Lindaland
  Global Unity 2.0
  and for those in the military... (Page 3)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
This topic is 4 pages long:   1  2  3  4 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   and for those in the military...
Happy Dragon
Knowflake

Posts: 183
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted July 14, 2009 07:00 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Happy Dragon     Edit/Delete Message
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
re :

** removing hussein from office after he got too big for his britches with the weapons we furnished him..
..katatonic **
( ok .. ubb code lazy .. scrolling back lazy .. skimming thru somewhat )
i understand that to be a quote from ~ katatonic ~

~ jwop ~ replied ..
** The truth is that NO US weapons or weapons systems were found in Iraq..not in the first Gulf **

then .. that list ..
some weapons 'n utility systems 'n more than nasty stuff .. sent .. or was authorised to be sent ..
by reagan and co.
.. scene .. the iran iraq conflict .. heavy duty losses on both sides ..

ffwd to gulf war .. .. no usa weapons found ..
of what was there .. probably many if not most destroyed in the iran-iraq war
very heavy losses on both sides ..

as for the bio ordinance ..
go prove a bug was manufactured somewhere .. i.e. bugs in saddams hands ..
in his storage systems .. ..
'n his bio weapons were probably destroyed at the end of the gulf war ( i'm assuming .. not checked that )

anyway back to the first quote .. i.e. " too big for his britches with the weapons we furnished him "
( "we" being usa i'm assuming there ?
( i.e. might be some uk manufactured systems ..
( or uk manufactured sold on from jordan possibly
anyhow .. no .. some howitzers and utility systems do not constitute large britches at all ..
neither would having some chemical bio weaponry .. 'cause it's very hard to deploy effectively ..
yes it worked against the iranian troops .. and that kurdish village ..
but it's still not a reliable weapon to use consistently ..

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

as for 'left' 'n 'right' .. on whose watch etc
which i quess seems to be the basic underlying conflict ..
between debaters on GU ..
well .. the above was a tech observation ..
i'd be more or less clueless in the main as to which usa p.party did what and when ..

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
good to see ~ wheels return ~ :-))

IP: Logged

AcousticGod
Knowflake

Posts: 1327
From: acousticgod@sbcglobal.net
Registered: Apr 2009

posted July 14, 2009 07:26 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for AcousticGod     Edit/Delete Message
I think you've got it about right. The things the U.S. furnished were long gone by the time the first Bush went into Iraq.

IP: Logged

Happy Dragon
Knowflake

Posts: 183
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted July 14, 2009 07:43 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for Happy Dragon     Edit/Delete Message
i was just re reading that list ..
so .. bugs 'n chemicals authorised after iran iraq cease fire ..
chems used against the kurds ..
ok that's business or 'nasty' .. it's an emotive thing
so suppliers were good or bad depending on opinion ..

as for being found after the gulf war ..
well what survived .. probably hard if not impossible to tell were it came from ..
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
( edited to add )
a while back .. went looking at this to compare to ww1 military scenerio
~ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Iraq_War ~
thought there might be list of weapon types by supplier nation ..
no-go ..

israel supported iran at the time .. i think but not sure .. they supplied some ordinance of somesort ..
now they're are at each others throats potentialy .. ironic ..
but not suprising ..
~~~~~~~~~~~~
'n why WOMD where thought to exist ..
given a WOMD would be a tech. effective system
i.e. regarding 'effectiveness' ..
well 'mass destruction' re chem or bio is a possibilty but not a guarantee .. imho ..

( edit to add ..
ok .. he was trying to aquire a nuke capabilty ..
if he had succeeded .. that would def, be mass destruction ..
all the better .. or necessary .. to take him out ..
( given his personality and style of governing )
i rekon most sane world leaders would have privately agreed on that one ..

anyhowz ..
i thought the 'misinformation ruse ' fed from the iraqi opposition to mr s. hussein and co. ..
was a plausible theory ( or was is known to be so .. i can;t remember off-hand )

and .. those kuwaiti oilfeilds had to be protected ..
that be common sense here .. i.e. re supplies 'n business etc .. economics 'n such ..
( had saddam aquired them .. more revenue for His ambitions .. more revenue for effective WoMD's ..
not to mention what he would have done to the kuwaiti population .. .. )

saddam was known to be the biggest threat at the time
( in the mid-east ) ..
he went too far .. for whatever reason ..
and the coalition took him out ..
saddam presented the opportunity through wanting those oil fields ..
he played .. he lost ..

IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 1588
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted July 14, 2009 10:34 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message
edit: not enough time to get into it again now.

IP: Logged

AcousticGod
Knowflake

Posts: 1327
From: acousticgod@sbcglobal.net
Registered: Apr 2009

posted July 15, 2009 02:05 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for AcousticGod     Edit/Delete Message
I think it might be more accurate to say that Saddam seemed like the biggest threat. In actuality, he was doing a decent job at posturing. People didn't know what he had, and he let them believe the worst because it was in his own interest to keep his neighbors from thinking that they could easily conquer his land. He was anti-religion, so I imagine that all potential challenges would be extremely distasteful to him.

He was a paranoid ruler, too. In order to keep his own army from rising against him, he strictly forbade his commanders from communicating and sharing information with one another, which is obviously extraordinarily ineffective if he ever hoped to have them do anything in tandum. He had spies watch these commanders. If a commander wanted to find out what a different commander was doing he'd have to covertly devise his own method of spying to garner that information.

IP: Logged

Happy Dragon
Knowflake

Posts: 183
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted July 15, 2009 10:49 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Happy Dragon     Edit/Delete Message
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
after i shut-down .. sort of realised i think of the iraq war as a continuation of the gulf war ..
with 9/11 in between .. ..
i thought i remember'd something about components for nuke triggers ..
went looking here .. saw something about 'yellow cake' ..
didn't read the lot in detail ..
~ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_War ~
suffice to say .. if he had succeeded in his WoMD ambitions ..
he might have co-operated with the likes of bib-laden ..
( and not to mention another potential go at kuwait .. or elsewhere )

i also have a tendency to retrace ..
i.e. howitzers to saddam against iran .. so my head goes back to the revolution in iran and the hostage crisis
( as to why the usa would support one against the other .. iran or iraq )
and with the mid-east as it is today .. i go back at least to 1918 and the resultant land borders etc etc ..

originaly just wanted to put forward why usa weapons might not have been found after the iraq-war ..

saddams thinking process be subject i'd be curious about ..
he surely must have known he couldn't win in a conventional military engagement with the usa ..
was he relying on the tactical precedents of the noth vietnamese commanders
looked for quote .. timed out on patience :-) .. went along the lines of ..
' as long as they stay in the field and engage the enemy .. without suffering any major defeat ..
then the other side eventually loses '

i rekon if you took a survey of male taurean sun signs in your neck of the woods ..
the basic underlying thought would be that saddam was a mad and dangerous bull that needed dispatching
( substitute 'animal' for 'bull' for those not into astrology )

