Lindaland
  Interpersonal Astrology
  Prince Harry and Meghan got engaged (Page 4)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
This topic is 4 pages long:   1  2  3  4 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   Prince Harry and Meghan got engaged
mir
Knowflake

Posts: 2810
From:
Registered: May 2009

posted January 08, 2018 03:35 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for mir     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
**Mir, I thought their Sun- Venus progressed conjunction was applying but I see now that her Venus is moving faster than his Sun.**

Venus is Always moving faster than the Sun unless Venus is retro/stationary in the progressions.


**And yes, his p Moon is now close to conjunct her nat. Sun, but the two bodies were not conjuncting when the started the relationship, that aspect began recently and will proceed to apply until April after which the aspects will begin to separate.**

Yes I saw that too. So I was more referring to their public announcement which is ofcourse a biggie in their and our world.


**I do not like their composite, I see that you are raving about the sexual planets being conjunct and mixed with Juno as well but the Moon is battered and the Sun is unstable.**

Yes but without the sexual planets exact square the Node I wouldn't have said it.


**hey, what do you make of prog Sun conj prog ASC in synastry ( not theirs).
It appears to be a long applying aspect for about 10 years to become exact.**

I don't give it much thought because the TRUE progressed angles are the quotidian angles (one circle takes a year for those). U can find them in Planetdance.


**which progression method is more reliable in your opinion, the Solar Arc/MC method which is used by solarfire and astrowin or the astro.com method, you think?[/B][/QUOTE]**

I don't use astrotwin or solarfire. Only planetdance and astro.com.

IP: Logged

Lalafortunaea
Knowflake

Posts: 1001
From:
Registered: Jul 2017

posted January 10, 2018 09:45 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Lalafortunaea     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
The magazine reports that Queen Elizabeth has seen "too many royal marriages end in divorce" and doesn't want her grandson to "take any chances with his reported $40 million fortune." That's led to tension between the spouses-to-be, with a source sharing, "Meghan can see where the queen is coming from, but at the same time, she's insulted that it would even cross the queen's mind that Meghan would have an ulterior motive for marrying Harry."

I do wonder about this. It's not like Meghan is a nobody. She is a celebrity, she has her own money, and can make her own money quite easily. Plenty of things for her to invest in or make.

For us it seems like a lot, but 40 million really isn't a much when talking about famous people/royalty.

I mean compared to a lot of celebs and notable people, who make quite a bit per year, and 40 million on a "down year", Harry is practically poor.
I can't see Meghan marrying him for his money, at all. So, the queen might be going senile. Or, the life of a royal has perhaps made her lose touch. 40 million, especially in this economy, and with how the market is (any), isn't much anyhow. A long time ago, back in her day, of course it really was quite a bit.

I do wonder if this is just a blown up gossipy rumor. After all, they did say quite awful things about Diana as well, and spread atrocious rumors about her, so, perhaps it should all not be taken too seriously.

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 105682
From: From a galaxy, far, far away...
Registered: Apr 2009

posted January 16, 2018 05:36 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
It's just gossip.

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 105682
From: From a galaxy, far, far away...
Registered: Apr 2009

posted January 22, 2018 11:42 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Bump!

IP: Logged

Nine
Moderator

Posts: 3567
From: The Cusp of Love
Registered: May 2009

posted January 23, 2018 09:46 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Nine     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Though Harry is triple earth, he does have Venus in Libra - his lady must be pretty. Moon in Taurus intensifies this preference.

They have natal Sun-Venus and Moon-Venus conjunctions. These are wonderful aspects for attraction and longterm compatibility.

Their pMoons will always oppose each other, currently in Aquarius & Leo. Time will tell how things will play out once their pMoons are no longer making aspects to either Suns or Ascendants.

When they met Meghan's pMoon was in Capricorn, in conjunction to his nAsc. Harry's pMoon was in Cancer, conjunct Meghan's nAsc. This is a double whammy. After leaving Cancer, Harry's pMoon moved into Leo where it then conjunct Meghan's Sun sign. Hopefully by the time his pMoon moves into Virgo the natal aspects (Sun-Venus, & Moon-Venus) will kick in and soften the pMoon-opposite-pMoon aspect.

IP: Logged

mir
Knowflake

Posts: 2810
From:
Registered: May 2009

posted January 24, 2018 05:54 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for mir     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
When they met Meghan's pMoon was in Capricorn, in conjunction to his nAsc. Harry's pMoon was in Cancer, conjunct Meghan's nAsc. This is a double whammy.

Interesting! Passed me by. Yea.. this is what we wanna see he, and who knows if it will be a "transit" for life! After all there's Always a certain harmony (and be fair not the LEAST 2) in the passing of each angels by pMoon.

IP: Logged

Nine
Moderator

Posts: 3567
From: The Cusp of Love
Registered: May 2009

posted January 24, 2018 08:56 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Nine     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yes. Hopefully it's a transit for life.

Wonder if their cultural differences is reflected in th pMoon opposite pMoon?

