Author
|
Topic: Porn and relationships 2
|
DopGang Knowflake Posts: 612 From: <--------- over there. Registered: Jun 2015
|
posted August 21, 2015 09:51 AM
quote: Originally posted by aquaguy91: I don't believe you....
LOL! How absurd! You're literally dividing the world in half. I'll have you know that I have my own thoughts, my own opinions, my own feelings and sometimes they even change. IP: Logged |
Orange Knowflake Posts: 2824 From: Georgia Registered: May 2009
|
posted August 21, 2015 09:54 AM
Why is everyone ganging on AG? Not cool.Leave the guy alone, the attack is not going to lead to any place good. as about the OP - I, personally, enjoy watching porn, in relationship or not, and wouldnt mind them watching porn too for as long as it is not an addiction, or it indulges some sick perversion. Or if they do it on a daily basis and start to neglect me. Or if the women are way too sexy and of certain type. Heck, better if my honey let me proof-read the porn video before they start watching...Other than the forementioned, I am very open to it..haha IP: Logged |
Faith Knowflake Posts: 12503 From: Bella's Hair Salon Registered: Jul 2011
|
posted August 21, 2015 09:57 AM
I didn't gang up on him.I said, I hate the word feminazi. Every time he uses it I cringe. I want him to stop. He keeps using it. I keep asking him to stop. Endless cycle. Some of his other points I agree with, but that's obvious by reading the threads and seeing where our arguments match.
IP: Logged |
LeeLoo2014 Knowflake Posts: 15269 From: Venus cornering Neptune Registered: Mar 2014
|
posted August 21, 2015 10:00 AM
No one is ganging up on AG, he is ganging up on all of us, as usually. Strong man, can hate and fight and repel billions of Eves at the same time. quote: Originally posted by Orange: Heck, better if my honey let me proof-read the porn video before they start watching...
Awesomely funny as usually, Orange. I can imagine you posting a dating ad: "Hi, I am Orange, gorgeous and fun, looking for Princes Charming, proof-read porn allowed" ------------------ I seem to have loved you in numberless forms... AstroMandala New Profiles IP: Logged |
Faith Knowflake Posts: 12503 From: Bella's Hair Salon Registered: Jul 2011
|
posted August 21, 2015 10:12 AM
quote: Originally posted by aquaguy91: Faith, As I've already said multiple times in this thread and in the last thread y'all are not men and do not know what its like to live in a male body with male hormones and male sexuality. You just don't!
I never pretended to know what it's like, and maybe you could give me credit for acknowledging the legitimacy of a man's sexual needs, instead of framing me here, pretending I never did. Give credit where it's due. And for someone CAPABLE of being quite logical, you are going way off track. I agree with DopGang that a man who commits suicide over sex has other issues. Including: every single thing that makes him rejected by the sexual partners he seeks (perhaps it's his appearance, low self-esteem from unresolved childhood issues leading to poor hygiene or weight gain; career and financial setbacks, etcetera), lack of spiritual transcendence which would enable him to rise above bodily desire, depression for various reasons which translate to a flawed mental assumption that all it would take was a good woman to save him. The same goes for the many women who commit suicide over failed relationships. They exist, too. And they all have similar additional issues that factor into their decision (that is to say, the same list I gave for men will apply to women --> depression, low self-worth, financial issues, the whole entire picture.) IP: Logged |
DopGang Knowflake Posts: 612 From: <--------- over there. Registered: Jun 2015
|
posted August 21, 2015 10:22 AM
quote: Originally posted by Orange: Why is everyone ganging on AG? Not cool.Leave the guy alone, the attack is not going to lead to any place good.
If AG wants to take on everyone and tell us what we think and feel and about how he's so misunderstood then he can deal with us correcting him. He may appear to be the underdog but that doesn't make him right, us wrong, or make him deserving of anyone's mercy. You eat the dinner that you serve yourself. There's always at least two to participate in these things. This is leading to a kind of discussion that I don't care to participate in anymore. Who would even attempt to reason with a person who is going to tell me what my sex is in order to fit his way of thinking? That's not a person worth wasting your efforts on.
IP: Logged |
aquaguy91 Moderator Posts: 11633 From: Wankety Wankerson Registered: Jan 2012
|
posted August 21, 2015 10:44 AM
Faith, What you don't understand is how much a man's romantic and sexual success (or lack thereof) affects other areas of his life. You, and others, rationalized women treating single men differently. You suggested that women perceived sexually and romantically successful men as safe. So the implication could be that men who are single or ignored by women are not safe and are somehow defective or flawed somehow. Do you not see how this line of thinking could be extremely offensive and even rage inducing to single men? Especially when said single men can look around them and see the biggest scumbags on the planet getting women left and right. A few years ago a college football coach was put on blast by the media for saying that one of the ways he chooses assistant coaches is by seeing how hot their wife is. His logic was that if a man was able to Charm attractive women he would be able to sell the football program and be a good recruiter. You know why the PC police jumped on him for this? Because it was offensive to women! Of course! the media chose to see that side of the issue! They failed to see how this was equally or more offensive to mem. He was essentially saying that a man wasn't competent unless he is desirable to women. So mans value is determined by how successful he is women! To me thats offensive! And guess what! His mindset is pretty universal across the board. I even read where a certain city in the UK was considering banning men from going to a certain park alone because they were seen as potential child predators!
