|
Author
|
Topic: What Happened? Who Hillary Blames For Her Loss!
|
teasel
Knowflake Posts: 10773
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 19, 2017 09:27 PM
  
I also don't see anyone here saying that he shouldn't be president, because he's unattractive. You said she shouldn't be president, because of what she wore.IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 85382
From: From a galaxy, far, far away...
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 19, 2017 09:31 PM
I never said you criticized Melania's heels. Everything is not always about you. And Hillary's attire was just one of many reasons she lost--indicative of how voters couldn't connect to her. I never mentioned anything about Hillary's hair, body, or looks. That's the difference. And for further proof of hypocrisy, President Trump has given several women very high positions, but where is the left with compliments about empowering women? Crickets. IP: Logged |
Catalina
Knowflake Posts: 5025
From: shamballa
Registered: Aug 2013
|
posted September 19, 2017 10:45 PM
Just keep digging, just keep digging..You may recall my objections to Sarah Palin. They had nothing to do with her being a woman or how she looked. No one gives a ratz about HRC wearing pants except the closet sexists. And my remarks about DT.. aired here only today, were to show you how stupid your even mentioning her pants suits (suits to those who aren't worried about women wearing pants) was. It is you who have shown your true colours. Because if you think a woman in pantsuits is a problem it totally diminishes anything else you critique her for. Sorry Chaz. Youre ok with a president who calls women"pieces of ass" and when they're heavier than he thinks ideal "pigs".. but a wardrobe choice is fair game to you.
Whatever IP: Logged |
Catalina
Knowflake Posts: 5025
From: shamballa
Registered: Aug 2013
|
posted September 19, 2017 11:01 PM
If you think Betsy deVos who bought a cabinet seat and an appellate judge nominee (with no experience) who thinks her religion takes priority over the law when sitting cases, Mike Huckabee's daughter and his own are exemplary of empowering women... your problem. I dont look at women as beans in a counting game but as individuals. So far not impressed with the women he has appointed. IP: Logged |
Catalina
Knowflake Posts: 5025
From: shamballa
Registered: Aug 2013
|
posted September 19, 2017 11:05 PM
Have you read the book? OrFox's/ whoever's summary/ diatribe? IP: Logged |
T
Knowflake Posts: 11964
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 19, 2017 11:07 PM
It has taken well over a decade or two, but it's kind of nice to see true colors starting to peak through to others. I've been sitting back waiting quite a long time.....Now, I think I'm due for another, longer, break.  out. IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 85382
From: From a galaxy, far, far away...
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 19, 2017 11:29 PM
If you read the article, you would know why there's nothing sexist about the pant suits critique. It's not a problem. It's just one piece of a puzzle that shows how out of touch she was Obama's millennial voters. Yet, you are free to body shame our President with impunity. Typical. Not his clothing. His looks. Big difference. Hypocrite.IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 85382
From: From a galaxy, far, far away...
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 19, 2017 11:33 PM
While President Trump empowers women, Hillary paid women less than men in her foundation.IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 85382
From: From a galaxy, far, far away...
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 19, 2017 11:37 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Randall:
It's not petty. It's relevant. It shows that Hillary was out of touch with her constituency and that the Millennial base who voted for Obama did not identify with her.
http://www.racked.com/2015/4/21/8433603/hillary-clinton-fashion-clothes-suits
IP: Logged |
teasel
Knowflake Posts: 10773
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 19, 2017 11:47 PM
quote:
Originally posted by T:
It has taken well over a decade or two, but it's kind of nice to see true colors starting to peak through to others. I've been sitting back waiting quite a long time.....Now, I think I'm due for another, longer, break. out.
What are you talking about?
IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 85382
From: From a galaxy, far, far away...
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 19, 2017 11:52 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Catalina:
Have you read the book? OrFox's/ whoever's summary/ diatribe?
No thanks. I'll pass. Have you read any of President Trump's books? IP: Logged |
teasel
Knowflake Posts: 10773
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 19, 2017 11:55 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Catalina:
Just keep digging, just keep digging..You may recall my objections to Sarah Palin. They had nothing to do with her being a woman or how she looked. No one gives a ratz about HRC wearing pants except the closet sexists. And my remarks about DT.. aired here only today, were to show you how stupid your even mentioning her pants suits (suits to those who aren't worried about women wearing pants) was. It is you who have shown your true colours. Because if you think a woman in pantsuits is a problem it totally diminishes anything else you critique her for. Sorry Chaz. Youre ok with a president who calls women"pieces of ass" and when they're heavier than he thinks ideal "pigs".. but a wardrobe choice is fair game to you.
Whatever
Right. I don't care about his looks - I don't even call him anything like Cheeto, because it doesn't matter. But it is hypocritical and sexist of him and others, to say that Hillary shouldn't be president because of the way she dresses and looks. IP: Logged |
Catalina
Knowflake Posts: 5025
From: shamballa
Registered: Aug 2013
|
posted September 19, 2017 11:58 PM
Fwiw no man can empower women. Women empower themselves. Or not. The relevant line for those too impatient to listen:
I can make a dress out of a bean bag and I'll make a man out of you.. But Miss M is so cute you might try
http://youtu.be/IDs-7I3NElE IP: Logged |
teasel
Knowflake Posts: 10773
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 19, 2017 11:58 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Randall:
If you read the article, you would know why there's nothing sexist about the pant suits critique. It's not a problem. It's just one piece of a puzzle that shows how out of touch she was Obama's millennial voters. Yet, you are free to body shame our President with impunity. Typical. Not his clothing. His looks. Big difference. Hypocrite.
