posted March 09, 2017 03:38 AM            

i tell them, have you ever looked at an atom?

this world is verrryyy small, on its foundation.

we are living micronobuel GIANTS in reality.

god is not up here. he is DOWN there.

look at an atam. this atom is god.

this is the level that god exists at. this single atom, feels every other atom in existence. hence- gravity.

it's a fact.

no one questions gravity. but there is some kind of connection between every atom in existence, making them "pull" on each other. every one.

100 trillion atoms are in a living cell. fact.

now how big is that? well take every star in the known universe. times that by a billion. thats how much

so that is the level god is working on.

and it goes deeper than the atom.

you can cut an atom. you know what happens then, it releases MASSIVE energy. what is this energy? this explosion- consists of something too. it's not electrons. its something else. and the energy, if we took one little "dot" of that explosion, and intersected it,

we would know

would know that "dot" is connected to the energy on the whole other area of this universe

posted March 09, 2017 03:58 AM            

Actually if you consider that an Atom goes even smaller then protons and neutrons. For example A proton has 3 quarks (Physics) .

And of course we enter dark matter which is pretty much is matter we can't explain that is even smaller.

So your 100 trillion atoms is much larger.

====================================
Gemini Sun,
Capricorn Rising
Aries Moon
Gemini Mercury
Venus Taurus
Mars Cancer

posted March 09, 2017 03:59 AM            

there is no repetetition.

our universe is just a mere spec

posted March 09, 2017 04:06 AM            

(dark matter is disproved now, gravity is all there is)

so then we can start to imagine, millions of other universes, seperated, far and wide,

posted March 09, 2017 04:43 AM            

they made up the idea the same way they thought, if you arent looking at the moon- it doesnt exist, and many still believe that if you arent observing matter- it doesnt exist (even eisntein said "well i like to believe, that when i turn around from the moon- that it is still there!)"

they made up this idea that when you arent observing physically something, then it isnt there. they made it based off of very limited experiment, where it seemed the "observer" made electrons form into particles (their ball form) but when they didnt observe/watch/record the electron being shot through a hole, then it was in a "wave" form (bending lines)

so just from that little thing, they decided that only humans materialized things by watching them. HAHAHAAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!! i cant believe thousands of quantum physisicts today still believe that. HAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!

trust me, when you arent watching something.. its still there.. haha..

the same thing with dark matter, they looked at some far away galaxies and "they were moving at too fast of speeds that gravity shouldn't have been able to hold them together. based on the speeds- the galaxies should have been ripped to pieces!!" hhahahahaaha. so you notice 1 thing, and decide thats the truth, and then you apply it to everything else.

"so we made the electron into a partcile form by observing it, therefore, the rest of the universe is 'non-materialized' until we observe it. it just has to work because we put two and two together and this is just how it has to be, according to our beliefs"

not being able to see beyond one little point,

same with "galaxies seem to be spinning TOO fast to keep all the suns in orbital positions, they should be moving around"

ok so they noted one little understanding of gravity, and said its not possible for the galaxies to be how they are.

i thought normally you get the bigger understanding before drawing a conclusion, and not finding one little thing, and making the bigger idea fit to it? the little thing is supposed to fit to the bigger idea,

posted March 09, 2017 05:03 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by soren:
if anyone understands basic gravity. is that all of existence is pulling on each other. one day another big bang will happen. its a fact.

---

Maybe. The only reason why the first big bang happened was because our galaxy began only with Hydrogen, it then underwent fusion to form the next element in the periodic table all the way until Iron 56.

Eventually it exhausted itself and the big bang occurred.

If another big band were to occur probably a different mechanism.

Again I'm not a physicist so I wouldn't be the best to say anything.

I only know that part about the big bang from a Geology perspective and how the geology of the planets formed, that's were my Taurus part of me comes in (top marks in Geology).

====================================
Gemini Sun,
Capricorn Rising
Aries Moon
Gemini Mercury
Venus Taurus
Mars Cancer

posted March 09, 2017 05:13 AM            

the big bang just explains THIS one, infinitely small to the grand idea, universe, stretching and conceived of stars that we've seen.

the known universe is only 4 billion years old. it fills us with fear to think, there was a definitive beginning to all that is. it just "came into existence".

if all matter has gravity and pulls, then one day they will all collide attract. as this happens, the material becomes so suppressed, that all the matter is fusing. it turns into a hot smoldering mass, and the stars we see, are just little bits of that smoldering mass that got left behind from the previous explosion

the galaxies are merely gravity taking hold of groups of stars,

posted March 09, 2017 05:23 AM            

its interesting how, all the galaxies did not start to come together- but forhold we see that the force of gravity was not strong enough for that much distance.

gravity has a certain strength, and if too far, becomes very weak.

we are lucky we live in a universe where the force of gravity is not so strong, that it even instantly brings galaxies together. instead, that process takes hundreds of billions of years.

this was not the first big bang, it was the 100 trillionth

or even then some, perhaps no beginning, that is a great wonder, if there was no beginning, how is that possible? maybe the beginning of our existence, was the end of some other existence.

and it just goes bigger and more amazing

posted March 09, 2017 05:27 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by soren:
the big bang has nothing to do with the start of existence itself. or it likely never started.

the big bang just explains THIS one, infinitely small to the grand idea, universe, stretching and conceived of stars that we've seen.

the known universe is only 4 billion years old. it fills us with fear to think, there was a definitive beginning to all that is. it just "came into existence".