~~~~~~~~~
*** He was a paranoid ruler, too. In order to keep his own army from rising against him, he strictly forbade his commanders from communicating and sharing information with one another, which is obviously extraordinarily ineffective if he ever hoped to have them do anything in tandum. He had spies watch these commanders. If a commander wanted to find out what a different commander was doing he'd have to covertly devise his own method of spying to garner that information. ***

i think many of the arab countries have a traditional history of keeping their armies weak in a sense ..
so as not to form a threat to the leadership ..
am thinking more of the soviet influenced countries .. e.g. iraq since '58
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Republic of Iraq :

.. The reinstated Hashemite monarchy lasted until 1958, when it was overthrown by a coup d'etat of the Iraqi Army, known as the 14 July Revolution. The coup brought Brigadier General Abdul Karim Qassim to power. He withdrew from the Baghdad Pact and established friendly relations with the Soviet Union, but his government lasted only until the February 1963 coup, when it was overthrown by Colonel Abdul Salam Arif.
.. Salam Arif died in 1966 and his brother, Abdul Rahman Arif, assumed the presidency. In 1968, Rahman Arif was overthrown by the Arab Socialist Baath Party. Ahmed Hasan Al-Bakir became the first Baath President of Iraq but then the movement gradually came under the control of Saddam Hussein al Tikriti, who acceded to the presidency and control of the Revolutionary Command Council (RCC), then Iraq's supreme executive body, in July 1979.
~ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq ~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
iraq has quite a history of overthrows since '58 .. be the m.o. to become 'leader' ..

IP: Logged

Happy Dragon
Knowflake

Posts: 183
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted July 15, 2009 11:01 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for Happy Dragon     Edit/Delete Message
.. jailed for insult poem ..
~ http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/world/middle_east/8150687.stm ~

.. be afraid of poems as well ..

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
wandering off topic ..
although slightly more relevant than ;-) .. :

.. strange jibes ..
~ http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/low/world/asia-pacific/8143047.stm ~

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 737
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted July 15, 2009 02:38 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message
Hmmm, the useful life of fighter aircraft, tanks, armored personnel carriers, mortars, artillery and light weapons is measured in decades...not merely a few years.

You can look it up for yourselves as to how long the F-15 and F-16 fighters have been in service and how long the US tank..prior to the A1 Abrams had been in service with the US military. Same thing for artillery pieces. The M1 Abrams tank has been in the US inventory since before the first Gulf War...that's about 18 years and it's still going strong...best tank in the world after all those years.

Someone here said the US broke off diplomatic relations with Iraq but that's backwards. Iraq broke off diplomatic relations with the US over US support for Israel in one of the Israeli/Arab wars.

By 1983 there was interest in restoring relations with Iraq, mainly because Saddam hated the Iranian leadership. Rumsfeld went to Iraq in 1983.

Now, from 1983 to 1991..date of the 1st Gulf War, is only 8 years. Yet, no US military gear, weapons or weapons systems were found in Iraq nor used against US or coalition forces in the war.

Major weapons systems don't get replaced or become obsolete in 8 years.

Saddam did not have US weapons or weapons systems or he would have used them in the 1st Gulf War. US weapons were and still are far superior to Soviet supplied and or French aircraft, tanks ect.

So, here's something which could have been found with a simple search and it details the weapons found in Iraq after the 2nd Gulf War.