IP: Logged

Nine
Moderator

Posts: 3567
From: The Cusp of Love
Registered: May 2009

posted January 24, 2018 08:56 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Nine     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yes. Hopefully it's a transit for life.

Wonder if their cultural differences is reflected in th pMoon opposite pMoon?

IP: Logged

mir
Knowflake

Posts: 2810
From:
Registered: May 2009

posted January 24, 2018 07:43 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for mir     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Wow I'm quite stunned by the exactness of their "transit" too! By around 6 deg her pMoon was approaching his Asc, while his pMoon approaching her Asc also by around 6 deg! (early july 2016). (Their TOB's must be quite accurate )

-------

And ^ combined with what they share in their synastry: a tight DW Sun/Moon parallel in the declinations:

Her Sun 17'12 N
His Moon 17'23 N

His Sun 2'48 N
Her Moon 2'23 N

(^ DW Solstice conjunction u might say)


+ in their Venus/Mars synastry:

- Both having a tight Venus/Mars sextile natally
- A DW Venus/Mars Square
- Composite Venus/Mars conjunction exact.
- Venus-Venus Solstice opposition
- Mars-Mars Solstice opposition


WOW, there ^ we have it ALL! We don't have to look any further guys really

(unbelievable I haven't seen this progressed "transit" myself! / many thanks to Nine for bringing this up! Tip for myself: just keep it a bit more with the basics plz + try to trust TOB's ;d )

IP: Logged

Nine
Moderator

Posts: 3567
From: The Cusp of Love
Registered: May 2009

posted January 25, 2018 08:29 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Nine     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
(unbelievable I haven't seen this progressed "transit" myself! / many thanks to Nine for bringing this up! Tip for myself: just keep it a bit more with the basics plz + try to trust TOB's ;d )

Mir, would you count his being born just after the last quarter, and her being born just before the first quarter as having an effect?

IP: Logged

mir
Knowflake

Posts: 2810
From:
Registered: May 2009

posted January 26, 2018 05:56 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for mir     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Nine yes!

I described it on the 1st page of this thread like this;

***And (looking a bit at their syna now); opposing moon phases! Born under a waning trine him / she the waxing sextile. Just like Camilla and Charles (opp. moon phases).***


Nine,
I had with my last ex an EXACT opposing phase, me born 9 deg over the FQ, him 9 deg over the LQ (theoretically in transit that would become a conj and opp at the same time - but in progressed actuality this wasn't the case because of our age difference).
He left me for a girl (well I stopped having sex with him monthss before we actually broke up, so blame me too ;d) with whom he shares an EXACT SAME lunar phase (she also has her Moon 9 deg over the LQ just like him!) but THEY have a Moon/Moon + Sun/Sun trine while WE had a Moon/Moon + Sun/Sun square.

But looking at their progressed Lunar Phases..... WOW! what a synchronity for life! I swear..and this is mainly from their progressed Moons to their natal Suns.
SO: when HE has a pMoon-nSun opposition SHE will have a pMoon-nSun conjunction.... and as a result ofcourse when SHE will have the WAXING trine HE will have the WANING sextile etc. etc.

They have an age-difference of 14 years (half a Saturn circle) and SHE is older. They already live together afer some months!
And I just see this new thread here of Hanni.. u see that? Same case: 14 years age difference where also SHE is older and ALSO exact same Moon phase! The big question now is... what about their progressed lunar phase transit....

It's all a big miracle!

The ONLY guy I can handle in my life is in a steady bad relationship with a girl. I know him since 2008 and we never lost truly contact. He thinks about me much so it is a natural thing and not at all one-sided.
Guess what??
We have exact opposing progressed Lunar phases so when he's in a pMoon-pSun opposition, I am in a pMoon-pSun conjunction. When he's in a waning quincunx, I am in a waxing semi-sextile etc. Can't be more steady (there's not 1 moon running faster than the other / same case as with ex & girl above).

These luminaries speak volumes!!

But Asc-Moon is truly worth watching too now!


@ making this distinction between (word-ly: waxing trine & waning sextile / FQ & LQ / waning semi-sextile & waxing quincunx etc.) opposing phases on the wheel is thus important to me because then I can see the "lining up" of both lunar phases at a glance (almost ) - I mean (lol I forgot the most important part) because I hardly look at wheels, I read syna mostly from the "additional tables" (on astro.com at the least ; )

IP: Logged

Nine
Moderator

Posts: 3567
From: The Cusp of Love
Registered: May 2009

posted January 26, 2018 08:37 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Nine     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
^^^Good stuff.

IP: Logged

Orange
Knowflake

Posts: 7525
From: Georgia
Registered: May 2009

posted January 29, 2018 09:38 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Orange     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
so I just read this psychic's prediction and it is consistent with Meghan's upcoming Saturn transits so lets see how this will unfold.
I don't wish love to die or hopes being dashed but I am curious what might happen before this high stake wedding.

"Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are unlikely to split – especially on the eve of their May 19 wedding. But one psychic thinks otherwise.
Lyndsay Edwards recently said that January will not be a good month for Markle and Prince Harry because this is month where their relationship will start to crumble down. The couple will start arguing over their wedding preparations, and it is possible that they will decide to call it quits sometime March or April.
Edwards also said that if March and April won’t be the month of Markle and Prince Harry’s split, it’s possible that they will announce the end of their engagement on eve of their wedding day. She also said that Prince Harry will be the one to end things with Markle.

“I was right about the timing of their engagement and I predicted that the wedding will be called off and they’ll split up a month or two before,” she said.
Edwards claimed that her predictions are guided by spirits that speak to her. “Meghan and Prince Harry get on really really well but they’re still on the honeymoon period of their relationship and they’re yet to see every side to each other, once this honeymoon phase passes there will be heated arguments which they’ll struggle to repair from and each argument will become bigger than the last,” she added.
The psychic also said that Markle will fight for her relationship with Prince Harry even after he tells her that it’s over. Following their split, it wouldn’t take Markle very long to move on from Prince Harry because she is a very strong woman.
“Prince Harry does feel the pressure to get this right due to being in the public eye, and he doesn’t want a failed marriage and knows that a failed engagement is better than a failed marriage – it’s this thought that gives him the push to get out before it’s too late,” she said.
Edwards is the third psychic to predict negative things about Markle and Prince Harry’s relationship. Australian psychic Kerrie Erwin also said that the couple’s relationship won’t last. The Psychic Twins, Terry and Linda Jamison also claimed that Prince Harry may cheat on Markle. "

difficult spot light, I must say. everyone is looking at their relationship and dissecting it. Not good.

IP: Logged

Thefish
Knowflake

Posts: 216
From:
Registered: Apr 2012

posted January 30, 2018 11:26 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Thefish     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Lalafortunaea:
I do wonder about this. It's not like Meghan is a nobody. She is a celebrity, she has her own money, and can make her own money quite easily. Plenty of things for her to invest in or make.

For us it seems like a lot, but 40 million really isn't a much when talking about famous people/royalty.

I mean compared to a lot of celebs and notable people, who make quite a bit per year, and 40 million on a "down year", Harry is practically poor.
I can't see Meghan marrying him for his money, at all. So, the queen might be going senile. Or, the life of a royal has perhaps made her lose touch. 40 million, especially in this economy, and with how the market is (any), isn't much anyhow. A long time ago, back in her day, of course it really was quite a bit.

I do wonder if this is just a blown up gossipy rumor. After all, they did say quite awful things about Diana as well, and spread atrocious rumors about her, so, perhaps it should all not be taken too seriously.


No man should marry without a pre-nup. I don’t blame his mother one bit. Harry may be poor but his family is not.

I say this being a prince myself who has ties to the royal family.

IP: Logged

Orange
Knowflake

Posts: 7525
From: Georgia
Registered: May 2009

posted January 30, 2018 12:35 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Orange     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Harry owns 1/2 of the Kensington palace after Diana's death

And of course a bunch of other royal properties throughout the kingdom

IP: Logged

Randall
Webmaster

Posts: 105682
From: From a galaxy, far, far away...
Registered: Apr 2009

posted February 04, 2018 05:40 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Randall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Thefish:
No man should marry without a pre-nup. I don’t blame his mother one bit. Harry may be poor but his family is not.

I say this being a prince myself who has ties to the royal family.


IP: Logged

bluestskies88
Knowflake

Posts: 602
From:
Registered: May 2011

posted March 12, 2018 04:42 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for bluestskies88     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I am pretty spot on with reading energies, and this 'actress' is totally acting! i don't like her one bit!

she also doesn't seem to have ANY couth. she was laughing at someone today at her first official appearance with the Queen at Westminster Abbey. Her family are a bunch of degenerates who are capitalizing over her 'connections' with the royals.

i don't think this is going to end well. ugh. i just feel badly, because harry should get the right girl after all that things he went through with his mother's passing etc.

IP: Logged

bluestskies88
Knowflake

Posts: 602
From:
Registered: May 2011

posted March 12, 2018 04:44 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for bluestskies88     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Thefish:
No man should marry without a pre-nup. I don’t blame his mother one bit. Harry may be poor but his family is not.

I say this being a prince myself who has ties to the royal family.


lol harry is not poor. he got his mother's money which is worth millions.

IP: Logged

Ami Anne
Moderator

Posts: 72902
From: Pluto/house next to NickiG
Registered: Sep 2010

posted March 13, 2018 02:02 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Ami Anne     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I agree about the pre-nup. They should have one.

------------------
Want to Read Simple, Fun,Sexy Articles on Astrology? Check Me Out, DUDE.


http://www.mychristianpsychic.com/

IP: Logged

bluestskies88
Knowflake

Posts: 602
From:
Registered: May 2011

posted January 07, 2019 11:26 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for bluestskies88     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
does anyone actually have the actual synastry chart?

IP: Logged


This topic is 4 pages long:   1  2  3  4 

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright 2000-2018

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a