posted September 22, 2020 01:11 PM            

quote:

---

POLITICO: Sen. Mitt Romney said he would support a floor vote on President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court, essentially clinching consideration of Trump’s nominee this year despite the impending election.

---

posted September 22, 2020 10:05 PM            

@5:00 p.m. ET

posted September 23, 2020 12:23 PM            

There was a prayer service this morning marking the beginning of this part of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's funeral...

I will include a video of the service when youtube has it available.

Teasel, thankyou for starting the asteroid thread on her.
- http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum28/HTML/005126.html

________________________________________
I've done work on the various USA charts represented at Astrodienst-- I followed the charts, and asteroids during the recent impeachment trial.

The asteroids were soooo ACCURATE to have revealed intentions!
Amazing finds! So much synchronicity.

"Written in the Stars"

QUOTE---
"Astrology has its own spy satellites in the Sky,
and it is a thought to savor that
not even the combined efforts of
the CIA, Mossad, and MI6
can SILENCE what they have to tell!!"

~ Astrologer Dennis Elwell

posted September 26, 2020 06:09 PM            

Here's a run down on #AmyConeyBarrett from our youth-led Judicial Advocacy Team.

Her beliefs harken back to an era:
- before civil rights
- before women's equality and right to choose
- before our country granted entry to people from all countries and cultures
Her confirmation would undo enormous strides we've made over the past several decades.

As a fundamental matter to our mission and advocacy, her confirmation would also threaten our constitutional right to not be shot.

- She has argued that common-sense background checks would “target” the whole Second Amendment.

- Her extreme disregard for legal precedent means that any existing law that has been ruled constitutional, including nearly every gun law, is now at risk.

- She's been described as an ideological heir to fmr Justice Scalia, who gutted gun legislation before he passed.

She is a "Constitutionalist Originalist", meaning she believes the Constitution should be interpreted as it was written in 1787 [when Black people were legally enslaved and women were denied human rights] and not as it applies to life in modern America. As an extreme "Originalist," she believes her own views of the Constitution should be able to override the standards of 200 years of rulings that have cemented our constitutional rights.

So, Barrett is a radical conservative who holds discriminatory beliefs, including blocking young people’s access to abortion, and defending racist corporate policies, like segregation in the workplace. We say this not to scare you, but to show how important it is that we fight.

The courts are not meant to be political institutions, but they have been corrupted by radical conservatives to enact their unpopular, unconstitutional, and deadly agenda on our country.

posted September 26, 2020 06:32 PM            

Loco!

Barrett believes in and implements 'Stare decisis', (‘let the decision stand’), following 'judicial precedents' when deciding cases.

Nevertheless, I can see why you're against Barrett.

Amy Coney Barrett: ‘I Love the United States and I Love the United States Constitution’

posted September 26, 2020 09:39 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by teasel:
Her beliefs harken back to an era:
- before civil rights
- before women's equality and right to choose
- before our country granted entry to people from all countries and cultures
Her confirmation would undo enormous strides we've made over the past several decades.

---

Such hyperbole.

If she was such a backward woman, she wouldn't have gone and gotten a Phd in law, and made a strong career for herself, she would have stayed home barefoot and pregnant.

Yes, her position on women's reproductive choices are at odd with women's right to choose. But that doesn't make her backward. That just makes her someone who strongly disagree with abortion.

posted October 12, 2020 08:36 PM            

quote:

---

Lindsey Graham just read into record that the ABA did not find Judge Barrett unanimously well-qualified to to take a seat on the Supreme Court of the United States.

Just so we're clear, every single person put on SCOTUS this century has been unanimously qualified.

---

posted October 13, 2020 02:05 PM            

he ABA has a history of taking liberal positions on issues including abortion, the death penalty, same-sex marriage, affirmative action, and the Second Amendment. The organization’s ideological bias has long tainted its ratings of judicial nominees. An entire book on the subject was written as early as 1965, Joel B. Grossman’s Lawyers and Judges: The ABA and the Politics of Judicial Selection. A 2006 Wall Street Journal editorial condemned the ABA’s “long history of . . . ideological sandbagging.” A 2012 Political Research Quarterly study found “strong evidence of systematic bias in favor of Democratic nominees.” Senator Ted Cruz pointed out at Wednesday’s hearing that eight of the 15 members of the ABA’s Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary, which evaluates nominees, have together contributed at least $60,000 to Democratic candidates and related organizations, and donations to the campaigns of presidential nominees have gone exclusively to Democrats: Five members donated to Barack Obama’s campaign, three to that of Hillary Clinton, and none to the last three Republican nominees.

posted October 13, 2020 02:31 PM            

Of course babies need to be protected by law.

If their mother won't, then the law must.

------------------------------------------

posted October 13, 2020 06:52 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by shura:
I appreciate the dramatic "this century".
Much more impactful than "6 judges over the past 20 years"

---

Btw, I agree. The ABA has a reliable leftist
bent.

posted October 13, 2020 08:01 PM            

"S.311 - Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act"
http://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/senate-bill/311/text

They're sick.

"...including those who voted against the federal ban on partial birth abortion — the practice of aborting a baby by delivering it legs first and then sucking out the brain."

------------------------------------------

Cruz: Democrats Push False Roe v. Wade Narrative at Barrett Hearing, States Could Legalize Abortion

I do think that it is interesting that our Democratic colleagues, No. 1, do not discuss what would actually happen if there came a day in which Roe v. Wade were overruled, which is namely that it would not suddenly become the case that abortion was illegal but rather it would revert to the status of the laws [as has] been for nearly 200 years of our nation’s history. Which is that the question of the permissibility of abortion is a question for elected legislatures at the state levels and at the federal level.

“It is difficult to dispute that there are great many jurisdictions, including jurisdictions like California and New York, who even if Roe v. Wade were no longer the law of the land, their elected legislatures would almost certainly continue unrestricted access to abortion with virtually no limitations,” Cruz said.

posted October 14, 2020 11:43 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by jwhop:

If the issues of abortion, the death penalty, same-sex marriage, affirmative action, and the Second Amendment didn't exist, their incomes would take a precipitous plunge.

---

This right here. This is the key.

This soft revolution is being funded and publicly supported by powers like the ABA who make money off it - like any other well researched marketing scheme. They've created a golem tho - a risky strategy. The revolution eats its own. One party isn't going to make it out of this alive.

posted October 15, 2020 04:06 PM            

This soft revolution is being funded and publicly supported by powers like the ABA who make money off it - like any other well researched marketing scheme."