Lindaland
  Astrology 2.0
  Would it be better to have no moon contacts or hard ones? (Page 2)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
This topic is 2 pages long:   1  2 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Would it be better to have no moon contacts or hard ones?
Ami Anne
Moderator

Posts: 39936
From: Pluto/house next to NickiG
Registered: Sep 2010

posted February 28, 2013 08:38 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ami Anne     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by YoursTrulyAlways:
I don't quite understand. So there's absolutely no moon contacts between my wife and I. Wouldn't that be highly unusual?

Wouldn't that signal incompatibility?



Yes, to me, it would.

------------------
Passion, Lust, Desire. Check out my journal


http://www.mychristianpsychic.com/

IP: Logged

Doux Rêve
Moderator

Posts: 2502
From:
Registered: Dec 2010

posted February 28, 2013 08:47 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Doux Rêve     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Faith:
Hmm. This got me thinking~ nothing in my husband's chart aspects my moon, except his ASC, nodal axis, and Juno. Do they count?

Yes, they do count. Especially the ASC/NN contacts. But maybe you don't feel *that* close to him.. sounds true? Like, a part of you isn't quite *at home* with him?


quote:
Originally posted by ail221:
Hard moon contacts over no moon contacts. The moon is too much of a integral portion of our identity and Psyche. The moon directly relates back to ones 4th house because symbolically it represents our childhood, the most private part of ourselves, our traditions and our mother. Hard aspects are necessary for growth and resolving past conflict. Lack of a emotional connection (moon aspects)doesn't seem like it would result in a lasting relationship or a emotionally satisfying one.

In theory, I agree with this.

But it seems that some people don't *need* (?) Moon aspects to be attached to someone.. hmm..


quote:
Originally posted by Orange:
My S.O. of many years (a Scorpio with a Taurus Moon) has his Moon completely unaspected by any of my planets in our syanstry. No contact at all.

He is attached to me at the hip. He is absolutely co-dependant in our relationship and I wanted to break up with him a few times already, but he won't let me go, ever. Even seeing me slightly detached from him makes him nervous and physically sick. With his Moon making no aspects to my pklanets, his Moon has no boundaries. It usually flies high.


Whoa, that's intriguing.

There must be some other tight aspects between you two for him to be so attached. Any 4th house/Water house activity? NN connections?


quote:
Originally posted by freebrainstorms:
What is it called again when signs are side by side? I'm trying to look up the synastry between moon signs that are side by side but I'm having a hard time looking it up without the right term? Thoughts about that synastry?

You know the term already, "side by side" Otherwise it's called Inconjunct/Semi-sextile.

IP: Logged

YoursTrulyAlways
Knowflake

Posts: 4899
From:
Registered: Oct 2011

posted February 28, 2013 09:01 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for YoursTrulyAlways     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Ami Anne:

Yes, to me, it would.



And yet you see us on FB and you see how we communicate as one.

Wouldn't that be an inconsistency with astrology?

IP: Logged

ail221
Knowflake

Posts: 3150
From: Mary Margaret Blanchard's home
Registered: Feb 2012

posted February 28, 2013 09:05 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for ail221     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
@Doux Rêve True for some people marriage is good enough without moon aspects but those that do have successful relationships are those with progressed composite/synastry moon aspects or have their composite moon placed in a place of exaltation such as the 2nd house or 4th house.

IP: Logged

Orange
Knowflake

Posts: 228
From: Georgia
Registered: May 2009

posted February 28, 2013 10:11 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Orange     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by YoursTrulyAlways:
And yet you see us on FB and you see how we communicate as one. Wouldn't that be an inconsistency with astrology?

Read my post above. My Scorpio man Moon is totaly unaspected by my planets. He is deeply attached to me in all possible ways, for years. His love is unconditional.
Moon/Sun or Moon/Moon square aspect is a sign of incompatibility!

IP: Logged

YoursTrulyAlways
Knowflake

Posts: 4899
From:
Registered: Oct 2011

posted February 28, 2013 10:31 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for YoursTrulyAlways     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Orange:
My S.O. of many years (a Scorpio with a Taurus Moon) has his Moon completely unaspected by any of my planets in our syanstry. No contact at all.

He is attached to me at the hip. He is absolutely co-dependant in our relationship and I wanted to break up with him a few times already, but he won't let me go, ever. Even seeing me slightly detached from him makes him nervous and physically sick. With his Moon making no aspects to my pklanets, his Moon has no boundaries. It usually flies high.


I quote you.

You wanted to "break up with him a few times already." He has issues of detachment.

There is a *significant* difference between that and my happy marriage of 20 years. Both husband and wife value each other to the upteenth degree. We both have options, you know, but we don't care about those options.

