posted August 08, 2006 01:28 PM         

Of late, I have thought about this.....thinking about it is fine....we all experiment in our minds, dont we....

But as for doing it.....a completely different matter.

Dont most men have enough challenge understanding one woman...

Why go for double or treble the complication...

Of course the other way around....women with a few men, well that would be a breeze.............

NOT !!!!!!!!

posted August 09, 2006 04:53 AM         

I cant help but think (on some level) its a bit of a cop out for men to have more than one partner at a time....I think it has a lot to do with committment phobia....not for all men of course, but in general the ones that would be drawn to this may be very detached in themselves....and scared to dive into the depths of love. Of course they could get a little of something from each woman, whilst not having to give or commit on a deeper level.

Whereas for women I think it would be for need of love.....

How interesting.....it would in some respects serve two different functions for the sexes....

Venus and Mars hey?

posted August 17, 2006 11:22 AM         

Too much hassle....

posted August 30, 2006 09:48 AM         

all kidding aside, I have felt in my soul that this would be the perfect arrangment for me. I am leo, and for some really crazy reason, i tend to choose men who are somewhat detached...dunno why. Sometimes I just think there is too much of me to go around. Sometimes I drive my virgo crazy with all the attention. He'd prolly love it if it was divided between two men. I even have the 'third party' in mind!

I agree that actually DOING it would be sort of well, different. I already have two kids, and not sure that I want more...also, there's the livinsep in one bed, do yure out. i mean, do you all sleep in one bed, do you even live in one house? who pays the bills?

I wonder, if it were an accepted prectice in our society, how it would shake out...multiple husbands, or multiple wives? would some sun signs be more prone to this?

good topic, and something i think about a lot. wish they'd change the marriage laws and let the experiment begin! surely there's an aqua out there who would be willing to solve the mystery!

posted August 30, 2006 01:25 PM         

quote:

---

financially support them without committing welfare fraud

---

posted September 02, 2006 12:13 PM         

No thanks. I couldn't deal with that many people dictating my life. *shudders*

don't think you'd find too many Saggies up for it

At first glance, there might appear space and freedom in it, but I think the everyday reality would be far different. After all, you'd all have to work together to make it work.

Personally, also I'm too romantically intense to consider it.

posted September 06, 2006 03:23 PM         

the sea captain...my friend, the fishman is one...

the man i have already is only dominating in bed...aside from that, he isnt very attentive. he's a good father, help, etc...but he doesnt like to go 'inside' of my head very often.

the fishman lives inside my head. he's just not very close very often. i could definately see how it would work to 'visit' the fishman at his place and give my husband a 'break'. husband, a virgo, finds it hard to give and take the amount of attention i need. fishman is the same, but when he gets off the boat for a limited time, is absolutely CRAVING attention and wants to give it too.

Financially, WOW. 3 breadwinners? heck yeah. i mean, btw us all...we are talking over 100k a year! fabulous!

I don't see it as a way for men to control women. In fact, I see it working out in the exact opposite...the woman comes out ahead!

posted September 06, 2006 06:46 PM         

B) Another woman in my kitchen? -
HELL NO!!!

posted September 12, 2006 04:47 AM         

But the fantasy of it is one thing....the reality another....

I love the idea of two lovers (or more), but still not sure whether it would work for me, because I am a woman who would get very involved emotionally and someone would definatley get hurt....