posted August 11, 2006 04:06 PM            

Doesn't calling someone a "dirty wh@re" qualify as a bannable offense?

And please don't argue with me that Pid is just as bad. If you think so, you too are welcome to request she be banned.

posted August 11, 2006 04:46 PM            

Once again, people like her start calling people "wh*re" "B1tch" "Gash" etc.... when they get angry.

I am not innocent- I have called people names and will most likely keep doing it .

posted August 11, 2006 04:58 PM            

Being called a ***** doesn't really bug me, because I'm not - it's the fact that with someone like her around, I don't feel like I can go express myself on another forum here without having her try to bring it back up on a completely seperate unrealated thread, mistating what I said in an attempt to paint me in a unflattering light.

posted August 11, 2006 05:10 PM            

I think if I called VL a string of insults and she came back and called me a ***** , that would be a different thing than just coming into a thread in which she's not even being addressed and randomly throwing out a rude insult.

posted August 11, 2006 06:26 PM            

Pid has listed some good reasons and I support this:

"Calling someone a name based on race, gender or sexual orientation."

Since this is a public forum, I would add to that list..."telling someone to shut up" or any derivative thereof like...STFU.

This is a rough and tumble forum and wisely used to take very controversial subjects off the other forums. People here are not shrinking violets. TP is everything others have said and makes inflammatory off the wall comments. When she does, I consider the source.

Now, you ladies know you're not Ho's, not lesbians, not ugly and not any of the vile things TP calls you....and me. So do the rest of us.

posted August 11, 2006 06:39 PM            

BUT.. that being said, DayDreamer is quivering in her boots to get me banned. There is nothing she would like more than to see me go because she can't handle me countering her statements protecting Islamic Terrorists.

I have yet to come into a conversation indiscriminately call someone a wh*re just because they disagreed with me.

I will not make excuses for the names I use. Calling someone a twit is just that- I feel like they are a twit

"The act or an instance of twitting.
A reproach, gibe, or taunt.
Slang. A foolishly annoying person. "

A foolishly annoying person....

Brain Dead Moron - that is self explanatory

Drooling Old Hag

Drooling- Self explanatory.. as is the word Old..

Hag- now that is an interesting term:

hag1 ( P ) Pronunciation Key (hg)
n.
An old woman considered ugly or frightful.

A witch; a sorceress.
Obsolete. A female demon.
A hagfish.

Now- ugly is subjective and although I wouldn't really call someone ugly on the outside, because one person's ugly is another person's "hot" I do call people ugly on the inside.

Hmmm... what else....

Oh yes.. a Terrorist.. or terrorist supporter.

I have explained that term numerous times; If you apologize for the actions of terrorists and even provide justification for their actions while also condemning the West and telling us we deserve it- YOU ARE A SUPPORTER and any supporter of a terrorist is a terrorist in MY book.

Those are MY judgements and I am not pretending they are anyone elses.

I have labelled peoples actions as being subversive, sly, sneaky, passive-aggressive, untruths and outright lies. When someone first tells me they don't blame Bush for Katrina or for murder, then they say "well, yes he could have prevented Katrina and he is killing babies" they have contradicted themselves and that is a LIE.

Lie:

A false statement deliberately presented as being true; a falsehood.
Something meant to deceive or give a wrong impression.

For example- posting a thread about Bush calling someone in Indian Kemosabe and posting it without any clarification- thereby leading some of the more mindless twits to get angry at him for being so stupid - is a LIE.. "something meant to deceive or give the wrong impression"

"Bush is a Baby Killer" that is a lie- has anyone seen him kill infants? Has he taken away someone's child and shot them in front of the parent? That statement is an outright form of deception...

and therefore a LIE.. the person that states that.. is a LIAR.

Any more questions?

