posted June 26, 2013 08:40 AM            

Could he have been "motivated" by a "Higher Power" to become a whistle blower a few months earlier than he would have? For fear that the crucial cover up data on UFOs is not "wiki leaked"?

posted June 30, 2013 05:41 PM            

Hey Ms Juni

posted July 01, 2013 07:31 AM              

i mean for sure aliens are out there and down here for sure.....but

i'd like to think that it's best to keep this Snowden thing about what it really is.....big cooperations going to the worst extent to spy on ppl, claiming it's for their own good 'oh it's so no terrorist blows you up'...when all that is BS and it's just about protecting their own interests from the people they use and employ themselves!

lol aliens are too smart to need any human assistance

posted July 04, 2013 04:16 AM              

I will say again, aliens don't need any human 'partners' the day they want you to know about them, trust me that there is no stopping...the day they want you to know about your own ET origin,(don't ask) there is also no stopping.

I also doubt they talk to 'human leaders' in the sense they know, they probably know how to pick out who to communicate with, even if to our understanding it'd be "Why that's just an average joe, your trying to pass on info to"

so yes not worried about aliens and alien disclosure lol being affected with anything....if anything i totally understand why they'd want to avoid contact with 'homo sapiens' for now.

nevertheless interesting topic

posted July 08, 2013 01:52 PM              

I have another theory to, we shouldn't call others aliens, as one day when the rest of our brain starts working again, many of us may remember a different origin than Earth. (H**K even for those who only believe it if it's written in a 'holy book' don't all religious books also say that Adam and Eve, fell onto Earth, fell from where??)

posted July 08, 2013 03:05 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by jellyfishtry:
[B]I have another theory to, we shouldn't call others aliens, as one day when the rest of our brain starts working again, many of us may remember a different origin than Earth. (H**K even for those who only believe it if it's written in a 'holy book' don't all religious books also say that Adam and Eve, fell onto Earth, fell from where??)

---

Yes, well, this is what I'm getting at. From our modern material world viewpoint, "fell" must mean from the sky. ie interplanetary. A spirtually oriented person might assume "fell" referred to a higher dimension. We have access to other physical worlds, albeit limited but increasing at a respectable rate. We've lost access to other spiritual worlds. Therefore, interplanetary makes more sense to modern man than interdimensional would.

posted July 18, 2013 09:08 PM            

If not ET/offworlder influence, what else could they be afraid of? Data on the sun swelling 4 billion years ahead of schedule? (...that's a disconcerting thought...)

On another note, who says that ET influence has to be mainly relegated to the three-dimensional realm? It's not entirely beyond the realm of possibilities in my mind that there could be offworld influences tapping into select world leaders or behind-the-scene players. Doesn't even have to be a manipulative plan. Just subtly influence behavior over time and craft events to their goals. For all the afflicted could know, they'd be working for the "greater good". (Not all of them, obviously, but it's possible for some...) Think of it as akin to possession, but not. Certainly the influenced could break the mold and do something other than the influencer wants, which leads to "corrections" (i.e. assassinations, scandals by other involved or influenced parties, "accidents" (and with that thought could there truly be a bona-fide accident?)).

And doing this over centuries, even millennia? Well, Time flows a bit differently in different levels of reality if at all, most likely. A day there could be like 1,234 years here in one pocket, or 1 year here could be 60 years in another 4D pocket.

Let's consider another track: Traumatic events are associated with some ET's right? (Abductions, paralysis, etc.) Suppose some never manifest in our physical 3D reality, but siphon energy as a means of support or sustenance or even an extra energy source. It's not beyond the realm of possibility that some entities would want to wipe out mass numbers of humans and other life at a time. Mass trauma through war and catastrophe would most certainly generate mass amounts of negative energy. Of course, such actions could be counterproductive to other entities that prefer to drain subtly over time. Besides, mass murder/extinction generally is a spike-event. What's gatherable after the spike's harvested? Not as much left, which doesn't help the victims, survivors or the slower-scale harvesters.

Hence why all the parasitic or vampiric entities wouldn't get along if I'm considering this correctly: differing methods. I'm certain there's a realization that should a mass-trauma event be allowed to happen, the spike-feeders would gain much more energy than the subtle/gradual-feeders. In other words, not in our OR their best interests. And such trauma/spike energy could probably sustain such spike-feeders for a very long while, and thus outlast the opposition.

There's the other thought of offworlders seeking to cause mass damage as a means of starving the subtle/casual feeders with no intent to gather anything for themselves. An extreme method of cutting off the power supply if there ever was one. I am also, thankfully, not thinking of any specific examples in this instance. It'd be like throwing away all the food in a kitchen to stop an ant incursion.

posted July 20, 2013 09:01 AM            

shura, the old Annunaki discussions days ey

There is "other life" but not necessarily in life form. Spiritual Essence.

Yet I do believe in other life forms from other dimensions with vast and superior Knowledge....... Not the Icke types but rather the W. Bramley or Z. Sitchin discription.

Hey Lalalinda, hows our desert rose?

posted July 20, 2013 05:39 PM              

quote:

---

Originally posted by iQ:
In the long run he is safer in Venezuela.
Russians will try to milk him for more and more info, and Snowden is too conscientious.

---

I don't agree IQ. Don't 4get the CIA almost got Chavez twice. He had all the army and secret service protecting him though...Snowden won't get that, as South America is practically their territory. i've got some blood from what is probably the two safer countries there, so am well aware of the realities not the 'romantic' view so many people have of that area. (Noreiga, School of the Americas, the military juntas etc etc...now these things won't happen anymore, but i don't think it's wise to think of them 'better' than Russian in some aspects.

Putin probably asked Snowden to quiet if he wants any help, because, first he basically told him that he said all he had to say, and Russia isn't a stage for these things, no surprises there.
Secondly i find it hard to believe that the Russians don't also have so many of the US secrets in their own hands already....including UFO and alien matters.

The only ppl who can really protect him as they know the most and may employ the same tactics as the US, are the Russians, whether people want to see that or not.

posted September 12, 2013 02:48 PM            

i highly doubt that Russia's secret service are any more efficient than our own. If Obama wanted to "hit" the man he could have done so. Equally feasible to inflitrate the Ecuador embassy where Assange is hanging out.

posted October 09, 2013 12:54 PM            

on the other hand Greenwald is still releasing all what he has....why do you think that the Brazilian president cancelled her long awaited trip to the US which was due this month?
countries like Brazil were deluded that the US or the gov't i should say, as gov't rarely represent their ppl these days...are really starting to treat them as equals now (there is a bad case in the 1980's when i think Regan in Brazil talking about the co-operation between these two countries, referred to the great ties between the US and....BOLIVIA!! a totally other country)

this showed them that whomever is telling them this isn't true...their resources are being abused at a bad rate by foreign countries, and it's nothing to do with partnership, as they are still not seen as equals (for heavens sake she even wanted to for her country to be one of the five permanent members...no comment on why she ever saw this happening)