We are effective communicators, anticipating and knowing each other's emotions, thoughts and actions. I would say having the same Moon sign helps.

Having said that, how do you justify the accuracy of astrology when there are no aspects and the marriage works well?

IP: Logged

Aquacheeka
Knowflake

Posts: 2289
From: Toronto
Registered: Mar 2012

posted February 28, 2013 10:54 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Aquacheeka     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I would prefer an opposition to none.

IP: Logged

Aquacheeka
Knowflake

Posts: 2289
From: Toronto
Registered: Mar 2012

posted February 28, 2013 10:58 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Aquacheeka     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by YoursTrulyAlways:
I quote you.

You wanted to "break up with him a few times already." He has issues of detachment.

There is a *significant* difference between that and my happy marriage of 20 years. Both husband and wife value each other to the upteenth degree. We both have options, you know, but we don't care about those options.

We are effective communicators, anticipating and knowing each other's emotions, thoughts and actions. I would say having the same Moon sign helps.

Having said that, how do you justify the accuracy of astrology when there are no aspects and the marriage works well?



When there are no moon contacts? Solar and Mercury contacts count just as much, if not more. So that would explain it.

IP: Logged

Orange
Knowflake

Posts: 228
From: Georgia
Registered: May 2009

posted February 28, 2013 11:04 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Orange     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yourstruely,

i was reffering to his Moon being unaspected, not mine. I was talking about his feelings for me, not mine for him. Dont misconstrue my words, i really hate that.
Your marriage success does not depend on your Moon aspect alone, dont be silly. The rest of your synastry is probably great. Lack of Moon aspects does not equal lack of affection, is all i am saying.


quote:
Originally posted by Aquacheeka:
I would prefer an opposition to none.

Moon opposition is actually a very good aspect.

IP: Logged

YoursTrulyAlways
Knowflake

Posts: 4899
From:
Registered: Oct 2011

posted February 28, 2013 11:18 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for YoursTrulyAlways     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Orange:
Yourstruely,

i was reffering to his Moon being unaspected, not mine. I was talking about his feelings for me, not mine for him. Dont misconstrue my words, i really hate that.


I apologize. But I didn't understand the point you were driving at.

When talking about synastry, wouldn't it matter about feelings in both directions? Why would you bother with the synastry when the feelings are not equi-reciprocal?

IP: Logged

Orange
Knowflake

Posts: 228
From: Georgia
Registered: May 2009

posted February 28, 2013 11:33 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Orange     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by YoursTrulyAlways:
I apologize. But I didn't understand the point you were driving at.

When talking about synastry, wouldn't it matter about feelings in both directions? Why would you bother with the synastry when the feelings are not equi-reciprocal?


Synastry shows how one affects the other and this is the main reason why people use it. Could be in many different ways- love, hate, jealousy, sexual chemistry, indifference. All aspects must be taken in consideration.

IP: Logged

Lava Flower
Knowflake

Posts: 416
From:
Registered: Feb 2012

posted February 28, 2013 12:04 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Lava Flower     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by YoursTrulyAlways:

Having said that, how do you justify the accuracy of astrology when there are no aspects and the marriage works well?

How is the composite moon aspected? I've read on many sites how important it is to have the moon well aspected in the composite. There was an example: Two same sign moon signs = familiarity, at first. But if the composite moon was unaspected, there was a lack of emotional affinity/attachment in the long run.


IP: Logged

freebrainstorms
Knowflake

Posts: 772
From:
Registered: Sep 2010

posted February 28, 2013 07:03 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for freebrainstorms     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Doux Rêve:
You know the term already, "side by side" Otherwise it's called Inconjunct/Semi-sextile.

Lol thanks!

IP: Logged

Lonake
Moderator

Posts: 9215
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted February 28, 2013 07:09 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Lonake     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I'd rather have hard ones. No aspects = no communication of that energy. You have to include Moon to the angles and nodes as valid aspects too.

Barring that they could have progressed Moon contacts but the basic natal synastry will be lacking and you can't make something out of nothing.

IP: Logged

YoursTrulyAlways
Knowflake

Posts: 4899
From:
Registered: Oct 2011

posted February 28, 2013 08:04 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for YoursTrulyAlways     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Lava Flower:
How is the composite moon aspected? I've read on many sites how important it is to have the moon well aspected in the composite. There was an example: Two same sign moon signs = familiarity, at first. But if the composite moon was unaspected, there was a lack of emotional affinity/attachment in the long run.


I don't know. The Composite looks like Moon Square Uranus and Pluto, and Trine Sun, Mars and Mercury. No idea on the aspect degrees

You have a look if you like. Second chart is the composite. Thanks.
http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum11/HTML/002836.html

IP: Logged


This topic is 2 pages long:   1  2 

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright 2013

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a