posted June 15, 2009 01:51 PM         

KNOCK IT OFF!!

quote:

---

If you fancy her ways, by all means- no one can stop you. All GN talked about from '06 on was her Pluto conjunct Ascendent, and her Pluto in her 1st house, and how grand a woman she was- being online virtually (note I just said "virtually", I did not say definitely, or otherwise) 24/7. She was the lowest, most pathetic parasite of society I had ever beheld

---

quote:

---

The following is yet another link provided by AG, where Gemini Nymph and eatbooks talk to herself (NOT "themselves") just for fun, because as one of the worst examples of solar Geminis on the planet, GN constantly felt bored to be restrained as only one identity. She felt the need to create multiple identities on the same website, so she could always talk to one of her other twins, or she could make a pact with one of her twins when attacking someone here at LL (and she was lovin' it!)

---

quote:

---

Do you recall the heated arguments between Randall and eatbooks three or four years ago? Eatbooks was NOT Writesomething! Writesomething is a lovely and wise Virgoan lady, who used to be writesomething, also "and".

---

quote:

---

Gemini Nymph was a troll. Period. She went absolutely bananas. Think about how she got banned (she well deserved it!).

---

Gemini Nymph had a sharp tongue, but she was most certainly NOT "the lowest, most pathetic parasite of society." She was never BANNED -- she left because she was upset. Mystic Gemini was banned at least 10 times -- I have a list of all her user names (AG listed a handful of them).

PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES HERE AT LL ABOUT *PERSONAL INSULTS*. Your ongoing rant here is uncalled for and offensive. Just because someone isn't posting here anymore doesn't mean you have free rein to publicly trash them.

I found one of GN's comments (that you quoted) quite appropos:

quote:

---

Yes, I've also been very concerned about Defiant's conduct for a long time. I've missed this most recent episode this morning. But this is what conerns me: she zeroes in and reacts/attacks toward specific people for utterly irrational reasons, and then ignores/argues with other people who try to redress her conduct. I think it's taken too much away from the community here overall. She's a destructive presence, and I don't think a verbose "statement" is sufficient at this point.

---

posted June 16, 2009 01:08 AM         

posted June 15, 2009 01:51 PM

quote:

---

D for Defiant ~

KNOCK IT OFF!!

---

quote:

---

YOU ARE WRONG.

---

quote:

---

Gemini Nymph and eatbooks ARE TWO DIFFERENT PEOPLE.

---

quote:

---

Randall forgave and forgot and gave eatbooks/writesomething a MODSHIP not too long ago (which she recently resigned).

---

Writesomething was never eatbooks. Writesomething is not eatbooks. Writesomething has never been eatbooks.

quote:

---

Gemini Nymph had a sharp tongue, but she was most certainly NOT "the lowest, most pathetic parasite of society."

---

Depends on whether you were a fan of hers or you were clear enough to perceive what she really was.

quote:

---

She was never BANNED

---

Apparently not so, judging from the remaining data of hers, long after LL had been hacked. I understand. My mistake.

quote:

---

she left because she was upset.

---

Whatever you say. I am more skeptical about each and every motive of hers. I am glad that she is gone.

quote:

---

PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES HERE AT LL ABOUT *PERSONAL INSULTS*.

---

I do. And I shall continue to do so. I posted the messages yesterday out of self-defense, not because I wanted to indulge in a rant. I had to defend myself.

quote:

---

I found one of GN's comments (that you quoted) quite appropos:

---

quote:

---

Yes, I've also been very concerned about Defiant's conduct for a long time. I've missed this most recent episode this morning. But this is what conerns me: she zeroes in and reacts/attacks toward specific people for utterly irrational reasons, and then ignores/argues with other people who try to redress her conduct. I think it's taken too much away from the community here overall. She's a destructive presence, and I don't think a verbose "statement" is sufficient at this point.

---

quote:

---

She's a destructive presence, and I don't think a verbose "statement" is sufficient at this point.

---

We are not friends, Zala. We never were, and we never have been, and we never will be. You and I are simply not on the same frequency, Zala. I do, however, respect your status and your knowledgeablitity here at LL to some extent. I used to be confused; I've been there- but I am no longer there. I returned here at LL last September, and I've been active at LL for the past nine months. Have you been attentively observing my behavior in the last nine months? Do you still consider me "a destructive presence" now?

I just said I used to be confused. I also just said that we are never friends. In my view, Zala, many a time you get confused, too. Or you would like to take my latest posts here on this thread as "the clear evidence" of my "relapse" or my "showing my true colors"? We are not friends, Zala- you do not understand at all my feelings about not wanting to start a bush fire here at LL. Likewise, I have similar deppreciation for you in certain situations; not all, but some. It seems that no one here at LL can be absolutely objective, perceptive, fair and just. Most of us spend way too much time online, and that is the main reason why people start going lunatic. Too much Internet or computer usage are unhealthy- simply put, we get intoxicated.

Zala, take more time, and time will tell if I am still a destructive presence. I understand that you meant well, but your perception is just not what I find to be sound.

I will not mess with you, Zala. We are not friends. You implied that, to this day, I am still a destructive presence. Time will tell. The way you perceive me is quite similar to the way I perceive you. Fair enough.

D

posted June 16, 2009 02:20 AM         

quote:

---

It seems that no one here at LL can be absolutely objective, perceptive, fair and just.

---

When you start acting fair and just and objective, you'll find that you receive it in return. Dragging some people's names out here with a story that is completely wrong (that these people are the same person, and that they were trolls) is a disservice to them, and it's a disservice to yourself, because those of us who were around (Zala and I) KNOW who these people are and were.

Saying in your defense that you never saw eye-to-eye with me, or that you've never been a friend of Zala's is completely beside the point. Saying that doesn't accomplish anything. It merely suggests that you believe your opinion is so valuable that your audience will, too.

The issue here is quite simple, and you could post all the threads on the site in trying to make your case, but none will deny the fact that these people were not one person, and they weren't ever considered trolls. You are the first to ever even voice this line of reasoning or opinion about these people.

I did consider for a moment the possibility that eatbooks, despite writing and posting in the exact same style as writesomething, wasn't her (since you seem to be so convinced), but that's who I remember associating with that name, and apparently so does Zala. The name, the non-capitalization of the letters, the lack of a space between the words, and the Mercurial nature of the name all point to writesomething. Her writing/posting style doesn't match Gemini Nymph's either.

posted June 16, 2009 03:35 AM         

The other side, is that as a forum mod, I'm asking you to either quit now or take it elsewhere - private mail or just somewhere else. BM's new argument thread is a good place. It's kind of like the back of the pub - made for brawling, et al. And it would be on-thread.