posted April 29, 2012 07:08 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by aquaguy91:
Ok this has all been a huge misunderstanding to say the least, I was simply saying I am not attracted to people with that attitude no matter how pretty they are,I never meant to imply all pretty women are bad or that I have a problem with them for being attractive, on the contrary I love a pretty. woman as much as the. next Guy, I was simply. saying I hate pretention of any kind,probably. because I'm a double. aqua. I think these issues I have with communication stem from my third house Mars and moon, I have noticed people tend to perceive me as an a** especially through writing or sarcastic when in my mind I was simply stating my thoughts, opinions, or experiences plainly, I never mean it to but its taken that way, so i would just like to ask you fine folks on lindaland to not take things I say to heart unless I specifically mention you,as I said I tend to write dramatically and with a lot of emotion and have a tendency to use strong words, so I can off as brusk, but I don't mean it that way, I guess we all speak in a different language, but anyways sorry for the whole ordeal lastnight, its just I seem to encounter miscommunication with people a lot, and it flusters me.

---

posted April 29, 2012 07:12 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by YoursTrulyAlways:
Dude,

I have a family friend who lives in Knoxville and she has an available sister and I'll see if she is interested in a blind date with you. But you must be able to handle a drop dead gorgeous 5'9" blonde. Big sister was an Elite Model and has several magazine covers. They are as sweet as can be and they don't give a crap about money: they already have lots of it.

Anyway, until we set up a female bashing forum for you to get your aggressions out, Harden The Foxtrot Up and get your Vicky Secrets out of a twisted knot. Show your Cajones. You are the one with the Johnson and they can't stand it. Get that chip outta yer assets and man up.

---

posted April 29, 2012 07:48 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Ami Anne:
Pisces Moon

---

posted April 29, 2012 08:24 AM            

But then I have Pluto on asc. My scorpio stellium is in the Aries house. the rest of my planets are in the mentioned non superficial signs, Aries, cap. I dunno if I can lump the leo moon in here. I thot it was the cause of it but I guess not from reading the replies..

To add.. Say if a woman marries for money or a man for looks in the eyes of society.. Don't u think there is still love there?? But to the whole world they dismiss it as just that. We can't really tell I think. We don't know what they feel.

posted March 10, 2019 10:52 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by ariesdragon:
Venus in cancer

---

posted March 11, 2019 03:06 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by awakemer:
Scorpios and Capricorns are the least shallow imo.. maybe Pisces too. Gemini is more superfical to me than libra.. at least Libra is nice about it.. Gemini can be kind of ruthless.

I cannot stand superficialness in any way.. but i just see it as a lack of spiritual development. Also i don't understand the whole needing physical attraction to mate because if feels very conditional to me,,ab unattractive person cannot become beautiful and someone who is born with no limbs cannot grow them either.. its just not fair. I think we need to learn to move beyond it. I am still working on this myself.. i am very critical on how i look.. i have been brainwashed by the media, parents, society etc that my beauty is my value.. but its sh*T and not true.I Think maybe if there is just more self love this will not be a problem.

---

I wouldn't say I'm shallow (Pisces sun) but I definitely do care about looks in a man. I would never date a guy that is physically unattractive to me (and that could be a guy that is deemed attractive by many other people)

posted March 11, 2019 03:28 PM            

They think they are trying to fight the struggle, trying to fight for the relationship, no, stupid, the mate you choose isn't suitable to your personality, you don't do a deep dig.

Sorry, thinking my Cap moon brother who willingly fights everyone to defend his new gf he met at blind date just few months ago wtf and remembering my Cap moon husband (and his cheating ex that worthy of being defended although she also run away with his money). I need to rant so I can relax and relieve.

posted March 11, 2019 04:33 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by hearttreasure:
^^ I agree. Cap moon is superficial (maybe they don't feel like that, but what I've seen they are so stupidly superficial choosing mate, sorry, I didn't mean to use "stupid" but what word is suitable more?) and so stubborn "pig-headed" s---.

They think they are trying to fight the struggle, trying to fight for the relationship, no, stupid, the mate you choose isn't suitable to your personality, you don't do a deep dig.

Sorry, thinking my Cap moon brother who willingly fights everyone to defend his new gf he met at blind date just few months ago wtf and remembering my Cap moon husband (and his cheating ex that worthy of being defended although she also run away with his money). I need to rant so I can relax and relieve.

Maybe, maybe, later they will realize.. their pig-headed s---.

---

😁😁😁

I understand.

The Cap Moons I know are like that too.
They suck at choosing a partner, they will always go for people who take advantage of them in some way and they will defend them.
Which is actually too Neptunian.

The ones I know though also value status and money. For example they wouldn't go out with someone who didn't have a good job, their own house and car, clothes on the expensive side etc. (they all are women btw).
I remember one saying that she liked someone but she was ashamed to go out with him because he wasn't "rich" meaning he didn't have a good car, clothes and lots of money to spend when they go out. So she chose the other one who she wasn't into but she was blinded by his expensive life.
Then was complaining how she is not fullfilled emotionally 😁

posted March 15, 2019 12:37 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Plut0nian2:
😁😁😁

I understand.

The Cap Moons I know are like that too.
They suck at choosing a partner, they will always go for people who take advantage of them in some way and they will defend them.
Which is actually too Neptunian.