If pant suits were the main problem with her and millennials, then we really have a problem. I don't know anyone who voted against trump because f the way he looks. They voted against what he stood for: the violence and ugliness of everything he touted at his rallies, his grabbing women (and his supporters making excuses for that). He's a sexual predator. That's what matters. Not a suit, or hair. IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 85382
From: From a galaxy, far, far away...
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 20, 2017 12:04 AM
I never said they didn't vote for her because of her pant suits. Let me reiterate, Hillary did not lose due to her fashion sense! I said it indicated that she was out of touch with the voters who helped elect Obama. And Bill Clinton is the sexual predator.IP: Logged |
Catalina
Knowflake Posts: 5025
From: shamballa
Registered: Aug 2013
|
posted September 20, 2017 12:05 AM
No thanks. I'll pass. Have you read any of President Trump's books?🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂 You mean"his own words" not the ghost writers or "media twists"? As it happens i have more firsthand knowledge of his books than you do of hers. Oh and I'm from NY so hes come across my radar plenty, his NY delivery doesn't bother me personally (except for the insincerity of Mr Silverspoon trying to sound like Kotter). Have you read the memoirs from the writer of Art of the Deal?
IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 85382
From: From a galaxy, far, far away...
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 20, 2017 12:08 AM
Memoirs? More Trump hate from people who loved him before he ran for office. But don't worry, Hillary never wrote her books, either.IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 85382
From: From a galaxy, far, far away...
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 20, 2017 12:10 AM
Yes, women empower themselves. Of that, I agree. I only use the term "empowerment," because the left claims to support it...unless the right furthers it.IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 85382
From: From a galaxy, far, far away...
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 20, 2017 12:14 AM
President Trump didn't cause the intolerance of the left--he exposed it. The true colors of the "tolerant" left can be seen in the violence, the riots, the death threats, the restriction on free speech, and all the rest of the insanity.IP: Logged |
teasel
Knowflake Posts: 10773
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 20, 2017 12:15 AM
quote:
Originally posted by Randall:
Yes, women empower themselves. Of that, I agree. I only use the term "empowerment," because the left claims to support it...unless the right furthers it.
Do you think that lying about someone bleeding from plastic surgery, because he dislikes her, is empowering women? He lies all the time. That doesn't empower anyone. IP: Logged |
teasel
Knowflake Posts: 10773
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 20, 2017 12:16 AM
quote:
Originally posted by Randall:
President Trump didn't cause the intolerance of the left--he exposed it. The true colors of the "tolerant" left can be seen in the violence, the riots, the death threats, the restriction on free speech, and all the rest of the insanity.
So we're supposed to be tolerant in the face of intolerance? We're supposed to meditate, do yoga, and try to hug nazis? IP: Logged |
Catalina
Knowflake Posts: 5025
From: shamballa
Registered: Aug 2013
|
posted September 20, 2017 12:17 AM
Isnt it time you stop talking about the left and start talking to the PEOPLE here? Who may or may not beLEFT but just don't like your guy for myriad reasons? Left and right are disintegrating. Hopefully what will remain will be more realistic than a football game or reality tv episode IP: Logged |
teasel
Knowflake Posts: 10773
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 20, 2017 12:22 AM
My cousin's husband is a veteran who supports Antifa. He says that he didn't fight for this country, just to have Nazis feel empowered to come out and spread their hate, thinking it's their time. This might not be the right thread, but he has empowered nazis. This cousin and her husband were also worried about rights being taken away from women and specifically their daughters and granddaughters. He does not empower women. IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 85382
From: From a galaxy, far, far away...
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 20, 2017 12:23 AM
As I said, the left was never truly tolerant. The party of free speech is no more. No one likes Nazis. What's worse, offensive speech, or physical violence? And if you check your history, the Nazis were from the left--the National Socialist party. Offensive speech is still protected speech. But physical violence, smashing car and business windows, and fire bombing police is never okay.IP: Logged |
teasel
Knowflake Posts: 10773
From:
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted September 20, 2017 12:26 AM
quote:
Originally posted by Randall:
As I said, the left was never truly tolerant. The party of free speech is no more. No one likes Nazis. What's worse, offensive speech, or physical violence? And if you check your history, the Nazis were from the left--the National Socialist party. Offensive speech is still protected speech. But physical violence, smashing car and business windows, and fire bombing police is never okay.
Hitler wasn't a democrat, and the Nazis attacked people! They killed a woman!! Damn it, I'm getting dizzy again. They killed a woman. They attacked others. They chanted Nazi BS. THAT IS BAD. that is scary.
IP: Logged |
Lindaland
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
