posted December 21, 2007 03:07 AM
amowls,We are debating playfully.
Like Neitzsche (a Libra) said,
the strong welcome "sportive monsters".
But if you think these are my claws....
you must be a Libra.
(Kidding; jeez.)
And calling us "childish" is not being above it.
But points for trying.
----------------------------------------------------
Xod,
quote:
Just that I kinda find it odd that I usually don't see Librans critisizing other signs on their designated threads yet there seem to be a slew of barage of critisism on nothing but stereotypical viewpoints.
First of all, I have not critized Libras,
I have only pointed out some well-established facts.
Secondly, I would not have felt the need to point them out,
if some here had not concealed them behind rose-colored fictions.
quote:
But really, its all taken at a grain of salt offcourse (don't worry; your posts aren't part of that category Lol!)
If you mean "with a grain of salt",
I still dont see a grain of wit in this.
Are you laughing because you are nervous?
quote:
Anyway, going to the point; Yes techinically speaking one would position Scorpio to be at the next evolution step after Libra
Thank you.
Sorry to have to get "technical" on you, lol.
quote:
but it seems they both have polar opposite balance system to it. Where Libra sees the Apollo's principle at a greater benifit (i.e. "we" are,) Scorpio takes the more individualistic role (i.e. "I" am.) Its the awareness factor of evolution that si the dividing line between the two. Scorpio's individuality vs. Libra's Unity. And that IMO ends up being the clashing factor between the two signs.
Are you making this up?
Apollo is solar,
like Leo is solar,
like Individuality is Solar.
Perhaps you are seeing your Asc/Dsc Axis here?
Individuality (Leo) - Unity (Aquarius)
quote:
Though personally (bias opinion offcourse) I couldn't ask for a batter partner in life then my Scorpio heartbeat. Then again, she does have a Libra moon and a Scorpio Asc LOL!
"Batter"?
Is your whole post half-baked?
Or just your grammar, spelling, etc.?
quote:
Oh but Cardinality has its benifits; Or would you care to disagree on the logical fact that the a-bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki actually prevented more casulaties in the long run of the Pacific War? Offcourse, one can always point at the fact that the creation of this weapon ended up trigging a new threat to the world all togather but in a way... It created a new balance... A new order.
"Read not the times, read the eternities." - Thoreau
Politics isnt my area of expertise, but I'd be happy to discuss any number of deeper issues with you. Honestly, I dont know how many civilian men, women, and children were lost when those bombs were dropped, or how many were saved. I dont know what sort of effects that radiation had on the planet, or is still having. I dont know what alternative courses of action might have presented themselves to a determined, resourceful and open mind. No doubt, there are a great many factors to consider, and, judging by your bravado, I'm sure you've carefully weighed them all.
quote:
Same applies to the current debt crisis in the U.S. Right now, the debt margin is at trillions of dollars and yet the U.S. still keeps borrowing from the World Bank. Are they bonkers? No offcourse not. They have a AAA credit rating and they need the money. The patient only has a small margin of a chance to live... One has to use every means necessary to revive him. The costs can wait.
When did I step into Global Unity, lol?
Sure, Cardinal energy has its place,
whether or not it applies to that example.
I never said it didnt,
and I'm not sure where you are going with this argument,
but you certainly seem to have left the building with it.
quote:
And THAT is where I credit the power of individuality and its importance. Thus I see myself modifiying the Apollian Principle to add in the "human" factor .
Which one is Apollonian again, lol?
And which are you?
Jesus, I can follow Proust,
but you are giving me a headache.
Seriously, though, you go girl;
modify the sh!t out of that sh!t.
I'm with you.
Now, what were we talking about?