Author
|
Topic: The moment in movement
|
Randall Webmaster Posts: 41956 From: Saturn next to Charmainec Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted June 20, 2014 02:08 PM
And maybe even some that are similar but not related in meaning.IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 41956 From: Saturn next to Charmainec Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted June 21, 2014 11:09 AM
Though unrelated, I still ponder why CARCINOGEN contains NO CANCER. IP: Logged |
Ellynlvx Moderator Posts: 8891 From: the Point of Light within the Mind of God Registered: Aug 2013
|
posted June 21, 2014 02:01 PM
Because you have to put your No order in to the Moon.IP: Logged |
Lexxigramer Moderator Posts: 4019 From: The Etheric Realms...Still out looking for Schrodinger's cat...& LEXIGRAMMING.♥.. is my Passion! Registered: Feb 2012
|
posted June 22, 2014 12:34 AM
quote: Originally posted by Randall: Though unrelated, I still ponder why CARCINOGEN contains NO CANCER.
NO CANCER IN CARCINOGEN. A statement which is self explanatory. A CARCINOGEN cannot have CANCER. The CARCINOGEN may cause it but cannot have it. NO CARCINOGEN IN A CIGAR. A statement that says there is no carcinogen in a cigar. However turn it into a question and the meaning dramatically changes! NO CARCINOGEN IN A CIGAR?
IP: Logged |
Randall Webmaster Posts: 41956 From: Saturn next to Charmainec Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted June 26, 2014 01:13 PM
Juts my opnion, and I could be totally wrong and off base, but I was thinking that carcinogens are blamed for causing cancer, while cancer is actually caused by something else other than these chemicals etc. Hence, CARCINOGEN = NO CANCER.IP: Logged |
Ellynlvx Moderator Posts: 8891 From: the Point of Light within the Mind of God Registered: Aug 2013
|
posted June 26, 2014 01:45 PM
It's a mutation, they're thinking it feeds on bacteria, last I heard.IP: Logged |