posted July 14, 2014 10:34 AM            

This is a little rock floating through named after Eros it was closely aligned with the Sun and Antares when i was born and i feel like a sexy ************ for it hahahaha

posted July 14, 2014 10:44 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by amelia28:
This is a hypothesis, is not even a theory as you can't proof or even test what you are saying.

Its more logical to conclude that we don't know enough yet as we are still advancing and growing scientifically; we haven't even started the aquarius age yet so bc we can't proof something it doesn't mean that in the future we will not be able to proof it. I dont think is just our collective unconscious as most people dont know anything about astrology; the vast majority of people don't belief in it.

An astrologer's input on gravitational resonance:

Gravitational Resonance:
Many critics of astrology have repeated the story that the gravity of the midwife has more effect on the newborn baby than the planets. However, astrologers don’t claim that gravity is the basis for natal astrology.

However, it is universally accepted that gravity and orbital resonance of the Sun and the Moon affects the Earth’s oceanic tides and the Earth tide (body tide). Studies have proposed that the tidal forces also affect the Earth's plate tectonics (Continental drift). (Moore 1973) (Scoppola 2006) The tidal force is part of what some astrologers call natural astrology which also includes the study of the coincidence of seismic activity with celestial positions, harvests and weather.

I believe it is premature to set limits on the effect of gravity and orbital resonance on Earth as there is much we don’t understand. For example, gravity is the one known force that does not yet fit into a Unified Field Theory.

Correlation precedes possible Causation:
Dr Percy Seymour, former principal lecturer in astronomy and astrophysics at Plymouth University and previously a researcher at the Royal Observatory in Greenwich, has developed a model to describe the mechanism behind astrology. It is outlined in his title “Astrology: The evidence of Science”. This interview from 1989 may not include his more recent research. In outline, his model is based on the tidal tugs of all the planets in addition to the Sun and Moon which disrupt the Earth’s magnetosphere (magnetic field) which affects the human neural network. It works through the gravitational effects of the planets which are magnified by what Seymour calls ‘magneto tidal resonance’ to affect the sunspot cycle. [more]

Planetary alignments correlate with Sunspot cycles which impact the Earth:
In separate studies, there are peaks within the Sun spot cycle coinciding with the Jupiter/Saturn [helio] conjunction 11.86 years, Jupiter’s perihelion 9.93 years and what astrologer’s call a Sun/Venus conjunction 11.08 years. Solar output (including heat, light, radio, x-rays, neutrinos, solar wind and possibly more) is extremely important as regards all life on Earth (not just climate). Some of these outputs directly affect human behaviour through interactions with the Earth’s electromagnetic field. For example, there are studies showing significant correlations between events such as wars on Earth and the 11 and 22 year sunspot cycle.

Chin Cheh Hung Apparent Relations Between Solar Activity & Solar Tides caused by Planetary Activity [2007 NASA]
Glyn Wainright Jupiter's Influence [2004 New Scientist]
Ian Wilson Planetary Tidal Forces [University of Southern Queensland, Aus 2008]
Four proposals that attempt to account for this planetary/sunspot correlation.

---

posted July 14, 2014 11:37 AM            

As I wrote above, I believe it is unwise and premature to use the current model of the four fundamental interactions (fundamental forces) as a basis to rule out possibilities for several reasons. First, within this model, quantum mechanics and gravity are not yet reconciled. Scientists are still struggling to develop a theory of Quantum Gravity and as a result a Grand Unified Field Theory. In addition, several discoveries within quantum physics suggests that this could in the future become a fertile area for research into a possible mechanism. [more]

QM has shown that physics works with uncertainties and probabilities.

The observer effect, (I prefer Participator effect), suggests that our consciousness may be affected by and may affect external objects.

Quantum Entanglement allows the possibility of atoms remaining interconnected over huge distances. Einstein called it “Spooky action at a distance.” Entanglement has no field and no satisfactory explanation. Zeilinger, the experimenter who demonstrated Quantum Entanglement over 89 miles (144kms) in the Canary Islands claims to be contemplating the possibility of shooting entangled photons to Mars and back to Earth (>100 million kms). [link]

While it is generally, but not universally agreed that an electron or photon, for example, is subject to the wave/particle duality, in theory a planet also exhibits the properties of a wave and a particle."

http://www.astrologer.com/tests/basisofastrology.htm

posted July 14, 2014 12:18 PM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Mystic_Cat:

We have! the Sun has left Cetus and for my generation is reflecting Formalhaut B ..

