posted April 16, 2014 11:20 PM            

O'Bomber hires whom he wants...for the position he wants...at the salary he wants. O'Bomber is unrestrained by any federal salary guidelines...didn't you notice that?

So, the fact O'Bomber pays women less than men and always has is a function of a deliberate, intentional, willful plan to do so...along with other demoscat howlers and screechers about equal pay for women.

posted April 18, 2014 04:45 PM            

Didn't I tell you O'Bomber hires whom HE WANTS to fill each Administration position.

So if women make less money in O'Bomber's administration than men, it's O'Bomber's intent to pay women less than men...just like he did as a US Senator and just like he did as a state Senator in Illinois.

posted April 25, 2014 08:42 AM            

Female Dem candidate accuses Democrats of ‘War on Women’

posted April 27, 2014 04:01 AM            

Now, he might be a hypocrite when it comes to paying women equally. That is unjust, of course. But there is no need to essentially lie about what he is and why he's doing it. I can guarantee you if he WAS a real socialist you'd see him going tooth and nail after the corporations and big banks of this country and definitely wouldn't discriminate against sex but he is not, so he's not gonna do that.

If you understand what the nature of the topic of the forum you are actually writing in is, then you would understand that real communism - (a stateless, classless society in which money is no longer needed and everyone does the work that they want to do and where the means of production are publicly owned) - is actually QUITE in line with Aquarian ideals and principles, and would actually be possible due to aquarius' heavy influence of technology. Technology would make food production and other menial tasks automated and leave people to do what they want to do in life.

posted April 27, 2014 02:35 PM            

And,
We have crickets from the Far Right crowd.

Party of three- table please!

posted May 01, 2014 09:59 AM            

This doesn't come close to passing the giggle test. O'Bomber would only be "slightly right of center" in the old communist mecca of the Soviet Union.

Btw, Socialism is the umbrella term under which all collectivists hide.

The entire array of Socialists/Collectivists are a sham which cannot sustain any governmental or socio-economic system without the regular injection of "other people's money"...from capitalists who can actually find their own as$es.

Socialism and all it's parts are perpetuated for one reason only. To catapult the terminally ignorant, incompetent, lazy, shiftless and unaccomplished into positions of authority and maintain them there..by force if necessary.

This entire concept sprang out of the ass of the 5th rate thinker from the 19th century, Karl Marx and there hasn't been a new idea on the left for the last 150 years.

"I can guarantee you if he WAS a real socialist you'd see him going tooth and nail after the corporations and big banks of this country"...Leorpio

More claptrap!

Perhaps you missed the O'Bomber Czars and also missed Dodd-Frank, foisted on American business and banks by the O'Bomber administration.

posted May 01, 2014 12:41 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by jwhop:
"First, I would REALLY encourage you to learn what marxism, communism, and socialism ACTUALLY ARE before you start saying someone is one. [b]Obama is actually slightly right of center when it comes to politics, as all american politics are. Socialism is on the far left of the spectrum."...Leorpio

This doesn't come close to passing the giggle test. O'Bomber would only be "slightly right of center" in the old communist mecca of the Soviet Union.

Btw, Socialism is the umbrella term under which all collectivists hide.

The entire array of Socialists/Collectivists are a sham which cannot sustain any governmental or socio-economic system without the regular injection of "other people's money"...from capitalists who can actually find their own as$es.

Socialism and all it's parts are perpetuated for one reason only. To catapult the terminally ignorant, incompetent, lazy, shiftless and unaccomplished into positions of authority and maintain them there..by force if necessary.

This entire concept sprang out of the ass of the 5th rate thinker from the 19th century, Karl Marx and there hasn't been a new idea on the left for the last 150 years.

"I can guarantee you if he WAS a real socialist you'd see him going tooth and nail after the corporations and big banks of this country"...Leorpio

More claptrap!

Perhaps you missed the O'Bomber Czars and also missed Dodd-Frank, foisted on American business and banks by the O'Bomber administration.

