|
Author
|
Topic: Judge Chutkan just unsealed Smith's motion arguing J6 immunity does not apply
|
Dhyana
Knowflake Posts: 2625
From: US
Registered: Sep 2019
|
posted October 02, 2024 07:31 PM
  
http://x.com/julie_kelly2/status/1841565400653304224 IP: Logged |
Dhyana
Knowflake Posts: 2625
From: US
Registered: Sep 2019
|
posted October 02, 2024 07:33 PM
This is election interference. Chutkan is doing this in order to damage President Trump right before the election.What a coincidence. Julie Kelly reports that Harris/Walz will try to make J6 a campaign issue. Good luck with that. The country at large and the rust belt - all blue wall states that Harris must win - doesn't care about J6. IP: Logged |
Dhyana
Knowflake Posts: 2625
From: US
Registered: Sep 2019
|
posted October 02, 2024 07:39 PM
quote:
…the defendant acted as a candidate who he pursued multiple criminal means to disrupt, through fraud and deceit, the government function by which votes are collected and counted-a function in which the defendant, as President, had no official role.
This will probably go back to the Supreme Court and my bet is a minority of liberal Justices along with ACB will vote against immunity. IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 193499
From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)!
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 02, 2024 07:39 PM
This is their last hurrah. “We’ll get him this time!” Someone should tell this idiot partisan hack of a judge that Wile E. Coyote never catches the Roadrunner.IP: Logged |
Dhyana
Knowflake Posts: 2625
From: US
Registered: Sep 2019
|
posted October 02, 2024 07:49 PM
Jack Smith's Weak, Watered-Down Election Interference Gambit quote:
By injecting the J6 matter back into the headlines, Smith enjoys the fruits of the DOJ’s attempt to interfere in a presidential election for the third time in a row without doing any labor.snip Smith faces strong headwinds in salvaging his disintegrating case even with a compliant, partisan judge on the bench. In some ways, SCOTUS’ ruling took Smith back to square one.
http://www.declassified.live/p/jack-smiths-weak-watered-down-election IP: Logged |
Dhyana
Knowflake Posts: 2625
From: US
Registered: Sep 2019
|
posted October 02, 2024 07:55 PM
quote:
Jeff Clark, [former U.S. DOJ Double Assistant U.S. Attorney] slams Jack Smith's re-indictment of President Trump...
quote:
“Jack Smith has made largely cosmetic changes to his original indictment. I’m gratified that he removed me—my work was core confidential constitutional advice to President Trump—but the whole indictment, even with the changes, still remains fatally flawed.”
http://gettr.com/user/JeffClarkUS IP: Logged |
teasel
Knowflake Posts: 28646
From: Here
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 02, 2024 08:55 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Dhyana:
This is election interference. Chutkan is doing this in order to damage President Trump right before the election.What a coincidence. Julie Kelly reports that Harris/Walz will try to make J6 a campaign issue. Good luck with that. The country at large and the rust belt - all blue wall states that Harris must win - doesn't care about J6.
You mean, like the FBI opening up Clinton’s file again? Just before the election in 2016? That was election interference, right? If it wasn’t, then neither is this. IP: Logged |
teasel
Knowflake Posts: 28646
From: Here
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 02, 2024 08:55 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Randall:
This is their last hurrah. “We’ll get him this time!” Someone should tell this idiot partisan hack of a judge that Wile E. Coyote never catches the Roadrunner.
No, this happened because the Supreme Court and that other judge, held things up for him, IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 193499
From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)!
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 02, 2024 09:01 PM
This is all going to disappear after the election. IP: Logged |
teasel
Knowflake Posts: 28646
From: Here
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 02, 2024 09:01 PM
He said something like “even if you lost the election, you still have to fight.”He admitted that he knew he’d lost, and he was acting as a candidate, not a president. IP: Logged |
teasel
Knowflake Posts: 28646
From: Here
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 02, 2024 09:16 PM
http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum26/HTML/003071.html IP: Logged |
teasel
Knowflake Posts: 28646
From: Here
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 02, 2024 09:20 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Dhyana:
This is election interference. Chutkan is doing this in order to damage President Trump right before the election.What a coincidence. Julie Kelly reports that Harris/Walz will try to make J6 a campaign issue. Good luck with that. The country at large and the rust belt - all blue wall states that Harris must win - doesn't care about J6.
I'd also like to know how this is election interference, if your man is innocent. What's in these files, that would hurt him? IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 193499
From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)!