---

When does the Age of Aquarius begin? And what is the Age of Aquarius? The Age of Aquarius is not part of astronomy. It’s an astrological age, which occurs because of a real motion of Earth known as the precession of the equinoxes, which, for example, causes the identity of the pole star to change over time. The cycle of precession lasts 25,800 years, and there are 12 constellations of the Zodiac. So, roughly every 2,150 years, the sun’s position at the time of the March, or vernal, equinox moves in front of a new Zodiac constellation. The Age of Aquarius begins when the March equinox point moves out of the constellation Pisces and into the constellation Aquarius. When will that be? There’s no definitive answer. Various interpretations give different answers to this often-asked question.

Leonardo da Vinci’s famous Vitruvian Man, a drawing created circa 1487, with the 7 chakras or energy centers indicated. Image via Wikimedia Commons

The constellation Aquarius. Image credit: Hubble Source

Age of Aquarius from astronomical perspective. First of all, we give the answer from an astronomical point of view. The International Astronomical Union (IAU) – which in the 20th century assumed the duty of officially naming and defining all things astronomical – created official constellation boundaries in 1930. From the perspective of astronomy, then, the beginning of the Age of Aquarius is based upon IAU constellation boundaries, which astrologers or New Age practitioners might or might not choose to use in their computations.

According to the Belgian astronomer and mathematical wizard Jean Meeus (bio here), who does adhere to the IAU’s definitions, the sun at the March equinox passed from being in front of the constellation Aries and to being in front of the constellation Pisces in 68 B.C. Looking ahead, again according to Jean Meeus, the March equinox will cross over into the constellation Aquarius in 2597. Once again, these are the astronomical dates, based on IAU constellation boundaries established in 1930.

Other interpretations for the beginning of the Age of Aquarius. The constellations as defined by the IAU are different sizes. Astrologers often like to divide the Zodiac into twelve equal sections. For example, the constellation Pisces – as defined by the IAU – spans more than 30o along the ecliptic, or sun’s annual path in front of constellations of the Zodiac.

Astrologers, though, might disregard the span of the constellation Pisces on the sky’s dome, and instead regard an astrological age as a precise 30o shift of the March equinox in front of the backdrop stars.

But even if you equalize the size of the signs of the Zodiac, you need to consider when the Age of Pisces started to be able to know when the Age of Aquarius begins. Apparently, there’s no firm consensus among astrologers as to when the Age of Pisces began, either. And thus there is no consensus as to when the Age of Aquarius begins. In The Book of World Horoscopes, Nicholas Campion suggests that approximated dates for entering the Age of Aquarius range from 1447 AD to 3597 AD. Campion also reviewed published material on the subject, from astrological sources. He says that most writers claim the Age of Aquarius arrived in the 20th century (29 claims). The 24th century is in second place (12 claims). Campion, by the way, is director of the Sophia Centre and Course Director of the MA in Cultural Astronomy and Astrology at the University of Wales, Lampeter. See Campion’s credentials here.

Some astrologers say the Age of Aquarius actually began in 2012. That’s because they believe the star Regulus in the constellation Leo the Lion marked the ancient border between the constellations Leo and Cancer. This star moved to within 30o of the September equinox point in 2012, meaning that Regulus left the sign Leo to enter the sign Virgo in that year. Presuming equal-sized constellations in antiquity, that places the border of the constellations Pisces and Aquarius at 150o west of Regulus, or at the March equinox point. By this reckoning, the Age of Aquarius started in 2012.

But again, although there is firm reckoning by many for the beginning of this astrological age, there is no agreement. Wikipedia lists what various writers have claimed.

To reiterate, we at EarthSky look at the subject from an astronomical persepective. If any knowledgeable astrologers out there would like to show us other ways of determining the Age of Aquarius, please do! We welcome your comments.