------------------
The democratic world believes that it is not the terrorists that are to blame, but us. Us, the westerners.
WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And the sooner you eliminate this misconception from your minds, the better.
We are NOT to blame. It is the freaking terrorists and the freaking terrorists only!!!! They are the bad guys. They do not understand concepts like peace, democracy, and respect for human life. They are, pure and simPle, EVIL!!!!! Behind all their political manipulations, if you carefully look at the actions of these MONSTERS, they are EVIL!!

http://www.mideastweb.org/log/archives/00000489.htm

posted August 11, 2006 06:59 PM              

And LOL, Ive never and never in a million years will "quiver in my boots", though I wouldnt care if you got banned or not.

posted August 11, 2006 07:08 PM            

Because you're an idiot plain and simple.

Carry on with your arguments.. I'd LOVE to see how you can justify them. You're logic is right up there with the thinking power of an amoeba.

PS...I want you to document what I have said, in a derogatory manner, about the Muslim religion.

I have only stated MY opinion over Islamic extremists I have yet to call someone a POS Muslim that should be murdered or anything of that nature. Discussing how an evil person can take the word of the Koran and twist it into the justification for killing people is NOT derogatory.

I use the SAME set of parameters for Christians that use the Bible to kill people outside of abortion clinics.

Go ahead DD... I challenge you to find where I have condemned someone or used derogatory language towards Muslims, as a religion or a people, here or anywhere on LindaLand.

posted August 11, 2006 07:16 PM            

I will guarantee you on thing though- YOU are one of 5 people that I would NEVER answer to on another forum even if you needed help in the worst way. After the things you have said about this country and your support for the terrorists / their actions, I will never help someone like you.

So carry on with your posting of lies... I am still waiting for you to post where I was so derogatory to the Islamic religion- (remember this is a way to get me banned- but while you do it, remember you must keep in mind that ALL people that have bashed on the religious RIGHT / Christians- should also be banned).

posted August 11, 2006 07:34 PM            

Seriouslyany rules are dfficult to enforce for bad manners, morals or ethics.

Way too subjective; whose ethics, whose morals & so on.

If I was a Mensa IQer & someone called me a twit I may absolutely be offended. If I was a Chriatian lady & was called a ho' bag.... well you can see the difficulty objectively drawing the line.

As long as we`re a public forum , we have to take our licks and determine OUR moral, ethical and good manner responses to the offenders.

My 4 cents

------------------
~
What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for others and the world is immortal"~

posted August 11, 2006 09:04 PM              

Quote: "Bush is a Baby Killer" that is a lie- has anyone seen him kill infants? Has he taken away someone's child and shot them in front of the parent? That statement is an outright form of deception...

and therefore a LIE.. the person that states that.. is a LIAR.

Any more questions?

--------

Yes, pid I do have a question, what about stem cell research? Bush is for that, so he's allegedly taking innocent lives, even if they are already aborted.

posted August 11, 2006 09:09 PM            

Not that I'm a fan of stem cell research, either. But taking something that is supposedly useful from a body that does not contain life is quite different from killing a life to take something you want/need. Isn't it?

It's strange the way these threads evolve sometimes ... I'm glad no one else got blown up by terrorists again, if anyone still cares about the topic here.

posted August 12, 2006 02:11 AM              

Funny what you said regarding feeling sorry for me, Isis, because I feel sorry for all of you guys who are so closed and shallow minded that all you can do is judge, condemn, label, and call others names who do not think as you do and who make the effort to inform themselves by using all the available news sources and articles instead of just naively believing what the government tells them. I also feel sorry for anyone who is a reactionary like you people. And I feel sorry for you guys because you have chosen to be controlled by fear. It must be terrible to live your life in fear. It must also be terrible to live your life with so much hate in you.

posted August 12, 2006 02:17 AM              

I think if Pidaua can call people names and Jwhop can do it then it should be allowed from everyone. Pidaua called Rainbow a "drooling old hag." Pidaua starts every post here at GU with an insult as does Jwhop. Their only intention of being here in fact is to come onto threads and start arguments. Talk about trolls.

