
Knowflake Posts: 116
From:
Registered: Jan 2010
|
posted April 30, 2012 06:36 PM
Rosalind, Diana, everybody...,Astrotheme doesn't source their information. Astrodatabank is the place to go for celebrity data. Astrotheme stole the bulk of their stuff from them minus the important source/reliability notes. Her ADB page has one of the lowest ratings: http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Catherine,_Duchess_Cambridge I think they'll be together forever.
IP: Logged |
Delilah
Knowflake Posts: 559
From:
Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted April 30, 2012 09:00 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Cat Face:
Rosalind, Diana, everybody...,Astrotheme doesn't source their information. Astrodatabank is the place to go for celebrity data. Astrotheme stole the bulk of their stuff from them minus the important source/reliability notes. Her ADB page has one of the lowest ratings: http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Catherine,_Duchess_Cambridge I think they'll be together forever.
I'm not sure about this, but thank you for the link. *No sarcasm at all.
IP: Logged |
Delilah
Knowflake Posts: 559
From:
Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted April 30, 2012 09:16 PM
Has anyone noticed that her Venus conjuncts his anti-vertex? Loosely, but still it may count for something. Also, his Saturn and Pluto conjunct her anti-Vertex as well. Quite a bit has been said about the negative side of Saturn-Vertex conjunctions, but what about the anti-Vertex?IP: Logged |
Lotis White
Knowflake Posts: 313
From: USA
Registered: Dec 2010
|
posted April 30, 2012 10:54 PM
People, Kate’s birth time may not be right after all!!When I look at the synastry I’m just not 100% convinced that that Kate’s birth time is accurate, so I did some research of my own. The chart for Kate used on this thread is based on Astrotheme’s data… The source for Kate’s birth time on Astrotheme is astrologer Marc Penfield….
However, Astro-Databank lists this birth time for Kate as unreliable… heres what they have to say about Kate’s birth time… Quote~~~~ Marc Penfield reports a birth time of 11:33 PM but when questioned said he had obtained it from another astrologer. The latter astrologer said he saw it on a British website but could not locate the website when questioned about it. This time is therefore considered unreliable until further evidence is shown. Ana Rakovic gave 8:28 PM on AstrologyinSerbia.com website according to Paddy de Jabrun; no source. Rakovic also gave sister Pippa a time of 4:40 AM; again no source. In late November 2011, Pamela Young posted the following on the Astro.com Forum: "Re Kate Middleton's birth time - in the book, "William and Kate: a Royal Love Story," by Christopher Andersen (New York: Gallery Books, 2011) it is stated on page 73: Although they could not know it at the time, the Middletons took their biggest step toward the top rung of the social ladder on January 9, 1982. That afternoon, Caroline gave birth to blue-eyed Catherine Elizabeth Middleton at the Royal Berkshire Hospital in Reading." Quote~~~ According to the book ‘William and Kate: a Royal Love Story’, Kate was born sometime in the afternoon… the afternoon is usually considered sometime between noon and 6 or 7 pm… I played around with this idea on the Astrodienst website… At exactly noon in Reading England Kate’s Asc would be about 9 degrees of Taurus…. And at 7pm, Kates’s Asc would be 20 degrees Leo… Based on this information Kate’s true Asc is likely somewhere between Taurus and Leo…. It could be Taurus, Gemini, Cancer, or Leo…
IP: Logged |
Delilah
Knowflake Posts: 559
From:
Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted May 01, 2012 03:28 AM
^God, guessing her ASC would be pointless. No point in continuing to talk about marriage connections between their charts now. Thank you for sharing this.One thing that I do find interesting about his upcoming transits is that Jupiter will enter his 5H, Ceres will conjunct his 5H cusp, T.Uranus will conjunct his natal Child asteroid with T.Pallas and T.Child, and Venus will be retrograde in his 6H by the end of this month. Maybe there will be news of a baby soon. I think it was Diana's former astrologer (their claim, not mine) who said that they will have a child, but it will be unexpected. I may be wrong about who said it because quite a few astrologers have said that they will start their family this year. IP: Logged |
Rosalind
Knowflake Posts: 507
From: Someday in London...
Registered: Mar 2011
|
posted May 01, 2012 06:12 AM
quote:
Originally posted by Cat Face:
Rosalind, Diana, everybody...,Astrotheme doesn't source their information. Astrodatabank is the place to go for celebrity data. Astrotheme stole the bulk of their stuff from them minus the important source/reliability notes. Her ADB page has one of the lowest ratings: http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Catherine,_Duchess_Cambridge I think they'll be together forever.
Forever is a great word. Don't use it on the physical plan. Nothing lasts FOREVER on Earth. People said exactly the same thing about Diana and Charles. They looked cute but neither cute appearances cannot make a couple last. We don't know the insides of this marriage. We cannot assume forever things. I said they wont last. I am usually right, but who knows? I just wait for the 7 karmic years to pass. If they are still together by then, then they will be together forever. Until then... we can only wish them goodluck. IP: Logged |
Cat Face
Knowflake Posts: 116
From:
Registered: Jan 2010
|
posted May 01, 2012 09:14 AM
Forever, i.e., married until death due part. I'm fine calling it now. It's my opinion; I don't expect everyone to agree with it.IP: Logged |
Lindaland
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