____________________________________________

I suppose yes it could have started already; I thought it would start in the year 2597 but apparently there are many theories as to when it would start.....

posted July 14, 2014 12:23 PM            

Nothing is as it was. The people, society and the consciousness of mankind today is changing rapidly. Norms and values dissolve, hierarchies and authoritarian structures break down, the illusion is unmasked, and subtle realities are perceived more and more consciously. Since the beginning of the 20th Century, especially since the late 1960s, this process has increased. Esoterism attributes these momentous changes to the constellation of Aquarius which sends spiritual impulses to mankind.
When does the time of spiritual change begin?

People who are susceptible to atmospheric impressions feel that a period of spiritual change has come. But if we investigate when the Age of Aquarius actually begins or has begun, remarkable differences become obvious. The International Astronomical Union (IAU) dates the beginning to in the year 2601. Astrology declares the year 2375 the beginning of the Aquarian Age. The Anthroposophist Rudolf Steiner (1861-1925) and the spiritual leader of the Lectorium Rosicrucianum, Jan van Rijckenborgh (1896-1968), come to different conclusions. While Steiner calls 3574 the year of Aquarius, van Rijckenborgh indicates the year 1908 as the relevant date. That makes a difference of 1666 years. What is right?
Astronomical and astrological answers

The different accounts have their origin in the different foundations of the beginning of the Aquarian Age. The IAU has an astronomical foundation. Its calculations are based on the the projection of the physical constellations on the ecliptic. The ecliptic means the plane of Earth’s orbit around the Sun, the imaginary boundary of which forms a large circle, the celestial equator. The terrestrial equator is positioned at an angle of 23.5 degrees inclined to the ecliptic. The projection of the twelve signs of the zodiac therefore cover different segments of the ecliptic. Astrologers, on the other hand, proceed from the theory that the celestial equator has to be divided into twelve equal segments of 30 degrees each, the astrological zodiac.

Both approaches disagree about the extent of the signs of the zodiac, and thus in their calculations come to different results about the beginning of the Aquarius era.
The perspective of astrosophy

Again, Rudolf Steiner and Jan van Rijckenborgh show a completely diverse approach to the the Aquarian Age. Although both in principle have an astrosophic perspective on the facts, their dates differ by 1666 years. To solve this mystery, one must not view the sky, but reflect upon man.

When does a person begin to exist? With conception? With the first movement in the womb? At the moment of physical birth? Or has the person really arrived in the world when he is a member of society as an adult? The answer depends also on the the perspective of the observer. Jan van Rijckenborgh and Rudolf Steiner are distinguished by the point of view from which they look at the Aquarius era.

To illustrate this, it is important to remember that the Aquarian impulse is an influence from the cosmos. Man responds to it in three ways: With his mind, soul and body. Everything that moves a person begins in his mind. The Aquarian impulse expressed itself in the collective mind of humanity first as an idea. This idea remains abstract in the beginning, without emotional or physical energy. At this stage man only thinks, speaks and writes about the new idea.

posted July 23, 2014 09:26 PM            

http://www.linda-goodman.com/ubb/Forum24/HTML/205632.html

"Chariklo was the wife of Chiron. She was discovered in 1997, and is about compassion and emotional connection, among other themes. She is about the "Need for definition between intimacy and personal space. Seeking definition of human interaction and boundaries. Desire to help without co-dependent interference. Negative: invasive, manipulative, solicitous without intent to respond, aloof. Positive: an shoulder to cry upon, well defined relating agenda, counselor of independence vs. intimacy.

Key words for Chariklo: intimacy and personal space, compassion and emotional connection

planetwiki.planetwaves.net/index.php

posted July 26, 2014 06:22 AM            

quote:

---

Originally posted by soren:
OH yeah well why is CERES considered the most significant asteroid and why is the sun the most influencial part of the chart. Just coincedence that its the biggest object in our solar system???

Edit: Oops I thought you said my beliefs were erroneous and that JIM could prove me wrong. My bad. But still I'm pretty sure sizes and distance, which would metaphysically have a strong effect on us, which is how I believe astrology works, metaphysically and NOT psychically, are quite important. So yeah

---