---

Its actually 4.5 billion years old and thats a fact!!. Source: http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_age.html

As well as many other sources. This is the reason why Meteorites and Astroids are important because they contain the unformed elements of our galaxy and they can be carbon dated to give us the date of the bigbang.

I wouldn't really on the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram as an age approximation.

I just want to reinforce that because I want to make it clear, I wouldn't say anything I wouldn't be able to back up
and I'm not BSing.

Hence the non physicist comment.

The big bang gives us a time frame of when the universe occurred again it gives us a clear idea when are galaxy occurred, but obviously the subatomic particles could have been in existence much longer.

Again science is about making a theory followed by an explanation based on the current known facts. Then a new discovery is made that challenges and puts the old theory to rest.

posted March 09, 2017 05:39 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by soren:
the gray aliens understand they are useless

---

But if you want to add Aliens into the picture that changes things.

They know more and could explain more then what we ever will know.

This is more imagination then fact so I can't back this up. But assuming aliens had some part in are creation.

The universe could have been much longer..its just that we may just view a small part of the universe only in a way humans can understand it.

Sorta how are house pets, cats and dogs see the world. Or maybe they do know were just not at that spiritual level yet.

posted March 09, 2017 05:42 AM            

just as before, there actually was a video showing a similar idea that the universe is just one drop upon billions, and those billions form up another drop, etc. but now i finally proved it as fact. its not speculation.

i want to evolve into a GIANT entity. the more mass you have in you, the more you can feel all of reality. my little atoms in my brain arent enough to "FEEL" the bigger picture. the realm that our universe is just a spec of, i'd need to be a massive creature. say 5 meters across. a 2-3 meter wide brain. then i'd feel a lot more.

posted March 09, 2017 05:49 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by soren:
you don't need to say it's speculation, it's a fact they know much more.

just as before, there actually was a video showing a similar idea that the universe is just one drop upon billions, and those billions form up another drop, etc. but now i finally proved it as fact. its not speculation.

i want to evolve into a GIANT entity. the more mass you have in you, the more you can feel all of reality. my little atoms in my brain arent enough to "FEEL" the bigger picture. the realm that our universe is just a spec of, i'd need to be a massive creature. say 5 meters across. a 2-3 meter wide brain. then i'd feel a lot more.

the universe could be longer? well refer to my first 2 points of this response

---

Depends on what method you want to prove something.

Scientifically or from a Spiritual perspective.

Scientifically you haven't proven anything.

From your first post you claimed that the universe was 4 billion then I corrected you at 4.5 billion. From a genuine source not a video that has yet to be seen.

Now your claiming billions on billons? after mentioning that.

Spiritual maybe you've prove it? but thats entirely based on ones belief system which is entirely based on the individual.

I appreciate your opinion on this but we still require harder prof before its mutual accepted in the scientific world.

posted March 09, 2017 05:52 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by DualGemV2:

====================================
Gemini Sun,
Capricorn Rising
Aries Moon
Gemini Mercury
Venus Taurus
Mars Cance

---

posted March 09, 2017 06:01 AM            

But...somethings are harder to prove no matter how compelling the evidence is.

Its sorta similar to how every religion talks about ghosts and spirits and yet as much as it is true the scientific method just can't prove it or wants to belive it.

I whould like to say yes to your idea soren and believe it, I truly do. But there is something lacking...

====================================
Gemini Sun,
Capricorn Rising
Aries Moon
Gemini Mercury
Venus Taurus
Mars Cance

posted March 09, 2017 06:05 AM            

especially when you know theres 100 trillion atoms in a single cell.

the only fact is these stars go out infinitely.

if this is true, then there are other physical "universes" just further out. its a fact. they each get their own gravity attraction and have their own big bangs repeatedly.

posted March 09, 2017 06:11 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by soren:
its only logical that its the only possibility. simply because of gravity. everything is pulling on each other, not PUSHING. therefore one day it will all come to be one again. to think this observable universe is all there is, would be foolish.

especially when you know theres 100 trillion atoms in a single cell.

the only fact is these stars go out infinitely.

if this is true, then there are other physical "universes" just further out. its a fact. they each get their own gravity attraction and have their own big bangs repeatedly.

and they all make up something larger. a group of a hundred trillion of them makes up their own "cell" but not a living cell, just a small part of a larger whole.

---

Yes, but is the "Institution" or "scientific community " willing to accept that no matter how logical or obvious it may sound.

If you said exactly everything you just said as verbatim, in the exact same words in the exact same manner and its accepted thats fine.

That's kinda what my point is in the previous post is. Unless the institution is willing to accept something then its as credible as wikipedia.

====================================
Gemini Sun,
Capricorn Rising
Aries Moon
Gemini Mercury
Venus Taurus
Mars Cancer