posted July 08, 2012 06:11 AM            

Always needs someone to go with them..

posted July 08, 2012 10:34 AM            

For example, even with some aspects indicating independence in my chart I retain core Libran traits. One being, the need to do things with other people. I don't consider this ALONE co-dependency. I'm perfectly capable of doing things by myself and roughing it on my own. But this doesn't mean I'll be happy doing it. As a Libra female I'm much happier with a partner whom I genuinely enjoy.

posted July 08, 2012 02:18 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Doux Rêve:
Libra influence, and that also includes the 7th house.

Maybe Cancer & Pisces, or strong Moon or Neptune..

---

posted July 08, 2012 10:21 PM            

I personally keep my own room that I keep to my own taste and don't have to worry what anyone else thinks about it. When the door is closed everyone knows I'm not to be bothered (though I try not to do that any more than I have to).

As to the sun sign I think is the most prone to co-dependency as defined in the OP (as opposed to how I define codepency) I'd have to say that would go to Gemini.

posted July 09, 2012 12:05 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by PixieJane:
Libras don't fit the bill because most Libras need as much alone time as social time, and if we're constantly around others (who inevitably throw our scales out of whack sooner or later) then just like being alone it becomes too much and we can get extremely cranky. We need friends, but we can't be smothered by them. It's all about balance.

I personally keep my own room that I keep to my own taste and don't have to worry what anyone else thinks about it. When the door is closed everyone knows I'm not to be bothered (though I try not to do that any more than I have to).

As to the sun sign I think is the most prone to co-dependency as defined in the OP (as opposed to how I define codepency) I'd have to say that would go to Gemini.

Keep in mind that I personally don't see being a social butterfly as being co-dependent anymore than I see self-confidence as narcissism, I'm just going by how the OP defines it as best I can.

---

posted July 09, 2012 03:23 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by sand:
Feel free to run with it. Curious y Gemini? Coz they need to talk to someone?

---

Because they seem the most inclined to talk to someone. And I've known Geminis that got crazy this way. For example, one Gemini was so obsessed with being around people (which drove many away, though I found her pleasant most of the time, even if I avoided her a few times as I wasn't in the mood to talk forever right then) that she had cats and when alone she would talk to them, out loud, and act as if they answered her back when no one was around. Whenever I went to visit I could never tell if anyone else was there or if she was on the phone or whatever because of that.

Now I wouldn't call them co-dependent by my definition (and short & sweet I define co-dependents as people with low self-esteem who are drawn to deeply flawed people so they can feel needed and sometimes even in control, and may very well become isolated if not obsessed with this one person and/or do many things on his/her own on behalf of the other person as opposed to being a social butterfly as you described), and as for those I did define that way I'd have to say Pisces (though I knew a Scorpio who could challenge any the Pisces I knew) but they didn't have to always be around someone. I knew a Cancer who was almost stalking me once (as he did about anyone who he felt had problems and would need him, and he was even a professional counselor) but once I told him to back off he did and was careful from then on (and once he found someone else to save he lost most of his interest in me).

But those co-dependents aren't what you asked about. You asked about people who had to be around people all the time, which isn't really (at least not necessarily) co-dependent anymore than a hermit is necessarily paranoid or distrustful (they could just be introverts who don't want to be distracted from their thoughts, projects, or meditations). Some people just find themselves comfortable around people and the energy they bring and I see nothing wrong with that (unlike someone being co-dependent). If you meant something other than "wants to be around people all the time" then you should've been clearer.

posted July 09, 2012 02:43 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by chocogold:
libra, first place
cancer, second place.

---

^ this

------------------
Imagination is intelligence having fun.
—George Scialabba

posted July 09, 2012 06:35 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by sand:
Ahh when I was thinking of my brother for this thread I was thinking whatever the opposite of a cardinal person would be. Like they hafta do something but procrastinate unless someone helps them out with it. He does have Aries mars so that bit has me baffled a little..

---

Pisces, maybe?

I knew a Pisces like that. When he lived with me I had to do about everything for him, or make sure he did it himself. And it wasn't that he was lazy it was just that he was easily distractible & lived more in his imagination than the real world and would rather not deal with mundane matters if he could help it, and thus a procrastinator.

Libras can be indecisive and take forever to decide whether or not to do something (or what exactly to do) but once the decision is made they don't need help. Of course Librans may very well charm someone else into taking care of it instead.