posted December 08, 2016 11:55 PM            

quote:

---

Btw, who is the person you are referring too in those brackets, now you made me curious.

---

Oh heavens, no. This name cannot be transmitted electronically. Even in a face-to-face meeting this name dare not be uttered above a whisper. Shhhhhhh...

quote:

---

I think that every format has their own use. A book/ course, or whatever more complex source of knowledge has its use, and a forum has a slightly different one. I think it's unreasonable to expect that a discussion in a thread about a certain planetary aspect will be as exhaustive, "serious" and full of compressed information as if it were part of a more complex study scenario.

---

I agree here.

quote:

---

I sometimes also feel that I would need to write 2 pages to express all the shades of what I want to talk about, but I guess this is not the place. I do feel like sometimes people ignore longer posts, but sometimes I do just the same, I have to be honest, so who am I to judge.

---

I only skim longer posts if they lack proper indentation and punctuation.

quote:

---

About the lack of supporting evidence, I see a forum as a place where one could gather subjective information, from various sources, and then it's their own job to connect the pieces to their own understanding about the subject. You don't get this from where everyone only talks about serious objective data (I personally do not believe in objectivity but that's another story).

---

re: supporting evidence. Especially in synastry, I've seen theories introduced but never any real world objective examples to backup their claims. Eg. The angles are important!

quote:

---

Sure, there is BS everywhere, but as you said, the atmosphere is free and open, and this is what I like here, but I'm pretty new.

I actually like the fun part of it, if this would only be for "serious students" I would run away screaming.

---

posted December 09, 2016 03:18 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Orange:
Like, seriously, what aspects in a chart would make a person not wear underwear?

---

posted December 09, 2016 03:44 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Orange:
Like, seriously, what aspects in a chart would make a person not wear underwear?

---

taurus
cancer
sagittarius
aquarius

for different reasons

posted December 09, 2016 08:26 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Orange:
Like, seriously, what aspects in a chart would make a person not wear underwear?

---

Lilith conjunct the Ascendant

------------------
Want to Read Simple, Fun,Sexy Articles on Astrology? Check Me Out, DUDE.

posted December 09, 2016 08:34 AM            

------------------
Want to Read Simple, Fun,Sexy Articles on Astrology? Check Me Out, DUDE.

posted December 09, 2016 09:03 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Ami Anne:
Penis size is Jupiter in the 8th

---

posted December 09, 2016 09:16 AM            

------------------
Want to Read Simple, Fun,Sexy Articles on Astrology? Check Me Out, DUDE.

posted December 09, 2016 10:30 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by girlwiththerainysoul:
taurus
cancer
sagittarius
aquarius

for different reasons

---

Hahaha

1.Aqua to be shocking and rebel against social expectations
2.Taurus bc it feels nice
3.Sagittarius bc they feel free
4.Cancer was told is good for your private parts to breathe
5.Scorpio bc is easy access or they feel sexy
6.Virgo bc they ran out of clean underwear 7.Aries wants to set a new trend or was in a rush
8.Libra feels all their underwear is old and needs to go shopping for more
9.Pisces spaced out and forgot to put underwear bc they were high
10.Leo will not wear any only when she has a hot date
11.Capricorn always wears underwear, they are not taking any risks and are always prepared
12. Gemini will flip flop to keep you guessing

posted December 09, 2016 04:26 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by soren:
actually heard that men with higher estrogen levels (from the womb/genetics) have larger ones.

---

Interesting because there was a study done which revealed that gay man, on average, have bigger ones than straight men.