posted December 23, 2017 11:58 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Orange:
Thanks, Todd

Same thoughts here as well!

Btw; how did you rate the composite of Cate and William back when they got married? I'm sure you had your interpretation on their composite back then

---

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle had their "first fight" over a prenup, reveals OK!. The engaged couple is moving ahead with wedding planning, but has hit a major hurdle, according to the story.

The magazine reports that Queen Elizabeth has seen "too many royal marriages end in divorce" and doesn't want her grandson to "take any chances with his reported $40 million fortune." That's led to tension between the spouses-to-be, with a source sharing, "Meghan can see where the queen is coming from, but at the same time, she's insulted that it would even cross the queen's mind that Meghan would have an ulterior motive for marrying Harry."

The actress "loves Harry, and money is the last thing on her mind," relates the insider. But Queen Elizabeth is nonetheless pressuring her heir to make sure the family's money is protected, explains the publication. Consequently, the outlet says that means Prince Harry and Markle are clashing over the situation.

posted December 28, 2017 01:21 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Orange:
I don't like how Harry commented about their Christmas experience together - "The family loved having her there. We had great fun staying with my brother and sister-in-law and running round with the kids. She's getting in there and it's the family I suppose that she's never had."

He almost invalidated what Meghan's mom and her family had done for them on every Christmas. Very insensitive of Harry. He didn't say it maliciously but this is how he thinks - that what he offers her is better and she is that poor little thing who never had a good Christmas before because her parents are divorced.
The moment I read it, I cringed. I thought - I wonder how Meghan's mom will feel about that.

---

posted December 28, 2017 02:46 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Orange:
Omg ..I just watched the interview and i didn't like it. I was left with the impression she was playing a role , not genuine and overly pushy while trying to talk over him. He was kinda taking the back stage and even appeared a bit submissive. I think he is crazy about her and she is capitalizing on it. They don't look like they have anything in common. Just plain sexual attraction. He looks stupid. I haven't looked at his chart but he looks like under the influence of Neptune right now.

Then I watched the same interview between William and Cate and these two were totally in sync with each other, like two peas in a pot. They didn't clutch on each others hand nor gazed but you can tell the deep mental and emotional connection they have. Completely different vibe. http://youtu.be/U4RcE9G1MhM

---

I'm not sure, but I think the interview between William and Kate was done awhile after they'd been together? Didn't they date several years before finally deciding to tie the knot?

posted December 30, 2017 05:21 PM            

Fed up Queen Tells Harry to Leave After Meghan Has Tantrum Over Royal Christmas Outing!
Queen Elizabeth II is in the midst of a royal nightmare as her grandson Harry’s fiance, dubbed “Princess Pushy,” makes him her whipping boy.

Meghan Markle touts herself as a liberal activist-actress, and instead of distancing herself from her former lifestyle, she is doubling down on her political activism.

Palace insiders were shocked as Markle had a tantrum over a centuries-old royal Christmas outing, which made the Queen furious, causing Princess Pushy and Harry to leave.
http://youtu.be/9pXNwaTRM_s

posted December 30, 2017 11:13 PM            

------------------
Want to Read Simple, Fun,Sexy Articles on Astrology? Check Me Out, DUDE.

posted December 31, 2017 01:43 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Orange:
I am not sure about those rumors. I think Meghan or any other fiancé, would keep on their best behavior until the wedding happens.

butttt..TR Saturn is soon going to square her natal stellium of Moon-Saturn-Jupiter all at 6-7 'Libra. Saturn-Jupiter square is dubbed as the heartbreak transit by Maggi astrology. That's in February.
Then Saturn turns retro at 9' Cappy and squares this stellium again for the second hit at the end of May ( when the wedding is scheduled for).

---

I seriously doubt they will get married. I do think they will call their engagement off before March.

posted December 31, 2017 07:01 AM            

From an astrological point of view, I'm sure there are couples with perfect synastry that are outwardly 'happy' while struggling in private. I'm as equally sure that there are couples with synastry that shouldn't work yet somehow it does.I would imagine that there are also couples that manage to get through Saturn transits

posted December 31, 2017 09:06 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Rosalind:
I seriously doubt they will get married. I do think they will call their engagement off before March.

If they do marry, they will divorce.

---

I agree.
He is a triple Earth, the big three in his chart Sun, Moon, ASC are: Virgo + Capricorn + Taurus.

What he is responding to Meghan's Leonine and Libran nature is his Mars and Venus in Libra and Saggy. So his Mars and Venus are dictating his decisions now. But in the core and in the long run, they are not compatible, I think.

If they wed, she will be marrying during a transit of Saturn in square to her Jupiter, which Maggi Astrology said leads to a divorce after that. Its one of those transits that should be avoided on a special day. Around the wedding time, TR Saturn will be squaring her Moon, Saturn and Jupiter, for a second time. TR Saturn on natal Moon is a very lonely time. And I am pretty sure Harry's Saturn squaring Meghan's Sun can be very mean, Harry looks like emotionally insensitive. Does he have water in his chart? I forgot to look, I think he is water void, yes, that's why he acts like a boar.
I don't think Meghan will like that later on.
Maybe the wedding will be postponed to a later date. That happens.
I mean, there is not much time left to prepare for a royal wedding and the guest list is not compiled yet, they said.

posted December 31, 2017 10:00 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Orange:
I agree.
He is a triple Earth, the big three in his chart Sun, Moon, ASC are: Virgo + Capricorn + Taurus.

