Author
|
Topic: Do co-rulers really exist?
|
Xiiro Knowflake Posts: 1754 From: San Diego CA, USA Registered: Jun 2011
|
posted March 03, 2013 03:31 PM
quote: Originally posted by 12thhouser: Didn't know our goal was to convince the OP.
lol IP: Logged |
Hera Knowflake Posts: 8636 From: Olympus Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted March 03, 2013 05:04 PM
I think this is highly subjective. Personally, I cannot wait for the other missing 2 planets to come forth and stabilize this *mystery* because for the time being, I am really bothered by the fact that it has no balance and symmetry and it makes little sense mathematically. It is something I struggle with, in my faith with astrology, this imperfection really irks me as I know the Universe could not have been so careless. It creates unbalance to have 2 signs sharing the same ruler (Taurus-Libra and Gemini-Virgo), just as it does to have 3 signs with modern rulers AND a possible co-ruler. I have, for a while, been taken with Carl Payne Tobey's theory, but it was so different than everything I knew traditionally that I guess in the end I rejected it, though it made perfect mathematical sense. I think, in a way, the way we are used to see and think about things influences our perception of said Aquariuses, Pisces and so on. We're still very much pre-programmed. Personally I tend to disregard corulers except for horary where I still use the traditional rulers. I look forward to the day when the higher octaves of Jupiter and Saturn will be discovered and all this confusion settled. Hope to live to see it. IP: Logged |
Xiiro Knowflake Posts: 1754 From: San Diego CA, USA Registered: Jun 2011
|
posted March 03, 2013 05:44 PM
quote: Originally posted by Hera: I think this is highly subjective. Personally, I cannot wait for the other missing 2 planets to come forth and stabilize this *mystery* because for the time being, I am really bothered by the fact that it has no balance and symmetry and it makes little sense mathematically. It is something I struggle with, in my faith with astrology, this imperfection really irks me as I know the Universe could not have been so careless. It creates unbalance to have 2 signs sharing the same ruler (Taurus-Libra and Gemini-Virgo)
I use Ceres for Virgo and Eris for Libra. When Pluto was reclassified as a dwarf planet, both Ceres and Eris fell into that category too (effectively promoting them to planets). Because Eris is such a new planet it is difficult to argue for her rulership of Libra, but Ceres fits Virgo very well. I have been circling the idea of posting my experiences with the Eris/Libra relationship so far, but Eris is a very complex and existential energy. That post would take a while to write and be a bit tl;dr. If she were Libra's ruler, she would expose a side of Libra people don't tend to consider (the heavier/subconscious reasons for why Libra is fixated with balance, relating, and attractiveness). Like Pluto, Eris gets a bad reputation before she has a chance to actually introduce herself. That results in people often discounting her as the ruler of such an apparently "light" sign. Consider though, that Gemini has his Evil Twin and Aquarius has his Mad Scientist/Snow Queen, but Libra so elegantly dances around being associated with the darker parts of the mind. It's not because he lacks access to it. IP: Logged |
12thhouser Knowflake Posts: 1581 From: Registered: Feb 2012
|
posted March 03, 2013 06:04 PM
quote: Originally posted by Hera: I think this is highly subjective. Personally, I cannot wait for the other missing 2 planets to come forth and stabilize this *mystery* because for the time being, I am really bothered by the fact that it has no balance and symmetry and it makes little sense mathematically. It is something I struggle with, in my faith with astrology, this imperfection really irks me as I know the Universe could not have been so careless. It creates unbalance to have 2 signs sharing the same ruler (Taurus-Libra and Gemini-Virgo), just as it does to have 3 signs with modern rulers AND a possible co-ruler. I have, for a while, been taken with Carl Payne Tobey's theory, but it was so different than everything I knew traditionally that I guess in the end I rejected it, though it made perfect mathematical sense. I think, in a way, the way we are used to see and think about things influences our perception of said Aquariuses, Pisces and so on. We're still very much pre-programmed. Personally I tend to disregard corulers except for horary where I still use the traditional rulers. I look forward to the day when the higher octaves of Jupiter and Saturn will be discovered and all this confusion settled. Hope to live to see it.