IP: Logged |
LeeLoo2014 Knowflake Posts: 15269 From: Venus cornering Neptune Registered: Mar 2014
|
posted August 21, 2015 10:49 AM
AG, it has nothing to do with you as a man, your manhood, it's about you as a person, a human being, and how you improve yourself, or not, to be more successful. It's not in the gender.------------------ I seem to have loved you in numberless forms... AstroMandala New Profiles IP: Logged |
goddessinworld Knowflake Posts: 128 From: Uranus Registered: Jun 2015
|
posted August 21, 2015 10:59 AM
.IP: Logged |
goddessinworld Knowflake Posts: 128 From: Uranus Registered: Jun 2015
|
posted August 21, 2015 11:03 AM
quote: Originally posted by bansheequeen: Also, calling someone a feminazi, no matter what she says... is equating words said over the internet to the genocide of the jewish. Pretty disrespectful of all the people that died in WWII. Just sayin.
^^^^ IP: Logged |
Faith Knowflake Posts: 12503 From: Bella's Hair Salon Registered: Jul 2011
|
posted August 21, 2015 11:19 AM
quote: Originally posted by aquaguy91: Faith, What you don't understand is how much a man's romantic and sexual success (or lack thereof) affects other areas of his life.
I dislike comments like this. Always accusative. "You don't understand" and "You don't understand." Actually I understand quite a bit, but you are incapable of acknowledging that, because it would threaten this stance of victimhood you've digged your heels into. quote: Originally posted by aquaguy91: You, and others, rationalized women treating single men differently.
You oversimplify and obfuscate. quote: Originally posted by aquaguy91: You suggested that women perceived sexually and romantically successful men as safe. So the implication could be that men who are single or ignored by women are not safe and are somehow defective or flawed somehow.
That is not the implication whatsoever! There are MANY ways for a man to signal that he is safe. Just because I have ONE example doesn't mean that I implicitly negate the entire list. But that never occurred to you. You wouldn't have thought to give me the benefit of the doubt. Because I am a woman, and you attack women almost as a matter of course. Even your female friends get no reprieve from this. So you present yourself as a friend to me and then pin crap on me that I never said nor implied. You take too much out of context. quote: Originally posted by aquaguy91: Do you not see how this line of thinking could be extremely offensive and even rage inducing to single men?
ONLY to men who cannot perceive my ACTUAL LINE OF THINKING and opt instead to project NASTY THINGS ON ME as you constantly do. And hey that compels me to feel a bit angry and resentful in turn. Plus you just told me the other day you were done with these arguments. Why do you tell me these things and then immediately go full speed in reverse? WHY? quote: Originally posted by aquaguy91: Especially when said single men can look around them and see the biggest scumbags on the planet getting women left and right.
All I see here is an expression of envy with nothing to debate. It's just a show of a black, toxic cloud of envy. quote: Originally posted by aquaguy91: He was essentially saying that a man wasn't competent unless he is desirable to women.
If social skills are required in a job, it's wise to pick someone who appeals to both genders. But you don't need looks, power, and status to draw women. You will never believe me when I inform you that all women are not shallow robots programmed to find and trap the Alpha Male. So you will never believe that your simple charms are sufficient, if you would remove the disgusting misogyny mask and let people see a more human and understanding soul. Your loss.
IP: Logged |
Faith Knowflake Posts: 12503 From: Bella's Hair Salon Registered: Jul 2011
|
posted August 21, 2015 11:23 AM
@goddessinworld Thanks for clarifying. ETA: Why'd you remove it? IP: Logged |
Ami Anne Moderator Posts: 63988 From: Pluto/house next to NickiG Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted August 21, 2015 11:27 AM
H and H allows you to prohibit people from posting on your threads and I did it and appreciated that I could do it. However, in my humble opinion, it looks bad for new people to see that people have to do this. I think it gives a creepy vibe that there is something unfriendly about LL.------------------ Want to Read Simple, Fun,Sexy Articles on Astrology? Check Me Out, DUDE. http://www.mychristianpsychic.com/
IP: Logged |
Faith Knowflake Posts: 12503 From: Bella's Hair Salon Registered: Jul 2011
|
posted August 21, 2015 11:50 AM
quote: I think it gives a creepy vibe that there is something unfriendly about LL.
