posted January 18, 2014 12:56 PM              

quote:

---

Originally posted by Sailor Gemini:
For both questions, I'd definitely say 1920s.
There's just something irresistibly beckoning about the style; all classy, but still looking casual and comfortable.
ASC Taurus
Apollonas & Aphrodite in Gemini, 2H

---

YES.

I don't even LIKE dresses but this is the stuff of dreams to me :

And I love the hats they wore back then :

They put Natalie Wood in a flapper-style dress in Splendor in the Grass and I was obsessed with that dress for years afterward (the red dress) :

posted January 18, 2014 05:06 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by PixieJane:
I don't even know how you saw that...is it people saying they like curvacious and are therefore being secretly (but willfully) mean to those who aren't?

---

posted January 18, 2014 05:29 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by FlashFouette:
Yes because actresses models today aren't as beautiful as those women because they are not voluptuous..
I always here people say that, and again that is mentioned on this thread.
I think it's so stupid and hypocritical.

---

posted January 18, 2014 07:43 PM            

Jean Harlow

Lovely Aries:
--Not sure what happened to the rest of your comments but I agree, the 50's style is similar to the 40's. I love the sophisticated and elegant look of the two era's.

posted January 18, 2014 10:18 PM              

quote:

---

Originally posted by PixieJane:
What's hypocritical about it?

---

...You're serious?

posted January 19, 2014 01:47 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by FlashFouette:
Yes because actresses models today aren't as beautiful as those women because they are not voluptuous..
I always here people say that, and again that is mentioned on this thread.
I think it's so stupid and hypocritical.

---

Please stop. You & Kerosene totally read way too much into that because it's not even what I was talking about.

I said MODELS. Not thin models, not plus-sized ones, not average ones. YOU decided that I was dissing thin women when I never actually did. That's on you, not me.

If I were actually stating that all thin women weren't sexy, that would be ignorant.

Marilyn Monroe is in a class all by her damn SELF - in terms of sex appeal. You may disagree, and that is fine. But please be correct about my point.

Mentioning "Curvaceous" under a picture of Bettie Page is not an insult.

Thank you.

posted January 19, 2014 02:20 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by IMoppedtheFloor:
...You're serious?

Basically he's saying it's wrong to slam thin people then holler about how wrong it is to demean fat people for their size. Doing that is...hypocritical.

---

Where was it said that it was wrong it is to demean fat people or whatever but then that it was okay to demean thin people? I'm guessing it must be another thread because I didn't see it in this one, at least not when I first asked.

posted January 19, 2014 02:47 AM            

Greaser/blue collar aesthetics of the 50s, hard rock getups of the 70s-80s and the return of the lowbrow 50s style in the early 90s.
Just give me sun bleached hair, tan skin, bright getups...

posted January 20, 2014 06:57 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by LovelyAries86:

Oooh excellent reply! I love how you broke everything down! Well stated.

POST MORE PICTURES EVERYONE!!!

---

posted January 20, 2014 07:10 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Stawr:
Thanks! I'm thinking of breaking it down for my favorite decade looks for men....!!!...

---

posted May 28, 2014 09:21 AM            

I however.. do like the 20s-30s g irls faces!

Mae West was shapely too!

Lillian Russell of the 1890s is my personal favorite too
[IMG]https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQ6qW1jmIM5Mvo0YqHQ2Lck4ou8SIBMngF0J96HGZLDHxUblLd-[/IMG]

Lillian, I can somewhat remember, was something like 38-23-41

This is interesting too:
"The sponsors of a 1904 contest to find “the best and most perfectly formed woman” settled on Emma Newkirk, an athlete from Santa Monica, Calif., who stood 5-foot-4 ¼, measured 35-26-36, and weighed 136 pounds. That would have given her a B.M.I. of 23.3 — not overweight, but close."

posted May 28, 2014 10:30 AM            

Love Elizabeth Taylor, especially as cleopatra. classy and natural, but probably feisty underneath. She has a simple kind of beauty, she kind of looks Libran/sagittarian I haven't checked her chart though.

Next would be 90's, I love liv Tyler, I don't know what it is about her but again she kind of looks simple but it's attractive. Nothing is overdone, she kind of looks classic Hollywood.

posted May 29, 2014 02:00 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by KarkaQueen:

Venus Gemini in 5th inconjunct Neptune, conjunct Mars
Moon in Taurus conjunct IC
Capricorn ASC conjunct Neptune

---

Fabulous Darling!!!

quote:

---

Originally posted by NeptunianSag:
Asc - libra
Sun - sag
Venus - aqua

Next would be 90's, I love liv Tyler, I don't know what it is about her but again she kind of looks simple but it's attractive. Nothing is overdone, she kind of looks classic Hollywood.

---