Perhaps astrology is symmetrical and mathematical, just not the way we'd like it to be. IP: Logged |
RunAroundScreaming Knowflake Posts: 8223 From: Registered: Oct 2010
|
posted March 03, 2013 06:17 PM
quote: Originally posted by 12thhouser: Didn't know our goal was to [b]convince the OP.[/B]
What're you talking about. Obviously I want to see solid reasoning behind people's opinions. That's what'll help convince me one way or the other. Instead of saying convince would you like me to use "become sure of my opinion?" Oh I'm sorry, does my choice of words bother you, you poor sensitive little dear...... The reason I made the thread is to explore different possibilities/theories/opinions, and the end goal is for people's input to help me become more sure of things one way or the other. Sorry, next time I'll be more sensitive in my choice of words so that you don't feel you have to *convince* me of anything. *Scoffs* IP: Logged |
12thhouser Knowflake Posts: 1581 From: Registered: Feb 2012
|
posted March 03, 2013 06:32 PM
quote: Originally posted by RunAroundScreaming: What're you talking about. Obviously I want to see solid reasoning behind people's opinions. That's what'll help convince me one way or the other. Instead of saying convince would you like me to use "become sure of my opinion?" Oh I'm sorry, does my choice of words bother you, you poor sensitive little dear......The reason I made the thread is to explore different possibilities/theories/opinions, and the end goal is for people's input to help me become more sure of things one way or the other. Sorry, next time I'll be more sensitive in my choice of words so that you don't feel you have to *convince* me of anything. *Scoffs*
At least Xiiro has a sense of humor about it. lol IP: Logged |
RunAroundScreaming Knowflake Posts: 8223 From: Registered: Oct 2010
|
posted March 03, 2013 06:49 PM
Yeah great sense of humor  *rolls eyes*IP: Logged |
Kerosene unregistered
|
posted March 03, 2013 07:07 PM
quote: Originally posted by Xiiro: I use Ceres for Virgo and Eris for Libra. When Pluto was reclassified as a dwarf planet, both Ceres and Eris fell into that category too (effectively promoting them to planets). Because Eris is such a new planet it is difficult to argue for her rulership of Libra, but Ceres fits Virgo very well. I have been circling the idea of posting my experiences with the Eris/Libra relationship so far, but Eris is a very complex and existential energy. That post would take a while to write and be a bit tl;dr. If she were Libra's ruler, she would expose a side of Libra people don't tend to consider (the heavier/subconscious reasons for why Libra is fixated with balance, relating, and attractiveness). Like Pluto, Eris gets a bad reputation before she has a chance to actually introduce herself. That results in people often discounting her as the ruler of such an apparently "light" sign. Consider though, that Gemini has his Evil Twin and Aquarius has his Mad Scientist/Snow Queen, but Libra so elegantly dances around being associated with the darker parts of the mind. It's not because he lacks access to it.
THISSSS I agree with everything here. Xiiro I've read about eris/libra rulership but can you give me your elaborate on it more please? I'm interested in your own theory. Sorry if you find that annoying, but I'm very fascinated with eris. At least answer this question :3.. I have eris conjunct mars. I find it hard to "fight" with others, I'm so focused on harmonizing with everyone. I can be a lot more direct on the anonymous level. Sometimes i feel like my mars is in libra. Although I do have that arian fire power.
IP: Logged |
Hera Knowflake Posts: 8636 From: Olympus Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted March 04, 2013 12:08 AM
quote: Originally posted by Xiiro: I use Ceres for Virgo and Eris for Libra. When Pluto was reclassified as a dwarf planet, both Ceres and Eris fell into that category too (effectively promoting them to planets). Because Eris is such a new planet it is difficult to argue for her rulership of Libra, but Ceres fits Virgo very well. I have been circling the idea of posting my experiences with the Eris/Libra relationship so far, but Eris is a very complex and existential energy. That post would take a while to write and be a bit tl;dr. If she were Libra's ruler, she would expose a side of Libra people don't tend to consider (the heavier/subconscious reasons for why Libra is fixated with balance, relating, and attractiveness). Like Pluto, Eris gets a bad reputation before she has a chance to actually introduce herself. That results in people often discounting her as the ruler of such an apparently "light" sign. Consider though, that Gemini has his Evil Twin and Aquarius has his Mad Scientist/Snow Queen, but Libra so elegantly dances around being associated with the darker parts of the mind. It's not because he lacks access to it.