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 02, 2024 09:34 PM
Everyone knows President Trump said “peacefully and patriotically” and that he wanted to put 10,000 soldiers there.IP: Logged |
Dhyana
Knowflake Posts: 2625
From: US
Registered: Sep 2019
|
posted October 02, 2024 10:52 PM
The media minions are now going to work to catapult the propaganda to inflict damage on President Trump before the election, or so they imagine. MSDNC has sprung into action and the TDS brigade will eagerly spread the propaganda on social media and LL. D.C. and Democrats will eat it up. The country at large doesn't care. IP: Logged |
Dhyana
Knowflake Posts: 2625
From: US
Registered: Sep 2019
|
posted October 02, 2024 11:13 PM
quote:
The latest lie seeded from Jack Smith’s dirty dossier is that Trump encouraged a riot after the election.This is from Smith’s “immunity” motion. The alleged comment was made by an unidentified campaign aide—not Trump.
President Trump should sue Jack Smith and the media actors propagating this lie. http://x.com/julie_kelly2/status/1841672811787567607
IP: Logged |
Dhyana
Knowflake Posts: 2625
From: US
Registered: Sep 2019
|
posted October 02, 2024 11:20 PM
But Jack Smith didn't charge Trump with inciting the riot. Why not? Because there is no evidence. IP: Logged |
Dhyana
Knowflake Posts: 2625
From: US
Registered: Sep 2019
|
posted October 02, 2024 11:27 PM
quote:
Dear Kamala Democrats:
Please, please talk about January 6th.
Everyday.
Between now and November 5th.
http://gettr.com/user/mrddmia IP: Logged |
teasel
Knowflake Posts: 28646
From: Here
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 02, 2024 11:49 PM
When you lose Fox News..."We’re learning that former President Trump resorted to crime in a bid to cling to power after the 2020 election." -Neil Cavuto http://x.com/ArtCandee/status/1841644460767113226 IP: Logged |
teasel
Knowflake Posts: 28646
From: Here
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 02, 2024 11:50 PM
Trump told Pence that he is too honest. He told him that hundreds of thousands of people were going to hate him, for doing the right thing. He then posted a tweet to remind those people, to be there on January 6th. IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 193499
From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)!
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 03, 2024 12:10 AM
Earth to teasel: Cavuto is a rabid anti-Trumper.Do better with your diatribe. Equating Cavuto with all of FOX News just shows how ignorant your sources are and how gullible you are. IP: Logged |
teasel
Knowflake Posts: 28646
From: Here
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 03, 2024 01:07 AM
From p. 142 of Jack Smith's filing:"Upon receiving a phone call alerting him that Pence had been taken to a secure location, [PERSON 15] rushed to the dining room to inform [Trump] in hopes that the defendant would take action to ensure Pence’s safety. Instead, after [P15] delivered the news, the defendant looked at him and said only, “So what?"" http://x.com/KatiePhang/status/1841579808053997670 IP: Logged |
teasel
Knowflake Posts: 28646
From: Here
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 03, 2024 04:33 AM
And what Trump is going to do is just declare victory. Right? He's going to declare victory. That doesn't mean he's the winner, he's just going to say he's the winner.-Steve Bannon, 3 Days before Election Day IP: Logged |
Randall
Webmaster Posts: 193499
From: I hold a Juris Doctorate (J.D.) and a Legum Magister (LL.M.)!
Registered: Apr 2009
|
posted October 03, 2024 04:54 AM
That’s all you got? That is supposed to be damning information? We don’t even know if any of it is true. And if it is, dialogue is cut off. Zero impact. What a pathetic little man Jack@ss is. And that judge should be removed from the bench. Judges who blatantly violate the law should lose judicial immunity. IP: Logged |
Dhyana
Knowflake Posts: 2625
From: US
Registered: Sep 2019
|
posted October 03, 2024 11:15 AM
quote:
Originally posted by Randall:
That’s all you got? That is supposed to be damning information? We don’t even know if any of it is true. And if it is, dialogue is cut off. Zero impact. What a pathetic little man Jack@ss is. And that judge should be removed from the bench. Judges who blatantly violate the law should lose judicial immunity.
I wonder if Garland/DOJ knew when they chose Jack Smith that he was reversed at the Supreme Court 9-0. However, that wouldn't have mattered to them if their goal was to destroy a political opponent's career, which he accomplished. They miscalculated though with President Trump. The lawfare has failed. IP: Logged |
Dhyana
Knowflake Posts: 2625
From: US
Registered: Sep 2019
|
posted October 03, 2024 02:48 PM
Julie Kelly, who has been reporting on J6 from the beginning, reports on Jack Smith's motion: quote:
A lot of the dirty J6 dossier is a rehash from the J6 Committee, which was a partisan political process. There is supposed to be some boundary to protect due process, the rule of law, and what we expect from our top law enforcement agency, the DOJ, to not turn a political document into a legal motion…which is of course what Jack Smith has done here. Tanya Chutkan, the Obama appointed judge, has a long history of making anti-Trump statements in her courtroom in J6 cases. So all this is is more cherry picked evidence from grand jury testimony, from FBI documents, from records they took from the J6 Committee, to now seed more damaging J6 stories in the media.
IP: Logged |
Lindaland
UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! 
