posted June 01, 2011 11:49 AM            

as i said, i think sterilizing the whole population would be counterproductive, don't you? who would those in power have power over then? and per your own argument, how would these people avoid the water supply? you can drink and cook with bottled springwater, but if you eat out, by prepared foods, eat food not grown by you (and using only springwater in the garden is just a little difficult even for cabinet members), you will be consuming it. taint the water supply, taint the food chain.

but the possibility that monsanto is - intentionally or unwittingly - already flooding the market with FOOD that causes successive generations to breed less and smaller babies (in the lab) is HERE NOW. and european countries, despite the UNION's wishes, are not having it!

posted June 01, 2011 01:58 PM            

i also believe that if people do not curb their breeding overpopulation, like the earth with warming trends, will be its own form of birth control. it has built in limits, but do we really want to live with less and less clean water, less food, less room, less of everything until we reach critical mass?

whether by war (a time-honoured culling method for our race), disease, famine, or just plain overcrowded egos battling each other...personally i would prefer people decide to have fewer kids! a lot of people already have made that decision, but many have not

posted June 01, 2011 03:42 PM            

But, I was never so stupid or thuggish I needed to learn the lesson to not attempt to sterilize Americans by putting chemicals in their drinking water or food. The idea is repugnant to every reasonable person in America...and always was. Notice katatonic, I said "reasonable people". Neither would "reasonable people" attempt to defend such a lame brained leftist thug. Nor, would any "reasonable person" hire such a person for any position of responsibility in the US government.

John Holdren is just another typical Marxist thug among many O'Bomber has brought into his administration.

posted June 01, 2011 10:46 PM            

i'm not defending holdren. don't know enough about him to do that. nor will i condemn someone without checking them out somewhat. i would have to be a speedreader or laid up in hospital to have as much research time as you seem to.

posted June 01, 2011 11:33 PM            

i agree about research with rats etc but until there has been enough human evidence logged i think it's foolhardy to just go ahead and eradicate our foodstock by contamination or deliberate alteration, don't you? what happens in 50 years IF we find out the GMO stuff is wiping us out and we can't go back because it's taken over?

for all i know it could turn out to be great for us all, but if it kills off even one species, like rats, who help keep the world clean as it happens, what then?

posted June 01, 2011 11:40 PM            

I've seen some of the studies where outrageous amounts of a substance were fed to animal test subjects and when symptoms appear, the substance is deemed harmful to humans.

katatonic, typical is the correct word to use when speaking about Marxist Socialist Progressives. They're all typically authoritarian. Obey me is their watchword.

posted June 04, 2011 03:52 PM            

I noticed you relocated my thread “what in the world are they spraying” to the new forum about conspiracy theories. However I posted it in GU and would not have posted it in a forum about conspiracy theory since, for anyone who watched the video will agree, this is not theories

it is admitted in the video by david keith, a geoengineer from the university of calgary that one method used by scientist to control the climate is to spray stuff in the atmosphere and he also says that the scientist haven’t yet tested the effect of it being done on a massive scale.
so spraying is real, it is not a conspiracy theory.

Besides, on the original post I posted a link to an article published in the guardian.co.uk, a top 3 mainstream English newspaper. In this article, the government of the UK released previously secret documents that reveal the use of spraying chemicals over the country for decades.

This is not conspiracy theory. it is real. the only theory or "unknown material" here would be if the motive behind geoengineering the climate was different than what the scientist are admitting today, i.e. to control the climate.

I would appreciate if you could post it back to GU as it is an acknowledge fact that governments such as the UK or the US have sprayed or are working with geoengineers that work on spraying chemicals over their country and their population.

Thanks for that and sorry for wasting your time with this.