There IS something unfriendly and creepy about LL. IP: Logged |
mercuranian Knowflake Posts: 1004 From: not here Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted August 21, 2015 12:11 PM
quote: Originally posted by Faith: There IS something unfriendly and creepy about LL.
anybody with an 8th house moon could see that IP: Logged |
Orange Knowflake Posts: 2824 From: Georgia Registered: May 2009
|
posted August 21, 2015 01:09 PM
quote: Originally posted by LeeLoo2014:
Awesomely funny as usually, Orange. I can imagine you posting a dating ad: "Hi, I am Orange, gorgeous and fun, looking for Princes Charming, proof-read porn allowed"
) ) im generous like that, am i notttt IP: Logged |
Ami Anne Moderator Posts: 63988 From: Pluto/house next to NickiG Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted August 21, 2015 01:33 PM
quote: Originally posted by aquaguy91: Faith, What you don't understand is how much a man's romantic and sexual success (or lack thereof) affects other areas of his life. You, and others, rationalized women treating single men differently. You suggested that women perceived sexually and romantically successful men as safe. So the implication could be that men who are single or ignored by women are not safe and are somehow defective or flawed somehow. Do you not see how this line of thinking could be extremely offensive and even rage inducing to single men? Especially when said single men can look around them and see the biggest scumbags on the planet getting women left and right. A few years ago a college football coach was put on blast by the media for saying that one of the ways he chooses assistant coaches is by seeing how hot their wife is. His logic was that if a man was able to Charm attractive women he would be able to sell the football program and be a good recruiter. You know why the PC police jumped on him for this? Because it was offensive to women! Of course! the media chose to see that side of the issue! They failed to see how this was equally or more offensive to mem. He was essentially saying that a man wasn't competent unless he is desirable to women. So mans value is determined by how successful he is women! To me thats offensive! And guess what! His mindset is pretty universal across the board. I even read where a certain city in the UK was considering banning men from going to a certain park alone because they were seen as potential child predators!
I see men bashing as a MUCH bigger problem than women bashing etc. Good point AG!
------------------ Want to Read Simple, Fun,Sexy Articles on Astrology? Check Me Out, DUDE. http://www.mychristianpsychic.com/
IP: Logged |
Soltze Knowflake Posts: 378 From: Registered: Mar 2015
|
posted August 21, 2015 06:02 PM
quote: Originally posted by aquaguy91: Are you a man?
You know, I have more sexual desire than several men I have been with. Young men actually. So I don't know what's up with that male hormones argument you made. It's a fallacy. Plus: No one kills themselves from sexual frustation They kill themselves because they don't have the ability to move their a**** in search of sexual satisfaction and then go all depressed. I wan't something I go for it. No whining. Poor me. I don't care if you're a man, woman, hermaphrodite. It is disrespectful you think only a man would feel suicidal over sexual frustration. Because many women don't like sex because they don't have a man competent in the sex department. Whether they don't kiss, caress properly, or they don't keep erection properly, etc etc. Sexual issues are not gender dependent. It's a stupid tag people use. Yes, we have a different anatomy but several similar mechanisms of arousal. I'm sorry if I was too graphic. But well...this is the Porn Thread hahaha IP: Logged |
Faith Knowflake Posts: 12503 From: Bella's Hair Salon Registered: Jul 2011
|
posted August 21, 2015 06:08 PM
quote: Originally posted by Ami Anne: I see men bashing as a MUCH bigger problem than women bashing etc. Good point AG!
Uh huh. Especially when well over 30 million men just got caught cheating or trying to cheat on their wives. Lots of man bashing now. Girls what can we do, collectively, that's as bad as that, so we can get bashed as much as the men are being bashed right now? We have to catch up. Because it's unfair for men to get criticized more than us.
IP: Logged |
Faith Knowflake Posts: 12503 From: Bella's Hair Salon Registered: Jul 2011
|
posted August 21, 2015 06:12 PM
quote: Originally posted by mercuranian: anybody with an 8th house moon could see that
IP: Logged |
Soltze Knowflake Posts: 378 From: Registered: Mar 2015
|
posted August 21, 2015 06:18 PM
quote: Originally posted by Faith:
I feel home. I like creepy IP: Logged |
Faith Knowflake Posts: 12503 From: Bella's Hair Salon Registered: Jul 2011
|
posted August 21, 2015 06:31 PM
Oh Ami is going to have a FIELD DAY with you.IP: Logged |
Soltze Knowflake Posts: 378 From: Registered: Mar 2015
|
posted August 21, 2015 06:37 PM
I actually had to Google: "field day meaning" hahaha My english has improved. Thanks Faith! :-DIP: Logged |
Faith Knowflake Posts: 12503 From: Bella's Hair Salon Registered: Jul 2011
|
posted August 21, 2015 06:58 PM
To be clear my meaning was along these lines: quote: 2. When someone in authority/authority of feelings has fun just because they have the power to, its really not necessary, because in most cases the person does it just to be an authoritative a$$hole.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Field+Day I would have censored the explicit language altogether, but it's important to preserve the integrity of the definition, when someone is learning a language. IP: Logged |
Soltze Knowflake Posts: 378 From: Registered: Mar 2015
|
posted August 21, 2015 07:28 PM
Yes, I got that from my googling. Yet still I don't have the wish to stir controversy with Ami, despite diferences of opinions. We should try to keep it relaxed here :-D Plus, I'm almost bilingual. I just have the ocasional doubt on some coloquial expressions haha That and my ortographic corrector not being programmed for english. It makes it seem like I don't know proper spelling of english words :-PIP: Logged |