What he is responding to Meghan's Leonine and Libran nature is his Mars and Venus in Libra and Saggy. So his Mars and Venus are dictating his decisions now. But in the core and in the long run, they are not compatible, I think.

If they wed, she will be marrying during a transit of Saturn in square to her Jupiter, which Maggi Astrology said leads to a divorce after that. Its one of those transits that should be avoided on a special day. Around the wedding time, TR Saturn will be squaring her Moon, Saturn and Jupiter, for a second time. TR Saturn on natal Moon is a very lonely time. And I am pretty sure Harry's Saturn squaring Meghan's Sun can be very mean, Harry looks like emotionally insensitive. Does he have water in his chart? I forgot to look, I think he is water void, yes, that's why he acts like boar.
I don't think Meghan will like that later on.
Maybe the wedding will be postponed to a later date. That happens.
I mean, there is not much time left to prepare for a royal wedding and the guest list is not compiled yet, they said.

---

posted January 01, 2018 08:59 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Orange:
I am not sure about those rumors. I think Meghan or any other fiancé, would keep on their best behavior until the wedding happens.

butttt..TR Saturn is soon going to square her natal stellium of Moon-Saturn-Jupiter all at 5-6 'Libra.
Saturn-Jupiter square is dubbed as the heartbreak transit by Maggi astrology. That's in February.
Then Saturn turns retro at 9' Cappy and squares this stellium again for the second hit at the end of May ( when the wedding is scheduled for).

---

I agree. Some of these rumors are a little unbelievable.

posted January 01, 2018 09:02 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by todd:
http://beforeitsnews.com/economy/2 017/12/fed-up-queen-tells-harry-to-leave-after-meghan-has-tantrum-over-royal-christmas-outing-2928430.html

Fed up Queen Tells Harry to Leave After Meghan Has Tantrum Over Royal Christmas Outing!
Queen Elizabeth II is in the midst of a royal nightmare as her grandson Harry’s fiance, dubbed “Princess Pushy,” makes him her whipping boy.

Meghan Markle touts herself as a liberal activist-actress, and instead of distancing herself from her former lifestyle, she is doubling down on her political activism.

Palace insiders were shocked as Markle had a tantrum over a centuries-old royal Christmas outing, which made the Queen furious, causing Princess Pushy and Harry to leave.
http://youtu.be/9pXNwaTRM_s

---

posted January 01, 2018 09:10 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Rosalind:
I'd like to add: I don't think the Queen would agree with a rushed wedding.I am pretty sure she doesn't agree with Meghan at all. Doesn't have that grace a royal woman must have.

---

posted January 01, 2018 09:24 AM            

quote:

---

For those that don't know, this country is notorious for it's press intrusion and it's lies in tabloids (and online) so the odds are already stacked against them.

---

Dear god yes.

And do you all remember how SCATHINGLY EVIL they were to Princess Diana? Do you all remember the absolutely awful things they said and did to hurt her?

Honestly they came up with VILE rumors literally just to cause pain and strife. Bunch of sadists.

With that said, I'm going to take every negative rumor about them with a grain of salt.

I hope it works out, but the culture clash could end up just being too much, and I do think they're going a bit fast. Even if they were meant to be, what would the harm be in taking it a bit slower?

posted January 01, 2018 10:58 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Gracha:
How in the heck do you know what "grace a royal woman must have"?? Are you part of the British royal family or any for that matter? You seem to not like Harry's partner for personal reasons, which is very strange imo, especially if you don't know her in real life. You're obviously jealous and filled will hatred towards this woman and have been spewing vitriol towards her throughout this thread. You are a sad little evil person to wish such ill will towards a couple and their upcoming marriage. WOW

---

I will ask a moderator to take action on this post full of insults. I will not accept being insulted for no reason. Thank you!

posted January 01, 2018 02:37 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Rosalind:

I will ask a moderator to take action on this post full of insults. I will not accept being insulted for no reason. Thank you!

Sad evil person? Jealous of Prince Harry engagement? Are you serious? Dont you have a better argument? Its ridiculous!!!

---

posted January 01, 2018 02:40 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Orange:
Everybody is free to express their opinion on the subject but please DO NOT attack and harass other posters for their expressed opinions.
OK ?
Or get out of my thread.

---

posted January 01, 2018 09:55 PM            

hey, what do you make of prog Sun conj prog ASC in synastry ( not theirs).
It appears to be a long applying aspect for about 10 years to become exact.

posted January 02, 2018 12:06 AM            

Megan is a lifepath 4 to Harry's lifepath 1.

Both pretty fixed and uncompromising personalities. 1 hates restrictions and 4 lives within them

1 is independent and self focused and 4 strategic and calculating. When 1's enthusiasm ruins 4's best laid plans, problems occur.

They both are attracted to challenges and don't hide from them so the tension created between them could be the very thing that keeps them coming back for more.

If they do break off, tension will be there: either because feelings are not resolved or there is a possibility for future reconciliation. But being platonic friends will be difficult and not likely.