I look forward to it!! I am sure it will be very interesting, even though it might be hard to enter my stubborn Aries skull lol, that Eris-Libra bit. I think Ceres fits for Virgo, too, but I am still rooting for Chiron to be honest. The problem is Tobey actually argued new rulers for Taurus and Gemini!! And I guess I sort of blocked and didn't continue sustaining his theory because I just can't see, for the life of me, Gemini being ruled by anything other than Mercury. He also said that Aries's true ruler is Pluto and that Scorpio is ruled by Mars. IP: Logged |
Hera Knowflake Posts: 8636 From: Olympus Registered: Sep 2010
|
posted March 04, 2013 12:11 AM
quote: Originally posted by 12thhouser: Perhaps astrology is symmetrical and mathematical, just not the way we'd like it to be.
I have been thinking about that too! I know there is a pattern, it used to obsess me so much lol, but I just can't figure it out! Meh, I have relaxed about this now, I am sure that when we'll be ready, we'll welcome it into our collective consciousness. IP: Logged |
Xiiro Knowflake Posts: 1754 From: San Diego CA, USA Registered: Jun 2011
|
posted March 04, 2013 04:17 AM
quote: Originally posted by Kerosene: THISSSS I agree with everything here. Xiiro I've read about eris/libra rulership but can you give me your elaborate on it more please? I'm interested in your own theory. Sorry if you find that annoying, but I'm very fascinated with eris. At least answer this question :3.. I have eris conjunct mars. I find it hard to "fight" with others, I'm so focused on harmonizing with everyone. I can be a lot more direct on the anonymous level. Sometimes i feel like my mars is in libra. Although I do have that arian fire power.
Okay, I’ll attempt a super-summary of how I feel Eris is a fitting candidate for ruler of Libra. Here is at least one of the arguments. Eris (aka Discordia [hearts apart]), is the goddess of chaos and it is stated in an old story, she inspires individuals to improve their selves through comparison to others. Being Libra’s ruler would pose the argument that Libra seeks harmony because it has a fundamental understanding of disharmony or disconnection. As ruler of the 7th House I feel this makes sense. The DSC is popular for being the House of Relationships. Some people don’t realize that includes ALL relationships, good and bad, harmonious and disharmonious. The ASC represents our Self-Image or projected self-expression, the IC represents our personal space and foundations, the MC represents our public space and foundations, and the DSC represents our Other-Image or what we expect/want to see when we interact with “Not Self”. The reason I mention the DSC is because ASC/DSC is a dualistic perspective. Without both, neither could exist. Perhaps a better explanation would be, “If nothing external existed, the self would have nothing to compare its self to. Without a point of reference the self is indescribable”. In the path of the zodiac, Libra/7H/Sunset/Autumn is the moment when established/objectified/self-developing energies give way to subjective consideration. We see this happen in nature every day. When the Sun is out, the world is apparent, object filled, and well contained between the green grass and the blue sky. When night comes, things become hidden and we must extend our senses outward. The sky becomes transparent and we are faced with our own insignificance, under the vast depth of a universe beyond our known home. I feel this is one of the ways Eris manifests in Libra, as a fundamental feeling of separation or disconnection. This results in a longing to reach out and connect with external objects. It may sound depressing, but it also makes Libra a champion of their own style and instills them with a desire to experience the unique style of other separate objects. There is a lot more but I’ll save that for the thread. The negative(ish) side of Eris ruling Libra would manifest as ruin through ignorance, sewing drama among others, social manipulation, pushing the first domino and believing because they never touched the other dominoes the mess is not their fault, projecting an image to produce specific social results, and avoiding disharmony even at the cost of destructive results, etc... I have Eris conjunct SN/ASC in the 12H. Inside I feel fundamentally alone and separate from others. It’s as if I was born on another planet. Whenever I turn inward, the feeling is very strong. When I was younger I always wanted to feel part of something with others, but even my family feel like strangers. As I get older I start to see it as a way to develop my own style and life, which turns into a way I can relate and integrate with others. Being