Iraqi Warplanes Found Buried in Desert
Friday, August 01, 2003

WASHINGTON — Some of Iraqi's missing air force has turned up down below.

Search teams, some hunting for Iraq's alleged weapons of mass destruction (search), found dozens of fighter jets from Iraq's air force buried beneath the sands, U.S. officials say.

At least one Cold War-era MiG-25 interceptor was found when searchers saw the tops of its twin tail fins poking up from the sands, said one Pentagon official familiar with the hunt. He said search teams have found several MiG-25s and Su-25 ground attack jets buried at al-Taqqadum air field west of Baghdad (search).

Iraq's air squadrons were a no-show during the war, and U.S. military officials supposed their pilots stayed grounded because they believed they were overmatched by American and British air power.

Various officials differed in opinion as to whether the buried aircraft could ever fly again. Many of the planes were buried intact with minimal efforts to protect them from the sand.

Rep. Porter Goss, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said the discovery pointed to how far Iraqi forces went to conceal their activities. The Florida Republican was briefed on the discovery during his recent trip to Iraq.

"Our guys have found 30-something brand new aircraft buried in the sand to deny us access to them," Goss said. "These are craft we didn't know about."

He said the planes were not considered weapons of mass destruction for which coalition troops have been searching for months, "but they are weapons (Iraq) tried to hide."

Prewar intelligence estimates from earlier this year said Saddam Hussein's regime had about 300 combat aircraft, all of them survivors of the Gulf War. Most were aging Soviet-era MiGs, Sukhois and older French Mirage fighters. The best are MiG-29 Fulcrums, one of the most advanced fighters produced in the Soviet era.

Allied warplanes bombed several planes on the ground, and U.S. Air Force officials say no Iraqi planes were detected flying a combat mission during the war.

Australian troops, who on April 16 captured the Al Asad Airfield, 112 miles northwest of Baghdad, found scores of fighter aircraft, mostly Soviet-era MiGs but also three advanced MiG-25 Foxbats, the fastest combat aircraft today. Helicopters, radar systems and millions of pounds of explosives also were found.

The MiGs had escaped detection during the coalition bombing campaign. Some were buried or hidden under trees or covered with camouflage sheets. Aircraft destroyed in prior wars were littered across the airfield to make it more difficult for bombers to choose their targets.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,93483,00.html

The nation which did have US military gear was Iran. Iraq did not.

There is a vast difference between dual use chemicals and weaponized war materials.

So US companies sold Iraq pesticides, sold Iraq steel, aluminum, other chemicals; so what? Iraq was not under any embargo by the US at the time. They were free to purchase what they wanted from the US and other manufacturing nations; and they did.

Someone here attempted to say the US sold Saddam WMD. That's bullshiit. The US supplied Iraq biological reference samples from the CDC as they routinely do to most any nation who asks...for use in disease research.

There's a vast difference between biological reference samples and weaponized diseases like Anthrax and others.

katatonic, this was found as a heading on the site from which you posted information. I find it impossible to accept this as authentic or even useful in discussion of the US supplying Saddam military weapons.
"A friend told him" doesn't cut it for me.

"Most of what follows in the chronology below was forwarded by a friend. I added a few items. "
http://deepblade.net/archive/Iraq_chron.htm

Hi Pid, hope you and Bear are well and happy.

IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 1588
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted July 15, 2009 05:22 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message
i'm not going to argue sources with you anymore, jwhop, since you use fox news which i consider completely UNcredible with alarming regularity, and other admitted OPINION blogs which are no more credible and don't supply any sources themselves... i am not a research robot and i have learned that any source i might quote (at YOUR insistence) will be discredited and i really am past caring. there appears to be no meeting ground between us when you respond to a question from me with a tirade about my supposed motives, attitudes etc. pure smokescreen.

anyway this thread was not about the gulf war(s), former presidents' motives or any of that. it started with some quotes that i deleted because i didn't want them taken the wrong way. my first actual entry on pg 1 expressed sorrow that our imperialist tendencies put good men and women at risk of their lives and in the position of killing many innocent people. for what?

using iraq as a decoy area for terrorists may sound smart but it just shows a lack of care for lives outside our boundaries. and i don't believe that was the reason. call it intuition but i am not going into the "source wars" with this. we went there to take hussein out and put iraq under our control until we feel it is secured in OUR interest and i believe we will be there for a long time because whether he wants out or not, obama has inherited the same kind of mess that earlier presidents found themselves in in vietnam. afghanistan! give me a break!

i don't support right or left, have been a non-party voter for decades. i agree with both sides on some issues and disagree with them on others. i seriously disagree with policy which makes us the police force of the world even though i know many think it is for our "safety".

as i said in the beginning, i think "defending" our country should be done at home not in someone else's backyard. the only reason bush and reagan came into this is because of the chant that bush protected us by taking it abroad. (and when i said 9/11 happened on his watch i was called a liar) which no amount of fighting in iraq could prevent, in fact it ties up a lot of our resources over there. it's not just terrorists fighting there, remember? it's OUR guys, everyone of them someone's bear, many of whom might make our home defenses work better if they were here on the spot and not in 130* desert heat.

and all that at a prohibitive cost that has seriously contributed to putting our economy in tatters...for which naysayers blame the administration that inherited it.

of course bringing them home would probably mean reducing their numbers and i'm not sure if the higher-up military would be happy to sit by while that happens. to me it is all "just a mess" to quote a clip of johnson talking about vietnam i heard the other day.

