posted March 17, 2016 08:08 PM            

I kinda don't like the concept of "maturity" in the zodiac, as it seems to make things lopsided so that Pisces gets the most credit for wisdom, and Aries gets the least.

I know there are differences, but I'm not sure what to call them so that everything sounds balanced.

I do know that the younger signs are just as capable of depth as the older ones...in fact sometimes the older signs get so saddled with responsibilities (Cap), experimenting in the labs in their garages (Aqua), or watching all the neighbors' pets just to be nice (Pisces) that they don't have the time and focus for deeper contemplation.

posted March 17, 2016 08:09 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by MilaBirkin:
My dominant signs are: Aquarius, Capricorn, Sagittarius and Pisces.
I have those signs in planets more than once (+mc) and their houses are repeated twice in planets (except 12th house, I don't have any planet in 12th house).
Do you think it has a deep meaning? Because those are the last signs or just nah? ha.

---

http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum25/HTML/005254.html

posted March 17, 2016 08:15 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Faith:
Not sure, Mila...

I kinda don't like the concept of "maturity" in the zodiac, as it seems to make things lopsided so that Pisces gets the most credit for wisdom, and Aries gets the least.

I know there are differences, but I'm not sure what to call them so that everything sounds balanced.

I do know that the younger signs are just as capable of depth as the older ones...in fact sometimes the older signs get so saddled with responsibilities (Cap), experimenting in the labs in their garages (Aqua), or watching all the neighbors' pets just to be nice (Pisces) that they don't have the time and focus for deeper contemplation.

---

I have to agree. Even though it can be nice to go "Oh hey look, I'm so evolved," you have to take another look at that Aries who just got their job promotion because they actually did the work and didn't sit around thinking about how they'll get promoted.

posted March 17, 2016 08:35 PM            

Yeah, someone can be extremely intelligent in let's say math(s).. But, that does not automatically make the person intelligent emotionally, or verbally.. Or artistically. Of course, they could be.. But, no specific intelligence has dominance over all others.

Every sign has its own genius. Every person has their own genius.. It's just about finding it. Problem is, a lot of the time, these things aren't encouraged because sometimes a person's Genius is different.. Unusual.. And people find no use in it. But, believe me, if you spend enough time looking, there is use.

I know you weren't making a post about intelligence.. And I'm not saying it is about that. I'm saying that every sign is extremely deep, in its own very specific way.

posted March 17, 2016 09:19 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by MilaBirkin:
My dominant signs are: Aquarius, Capricorn, Sagittarius and Pisces.
I have those signs in planets more than once (+mc) and their houses are repeated twice in planets (except 12th house, I don't have any planet in 12th house).
Do you think it has a deep meaning? Because those are the last signs or just nah? ha.

---

posted March 18, 2016 12:17 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by ReadingTheStars95:
^^ I guess you could say it like this..

The most evolved Aries energy can acomplish just as much as the most evolved Pisces. The energy is just going to be in different places. Does that make one better than the other? Not exactly. Maybe through subjective view, yes. But, in the end, every sign depends on every other sign for everything to operate together. It's as if the stars are all synchronized dancing with one another. If one dancer isn't there, it can mess up the whole tempo. One sign may be able to sit in as substitute, but, it won't be able to do both its part and the others at the exact same time without sacrificing something.

---

posted March 18, 2016 02:25 AM            

The mistake people make is thinking that the "wisdom" possessed by the last few signs is maturity as we know it, when in actuality, what they possess is a well developed (i.e. mature) spiritual connectivity (not maturity as in paying bills on time or making practical decisions). So yes they are more mature, it's just about in what way or in what sense. Now... possessing that specific type of "maturity" does not mean that they are great in the actual use of these developed(or mature) spiritual abilities. Notice that Sag is often reckless and Pisces isn't very dependable. I'm a Sag and my brother is Pisces lol. This is b/c usually the spiritual and/or philosophical aspects are nurtured while the aspects to navigate this world (material, social, etc.) are neglected/stunted. Whether or not these signs eventually balance out this issue depends on other factors. Just as whether or not the earlier signs become spiritually connected depends on other factors. The goal of each sign (whether at beginning or end) is to reach a balance of application. They will still (by their very nature) maintain a certain disposition, but their actions will be applied in a manner that utilizes both effectively.

The last signs are only considered wise b/c of a universal order of depth. Surface, then Mental, then Emotional, then Spiritual, & Beyond). Libra is Aries who applies leadership for societal justice (rather than self). Scorpio is Taurus who has gone beyond the sensual pleasures of flesh to spiritual transformation through flesh. Sag is Gemini who uses a brilliant mind for internal reform rather than external stimulation/reciprocation. They are basically the first signs after gaining awareness of "another world" within (or beyond) this world. So naturally, members of the "aware" group are thought to be closer to that which humanity yearns to understand but cannot reach. Note I said "closer to" not that they have actually reached by any means. The second set of signs can actually come across as more selfish or lacking in spirituality based on the fact that they are aware of "something" but have no idea what to do about it. It can cause more trouble and confusion than for those who are content with being grounded here on earth (with little thought of "deeper" realms). So they are wise in the sense that they are aware, but how they react to that awareness is a totally different story.

In essence, both types are absolutely necessary and have different roles and purposes. The prototype has to exist with the 2.0 (or aware version). They need each other. Think about it this way. An idea starts in the mind (internal) but has to be brought to action (external). If it stays in the mind and never comes out it is no good. Yet, if the idea never manifests in the mind in the first place, then there is no action to do. The signs manifest out of the other in different ways.

posted March 18, 2016 02:40 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by teasel:
Yep. We all balance each other out - and I love that. No one sign is better than the next.

---