opposed my NN/DSC it’s important I find that voice and share it with others. Otherwise I am tempted to retreat into solitude and isolate myself from the world. Conjunct Mars, I get this image of an astronaut orbiting earth in an abandoned ship. Taking care of his daily needs and doing whatever he has to do to survive, but his only connection to Earth is a radio and the view outside his window. There could be a need to keep things harmonious with others because the prospect of losing contact is more frightening. I can’t really comment well without seeing your chart. It’s also not all gloom either. Eris/Mars could inspire you to great effort in connecting with others. You could cherish connections with others as very valuable. It could result in a strong sense of individuality self-worth. Keep in mind Eris in Aries would be in detriment, so the sense of disconnectedness will be a lot less graceful with our generation. Fundamentally Eris is the force in the universe (within us all) that sees "other" as a collective and "self" as an individual. The list of things which arise out of that construct is long. This doesn’t do the whole picture much justice, there is a lot more. A whole spiritual lesson to why discord is essential to our life experience, the oddly uncanny connections Eris has to Venus, the way Eris manifests in Taurus as a sub-ruler, and the neat way our solar system can be classified when Eris and Ceres are included. That’s all I got for now though. =)
IP: Logged |
Sailor Gemini Knowflake Posts: 797 From: Melinoe Castle, Proserpine Registered: Mar 2013
|
posted March 04, 2013 10:57 AM
Ares-passionate, assertive Dias-expansion, law, philosophy Kronos-devoted, hard workingAries is the firey passionate and agressive while Scorpio's passion is calmed and refined by water, and agression that makes me think of ice for some reason. Likewise, Sagittarius represents adventurous expansion and teaching, religion, etc. Pisces makes it seem a bit... spiritual, karmatic, other worldly. As for Kronos, Capricornus is driven by more earthly work, like accountants, bussiness men, and such. Aquarius just makes it more airy and intellectual. They make great scientists, humanitarians, and the like. My aunt is strongly Aquarius, but I still see more of the Saturnine traits associated with Kronos. IP: Logged |
diamondbaby Knowflake Posts: 346 From: Registered: Jul 2012
|
posted April 24, 2016 11:42 PM
Interesting topic! I personally don't believe in co-rulers, I think each sign is ruled by one "planet" exclusively. The sign/planet/house triplicity represents the very same archetype (for example Leo/Sun/5th house). The way I see it, Mars doesn't have a lot to do with Scorpio, Saturn with Aquarius, and Jupiter with Pisces. I also don't think that Mercury is a good fit for Virgo and Venus for Libra.So in my opinion: Virgo is ruled by Ceres Libra is ruled by Pallas Scorpio is ruled by Pluto Aquarius is ruled by Uranus Pisces is ruled by Neptune IP: Logged |
diamondbaby Knowflake Posts: 346 From: Registered: Jul 2012
|
posted April 25, 2016 12:04 AM
As for the Saturn VS Uranus coldness "debate", I would say Uranus is the ultimate "cold" planet. As an Air sign Aquarius is already a detached and distant energy but since Aquarius is Fixed Air, it becomes frozen and ice cold. Plus, Aquarius is the opposite of Leo. Leo season is the hottest time of the year, Aquarius season is the coldest. While the Sun rules Leo, it's in detriment in Aquarius. It's said that Aquarius season is the most depressive time of the year, there is also a very interesting topic about this: http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum24/HTML/224824.html I have always found Aquarius/Uranus dominant people to be colder than Capricorn/Saturn dominant ones. So in my opinion for example between Moon in Capricorn and Moon in Aquarius definitely the Moon in Aquarius is the colder one. IP: Logged |
Kannon McAfee Knowflake Posts: 1372 From: Portland, OR - USA Registered: Oct 2011
|
posted April 25, 2016 05:22 PM
Yes, planets that have same/very similar color resonance vibration can be said to 'co-rule' a sign and my rectification work has proved this to me beyond mere theory.Jupiter = blue Neptune = saturated blue both relate to Pisces and Sagittarius Saturn = green Uranus = saturated green both relate to Aquarius and Capricorn Mars = red Pluto = saturated red both relate to Scorpio and Aries ------------------ The Declinations Guy Rising Sign Descriptions | Expert rectification IP: Logged |
Koniucha Knowflake Posts: 556 From: Registered: Jun 2014
|
posted April 25, 2016 05:41 PM
What would be the difference between a Martian Scorpio versus a Plutonian one?IP: Logged | |