The ones I know though also value status and money. For example they wouldn't go out with someone who didn't have a good job, their own house and car, clothes on the expensive side etc. (they all are women btw).
I remember one saying that she liked someone but she was ashamed to go out with him because he wasn't "rich" meaning he didn't have a good car, clothes and lots of money to spend when they go out. So she chose the other one who she wasn't into but she was blinded by his expensive life.
Then was complaining how she is not fullfilled emotionally 😁

The whole chart should be taken into consideration of course.

---

I don't have any Capricorn placements, but I definitely would not date someone who doesn't have a stable income "equivalent" to his age, doesn't wear decent clothes and doesn't have a nice car. Honda Civic Sedan 2015-2016 for instance. Overall, I would not date a man under 26 years of age.

posted March 15, 2019 06:14 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Leo-Cancer98:
I don't have any Capricorn placements, but I definitely would not date someone who doesn't have a stable income "equivalent" to his age, doesn't wear decent clothes and doesn't have a nice car. Honda Civic Sedan 2015-2016 for instance. Overall, I would not date a man under 26 years of age.

---

Capricorns aren't the only ones who are materialistic.
Leos are often like that
To my surprise Aquas if not for a water Moon often value someone's money and status more than their personalities.

posted March 16, 2019 02:02 PM            

To me being superficial is only being concerned with surface details. A lack of willingness to go into depth with a said topic, whether that be emotionally or intellectually.

When it comes to relationships I personally need to be with someone who is sexually attractive, but that is also because I have a very high sex-drive and would have a hard time doing sexual things with someone who I am not attracted to physically. Unlike some people I take sex very seriously and will only do it with those who I am comfortable with and deserve it (Scorpio Mars-Asc). Honestly though relationship wise, I need someone who is emotionally understanding of me and my turbulent emotional states and someone who is willing to listen to me when I really need someone. I could care less about someone's social status or how much money they have, but I would prefer for them to be at least self-sufficient. If I can't respect them I can't see myself being in a relationship with them. It's so black and white for me that once I get attached to someone I want someone to be as invested in it as I am.

posted March 17, 2019 12:53 PM            

But I mean to some extent doesn’t almost everyone need to be physically attracted to their partner? Is that really superficial?
Pisces and Aquarius stellium here

posted March 21, 2019 01:51 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by SoulOfABird:
I don’t care if he’s dirt poor as long as he has the traits I want in my significant other and he loves me. However I still have to be attracted to him. Not saying he has to be a supermodel but I got to find him cute/good looking in my eyes.
to their partner? Is that really superficial?
Pisces and Aquarius stellium here

---

posted March 21, 2019 05:17 PM            

Of course going by looks is shallow, or perhaps kneejerk since a lot of judgments (often unfair and even irrational) can actually go along with that which may have an impact more than the looks themselves.

Or maybe it's just normal. Few women will be with men shorter than themselves, for example, even if they like the guy or think he's otherwise cute (though they may be turned off by his wanting a woman with a big bust, seeing him as shallow while seeing herself as "refusing to settle").

Advertisement agencies that rake in billions of revenue (which in turn shapes the internet for the worse) along with scriptwriters know how important looks are down to the very detail to get the very idea or feeling across. Humanity is a visual species.

posted March 21, 2019 06:03 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by PixieJane:
It occurs to me that people have different definitions of shallow. For example, focusing on transient emotions, elevating it above other aspects, seems shallow to me, but others define that as depth.

Of course going by looks is shallow, or perhaps kneejerk since a lot of judgments (often unfair and even irrational) can actually go along with that which may have an impact more than the looks themselves.

Or maybe it's just normal. Few women will be with men shorter than themselves, for example, even if they like the guy or think he's otherwise cute (though they may be turned off by his wanting a woman with a big bust, seeing him as shallow while seeing herself as "refusing to settle").

Advertisement agencies that rake in billions of revenue (which in turn shapes the internet for the worse) along with scriptwriters know how important looks are down to the very detail to get the very idea or feeling across. Humanity is a visual species.

I'm also curious how many here would enjoy a partner who did not care for how you looked, but appreciated your great personality to overcome that. I'd think the world of advertisement (and modeling) would be a lot different if many would.

---

posted March 21, 2019 06:10 PM            

Scorpio (Pluto), Pisces (Neptune), Aquarius (Uranus).

Though I have met ones who were shallow, I find when they are not, they really, really aren't shallow/superficial at all.

Which one of those would I say is capable of being the LEAST superficial?

Hmmm...

posted March 21, 2019 08:42 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by kani:

I'm the same. I don't care about money at all but he does have to be physically attractive to me for me to even consider a relationship with him (of course personality needs to fit as well) and I really think that most people think like that. Obviously we all have different tastes as in what we find attractive but I doubt that there are many rl where there is no sexual attraction between the partners (not counting the arranged marriages and the likes).

---

Yes absolutely. Personality is super important. And like you said people have different views on what’s attractive. I have liked guys that other people think why do you think he’s cute? But to me he is, he has that something I like and it makes him cute/attractive in my eyes. Not everyone will agree with what others find physically attractive and sometimes if they have personality traits you like it adds to their attractiveness. Ive had friends the same way, that they like a guy and Im like ehhh he’s alright. I don’t see how someone can have a serious relationship with someone they don’t find physically attractive. Regardless if it’s typical conventional looks or not.