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 737
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted July 15, 2009 08:28 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message
quote:
i'm not going to argue sources with you anymore, jwhop, since you use fox news which i consider completely UNcredible with alarming regularity, and other admitted OPINION blogs which are no more credible and don't supply any sources themselves...katatonic

Right katatonic; Fox News is totally unreliable.

I understand your aversion to knocking the props out from under your own arguments; hence the lack of research...before you put your foot in your mouth.

If not Fox News, then how about this? As I said before..numerous times; you could have found this information with only a cursory search...hours or research not needed.

Notice, not one US produced aircraft was found in Iraq. Notice, there is no reports of any US produced aircraft ever being sold to Iraq. Notice, the Iraqi air force consisted of Russian and French aircraft.

Iraqi Air Force
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Iraqi Air Force or IQAF (Arabic: Al Quwwa al Jawwiya al Iraqiya ÇáÞæÉ ÇáÌæíÉ ÇáÚÑÇÞíÉ) is the military branch in Iraq responsible for the policing of international borders, surveillance of national assets and aerial operations. The IQAF also acts as a support force for the Iraqi Navy and the Iraqi Army and it also allows Iraq to rapidly deploy its developing Army.

It was first founded in 1931, when Iraq was under British rule, with a handful of pilots and continued to operate British aircraft until the 14 July Revolution in 1958, where the new Iraqi government began increased diplomatic relationships with the Soviet Union. The air force used both Soviet and British aircraft throughout the 1950s and 1960s. When Saddam Hussien came to power in 1979, the air force grew very quickly after Iraq ordered more Soviet and French aircraft. Its peak came a few years after the long and bloody Iran-Iraq War, in 1988, when it consisted of over 950 aircraft, becoming one of the largest air forces in the region. Its downfall came after the Gulf War and when the coalition forces enforced no-fly zones. Iraq's air force eventually collapsed after he was forced out from power after the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Currently, the IQAF is rebuilding and receiving most of its funding and aircraft from the United States.

The Royal Iraqi Air Force (RIrAF) was founded on April 22, 1931 under British guardianship.[3] Before the creation of the new air force, the RAF Iraq Command was in charge of all British forces in Iraq in the 1920s and early 1930s.[4] The RIrAF was based at the airport in the Washash neighborhood of Baghdad, and consisted of five pilots (aeronautics students from the RAF college at RAF Cranwell, and 32 aircraft mechanics.[3] The original five pilots were Natiq Mohammed Khalil al-Tay, Mohammed Ali Jawad, Hafdhi Aziz, Akrem Talib Mushtaq, and Musa Ali.[3] During the early years of the Royal Iraqi Air Force, they mainly received aircraft from the United Kingdom.[4]

In the years following Iraqi independence, the Air Force was still dependent on the RAF. The Iraqi government allocated the majority of its military expenditure to the Iraqi Army and by 1936 the Royal Iraqi Air Force had only 37 pilots and 55 aircraft. The following year, the Air Force showed some growth, increasing its number of pilots to 127.[5]


[edit] 1940s
The RIrAF was not used in a combat role until being decimated in the 1941 Anglo-Iraqi War, and then in 1948 in their war against the newly-created state of Israel.[4] During the Anglo-Iraqi War, the RIrAF under Rashid Ali received aid from the Luftwaffe to fight the British. When the First Arab-Israeli War erupted, the RIrAF was still recovering from its destruction by the British[4] . Even though the RIrAF was still contained a modern aircraft inventory, the RIrAF played a small role in the first war against Israel. In 1948 to 1949 the RIrAF dispatched Avro Anson training-bombers to Jordan, from where these flew a number of attacks against the Israelis[4] . Part of the Ansons were replaced by the more modern fighter the Hawker Fury. These aircraft flew only two missions against Israel in Iraqi markings before most of the available examples were given to the Egyptians.[4] All together 14 Hawker Furies were delivered but only 6 were operational by the 7 of June, 1948.[4] Despite all these early problems the RIrAF was to continue purchasing Furies, and acquired a total of 38 F.Mk.1s, and 4 two-seaters.[4] The only claimed aircraft kill of the Fury belonging to the RIrAF was an Israeli Boeing B-17 Flying Fortress bomber.[4] The IQAF also received the first 3 de Havilland Dove VIP-transports which entered in 1951.[4]


[edit] 1950s and early 1960s
During the 1950s, the RIrAF went through a series of important developments where their monarchy government was toppled in 1958 resulting in the change of arms imports from countries.[4] From 1950 to 19 most of the RIrAF aircraft were from the United Kingdom. The first jet fighters, the de Havilland Vampire of the RIrAF were delivered in 1953. The RIrAF also received de Havilland Venoms and Hawker Hunters during the mid-1950s.[4] In 1954 and 1956, a total of 19 de Havilland Vampire jet fighters were delivered, and with the help of U.S. funding, 14 ex-RAF Hawkers were delivered.[4] They also received 4 obsolete Bristol 170 Freighters in 1953.[4]