These two attack people all the time with verbal abuse and then want someone banned from the site for doing it to you. What hypocrites and phonies!!!!

The only difference is that VL comes straight out with it while Pidaua does it in an indirect manner but implies and insinuates the same thing. So you think that VL should be banned for being direct and honest and it's okay for Pidaua to stay because she does it in a sneaky and dishonest manner? It still amounts to the same thing.

In fact, LL is probably the only site like this with public forums that Pidaua and Jwhop wouldn't be banned from.

I have my reasons for doing the same thing back to them that do to me and others, JuniperB. I do not feel that people have to just put up with bad behavior of others. To do that shows no self-respect. Doing nothing only enables them to continue on with their bad behavior. So I hand it back to them in spades because they need to be told by other people and they need to learn that what you dish out you better be prepared to get back in return. It's strange that anyone would treat others badly and expect to be treated well in return.

posted August 12, 2006 02:53 AM              

This one too, since the topic deviated to what and who should get banned...

quote:

---

I still find it very amusing that both Jwhop and Pidaua claim to place certain "standards" on verbal abuse. Which then makes it okay for them to verbally abuse others. But then again, we all find ways and excuses to justify our actions don't we? The fact remains, verbal abuse is verbal abuse no matter what else you want to call it or what "standards" you place on it. Ask any psychologist.

---

posted August 12, 2006 03:11 AM              

That is normally what the neo-cons here at LL verbally abuse and insult any of us for, for giving a different viewpoint and a different opinion. That is not only anti-democratic, it is intolerant and with a couple of people here at LL it borders on the insane.

I guess the idea is that if you verbally abuse people long enough they will leave and stop posting what you don't want anyone to know or what you don't want to hear. It is not going to work on me or quite a few of us so called "liberals."

This is America and we have a right to give our opinions as much as you do. We have a right to disagree with your opinions and we have a right as a free people to be conspiracy theorist if we choose to be one.

To think otherwise is not patriotic at all. It is in fact treasonous. That is why I draw the conclusion that all neo-cons are out to destroy democracy in America and they are all treasonous against the Constitution.

posted August 12, 2006 09:23 AM            

quote:

---

have my reasons for doing the same thing back to them that do to me and others, JuniperB. I do not feel that people have to just put up with bad behavior of others. To do that shows no self-respect

---

Exactly my point

Who has the moral or ethical Truth to be pronounced on a group? We each have that right unto ourselves but to insist another follow OUR code is a difficult path to Global Unity.

This forum isn`t exactly a chance meeting place for objectivity but for passions & beliefs. Good, bad or ugly, if one plays in the mud, one is going to get mud splattered on them. There are many ways to wash the mud off. The choice of how we wash is ours & ours alone.

------------------
~
What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for others and the world is immortal"~

posted August 12, 2006 11:51 AM              

quote:

---

For example- posting a thread about Bush calling someone in Indian Kemosabe and posting it without any clarification- thereby leading some of the more mindless twits to get angry at him for being so stupid - is a LIE.. "something meant to deceive or give the wrong impression"

---

lol...pidaua's still seething because she fell for it when everyone else knew it was a spoof.

as for your 'standards' and 'rules,' they are both subjective and laughable to the extreme. the personal manner in which you attack, slander and express the most vile things about people, usually simply because you disagree with their opinion or stance, is far worse and damaging than the use of a few token curse words and nebulous "taboos".

that you choose to 'uphold' your behavior in light of these few words and arbitrary rules and standards is so ridiculous i can't believe you take yourself seriously.

you overstep every boundary of decency and protocol on this board, in a much more sinister way than anyone else here.

why it is that you think that your arbitrary standards and rules should apply here, considering your unchecked and despicably abusive behavior towards those whose opinions displease you, i can't fathom -- it's the most absurd and non-sequitur position i've seen anywhere.

and since it appears you misunderstand in the worst way, insulting and degrading people is in no way the same thing as debate.