posted February 24, 2022 09:27 AM            

Algol IS known as the malefic fixed star.

posted February 24, 2022 10:11 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Lilithsquared:
Ukraine*

Algol IS known as the malefic fixed star.

I thought Mars may conjunct Pluto before all out war but that is yet to come :fun:

---

Eris square Pluto, too, I think, but that's a long-standing one.

I agree with you.

posted February 24, 2022 10:13 AM            

quote:

---

http://www.facebook.com/LuaAstrology/posts/505909494229458

Putin's TV address re. 'military operation' listed as 05:55 am Moscow time on the BBC website - noting all the 5's -number of conflict! I know there are a few other charts floating around but I'm just going with this one for the time being. Noting massive first house emphasis - Capricorn ASC. My eyes can't unsee asteroid Lucifer conjunct the Moon (!), along with Pandora! Sedna conjunct the IC suggests this action stems from deep bitterness. Saturn, ruler of the chart applying to a square with the Nodes - this feels like unfinished business - more so with the South Node on the MC too. Saturn of course still in a waning square to Uranus. Venus and Mars coming up to conjoin Pluto again with Vesta - Intense focus on power and control. Always the choice to make love not war but I guess Putin isn't interested. The Sabian of the MC is The King Of The Fairies Approaching His Domain. Not sure how much Putin would like being described as a fairy king (!) but well, he thinks this is HIS domain. South Node on A Military Band Marches Noisily On Through The City Streets. You couldn't make it up.

Putin himself has Uranus opposing his Venus right now which is very descriptive of rebelling (Uranus) against diplomatic agreements (Venus).

---

posted February 24, 2022 10:14 AM              

It would be like Russia setting up military outposts at the Canadian-US or Mexican-US borders, while claiming "peaceful" intentions. Right. Russians are not stupid, and they know the power hunger of the forces that control the US has no bounds.

Interestingly, Edgar Cayce in a couple different readings pointed to a future Russia as potentially being a "hope of the world", first via a friendship with the US (the Reagan-Gorbachev era?) but then later unspecified except as related to religious and freedom movements. This is not to say that Russia doesn't have it's issues and problems, of course it does. There is no black and white, good guy vs bad guy here necessarily. There are forces of control and corruption in both nations, and really in all nations.

Btw, since most fixed Stars are not found on our Solar Systems ecliptic, you really shouldn't use regular aspects with them, but Parans. The aspects we use from planets to planets is because these are all roughly on a 2D like, relatively "flat" plane, though not perfectly so and the Moon and Pluto in particular can go way off that plane at times.

With Fixed Stars, you have to use a more 3D type reckoning.

I keep pointing out this fact at this site, but it keeps getting ignored.

posted February 24, 2022 11:54 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Librapurr:
Nobody invaded anybody yet. Don’t bring one side of a political story ideology in the astrology.
There’s a big political conflict. The liberal news try to simply it for Americans and make it about a bad guy and a victim. Without mentioning Europe and NATO. And many years it was brewing.

---

I'm truly sorry you don't have access to news in your country. Must be tough.

posted February 24, 2022 12:37 PM              

And if the most aggressive, war prone, and wealthiest country with largest military in the world starts setting up military outposts all around you, increasingly, you wouldn't think it prudent to push back some?

Last I heard during the last Ukrainian issue involving Russia and the US, the Ukrainians were asked about how they felt being part of Russia and a slight majority said that they would prefer to be part of Russia again. If that is objectively true, that is called "democracy in action". The corporate western media of course never said a peep about any of that, because it was all about how Russia was bad, Ukraine was a victim, and US was good and needed to intervene.

Same old, same old, US corporate media propagandist b.s.

It's just sadly funny that the so called liberals in my country are the ones falling for the war hawk stuff, when it used to be primarily the other side (though Obama and H. Clinton really are the ones that started to turn the tide there). Since I don't identify with either side and haven't for a long time, I can look objectively at both sides.

posted February 24, 2022 12:48 PM            

Children scared of the bombs.

http://twitter.com/olgatokariuk/status/1496902384966062087?s=21

posted February 24, 2022 12:55 PM              

quote:

---

Originally posted by teasel:
Not falling for anything.

---

If you simply and automatically believe what corporate media is telling you, then yes, you are. These have agendas and it is not truth nor the well being of people at large.

The sooner you accept that this world is run by extremely wealthy and powerful psychopaths who are extremely control and power hungry, the sooner you'll start seeing through corporate media which is one of their propaganda branches, and it doesn't matter if that corporate media projected image is supposedly left or right leaning.