After the 14 July Revolution in 1958, when the King of Iraq was overthrown, the country increased diplomatic and political relationships with the Warsaw Pact countries, while simultaneously severed relations with western nations.[4] The Iraqi Air Force (IQAF) dropped "Royal" from its name after the revolution.[4] The Communists were swift to start supplying MiG-17s, and later MiG-19 and MiG-21 fighters, as well as Ilyushin Il-28 bombers to the new Iraqi government.[4] They also received 13 Ilyushin Il-14 transports in 1957 from Poland.[citation needed] The first MiG-17s were first delivered in 1958 to replace the de Havilland Vampires.[citation needed] It is possible that during the late 1960s and or early 1970s for a few additional MiG-17 examples were purchased and then forwarded to either Syria or Egypt.[4] The IQAF received about 50 MiG-19s during the early 1960s but some of these aircraft were given to Egypt. In 1966, Assyrian Iraqi Captain Munir Redfa flew his MiG-21F-13 to Israel. Two years later, Israel gave his MiG-21F-13 to the United States for evaluation under the code-name "Have Donut".[6]

Another coup in 1962 brought Iraq closer to the NATO powers, and as a result, more Hawker Hunters were ordered by the IQAF.[4] For several years aircraft imports from the Communist Eastern European nations ceased--until 1966, where a batch of MiG-21PF interceptors was purchased from the Soviet Union.[4]


[edit] Six-Day War
During the Six-Day War in June 1967, the Iraqi Air Force had many planes destroyed by an Israeli strike on one of its bases on the first day of the war.[citation needed] The Iraqi Air Force regrouped and struck back, however, as it bombed several air bases and land targets on the fifth day, and it also played a significant role in supporting Jordanian troops.[3] As well, the Iraqi Air Force assembled a special task force of foreign pilots to take the vanguard, and on June 6, Iraqi Hawker Hunters some piloted by East German, Polish, and Pakistani pilots destroyed seven Israeli planes in air combat.[4] Due to these volunteers, the IQAF were successfully able to defend their air bases in western Iraq from additional Israeli attacks.[4] On the same day the IQAF also were able to break through Israeli air spaces and destroyed five Israeli aircraft in air fighting.[3]


[edit] 1970s and the Yom Kippur War
This section needs additional citations for verification.
Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (August 2008)

Throughout this decade, the IQAF grew in size and capability, as new treaties with the Eastern European nations were to bring large numbers of relatively modern fighter aircraft to the air force.[citation needed] The Iraqi government was never satisfied with the East supplying them and while they were purchasing modern fighters like the MiG-21 and the Sukhoi Su-7, they began persuading the French to sell Mirage F-1s fighters and later Jaguars.[4]

Before the Yom Kippur War, the IQAF sent 12 Hawker Hunters to Egypt where they stayed to fight; only 1 survived the war.[4] The IQAF first received their Sukhoi Su-7s in 1968; they were originally stationed in Syria. Aircraft deployed to Syria suffered heavy losses due to Israeli aircraft and SAMs.[citation needed] In addition, they were hit with friendly fire from Syrian SAMs.[citation needed] A planned attack on the 8th of October was canceled due to these heavy losses as well as disagreements with the Syrian government.[citation needed] Eventually, all aircraft besides several Sukhoi Su-7s were withdrawn from bases in Syria. During the war in October 1973, the first air strike against Israeli bases in Sinai was composed of Iraqi planes; they hit artillery sites and Israeli tanks, and they also claimed to have destroyed 12 Israeli fighters in air combat.[citation needed] Shortly after the war, the IQAF ordered 14 Tu-22Bs and two Tu-22Us from the USSR as well as Raduga Kh-22 missiles from Romania.[citation needed] By 1979, 10 Tu-22Bs and 2 Tu-22Us were delivered.[citation needed]

The 1970s also saw a series of fierce Kurdish uprisings in the north of the country against Iraq.[citation needed] With the help of the Shah of Iran, the Kurds received arms and supplies including modern SAMs as well as some Iranian soldiers.[citation needed] The IQAF suffered heavy casualties fighting the Kurds, so they began using their new Tu-22s in combat against them, as they were able to avoid a greater percentage of SAMs due to their greater mobility.[4] During the mid-1970s, tensions with Iran were high but was later resolved with the Algiers Treaty.[citation needed]


[edit] 1980s and War with Iran
Between 1980 and the summer of 1990, the number of combat aircraft in the IQAF went from 332 to over 950.[3] Before the Iraqi invasion of Iran, the IQAF had expected 16 modern Dassault Mirage F.1EQs from France and were also in the middle of receiving a total of 240 new aircraft and helicopters from their Eastern European allies.[citation needed] When Iraq invaded Iran in late September 1980, the Communists and the French stopped delivery of additional aircraft to Iraq but resumed deliveries a few months later.[citation needed]

