Author
|
Topic: Born on the cusp - Does that make you a zodiacal hybrid?
|
soren Knowflake Posts: 3962 From: Registered: Sep 2012
|
posted August 27, 2014 01:22 AM
Correct they would take up 0.15 m in each sign if it was exactly in the middle. Mcafee calculated that the sun is on that cusp where its touching both for 1.666 percent of the timeIP: Logged |
soren Knowflake Posts: 3962 From: Registered: Sep 2012
|
posted August 27, 2014 01:24 AM
once the sun enters the 29.45 zone it immedietly starts touching the cusp of the other sign because with half a degree it would stretch from 29.30 to 0.00IP: Logged |
soren Knowflake Posts: 3962 From: Registered: Sep 2012
|
posted August 27, 2014 01:27 AM
so if the sun goes through 30 degrees, in each degree for an equal amount of time, then for 0.25/30th of the time it is in the cusp degrees for the start of the sign, plus another 0.25/30 degrees for the time it is in the cusp zone for the end of a sign. so all in all it is in the cusp zone for 0.5/30, which equals 1.666%IP: Logged |
Mercurian Intellect Knowflake Posts: 3988 From: Vulcan & Mercury. Yes, I was born on both planets, somehow. Registered: Sep 2013
|
posted August 27, 2014 01:29 AM
quote: Originally posted by soren: Correct they would take up 0.15 m in each sign if it was exactly in the middle. Mcafee calculated that the sun is on that cusp where its touching both for 1.666 percent of the time
Alright. So perhaps that we should equate whatever sign it's closest to, it's in, instead of it being considered in two signs. So if the Sun/Moon is at 29.59 Virgo, then it is considered to be in the sign of Virgo, because more of the Sun/Moon takes up Virgo (0.01 to be exact) and if it is at 0.00 Libra, then it is to be considered to be in the sign of Libra. I know the Sun/Moon will still cover both signs either way, but it will be like we're rounding it to whatever sign it is closest to. Just like they round in Math, and the Universe is comprised of mathematical calculations and theorems. So basically, it's kinda like we're arriving at the conclusion that there no such thing as a Cusp. Because 29.59 Virgo is still in Virgo, and 0.00 Libra is still in Libra, haha. Do you or anyone else agree with this notion? IP: Logged |
Mercurian Intellect Knowflake Posts: 3988 From: Vulcan & Mercury. Yes, I was born on both planets, somehow. Registered: Sep 2013
|
posted August 27, 2014 01:33 AM
quote: Originally posted by soren: so if the sun goes through 30 degrees, in each degree for an equal amount of time, then for 0.25/30th of the time it is in the cusp degrees for the start of the sign, plus another 0.25/30 degrees for the time it is in the cusp zone for the end of a sign. so all in all it is in the cusp zone for 0.5/30, which equals 1.666%
I think this is pretty much what I said in my post above, but through a different means of calculation, right?  IP: Logged |
soren Knowflake Posts: 3962 From: Registered: Sep 2012
|
posted August 27, 2014 01:35 AM
Well I believe that the sun is potentially the most powerful factor in the chart, and if even 1/4 of it is in another sign, that 1/4 might still outpower all of the other planets. i think i do believe in the cusp. i have one friend on a leo virgo cusp and he always had a negative signed aspect to him. you can round it off to which energy is stronger in the person's sun, but i still think the sun would have energy from both signs, potentially masked by the side its more onIP: Logged |
soren Knowflake Posts: 3962 From: Registered: Sep 2012
|
posted August 27, 2014 01:37 AM
No its a different calculation. You calculated to which sign to round to, but this calculation is the literal amount of time that the sun is in the zone where its half a degree is touching both signs at once. which is 1.666% of the timeIP: Logged |
soren Knowflake Posts: 3962 From: Registered: Sep 2012
|
posted August 27, 2014 01:39 AM
but who knows this is all theory, maybe it does just go from one sign to the nextIP: Logged |
Mercurian Intellect Knowflake Posts: 3988 From: Vulcan & Mercury. Yes, I was born on both planets, somehow. Registered: Sep 2013
|
posted August 27, 2014 01:43 AM
quote: Originally posted by soren: No its a different calculation. You calculated to which sign to round to, but this calculation is the literal amount of time that the sun is in the zone where its half a degree is touching both signs at once. which is 1.666% of the time
So are you saying that if the Sun/Moon is on the Cusp (no matter if it's at 29.59 Virgo or 0.00 Libra), it's technically in the next sign? (In which case for my example, it's Libra). Because it's 1.666%, and that rounds positively. Right? I'm sorry if my questions seem repetitive, constant or obvious. I just want to make sure that I am understanding this correctly  IP: Logged |
soren Knowflake Posts: 3962 From: Registered: Sep 2012
|
posted August 27, 2014 01:52 AM
If the sun was in 29.59 degrees Virgo it would be more in the sign of Virgo. But I just believe in cusps so I think it would be a Virgo-LibraIP: Logged |
soren Knowflake Posts: 3962 From: Registered: Sep 2012
|
posted August 27, 2014 01:54 AM
1.666% of all the time is how often sun is in both signs. so if you apply that to months, you would get 30 (days) x 1.666% = 0.4998, which is half a day. So the sun is touching both signs for half a day out of every 30 daysIP: Logged |
Mercurian Intellect Knowflake Posts: 3988 From: Vulcan & Mercury. Yes, I was born on both planets, somehow. Registered: Sep 2013
|
posted August 27, 2014 02:00 AM
quote: Originally posted by soren: 1.666% of all the time is how often sun is in both signs. so if you apply that to months, you would get 30 (days) x 1.666% = 0.4998, which is half a day. So the sun is touching both signs for half a day out of every 30 days
Oh! Okay... I think I get it now, haha. I thought you meant that it was in one sign 1.666% more, or .116% more than the other sign when on the Cusp. But you were actually talking about days the Sun was on the Cusp in a month in a percentage, lol. But anyway, this was an interesting exchange of communication, so thanks for the discussion, soren  IP: Logged |
soren Knowflake Posts: 3962 From: Registered: Sep 2012
|
posted August 27, 2014 02:08 AM
Ahhh yeah I get you. Yeah man it was fun thanks as well for discussing, MI. IP: Logged |