This is not to say that there is just one over arching cabal that decides everything in a Dr. Evil kind of way. Too simplistic. They do vie with each other to some extent for power and control, and it is not one homogeneous blend. But at the same time, there are agreements, there are meetings/inter-communication, and there is an understanding and belief (of theirs) that they are the superior ones that need to control and direct the cattle masses of which you, I, and the huge majority of people are part of.

When you understand that these control obsessed men are like your BIL but on roids times 100 and with A LOT of money and time on their hands, then you will understand how bad things really are.

posted February 24, 2022 12:56 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by GalacticCoreExplosionV2:
If you simply and automatically believe what corporate media is telling you, then yes, you are. These have agendas and it is not truth nor the well being of people at large.

The sooner you accept that this world is run by extremely wealthy and powerful psychopaths who are extremely control and power hungry, the sooner you'll start seeing through corporate media which is one of their propaganda branches, and it doesn't matter if that corporate media projected image is supposedly left or right leaning.

This is not to say that there is just one over arching cabal that decides everything in a Dr. Evil kind of way. Too simplistic. They do vie with each other to some extent for power and control, and it is not one homogeneous blend. But at the same time, there are agreements, there are meetings/inter-communication, and there is an understanding and belief (of theirs) that they are the superior ones that need to control and direct the cattle masses of which you, I, and the huge majority of people are part of.

When you understand that these control obsessed men are like your BIL but on roids times 100 and with A LOT of money and time on their hands, then you will understand how bad things really are.

---

posted February 24, 2022 01:17 PM              

But to be fully honest, I do lean in that direction, because in the 2 or so years I've been observing you, you seem to lean in the direction of trusting corporate media if they are allegedly liberal leaning.

There is a reason why I refer to these organizations by the corporate media label because that is to remind self and others that these are for profit businesses that have agendas other than objective truth. Some of it is the banality and ubiquity of regular old corporate greed, and some is the being influenced by US intelligence agencies like CIA, NSA, DIA, etc.

posted February 24, 2022 01:35 PM              

It is not so black and white.

These are super powers vying for control over the globe (rather with Russia, they are trying to not be taken over) and you are only being told and shown what they want you to see. How do you not get that?

Think of it this way at much smaller scale... When Amber Heard first came out and claimed she was being abused by Johnny Depp, she released a highly edited video that seemed to support her claim. Many (most people) jumped on team Heard and denounced Depp. His career has since tanked and many have "canceled" him.

Turns out, the actual account was far more shades of gray, and Heard is far more the abuser in the situation. This only came out with more evidence, court hearings, etc. She literally cut part of his finger off for one example. The day that he had lost it on the video was shortly after his mother died, he lost a crap ton of money, and she was deliberately goading him, trying to push him into an extreme reaction while he was hurting and already imbalanced.

But people should have questioned Heard more, as she did not have a good MO and past with this stuff and her past girlfriend had brought charges of abuse towards her.

Me, I started to question her very early on after very briefly siding with her, because my intuition was screaming at me, "this woman is a raging malignant narcissist and has an agenda".

But isn't it interesting how easy it is to manipulate human perception with a little distorted data and some edited video?

Well, in this case, Heard is the US and Depp is like Russia. And Russia seems to be the aggressor here, but if you understand the bigger and longer term picture (which you clearly don't), it is actually the US being the aggressor with both sides using Ukraine in this.

If I and my friends started to set up tents around your property and we all have weapons in hand, and you started to worry, hey, maybe they are getting ready for something, would it not be understandable if you went and got the shot gun and walked to the edge of your property and said, "hey, if you step any closer, there will be consequences"?

posted February 24, 2022 01:52 PM            

This was shared by a woman whose daughter works in politics in New York State. She double-majored, one of her majors was Russian studies. She was over there a few years ago, she stayed with a family.

posted February 24, 2022 03:37 PM            

Ukraine should be annexed by Russia because "Ukraine as a state has no geopolitical meaning, no particular cultural import or universal significance, no geographic uniqueness, no ethnic exclusiveness, its certain territorial ambitions represents an enormous danger for all of Eurasia and, without resolving the Ukrainian problem, it is in general senseless to speak about continental politics". Ukraine should not be allowed to remain independent, unless it is cordon sanitaire, which would be inadmissible.[9]

In the United States:
Russia should use its special services within the borders of the United States to fuel instability and separatism, for instance, provoke "Afro-American racists". Russia should "introduce geopolitical disorder into internal American activity, encouraging all kinds of separatism and ethnic, social and racial conflicts, actively supporting all dissident movements – extremist, racist, and sectarian groups, thus destabilizing internal political processes in the U.S. It would also make sense simultaneously to support isolationist tendencies in American politics".[9]