The IQAF had to instead fight with obsolete MiG-21 Fishbeds and MiG-23 Floggers.[7] The MiG-21 was the main interceptor of the force while their MiG-23s were used for ground attack.[citation needed] These aircraft were still no match for the Iranian F-4 Phantoms and F-14 Tomcats, however.[citation needed] On the first day of the war, a formation of MiG-23s and MiG-21s raided airports and airfields of the Iranian Air Force, but the Iranian aircraft were not heavily damaged because of strong concrete hangers that housed the planes.[citation needed] In retaliation for these aerial attacks, the Iranian Air Force launched Operation Kaman 99 a day after the war was launched, where 58 F-4s , Most of the Iranian F-4 Phantoms planes were shot down by the Iraqi anti-aircraft missiles systems, the main reason of the Iranian failure was the lack of experience of the Iranian fresh pilots how had replaced the former pilots who were executed after the revolution by the revolutionary guards claiming that they were loyal to the shah , and the lack of the American spare parts due to the sanctions .


During late 1981, it was soon clear that the modern Mirage F-1s and the Soviet MiG-25s were effective against the Iranians, though they suffered considerable losses to Iranian interceptors.[citation needed] Some of these aircraft were reportedly even when flown by foreign mercenaries and "advisors".[7] The IQAF began to use their new Eastern weaponry which included Tu-22KD/KDP bombers, equipped with Kh-22M/MP air-to-ground missiles, MiG-25s equipped with Kh-25 air-to-ground missiles as well as Kh-25 and Kh-58 anti-radar missiles and even MiG-27s, equipped with Kh-29L/T missiles.[7] In 1983, to satisfy the Iraqis waiting for their F-1s, Super Etendards were leased to Iraq. The Iranian gunships and the Iranian fleet suffered saver damage by these attacks interceptors.[7]


Stark listing following two hits by Exocet missilesThe IQAF generally played a major role in the war against Iran, it had bombed airfields in Tehran and other Iranian cities.[3] The air force had a more successful role attacking tankers and other vessels using Exocet missiles on their French built Mirage F-1s. On May 17, 1987, an Iraqi F-1 mistakenly launched two Exocet anti-ship missiles into the American frigate USS Stark crippling the vessel and killing 37 sailors.[3]

By 1987, the air force consisted of 40,000 men, of whom about 10,000 were apart of the Air Defense Command.[3] Its main base was in Baghdad and other major bases in Basra. The IQAF operated from 24 main operating bases and 30 dispersal bases, with nuclear-hardened shelters and extensive runways.[3] At the end of the war, the IQAF played a significant role in halting Iran's last military offensive, resulting in Iraq's relative success in this bloody and prolonged conflict.[3]

By the end of the war the IQAF succeeded in neutralizing the Iranian Air force.


[edit] 1990s- Persian Gulf War and no-fly zones
In August 1990, Iraq had one of the largest air forces in the region even after the long Iran–Iraq War. The air force at that time contained more than 500 aircraft in their inventory. Theoretically, the IQAF should have been 'hardened' by the conflict with Iran, but post-war purges decimated the air force, as the Iraqi regime struggled to bring it back under total control.[7] Training was brought to the minimum during the whole of 1990.

During the 1991 Persian Gulf War, the Iraqi Air Force was devastated by the United States, the United Kingdom and their allies. Most airfields were heavily struck, and in air combat Iraq was only able to obtain one kill, while sustaining many losses. Five out of the six Tupolev Tu-22s that Iraq possessed were destroyed by bombing at the start of Operation Desert Storm.

The MiG-25 force (NATO reporting name 'Foxbat') recorded the only Iraqi air-to-air kill during the war. A Mig-25PD shot down an American F/A-18 on the first night of the war. In another incident, an Iraqi Foxbat-E eluded eight American F-15s, firing three missiles at an EF-111 electronic warfare aircraft, forcing them to abort their mission. In yet another incident, two MiG-25's approached a pair of F-15 Eagles, fired missiles (which were evaded by the F-15s), and then out-ran the American fighters. Two more F-15s joined the pursuit, and a total of ten air-to-air missiles were fired at the Foxbats; none of which could reach them.

During the Persian Gulf War, many Iraqi pilots and aircraft (of French & Soviet origin) escaped to Iran to escape the bombing campaign. The Iranians impounded these aircraft after the war and never returned them, putting them in the service of the Islamic Republic of Iran Air Force[8] -- claiming them as reparations for the Iran–Iraq War.

These included: Mirage F1s, Su-17, Su-20 amd Su-22M Fitters, Su-24MK Fencer-Ds, Su-25K/UBK Frogfoots, MiG-21 Fishbeds, MiG-23 Floggers, MiG-25 Foxbats, MiG-29A/UB Fulcrums and a number of Il-76s, including the one-off AEW-AWACS prototype Il-76 "ADNAN 1"

Also, prior to Operation Desert Storm, ten Iraqi MiG-23 fighter aircraft had been sent to Yugoslavia to get overhauled, but the MiG's were never returned due to the war that started in Yugoslavia.

As well as the Persian Gulf war, the IQAF was also involved in the 1991 uprisings in Iraq. Mi-8, Mi-24, Gazelle, Alouette and Puma helicopters were used to counter the attempted Shi'ite and Kurdish revolts between 1991 and 1993.