You're in Cypress. Is that "Cypress" in The People's Republic of California?[/B]

---

posted May 01, 2014 10:44 PM            

Right, no rebuttal forthcoming because you can't rebut. Nice try but no cookie.

posted May 02, 2014 05:52 PM            

Obamacare Slashes Senior Home Health Care Services
Mike Flynn
23 Apr 2014

In early April, the Obama Administration delayed cuts in the Medicare Advantage program mandated by Obamacare. These plans, used by 30% of Medicare beneficiaries, supplement traditional Medicare coverage. The planned cuts to the MA program risked a political firestorm just months before the midterm elections. While MA received a short-term pardon, the Obama Administration is going forward with dramatic cuts to home health care services for seniors.

Over 3.5 million seniors receive health care services in their home. Over 60% of the recipients are women. These beneficiaries tend to be older, poorer and sicker than the overall Medicare population. Because of this, they often lack transportation, making home health care services critical for their well-being. Those impacted by the ongoing cuts are the most vulnerable and at-risk seniors.

Obamacare gave the Obama administration wide latitude in containing spending in the program. In a decision that baffled critics, however, the administration chose to impose the maximum cuts allowed, cutting reimbursements by 14% over the next four years. The announced cuts will dramatically shrink the home health care sector and leave over a million seniors without access to health services.

“Despite the broad discretion granted to it by Obamacare, the Administration decided to impose the deepest possible cut, which is already having a dire impact on jobs, women and vulnerable seniors,” Eric Berger, CEO of the Partnership for Quality Home Healthcare said. “Without relief, these Medicare cuts will continue to impact the home health professionals upon whom millions of the Medicare program’s most vulnerable seniors depend.”

In issuing its reimbursement guidelines, the administration acknowledged that "approximately 40%" of the more than 11,000 home health care agencies would be losing money by 2017.

posted May 09, 2014 08:31 AM            

But Hillary kicked off the demoscat's war on women. Kommander Korruption, aka Bill Clinton, raped Juanita, had a long affair with Jennifer, sexually assaulted Kathleen, tried to force Paula into a sexual relationship and then, there was Monica!

Through it all, there was Hillary...and her friends...trying to destroy the women to protect Kommander Korruption.

Now that's the real war on women and it's a demoscat affair.

Ingraham: War on Women? The Clintons Pioneered It

LAURA INGRAHAM: In a new essay in Vanity Fair, Monica Lewinsky acknowledges her deep regret over her sexual relationship with Bill Clinton. Although she says the relationship with the president was consensual, she also charged, ‘my boss took advantage of me.’

In the scandal's aftermath, she became disposable. Quote, ‘I was made a scapegoat in order to protect his powerful position.’ Basically, this woman's life was ruined. Her name became radioactive, no one would hire her. Beyonce even recently mocks her in a new song. Meanwhile, Bill and Hillary Clinton, well, they went on to become one of the most powerful and most admired couples in the world.

So why does any of this matter today? Well, as it was recently revealed in the midst of the scandal, Hillary referred to Lewinsky as a narcissistic loony toon in correspondence with her close friend, Diane Blair, and she even blamed herself for being emotionally withholding. So Lewinsky’s reaction to that? She said, ‘I find her impulse to blame the woman, not only me but herself, troubling.’

The fact remains; a young woman was being manipulated by the most powerful man on the planet. And Mrs. Clinton’s reaction initially was to write her off as a nut case, and of course, blame the vast right wing conspiracy.

When Rand Paul raised the Lewinsky saga as perhaps relevant in the examination of the overall Clinton record, he was excoriated by the media and political elite. But I say why? Democrats claim to champion women's rights in the work place, for equal pay, against sexual harassment in the military, and recently against date rape on campus, but the instinct here was to duck, cover, and blame the young intern as a narcissistic loony toon who was ‘obsessed’ with the president.

posted May 10, 2014 09:34 AM            

Yeah, taking over 16% of the US economy and running it from the White House is definitely Socialism in action.

posted May 10, 2014 09:54 AM            

Hmmm, let's bore right down to the bedrock here.

I don't recall Warren Harding bloviating about being a champion of "women's rights".

However, it seems the daily demoscat message coming from the Marxist Messiah, O'Bomber and the rest of the Socialist choir..including Hillary, is that they are!