posted March 04, 2009 10:39 AM         

At any rate - I think some celebrities are more 'quiet' about their love lives. I never thought any were gay because of that. I'm sure it's easy when rumors go around....if you notice, most have their love life flaunted only if they're not married pretty much.

I'm no good at this stuff though - I don't ever know really who's with who. I'm so out of touch!

posted March 04, 2009 10:57 AM           

No, I don`t think John is gay either,
or as Jude said it in that hilarious monologue (SNL): "Usually if you`re that goodlooking, people think you`re gay. I`m just English."

However, I just noticed that I have some interesting synastry with John.
His Sun exactly opposes my Venus
His Venus opposes my Mars
his Juno opposes my Mars and conjuncts my DSC
his Karma conjuncts my SN and DSC and trines my Pluto
his psyche exactly conjuncts my Eros

posted March 04, 2009 11:38 AM           

It was pretty common for Roman men of the higher classes to have as well female as male lovers.

posted March 04, 2009 01:33 PM         

but i think celebrities in general have a certain something that ties in with many of our own patterns, that is why they ARE celebrities, they speak to something either in the general collective consciousness, just as a book, painting, song or movie will be popular because it speaks to us personally even without being about us...

where am i going with this? that maybe celebrities who carry hooks for the collective are ALL our soulmates, in the sense that they are maybe closer to the ORIGINAL split soul and so we are spinoffs of them so to speak? as in linda's explanation of the isis/osiris story and how the parts are looking to meet up with their original whole...

posted March 04, 2009 02:00 PM         

Neither is Jude Law, he's just an adulterer.

posted March 04, 2009 08:46 PM         

Amowls, I agree with you too - not buying the gay thing on said guys.
As for famous men in history like Socrates and Caesar, I'm with DD - there was usually an abundance of same sex activity during that time that was very much out in the open.

Not to stray too far off-topic....

My synastry with Cusack isn't marvelous, but our moons fall into each other's 7th....and like I said before, my Sun, Mercury, and Pluto conjunct his ascendant. My Sun also conjunct his Anti-Vertex....
His sun sextile my Ascendant, his Moon conjunct my Dcs.
It's a mixed bag with Saturn - lots of Saturn ties.

Ooooh, neat! I just checked asteroids! Dunno if these mean anything - these are the tight ones:

*His Pluto sq. my Persephone
*My Juno quinx his Jupiter/Double Whammy
*My Psyche conj his Moon/DW
*My Psyche conj his SN
*His Valentine conj my Moon
*His Proserpina conj my NN
*His Vertex sextile my Karma/DW
*Karma sq Valentine/ DW
*Eros sq Psyche /DW (kinda wide though- 5 degrees)

Whoa! Ok, this is just a skimming....I'll have to look more thoroughly!

Davidson/Composite shows Psyche sq Eros tightly, Hera sq Jupiter, Juno conj Sun, Sun conjunct Venus, Karma conj NN (they're all fairly tight)...and we have a Grand Trine in both midpoint composite and davidson (It looks like Moon, Mars, and Pluto)...

posted March 05, 2009 05:43 AM           

I think that is important: first to fall in love and then study all those Synastry aspects.
If somebody has Natal Chart without some great romance or marriage aspects, all that is for nothing.

It is good to know, just in case to explain to other people, will they stay together or not.

Buena

p.s. Thank you DD for all that. I am still waiting for your book.

posted March 05, 2009 06:07 AM           

DD I'm in awe and humbled by your research
and knowledge on love aspects.

*goes back to lurking in this thread*

posted March 05, 2009 10:13 AM           

BTW Buena, I donīt think that there is any aspect in the natal chart that makes marriage "impossible", even though some may be more difficult to deal with than others.
Also, it comes down to one`s preferences. If someone doesn`t want to marry, he or she probably won`t, no matter how beautiful the synastry looks like.