After the Persian Gulf War, the air force was comprised of only a sole Tu-22 and several squadrons of MiG-25s purchased from the Soviet Union in 1979. During the period of sanctions that followed, the Air Force was severely restricted by no-fly zones established by the coalition and by restricted access to spare parts due to United Nations sanctions. Many aircraft were unserviceable and a few were hidden from American reconnaissance to escape potential destruction. In patrols of the no-fly zones, three Iraqi MiGs were lost. Despite several attacks from U.S. F-15s and F-14s firing AIM-54 and AIM-120 missiles at the Iraqi fighters, the Iraqi maneuvers ensured they were able to avoid any casualties in their dispute over Iraqi airspace.[citation needed]


[edit] Operation Iraqi Freedom - 2003

An Iraqi MiG-25 Foxbat found buried under the sand west of Baghdad.On the brink of the US led invasion in 2003, Saddam Hussein disregarded his Air Force's wishes to defend the country's airspace against U.S. aircraft and ordered the bulk of his fighters disassembled or buried. Some were later found by US excavation forces around the Al Taqqadum and Al Asad air bases, including MiG-25s and Su-25s[10]. The IQAF proved to be totally non-existent during American invasion; a few helicopters were seen but no fighters flew to fight against coalition aircraft.[citation needed]

During the occupation phase, most of Iraq's combat aircraft (mainly MiG-23s, MiG-25s and Su-25s) were found by American and Australian forces in poor condition at several air bases throughout the country while others were discovered buried.[11] Most of the IQAF's aircraft were destroyed during and after the invasion, and all remaining equipment was junked or scrapped in the immediate aftermath of the war. None of the aircraft acquired during Saddam's time remained in service.[9]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraqi_Air_Force

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 737
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted July 15, 2009 08:32 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message
I repeat, no US military armaments were given or sold to Saddam Hussein.

IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 1588
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted July 15, 2009 08:36 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message
"Right katatonic; Fox News is totally unreliable. " - jwhop

one more thing we agree on then!

IP: Logged

wheels of cheese
Knowflake

Posts: 590
From:
Registered: May 2009

posted July 16, 2009 07:05 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for wheels of cheese     Edit/Delete Message
Well of course the US sold arms to Iraq. The UK did, and it was proven. So why is it so hard for you to swallow that your own beloved Republican government did the same Jwhop? Possibly because it would make the current war look like such a farce? And back up Katatonic's opinion that the military stationed there are being played like puppets?

And before you accuse me of "wild accusations" - what have you got to say about the Scott Report Jwhop? That's real enough, even for you. It's hard unrefutable evidence that our government lied about arms trade.

IP: Logged

wheels of cheese
Knowflake

Posts: 590
From:
Registered: May 2009

posted July 16, 2009 07:06 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for wheels of cheese     Edit/Delete Message
"good to see ~ wheels return ~ :-))"

Thanks HD.

(Funny Bill Hicks you tube clip from 1993 on the US sale of arms to Iraq. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqBOMBSDQsI)

IP: Logged

wheels of cheese
Knowflake

Posts: 590
From:
Registered: May 2009

posted July 16, 2009 07:08 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for wheels of cheese     Edit/Delete Message
http://www.historycommons.org/entity.jsp?entity=matrix_churchill_corp.

Look at all the companies in this document. Eastman Kodak, Hewlett Packard. American as apple pie my friend.

IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 1588
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted July 16, 2009 11:02 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message
bill hicks! lovely!
couldn't get thru on that link maybe this will work:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kqBOMBSDQsI

and speaking of (the late) bill hicks: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gyzFM8QJBLM&feature=related

and this one shown posthumously by david letterman who scotched it at the time...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-s6Gs6Rj2U&feature=fvw

the pro-lifer bit apparently was considered possibly offensive to advertisers! i wonder what happened to the 1st amendment there?

IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 1588
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted July 16, 2009 02:45 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message
and here, a third-party take on the credibility of fox news...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gh6r5ALVMo&feature=channel

seems you and i aren't the only ones who find them biassed, jwhop!

IP: Logged

jwhop
Knowflake

Posts: 737
From: Madeira Beach, FL USA
Registered: Apr 2009

posted July 21, 2009 11:00 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for jwhop     Edit/Delete Message
You could easily have found this information for yourself...since you questioned my statement...the planning for the attack on the WTC went back to 1998. But, as usual, you're far to busy to do any reasearch so you would actually know what you're talking about.

"The motivation for this campaign was set out in a 1998 fatwa issued by Osama bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahiri, Abu-Yasir Rifa'i Ahmad Taha, Shaykh Mir Hamzah, and Fazlur Rahman"
http://www.theblackvault.com/wiki/index.php/September_11,_2001_attacks

IP: Logged

pidaua
Knowflake

Posts: 47
From: Grafenwohr, Germany- but my heart is in Iraq
Registered: Apr 2009

posted July 21, 2009 04:35 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for pidaua     Edit/Delete Message
Kat,

Until you have lived my life, as a scientist and a Military wife, you should stop making such absurd statements.

As far as looking at organisms or anything under a microscope.. LMAO yes, I must be focused. I MUST look for certain pathogens. Why would I look at all the extra material when I already know it is not harmful in any way?

Bad comparison.

As to the topic, I think many people here make assumptions based on emotion without living the life, or if they were in the services they were not serving during a time of war or they were in a specific 'Safe zone' and did not have to worry about being killed by terrorists.

While it makes your heart feel good doing what you do, you discount all the Soldiers and the REAL accounts of what is happening out there.

Suffice it to say, I may have more knowledge solely based on the nature of my husband's job and his clearance. I will not elaborate more on that but what I can say is that what the mass media feeds you all, or your little conspiracy theory organizations, is nothing compared to the truth.

Have a nice day...

Mine will be much better when Bear comes home in a few weeks for R&R. Then again, we won't be thinking about the non-serving peanut gallery and their pacifist ways to correct the world.


AG.. you may have served for a short time, but you did not get knee deep in war. Your commentary is more from an outside view other than someone deep in the trenches. I have been here long enough to remember your posts and bitterness towards all things Military.

To others.. as I said to kat... until your loved one is in an actual war zone and you have a dog in this fight, and I am not talking about a friend of a friends cousin, but a REAL DOG or LEO in my case.. shut the hell up! You have no idea about the real bull$hit we go through.

How many of you LL people here actually work with the Military? How many work with Military Families? Umm..... silence...

Oh and Kat.. I don't work in a lab anymore.. I work with families.

I am tired of hearing from people had a third cousin twice removed talk about this war and the effect is has on families.

For the most part we are GOOD. It is the young wives that marry a Soldier thinking they are marrying into a lifestyle where they get to see a yummy man in uniform that will rescue them every day of their lives, that end up in trouble.

Someday.. I would wish the people that have no Military experience or no Military connection could never vote on what we do.

You don't know our lives, you don't know our pain and you sure as hell don't know our happiness when we can finally hold our Soldier in our arms when he returns from downrange.

When that happens.. please post to me..


I'll bet millions that what I get is more Liberal spam.

IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 1588
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted July 21, 2009 05:08 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message
"i am not saying one word against bear or any other soldiers in iraq. for your information, though i have said so before and you didn't notice it then, i have family there too."

pidaua i have nothing more to say to you. i should have known you would somehow turn what i said into an insult and another opportunity to brag about how important you are. the scientists i know don't judge people and circumstances with little to no evidence.

we all contribute. we just don't all think it's right to invade other countries and call it defense. that is not the military's fault. end of "diatribe". have a good life.

IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 1588
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted July 21, 2009 05:37 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message
"The motivation for this campaign was set out in a 1998 fatwa issued by Osama bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahiri, Abu-Yasir Rifa'i Ahmad Taha, Shaykh Mir Hamzah, and Fazlur Rahman" http://www.theblackvault.com/wiki/index.php/September_11,_2001_attacks

a fatwa is not a battle plan. it is basically a decision, or ruling on law, and not the death sentence most westerners think of when they hear the word.

"A fatwā (Arabic: فتوى‎; plural fatāwā Arabic: فتاوى‎ , in the Islamic faith is a religious opinion concerning Islamic law issued by an Islamic scholar. In Sunni Islam any fatwa is non-binding, whereas in Shia Islam it could be binding, depending on the status of the scholar. Western media frequently uses the term incorrectly to specifically mean an Islamic law pronouncing a death sentence upon someone who is considered an infidel or a blasphemer, whereas the term's correct definition is significantly broader.[1] Fatwā cover social and political issues and jihad. If a fatwā does not break new ground, then it is simply called a ruling.[2]" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fatwa

IP: Logged

pire
Knowflake

Posts: 483
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted July 21, 2009 06:38 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for pire     Edit/Delete Message
Pidaua, may i call you pitbulla ?

IP: Logged

AcousticGod
Knowflake

Posts: 1327
From: acousticgod@sbcglobal.net
Registered: Apr 2009

posted July 21, 2009 07:31 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for AcousticGod     Edit/Delete Message
quote:
AG.. you may have served for a short time, but you did not get knee deep in war. Your commentary is more from an outside view other than someone deep in the trenches. I have been here long enough to remember your posts and bitterness towards all things Military.

Bitterness towards all things military? When was that?

No, I didn't get knee deep in war, and nor did I intend to (I joined the Navy after all). I don't know how this relates to anything I've said in this thread, though. It looks like you're just being sensitive to some perceived attack when none is present.

(And four years isn't exactly a short time.)

IP: Logged

wheels of cheese
Knowflake

Posts: 590
From:
Registered: May 2009

posted August 03, 2009 05:30 AM     Click Here to See the Profile for wheels of cheese     Edit/Delete Message
quote:
Someday.. I would wish the people that have no Military experience or no Military connection could never vote on what we do.

What an extraordinary statement Pidaua. Who do you think picks up the bill for what you do?

IP: Logged

katatonic
Knowflake

Posts: 1588
From:
Registered: Apr 2009

posted August 04, 2009 12:04 PM     Click Here to See the Profile for katatonic     Edit/Delete Message
point, wheels! i was wondering the same thing.

IP: Logged


This topic is 4 pages long:   1  2  3  4 

All times are Eastern Standard Time

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Linda-Goodman.com

Copyright © 2008

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.46a